Attachment_(B)_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

Past Performance Questionnaire

15 December 2016

Instructions:

The company that has provided this form to you is proposing to submit an offer to a Washington

Headquarters Services/Acquisition Directorate (WHS/AD) solicitation to procure Architect-Engineer services for Washington Headquarters Services, 1155 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC. Past

Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition; therefore, your input is extremely important. The questionnaire should be filled out and emailed (no later than the RFP closing date of January 5, 2017 at 2:00pm EST) to the Contract Specialist, Ms. Kimberly

Darby at kimberly.h.darby.civ@mail.mil AND Ms. Connie Arline at connie.p.arline.civ@mail.mil.

This information will not be disclosed to the offeror.

Questionnaires that are not received by the due date may not be evaluated. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Kimberly Darby at kimberly.h.darby.civ@mail.mil and Ms. Connie Arline connie.p.arline.civ@mail.mil.

Company Name & Address:

Contract Number: Period of Performance:

Contract Value: Complexity: Routine Moderate Difficult

Contract Role: Prime Subcontractor

Team Member

Description of the Work Performed Under the Contract (Please be specific about tasks performed.)

mailto:kimberly.h.darby.civ@mail.mil mailto:connie.p.arline.civ@mail.mil mailto:kimberly.h.darby.civ@mail.mil mailto:connie.p.arline.civ@mail.mil

Performance Survey:

No Performance Questions E=Excellent G=Good S=Satisfactory M=Marginal

U=Unacceptable

N/A= Not Applicable

Ratings (Mark an “X” in the appropriate Selection)

E G S M U N/A

1. If applicable, how did the contractor perform during a transition of task from another firm?

2. General quality of services and support provided during their period of performance?

3. Content, accuracy, and timeliness of technical reports and deliverables?

4.a. Contractor’s ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner?

4.b. Contractor’s ownership of problems and actively working to resolve them?

5. Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner?

6. Ability to handle fluctuating workloads?

7. Communicating schedules, delays, and expectations and interfacing with

Government employees?

8. Overall Responsiveness to Government requests?

9. If performance based, how successful was the Contractor in meeting the contract metrics?

10. Overall Contract Performance Rating?

Additional Rater Comments About Contract Performance

Definitions:

Excellent: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer's benefit.

The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified or taken satisfactory corrective action.

Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur or is not likely to occur in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective action appear or were ineffective.

Not applicable: Does not apply to the acquisition.

Rater Information

Name Title Agency/Company

Phone: Email:

Signature (Digital or Wet)