ATSS IDIQ-R Industry Day Slides_SAM.GOV_Posted.pdf

ATSS IDIQ-R

INDUSTRY DAY

27 JAN 2020

MARK CENTER

AUDITORIUM

HOSTED BY WHS/AD

INTRODUCTION

Mr. David Sanders Director, WHS/AD

Ms. Joelle Faucher Director (A&S), Ms. Carla Johnson Contracts Management

Team Lead, A&S/RPDS

Mr. Warren “Trey” Arthur Contract Specialist/Officer, warren.g.arthur.civ@mail.mil

AGENDA

• Rules of the Road

• ATSS IDIQ Overview

• Program Office

Presentations

• ATSS IDIQ-R (New IDIQ)

Overview

• Question & Answer Session

• Breakout Time

(Auditorium)

RULES OF THE ROAD

• This exchange is conducted for information and planning purposes and does not constitute a solicitation

• Exchange content/discussion shall not be construed as solicitation guidance

• Information may change prior to the final IDIQ solicitation

• Participants are solely responsible for all expenses associated with this event

RULES OF THE ROAD

• Photos and videos are prohibited

• Please silence cell phones

• Keep visitor badges visible at all times

• All Mark Center visitors must have an escort to leave the auditorium

• Index Cards for Questions

• Program Office Specific Questions

INDUSTRY DAY GOALS

• Better understanding of A&S requirements

• Networking

• Information sharing

The Analytic and Technical Support Services (ATSS) Indefinite Delivery /

Indefinite Quantity (ATSS IDIQ) Contract

Ms. Elizabeth Fuller Contracting Officer, elizabeth.e.fuller2.civ@mail.mil

ATSS IDIQ OVERVIEW

• Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) and Deputy

Secretary of Defense (DEPSECDEF)

• Professional and administrative support

• Principal Defense policy maker and adviser in charge of the Defense Department's day-to-day business

• Weapons acquisition, research, intelligence, and fiscal policy

• Performance Work Statement (PWS) Scope

• Acquisition Program Oversight Technical Support

• Operational and Technical Research Analyses, Assessments and Evaluations Support (Studies)

• Research and Development

• Technical, Financial, and Congressional

Affairs Support

• Eight (8) IDIQ contracts awarded in 2014

• Minimum task order is $5K

• Maximum task order is $125M

• ATSS IDIQ maximum ceiling is $650M

• ATSS IDIQ ordering period ends 14 June 2020

• Small business competition pool

• Services under NAICS Code 541611

• Primarily administrative management, general management consulting services, financial management support

• ATSS IDIQ small business incumbents American Technology Solutions International (ATSI) Artlin Consulting, LLC Interactive Process Technology, LLC (IPT)

• Unrestricted competition pool

• Services under NAICS Code 541990

• Primarily professional, scientific, engineering and technical analytical support

• ATSS IDIQ large business incumbents

Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) CACI Enterprise Solutions Inc. (CACI) Logistics Management Institute (LMI) Modern Technology Solutions Inc. (MTSI) Systems Planning and Analysis Inc. (SPA)

ATSS IDIQ LABOR EXPERTISE

ADVANCED -Executive level

-Master’s Degree in related field, equivalent experience/certification

INTERMEDIATE -Mid-to-executive-level -Master’s or Bachelor’s Degree in related field, equivalent experience/certification in a field relevant to the specific position, or substantial equivalent occupational experience

BASIC -Associates degree level education in a related technical field or substantial equivalent technical experience

ATSS IDIQ LABOR CATEGORIES

PROGRAM MANAGER – INTERMEDIATE

PROJECT MANAGER - INTERMEDIATE

STATISTICIAN – ADVANCED

SECURITY SPECIALIST - INTERMEDIATE

OPERATIONS RESEARCH ANALYST - ALL LEVELS

TECHNICAL SPECIALIST - ALL LEVELS

TECHNICAL CONSULTANT - ALL LEVELS

EARNED VALUE ANALYST - ALL LEVELS

ATSS IDIQ LABOR CATEGORY

SUBJECT MATTER

EXPERT - ADVANCED

-Recognized industry expert with significant depth and breadth of knowledge capable of providing advisor and consultant services based on unique experience that has a significant level of technical value and return on investment -Capable of supporting teams and/or working independently regarding very complex technical or programmatic issues usually related to complex weapons systems

ATSS IDIQ LABOR CATEGORY

RESOURCE/BUDGET

ANALYST -

INTERMEDIATE

-Expertise in relevant budget and resource management principles and practices for developmental and operational programs -Knowledge, skills, and abilities in the budget analysis field -Capable of utilizing, adapting and developing budget and resource analytic tools, techniques, and processes for both technical and administrative support activities -Assists with solving complex problems

PROGRAM OFFICE

PRESENTATIONS

Ms. Katie Arrington

Chief Information Security Officer

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)

CMMC Model v1.0

31 January 2020

DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release

C os t

Sc he du le

Pe rf or m an ce

Cost, Schedule, and Performance

CYBERSECURITY

C os t

Sc he du le

Pe rf or m an ce are only effective in a SECURE ENVIRONMENT

Without a Secure Foundation All Functions are at Risk

C yb er se cu rit y

CMMC Level Practices Processes

Level 1 17 -

Level 2 55 2

Level 3 58 1

Level 4 26 1

Level 5 15 1

CMMC Model v1.0 Overview

• CMMC is a unified cybersecurity standard for future DoD acquisitions

• CMMC Model v1.0 encompasses the following:

– 17 capability domains; 43 capabilities

– 5 processes across five levels to measure process maturity

– 171 practices across five levels to measure technical capabilities

CMMC Model v1.0: Number of Practices and Processes Introduced at each Level

CMMC Model Framework

• CMMC model framework organizes processes and cybersecurity best practices into a set of domains

– Process maturity or process institutionalization characterizes the extent to which an activity is embedded or ingrained in the operations of an organization. The more deeply ingrained an activity, the more likely it is that:

− An organization will continue to perform the activity – including under times of stress – and

− The outcomes will be consistent, repeatable and of high quality.

– Practices are activities performed at each level for the domain

Model

Practices

Model encompasses multiple domains

For a given capability, there are one or more practices that span a subset of the 5 levels

For a given domain, there are processes that span a subset of the 5 levels

Capabilities

Processes

For a given domain, there are one or more capabilities that span a subset of the 5 levels

Domains

CMMC Model Structure

Access Control

(AC)

Asset Management

(AM)

Awareness and Training

(AT)

Audit and Accountability

(AU)

Configuration Management

(CM)

Identification and Authentication

(IA)

Incident Response

(IR)

Maintenance

(MA)

Media Protection

(MP)

Personnel Security

(PS)

System and Information Integrity (SI)

System and Communications Protection (SC)

Situational Awareness

(SA)

Security Assessment

(CA)

Physical Protection

(PE)

Risk Management

(RM)

17 Capability Domains (v1.0)

Recovery

(RE)

CMMC Model with 5 levels measures cybersecurity maturity

LEVEL 1

PERFORMED

LEVEL 2

DOCUMENTED

LEVEL 3

MANAGED

LEVEL 4

REVIEWED

LEVEL 5

OPTIMIZING

0 PROCESSES

Select practices are documented where required

2 PROCESSES

Each practice is documented, including Level 1 practices

A policy exists that includes all activities

3 PROCESSES

Each practice is documented, including lower levels

A policy exists that cover all activities

A plan exists, is maintained, and resourced that includes all activities*

4 PROCESSES

Each practice is documented, including lower levels

A policy exists that covers all activities

A plan exists that includes all activities*

Activities are reviewed and measured for effectiveness (results of the review is shared with higher level management)

5 PROCESSES

Each practice is documented, including lower levels

A policy exists that covers all activities

A plan exists that includes all activities*

Activities are reviewed and measured for effectiveness

There is a standardized, documented approach across all applicable organizational units

CMMC Maturity Process Progression

*Planning activities may include mission, goals, project plan, resourcing, training needed, and involvement of relevant stakeholders

LEVEL 1

BASIC CYBER HYGIENE

LEVEL 2

INTERMEDIATE CYBER

HYGIENE

LEVEL 3

GOOD CYBER HYGIENE

LEVEL 4

PROACTIVE

LEVEL 5

ADVANCED / PROGRESSIVE

17 PRACTICES

Demonstrate compliance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 48

CFR 52.204‐21

72 PRACTICES

Comply with the FAR

Perform a select subset of 48 practices from the NIST SP 800‐ 171 r1

Perform an additional 7 practices to support intermediate cyber hygiene

130 PRACTICES

Comply with the FAR

Perform all 110 practices from the NIST SP 800‐171 r1

Perform an additional 20 practices to support good cyber hygiene

152 PRACTICES

Comply with the FAR

Perform all 110 practices from the NIST SP 800‐171 r1

Perform a select subset of 11 practices from Draft NIST SP 800‐171B

Perform an additional 29 practices to demonstrate a proactive cybersecurity program

171 PRACTICES

Comply with the FAR

Perform all 110 practices from the NIST SP 800‐171 r1

Perform a select subset of 15 practices from Draft NIST SP 800‐171B

Perform an additional 40 practices to demonstrate an advanced cybersecurity program

CMMC Practice Progression

+ 15 Practices

LEVEL 5

171 PRACTICES

ADVANCED / PROGRESSIVE

LEVEL 3

130 PRACTICES

GOOD CYBER HYGIENE

+ 58 Practices

LEVEL 4

156 PRACTICES

PROACTIVE

+ 26 Practices

LEVEL 2

72 PRACTICES

INTERMEDIATE CYBER HYGIENE

+ 55 Practices

LEVEL 1

17 PRACTICES

BASIC CYBER HYGIENE

CMMC Practices Per Level

CMMC

Level

Total Number Practices

Introduced per CMMC Level

Source

48 CFR

52.204-21

NIST

SP 800-171r1

Draft NIST SP 800-171B ** Other

Level 1 17 15* 17* - -

Level 2 55 - 48 - 7

Level 3 58 - 45 - 13

Level 4 26 - - 11 15

Level 5 15 - - 4 11

• Model leverages multiple sources and references

– CMMC Level 1 only addresses practices from FAR Clause 52.204-21

– CMMC Level 3 includes all of the practices from NIST SP 800-171r1 as well as others

– CMMC Levels 4 and 5 incorporate a subset of the practices from Draft NIST SP 800-171B plus others

– Additional sources, such as the UK Cyber Essentials and Australia Cyber Security Centre Essential Eight Maturity Model, were also considered and are referenced in the model

CMMC Model v1.0 Source Counts

Draft CMMC Model v1.0: Number of Practices per Source

* Note: 15 safeguarding requirements from FAR clause 52.204-21 correspond to 17 security requirements from NIST SP 800-171r1, and in turn, 17 practices in CMMC

** Note: 18 enhanced security requirements from Draft NIST SP 800-171B have been excluded from CMMC Model v1.0

Summary

• CMMC establishes cybersecurity as a foundation for future DoD acquisitions

• CMMC levels align with the following focus:

– Level 1: Basic safeguarding of FCI

– Level 2: Transition step to protect CUI

– Level 3: Protecting CUI

– Levels 4-5: Protecting CUI and reducing risk of APTs

Mr. Mark Krzysko

PD,

Acquisition Enablers

OUSD(A&S) ACQUISITION ENABLERS

MISSION OVERVIEW

MISSION: Enable the acquisition workforce with innovative, data-driven practices and policies to deliver warfighting capability at the speed of relevance • Acquisition Policy

• Adaptive Acquisition Framework

• Intellectual Property

• Acquisition Intelligence

• Acquisition Pathways

• Major Programs

• Software

• Middle Tier

• Acquisition Visibility

• Data Framework

• Analytics, Reporting

• Applications & Tools

TECHNICAL

ATSS Task Orders supporting Acquisition Enablers:

• Acquisition Visibility Capability Support

• 0012-0003; $5.6M annually

• Agile development management; agile requirements; systems engineering

• Joint Acquisition Data & Engineering

• 0012-0431; $4.5M annually

• Acquisition data analytics, data governance, data science

• Earned Value Management, Program Assessment & Root Cause

• 0015-0002; $2.9M annually

• Assessments of Major Programs; earned value analysis of Major Programs

TECHNICAL

• Technical/Administrative Areas Needing Contractor Support:

• Acquisition Policy; Data Science and Data Analytics; Program

Analysis, PPBE; Agile Methodologies

• Technical Areas of Growth or Expansion:

• Review recent NDAAs, 800-series and 900-series sections

• Use of automation, machine learning, AI to reduce manual effort

• Intellectual Property policy, data rights

• Acquisition Intelligence; automation, Data Analytics

• Policy development for multiple acquisition pathways

• Technical Challenges:

• Emerging policy in support of multiple acquisition pathways

• Emerging data environments

• Merging of Policy and Data

STAFFING

• Blend of Bachelors and Masters degrees; corporate reachback to PhDs

• Most positions require over a decade of defense acquisition program experience; But we need fresh perspectives to spur innovation

• Policy skills; analytic skills; EVM skills; PPBE skills

• Blend of acquisition policy and acquisition data expertise – rare find

• All onsite personnel require a SECRET clearance. Some TS work

• Effective recruiting and teaming to obtain required skill mix is essential to sustained success

• Retention of qualified personnel a must - employee turnover frequently hinders the Offices’ mission

Mr. Eric Kim

Strategic Intelligence Analysis Cell

STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS CELL

(SIAC) MISSION OVERVIEW

Operational Analysis

Comparative analyses of U.S. and threat capabilities, identifying gaps and vulnerabilities through an operational context

Operational Analysis

Comparative analyses of U.S. and threat capabilities, identifying gaps and vulnerabilities through an operational context

Intelligence Support

Liaison support to the analysts within the R&E and Intelligence communities

Intelligence Support

Liaison support to the analysts within the R&E and Intelligence communities

TechWatch/ Horizon Scan

Global technology tracking and forecasting;

identifying promising near term technologies and assessing emerging disruptive technology

TechWatch/ Horizon Scan

Global technology tracking and forecasting;

identifying promising near term technologies and assessing emerging disruptive technology

Engineering Analysis

Engineering analyses providing solution spaces to

Joint Force technical challenges

Engineering Analysis

Engineering analyses providing solution spaces to

Joint Force technical challenges

Intelligence Community

JS/Services/ COCOMs

Wargaming

OSD/USD(R&E)

FFRDC/

UARC

Intel Needs

Intel Liaison

Technology Superiority

Threat-informed Analysis

Operational Stakeholders

Informing Decision

Leveraging Knowledge

SIAC provides analytic support to the Department’s modernization efforts by delivering threat informed, operationally relevant analysis on technical capability development for Joint Force cross-cutting mission areas in a rapidly evolving global technology environment.

USD(R&E)

Director, SIAC

Intelligence Support

Operational Analysis, Wargaming

Engineering/ Technical Analysis

Global Tech Watch/ Horizon Scanning

Deputy Director

Joint/Service Coordination

Kill Chain Analysis

Mission Level Assessment

Tech Roadmap Development

Wargaming

Comparative Assessment

Quick Reaction Analysis

FFRDC/UARC

Integration

Modeling & Sim

Global Tech Watch

Horizon Scanning

Tech Scouting

Data Analytics

Tech Forecasting

IC Liaison

Intel Support to Analysis and Assessment

Intelligence Needs Planning

SAP Portfolio

Service Liaison

Tradespace / Impact Analysis

Operational Concepts

SIAC OFFICE STRUCTURE

SIAC TECHNICAL DISCUSSION

Current and Future Requirements:

• Comparative Analysis

• Kill Chain Analysis, including Kill Chain development and associated operational evaluation

• Technology Roadmaps and comprehensive Science and Technology prioritization development

• Surge Support & Term-limit Studies/Reports, including Mission Level

Analysis and Wargaming efforts

• General Analytic Support

• Administrative Support

Staffing Needs:

• Approximately 35 FTEs

• Security Clearance: 90% of the support staff requires TS security clearance and ability to obtain/maintain SCI

• Off-Site Support Requirement: Primarily performed at the contractor’s facilities

• Relevant mission knowledge/experience critical

Mr. Dyke Weatherington

DASD,

Information & Integration Portfolio Management (I&IPM)

DASD(I&IPM) Portfolios

43Cross‐Cutting Activities: OIPTs/DABs/MDAPs ~ DSB ~ PDRs/CDRs ~ POM/PBR/Issue Teams ~ JCIDS ~ Analyses of Alternatives DMAGs ~ SPRs ~ Integration Groups ~ Congressional Reports, Testimony, QFRs ~ GAO Requests/Reports

Dyke Weatherington – DASD

SAE/Agency Director Support:

• 39 NRO MSA/SIA/ERD

• 8 NGA MSA/SIA/ERD

• 5 NSA MSA/SIA/ERD

• 3 DIA MSA/SIA/ERD

• 1 “Other” Classified SIA

• IC ERD/R&D Programs

• SENSR

• TDL(Link 16, etc)

• LO TDL Roadmap

• HMS

• Common Data Links

(PSA)

• DCGS‐A/AF/Navy Modernization w USD(I)

• Cyber/C2 (PSA)

• Ground Tac Ntwks

• Joint Tac Net Center

• DI2E Enterprise

• CEC/GCCS‐J

• AISR Data Transport

• Airborne/Other ISR

• DoD 5G Systems

• DoD Microelectronics

• JADC2/ABMS

• Hypersonic Weapons Development

Co‐MDA Support (w ODNI):

• 56 Total IC Programs/27 Delegated MSAs

• 14 Co‐MDA IC Major Systems Acquisitions

Mission Areas/ Board/Reviews:

• National Intel Acq Board

(NIAB)

• IC QPRs

• NRO Monthly Status Review (MSR)

• Acq Coord Team (ACT)

(NGA)

• National Special Comms WG & Executive Council

• IC E2E Reviews

• Engineering Standing

Board (ERB) and IPAs

• C3 Leadership Board/Tactical DL SSG

• A‐I Functional IPT

• IC Requirements & Acq.

Councils

• Joint C2 Steering Group/JC2 SAG

• DCGS Modernization Quarterly

• SENSR ESG

• US‐Intl Data Link Interoperability; US‐UK

NNCG

Strategic Activities:

• AI/ML for platform ATR/Sensor to Shooter

• Small Satellite & Commercial Space

• ISR Enterprise (End‐to‐end, TCPED)

• Mission/System Roadmaps

• DoD/IC C2 Integrations

• DoD Tactical Communications Enterprise

• LO TDL Roadmap/ CDL Roadmap

• IC IPAs/SRBs

• IC End‐to‐End Architectures

Updated: 2/6/2020

Space Vacant (Dr. Chuck Frizzelle, Acting)

C4ISR

Bong Gumahad

Strategic Deterrence & Capability Tom Troyano

NC3

Tom Greenfield

Milestone Decision Authority Support:

• Ground Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD)

• Long Range Standoff Cruise Missile (LRSO)

• New START Treaty

• Outer Space Treaty

Service Acquisition Executive Support:

• B61‐12 LEP Tailkit Assembly

• ICBM Fuze Mod

• TRIDENT II (D5) SLBM Life Extension

• TRIDENT II (D5) SLBM Life Extension 2

• Nuclear Sea‐Launched Cruise Missile

• Mk21A ICBM Reentry Vehicle

• Mk5 SLBM Reentry Body

• Mk7 SLBM Reentry Body

Mission Areas/Board/Reviews:

• Quarterly SecDef Nuclear Priorities Reviews

• Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) Implementation

• Nuclear Force Portfolio and Sustainment (OHIO and COLUMBIA SSBN, MMIII and GBSD ICBM, B‐52, B‐2, B‐21, ALCM and LRSO, F‐15E and F‐35A DCA)

• Nuclear Deterrent Enterprise Review Group (NDERG) and Nuclear Deterrence Senior Oversight Group (NDSOG)

• Nuclear Weapons Council (NWC) and NWC Standing & Safety Committee (NWCSSC)

• Strategic Radiation Hardened Electronics Council (SRHEC)

• CWMD Survivability Oversight Group – Nuclear (CSOG‐N)

• DoD Compliance Review Group (CRG)

• Treaty Implementation Working Groups (IWG)

• Interagency Treaty Reviews

Strategic Activities:

• Nuclear Certifications

• Large Solid Rocket Motors

• Rad Hard Parts

• Nuclear system supply chain security/integrity

• Navy/AF/MDA ballistic missile commonality

• NC3/nuclear delivery system MDAP integration

• Hard & Deeply Buried Targets

• Mission/System Roadmaps

• DoD/NNSA alignment

• Nuclear Test Infrastructure

MDA Support:

• Classified Programs

• JUON

• NSSL

• JMS Inc 2

• ESBMC2

• SM‐3

• THAAD

• GBI/RKV/NGI

• AEGIS/AEGIS Ashore

• Joint IAMD

• AN/TPY‐2

• LRDR

• SBX

• GPS III/OCX/ MGUE

• Space C2

SAE Support:

• Space Fence

• SBSS‐FO

• GSSAP

• DARC

• Space Surv. Telescope

• Ground Based Counter Communication

• SBIRS 5/6

• Next Gen OPIR

• MUOS

• GEO SSA

• EPS / EPS‐R

• AEHF/ESS

• WGS

• Weather/environmental sciences/METOC

• PTS

• PTES

• PNVC

• FAB‐T/EHF Terminals

• GPS IIIF/COps/MCEU

• NUDET Detection Sys

• Forge

• EGS

Mission Areas/ Board/Reviews:

• Missile Defense Exec Board (MDEB)

• Space Force Implementation

• Space Strategic Portfolio Review

• Missile Defense Review

(MDR)

• Space Protection

• ODNA Space

• RCO BOD

• SpRCO BOD

• AFRCO BOD

• Time Sensitive Target Engagement Weapons

• MTA Advisory Board

• USD(I) Intel Support to Space Control

• Joint Technology Office on Hypersonics

• Def. Remote Sensing WG

• OSD(R&E) COI‐Aircraft

• Semi‐annual Tech Exchange w/ NASA

• WCS AoA Implementation

• SATCOM Systems Engineering Group

• Narrowband SATCOM AoA

• OCX Senior Reviews

• Defense Against Hypersonics

Strategic Activities:

• Rapid Space Acq

• Space Control Policy

• Space Control Architecture

• Mission/System Roadmaps

• New Entrants (Space Launch)

• Strategic Mission Warfighter Roadmaps

• Long Range Strike Roadmap

• SATCOM Terminal Architecture

• Protected Comm Roadmap

• NC3 Enterprise / Council

MDA Support:

• NC3 Enterprise Capability Portfolio Manager (on behalf of

USD (A&S))

CDRSTRATCOM/SAE Support:

• Satellites

• Terminals

• Conferencing

• C2 Aircraft

• Transport

• Cyber

• Survivability

• Platform Integration

Mission Areas/ Board/Reviews:

• NC3 Enterprise Review (NER)

• NC3 Executive Board (NEB)

• NC3 Enterprise Acquisition Strategy

• Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) Implementation

• Council on Oversight of the National Leadership Command, Control, and Communications

• National Leadership Command Capability (EMB & SSG)

• Systems Engineering & Architecture Review (SEAR) Board

• CDRSTRATCOM Senior Advisory Group (SAG)

• PNVC & PAGCN Executive Groups (PEGs)

Strategic Activities:

• NC3 Portfolio Assessment

• NC3 Investment Strategy

• NC3 Enterprise Acquisition Strategy

• Enterprise Resource Advocacy

• Cyber Security Engineering Practices & Secure Industrial Base

• POM Capability Planning Guidance for NC3

• Congressional Engagement/Policy/Directives

• Enterprise Modernization Evaluation Program

• NC3 Mission/System Modernization Roadmaps

• Mission Essential Function Integration: Situation Monitoring, Planning, Decision Making, Force Management, Force Direction

• Portfolio Analytic Tools

• NC3 Next Generation

• NC3 Research & Development Partnerships

The Analytic and Technical Support Services (ATSS) Indefinite Delivery /

Indefinite Quantity Recompete Contract

(ATSS IDIQ-R)

Ms. Elizabeth Fuller Contracting Officer, elizabeth.e.fuller2.civ@mail.mil

ATSS IDIQ-R (NEW IDIQ)

• Multiple award IDIQ contract award

• PWS will have new technical areas

• Competition Pools (Small & Unrestricted)

• Minimum task order of $5K

• Maximum task order of $250M

• ATSS IDIQ-R Total Ceiling: $1.5 Billion

(Subject to Change)

• Ordering period of 5 years

15 June 2020 – 14 June 2025

• Contract types: fixed price, cost reimbursable, or time and materials (Depending on the type of work to be completed)

• Commercial and Non-Commercial

• Ordering: External ordering allowed from DoD

Fourth Estate Agencies

Tentative Go/No-Go Factors

• Current/active DoD Facility Security Clearance at the SECRET level or above

• DCAA-approved accounting system

• Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI)

Mitigation Plan

• Small Business Participation Commitment Document (SBPCD)

• Subcontracting Plan (Other than Small Businesses Only)

• Subcontracting Past Performance

Office of Small Business PoC: Tequilla Wheeler (tequilla.n.wheeler.civ@mail.mil)

ATSS IDIQ-R MILESTONES

(TENTATIVE)

• SOLICITATION: 15 April 2020 (30 days including a Q&A period)

• AWARD: 14 June 2020

ORDERING PERIOD BEGINS!

QUESTION & ANSWER

THANKS

FOR

ATTENDING!!

BREAKOUT

TIME