Primary_Barrier_Exhibit_Local_Exhaust_Ventilation2018.doc
DOC document 102 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HHS-NIH-OD-75N98019R00015
About this file
Primary Barrier Exhibit Local Exhaust Ventillation
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
National Institutes of Health
Local Exhaust Ventilation Testing Protocols
Authored by the Division of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS) Local Exhaust Ventilation Program (LEV) Manager.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Downdraft Sinks for Small Animal Surgery
Downdraft Sink Survey Report
Downdraft Tables for Small Animal Surgery
Downdraft Table Survey Report
Slot Hoods Used for Local Ventilation
Slot Hood Survey Report
Canopy Hoods Used for Local Ventilation
Canopy Hood Survey Report
Miscellaneous Local Exhaust Ventilation Devices
Miscellaneous LEV Report
1. Downdraft Sinks for Small Animal Surgery I. Introduction The Division of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS), Office of Research Services (ORS), has established this protocol for the routine performance testing of downdraft sinks where the work area does not exceed three square feet.
II. Performance Testing
Performance testing of downdraft sinks is divided into two parts. The first part is the measurement of the uniformity of air velocities and a determination of the average air velocity. The second part of the test is a visual inspection of the smoke capturing ability of the downdraft sink.
A. Air Velocity Measurement
The measurement of air velocities is to be done using a calibrated thermoanemometer. For measurement purposes, the work surface of the downdraft sink is to be divided into an imaginary grid of four inch squares. The air velocity measurements shall be taken at multiple points over the entire work surface on a grid with the points approximately four inches apart and at a height of five inches above the work surface. Measurements along the perimeter of the table should be taken at least one inch onto the work surface.
The air velocity measurements, when taken on an unobstructed downdraft sink, should have a calculated average velocity of 50-100 fpm. No single measurement point should be below 40 fpm, nor should any point exceed 125 fpm.
B. Smoke Test
Smoke is to be used to visually evaluate airflow direction and to identify any turbulence in the inward movement of air violent enough to affect the capture of the majority of the generated smoke. Smoke should be released for capture by the downdraft table at a height of five inches.
C. Recording Results
After the testing of each downdraft sink is completed, a section of the "Downdraft Sink Survey Report" is to be completely filled out, including comments. A copy of the form is attached. The results will be entered into a computer database for record keeping and performance tracking of the downdraft sink by the Technical Assistance Branch (TAB).
III. Certification of Performance
Downdraft sinks that meet the performance testing criteria identified in part II are considered to be acceptable for use in small animal surgery, necropsy and other procedures where volatile anesthetics and other chemicals posing a potential human exposure are used. A green sticker will be affixed to the table near but not on the work surface. The sticker will indicate that the downdraft sink is approved for work, and will identify the date the sink was tested, who tested it and list a telephone number to call if there are any questions.
Downdraft sinks failing the test criteria will have a red sticker affixed to them stating that the sink is not suitable for work and list a telephone number to call if there are questions. Sinks failing to meet the acceptable performance criteria will be identified to maintenance for repair. After repair, the sink will be rechecked and passed if it meets the performance testing criteria.
IV. Frequency of Performance Testing Downdraft sinks at the NIH will be tested on a routine basis at least once a year. If adjustments or modifications are made to the exhaust system which serves the downdraft sink, the table is to be re-tested when the changes are completed.
Downdraft Sink Survey Report
(Measure air velocity at 5 inches above table surface.)
Date:___________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # ______________
Sink Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume ____________ cfm Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:_______ Comments:
Date:___________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # ______________
Sink Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume __________ cfm Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:________ Comments:
Date:___________ Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # _______________
Sink Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume _________ cfm
Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:_______ Comments:
Date:___________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # _______________
Sink Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume _________ cfm Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:_______ Comments:
Date:___________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone #_______________
Sink Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume __________ cfm Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:_______ Comments:
2. Downdraft Tables for Small Animal Surgery I. Introduction The Division of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS), has established this protocol for the routine performance testing of small downdraft tables where the work area does not exceed three square feet.
II. Performance Testing
Performance testing of a downdraft table is divided into two parts. The first part is the measurement of the uniformity of air velocities and a determination of the average air velocity. The second part of the test is a visual inspection of the smoke capturing ability of the downdraft table.
A. Air Velocity Measurement
To ensure a representative air velocity measurement, disruptive cross drafts that may be created by excessive traffic and overhead supply diffusers must be avoided. Air velocity measurement is to be done using a calibrated thermoanemometer. For measurement purposes, the work surface of the downdraft table is to be divided into an imaginary grid of four inch squares. The air velocity measurements shall be taken at multiple points over the entire work surface on a grid with the points approximately four inches apart and at a height of five inches above the work surface. Measurements along the perimeter of the table should be taken at least one inch onto the work surface.
The air velocity measurements, when taken on an unobstructed downdraft table, should have a calculated minimum average velocity of 50-100 fpm. No single measurement point should be below 40 fpm, nor should any point exceed 125 fpm.
B. Smoke Test
Smoke is to be used to visually evaluate airflow direction and to identify any turbulence in the inward movement of air violent enough to affect the capture of the majority of the generated smoke. Smoke should be released for capture by the downdraft table at a height of five inches.
C. Recording Results
After the testing of each downdraft table is completed, a section of the "Downdraft Table Survey Report" is to be completely filled out, including comments. A copy of the form is attached. The results will be entered into a computer database for record keeping and performance tracking of the downdraft table by the Technical Assistance Branch (TAB).
III. Certification of Performance Downdraft tables that meet the performance testing criteria identified in part II are considered to be acceptable for use in small animal surgery, necropsy and other procedures where volatile anesthetics and other chemicals posing a potential human exposure are used. A green sticker will be affixed to the table near but not on the work surface. The sticker will indicate that the downdraft table is approved for work, and will identify the date the table was tested, who tested it and list a telephone number to call if there are any questions.
Downdraft tables failing the test criteria will have a red sticker affixed to them stating that the table is not suitable for work and list a telephone number to call if there are questions. Hoods failing to meet the acceptable performance criteria will be identified to maintenance for repair. After repair, the table will be rechecked and passed if it meets the performance testing criteria.
IV. Frequency of Performance Testing
Downdraft tables at the NIH will be tested on a routine basis at least once a year. If adjustments or modifications are made to the exhaust system which serves the downdraft table, the table is to be re-tested when the changes are completed.
Downdraft Table Survey Report
(Measure air velocity at 5 inches above table surface.)
Date:_________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # ___________________
Table Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume _______ cfm
Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:______
Comments:
Date: ___________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # ________________
Table Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume _______ cfm Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail: ______
Comments:
Date: ___________ Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # _________________
Table Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume _______ cfm Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:_______
Comments:
Date:___________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone # ______________________
Table Dim. (in.) x Area (sq. ft.) Avg. fpm Hi fpm Low fpm Total Volume _______ cfm Smoke Test 5" above table surface: Pass/Fail:_______
Comments:
3. Slot Hoods Used for Local Ventilation
I. Introduction
The Division of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS), has established this protocol for the routine performance testing of slot hoods used for local ventilation. The testing of slot hoods is divided into two parts; preliminary evaluation, and routine performance testing.
II. Preliminary Evaluation
A preliminary evaluation conducted according to this protocol will be performed on each slot hood to determine the average slot velocity required to obtain an estimated capture velocity of at least 50 feet/minute (fpm) at the point of contaminant generation. The evaluation will be done by Technical Assistance Branch (TAB), DOHS staff, before any routine performance testing. The required average slot velocity to obtain 50 fpm at the point of contaminant generation can be estimated based on the width, and length of the slot, the existing slot velocity and the distance from the slot face to the farthest point of contaminant release.
The volumetric air flow (Q) in cubic feet/minute (cfm) of each slot hood can be determined by the formula:
Q = (Vslot)(A) where:
Vslot = average slot air velocity, fpm
Area = area of slot, square ft.
This does not give the capture velocity at the site of contamination generation. The capture velocity must be estimated using the formula:
V = Q/2.6(LX)
where:
V = capture velocity at distance X, fpm
L = length of slot, ft.
X = distance from slot face to contaminant release, ft
(This formula only applies for slot hoods where the aspect ratio of the slot (W/L) is 0.2 or less.)
If the estimated capture velocity at the point of contaminant release is less then 50 fpm then the slot velocity must be increased. With the data gathered above in accordance with the procedure outlined in Part III, the slot velocity required to give 50 fpm capture velocity at the point of contaminant generation can be calculated and the system adjusted accordingly. With the required slot velocity known for each individual slot hood, future checks of the slot hood would only have to measure the average slot velocity to determine that it meets the minimum slot velocity set in the original evaluation. This assumes that there have been no changes in the system or the area since the original evaluation.
A sketch of the slot hood and the area surrounding it must be made, noting locations of air vents, doorways and anything that might obstruct or deflect the air movement into the slot hood. The slot hood should be tested with smoke to help verify the movement of air toward the slot hood and to visualize the effects that any of the items listed above might have on the capture of the smoke by the slot hood. In addition, tape will be placed across the work surface indicating the point where the 50 fpm capture velocity is determined to be.
III. Performance Testing
Performance testing of the slot hoods is divided into two parts. The first part is the measurement of the slot velocities and a determination of the average slot velocity. The second part of the test is a visual inspection of the smoke capturing ability of the slot hood.
A. Air Velocity Measurement
The measurement of air velocities is to be done using a calibrated thermoanemometer. Air velocity readings should be measured at the face of the slot and taken every 6 inches along the entire length of the slot and the average slot velocity calculated. The average slot velocity measured should be compared with the required minimum slot velocity determined in the original evaluation. If the measured average slot velocity is less than the minimum slot velocity for that slot hood then the hood fails.
B. Smoke Test
Smoke is to be used to visually evaluate airflow direction and to identify any turbulence or cross drafts in the movement of air violent enough to affect the capture of the majority of the generated smoke. Smoke should be released for capture by the slot hood at the farthest distance from the slot hood where contaminant release will likely occur.
C. Recording Results
After the testing of each slot hood is completed, a copy of the "Slot Hood Survey Report" is to be completely filled out, including comments. A copy of the form is attached. The results will be entered into a computer database for record keeping and performance tracking of the slot hood by the Technical Assistance Branch (TAB).
IV. Certification of Performance Slot hoods that meet the performance testing criteria identified in Part III are considered to be acceptable for use with known low toxicity materials. A green sticker will be affixed to the slot hood near, but not on the work surface. The sticker will indicate that the slot hood is approved for work, and will identify the distance from the hood where the 50 fpm capture velocity is determined to be, date the slot hood was tested, who tested it and list a telephone number to call if there are any questions.
Slot hoods failing the test criteria will have a red sticker affixed to them stating that the slot hood is not suitable for work and list a telephone number to call if there are questions. Slot hoods failing to meet the acceptable performance criteria will be identified to maintenance for repair. After repair, the slot hood will be rechecked and passed if it meets the performance testing criteria set for that slot hood.
V. Frequency of Performance Testing
Slot hoods at the NIH will be tested on a routine basis at least once a year. If adjustments or modifications are made to the exhaust system which serves the slot hood, the slot hood is to be re-tested when the changes are completed.
Slot Hood Survey Report I. Original Evaluation
Date of Original Evaluation:_______________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone #:________________________
Dimensions of slot (ft) length width_________
Aspect Ratio (W/L) Area (sq. ft.) _________
Distance to farthest point of contaminant generation (ft.) Avg. slot velocity fpm Hi fpm Low fpm
Total Volume (Q) cfm Minimum Acceptable Velocity fpm
Calculated Capture Velocity Required fpm Pass/Fail Comments:
Sketch of Slot Hood and Surrounding Area:
II. Performance Testing
Date:____________
Slot 1 Slot 2 Slot 3
Avg:
Hi. :
Low :
Total avg. slot velocity fpm (Refer to Part I for minimal acceptable velocity) Smoke Test (See taped location &/ or indicated distance of contaminant generation) Pass/Fail:_______ Comments:
4. Canopy Hoods Used for Local Ventilation I. Introduction (Note: Currently canopy testing is inactive) The Division of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS), has established this protocol for the routine performance testing of canopy hoods used for local exhaust ventilation. The testing of canopy hoods is divided into two parts; preliminary evaluation and routine performance testing.
II. Preliminary Evaluation
A preliminary evaluation conducted according to this protocol will be performed on each canopy hood to determine the average velocity at the face required to obtain an estimated capture velocity of at least 50 feet/minute (fpm) at the point of contaminant generation. The evaluation will be done by the Technical Assistance Branch (TAB), DOHS staff before any routine performance testing. The required average canopy face velocity to obtain 50 fpm at the point of contaminant generation (site of work) can be estimated based on the perimeter of the work surface, the height of the canopy above the work, and the existing canopy face velocity.
The volumetric air flow (Q) in cubic feet/minute (cfm) of each canopy hood can be determined by the formula:
Q = (V)(A) where:
V = average air velocity at the canopy face, fpm
A = area of canopy, square ft.
This does not give the capture velocity at the site of contamination generation. The capture velocity must be estimated using the formula:
V' = Q/1.4(PD)
where:
V' = capture velocity at work site, fpm D = height above work area, ft.
P = perimeter of work area, ft.
If the estimated capture velocity at the point of contaminant release (work) is less then 50 fpm then the canopy face velocity must be increased.
With the data gathered above, the velocity required to give 50 fpm capture velocity at the point of contaminant generation can be calculated and the system adjusted accordingly. With the required velocity known for each individual canopy hood, future checks of the canopy hood would only have to measure the average face velocity of the canopy to determine that it meets the minimum velocity set in the original evaluation. This assumes that there have been no changes in the system or the area since the original evaluation.
A sketch of the canopy hood and the area surrounding it must be made, noting locations of air vents, doorways and anything that might obstruct or deflect the air movement into the canopy hood. The canopy hood should be tested with smoke to help verify the movement of air toward the canopy hood and to visualize the effects that any of the items listed above might have on the capture of the smoke by the canopy hood.
III. Performance Testing
Performance testing of the canopy hoods is divided into four parts:
A. The measurement of air velocities for calculation of the average capture velocity at the canopy, B. A visual inspection of the smoke capturing ability of the canopy hood, C. Verification of the physical operating parameters of the canopy, and
D. Recording of the results.
A. Air Velocity Measurement
The measurement of air velocities is to be done using a calibrated thermoanemometer. Air velocity readings should be measured at the face of the canopy and taken in a grid pattern over the entire open area of the canopy, and the average canopy capture velocity calculated. The same number of testing points as was used in the original evaluation. The average capture velocity measured should be compared with the required minimum velocity determined in the original evaluation. If the measured average velocity is less than the minimum velocity for that canopy hood, then the hood fails.
B. Smoke Test
Smoke is to be used to visually evaluate airflow direction and to identify any turbulence or cross drafts in the movement of air violent enough to affect the capture of the majority of the generated smoke. Smoke should be released for capture by the canopy hood at the work site where contaminant release will likely occur.
C. Operating Parameter Check
Following completion of the smoke test of the canopy, the physical operating parameters of the canopy will be checked to verify that the parameters have not been changed since the first survey. The operating parameters to be checked are the dimensions of the canopy, perimeter of work area, and the height of the canopy above the work area. Any alterations in these parameters are to be noted and an evaluation of the canopy may have to be done.
D. Recording Results
After the testing of each canopy hood is completed, a copy of the "Canopy Hood Survey Report" is to be completely filled out, including comments. A copy of the form is attached. The results will be entered into a computer database for record keeping and performance tracking of the canopy hood by the Technical Assistance Branch (TAB).
IV. Certification of Performance Canopy hoods that meet the performance testing criteria identified in Part III are considered to be acceptable for use with known low toxicity materials. A green sticker will be affixed to the canopy hood. The sticker will indicate that the canopy hood is approved for work, and will identify the date the hood was tested, who tested it and list a telephone number to call if there are any questions.
Canopy hoods failing the test criteria will have a red sticker affixed to them stating that the hood is not suitable for work and list a telephone number to call if there are questions. Canopy hoods failing to meet the acceptable performance criteria will be identified to building maintenance section for repair. After repair, the hood will be rechecked and passed if it meets the performance testing criteria set for that canopy hood.
V. Frequency of Performance Testing
Canopy hoods at the NIH will be tested on a routine basis at least once a year. If adjustments or modifications are made to the exhaust system which serves the canopy hood, the canopy hood is to be re-tested when the changes are completed.
Canopy Hood Survey Report
I. Original Evaluation
Date of Original Evaluation
Bldg. /Rm ICD Telephone #_______________
Dimensions of Canopy (ft.) length width__________
Perimeter of Work Area (ft.) Area of Canopy (ft.) _____________ Height above work (ft.) Number of Grid Sampling Points Avg. velocity fpm Hi fpm Low fpm
Total Volume (Q) cfm Minimum Calculated Capture Velocity Required fpm Minimum acceptable face velocity fpm
Smoke Test Comments:
Sketch of Canopy Hood and Surrounding Area Including Location of Grid Sampling Points:
II. Performance Testing
Date: _____________ Avg. Canopy velocity fpm Hi fpm Low fpm
Refer to Part I for minimal acceptable face velocity, dimension of canopy, perimeter of work area, and height above work area.
Smoke Test: Pass/Fail_______ Comments:
5. Miscellaneous Local Exhaust Ventilation Devices I. Introduction The Division of Occupational Health and Safety (DOHS), Office of Research Services (ORS) established this protocol for the routine performance testing of LEV (the acronym LEV would be referring to all types of local exhaust ventilation mentioned in this protocol). LEVs currently included on the miscellaneous list: movable exhaust hoods, soldering and welding bench, welding trunk hood, enclosed canopy, large necropsy table, and simple hood. The testing of LEV hoods is divided into two parts; preliminary evaluation and routine performance testing.
II. Preliminary Evaluation
A preliminary evaluation conducted according to this protocol will be performed on each LEV hood to determine the average velocity required to obtain an adequate capture velocity at the point of contaminant generation. The evaluation will be done by the Technical Assistance Branch (TAB), DOHS staff before any routine performance testing. The required average velocity to obtain the required fpm at the point of contaminant generation (site of work) will be determined as per the specific LEV.
The volumetric air flow (Q) in cubic feet/minute (cfm) of each LEV can be determined by the formula:
Q = (V)(A) where:
V = average air velocity at the point of measurement, fpm A = area of LEV monitored, square ft.
A = area of LEV monitored, square ft.
This may not give the capture velocity at the site of contamination generation. The capture velocity may be estimated using a relevant formula. The respective formula will be adapted from the most recent edition of the ACGIH "Industrial Ventilation" text.
If the estimated or measured capture velocity at the point of contaminant release (work) is less than 50 fpm, then the LEV face velocity must be increased. With the data gathered above, the velocity required to give 50 fpm capture velocity at the point of contaminant generation can be calculated and the system adjusted accordingly. With the required velocity known for each individual LEV, future checks of the LEV would only have to measure the velocity of the LEV, at the point(s) indicated to determine that it meets the minimum velocity set in the original evaluation. This assumes that there have been no changes in the system or the area since the original evaluation.
A sketch of the LEV and the area surrounding it must be made, noting locations of air vents, doorways and anything that might obstruct or deflect the air movement into the LEV. The LEV should be tested with smoke to help verify the movement of air toward the LEV and to visualize the effects that any of the items listed above might have on smoke capture.
III. Performance Testing
Performance testing of the LEV is divided into four parts:
A. The measurement of air velocities for calculation of the average capture velocity at the LEV;
B. A visual inspection of the smoke capturing ability;
C. Verification of the physical operating parameters of the LEV; and
D. Recording of the results.
A. Air Velocity Measurement
The measurement of air velocities is to be done using a calibrated thermoanemometer. Air velocity readings should be measured at the point(s) indicated for each type of LEV and taken in a grid pattern over the entire open area of the LEV, and the average capture velocity calculated. The same number of testing points as was used in the original evaluation should be used in this test. The average capture velocity measured should be compared with the required minimum acceptable velocity determined in the original evaluation. If the measured average velocity is less than the minimum acceptable velocity for that LEV, then it fails.
B. Smoke Test Smoke is to be used to visually evaluate airflow direction and to identify any turbulence or cross drafts in the movement of air violent enough to affect the capture of the majority of the generated smoke. Smoke should be released for capture by the LEV at the work site where contaminant release will likely occur.
C. Operating Parameter Check
Following completion of the smoke test of the LEV, the physical operating parameters will be checked to verify they have not changed since the last survey. Any alterations in these parameters are to be noted and a re-evaluation of the LEV may have to be done.
D. Recording Results
After the testing of each LEV is completed, a copy of the Miscellaneous LEV Survey Report is to be completely filled out, including comments. A copy of the form is attached. The results will be entered into a computer database for record keeping and performance tracking of the LEV by the Technical Assistance Branch (TAB).
IV. Certification of Performance LEVs that meet the performance testing criteria identified in Part III are considered to be acceptable for use with known low toxicity materials. A green sticker will be affixed to the LEV. The sticker will indicate that the LEV is approved for work, and will identify the date the LEV was tested, who tested it and list a telephone number to call if there are any questions.
LEVs failing the test criteria will have a red sticker affixed to them stating that the LEV is not suitable for work and list a telephone number to call if there are questions. Those LEVs failing to meet an acceptable performance criterion will be identified to building maintenance section for repair. After repair, the LEV will be rechecked and passed if it meets the performance testing criteria set for that LEV.
V. Frequency of Performance Testing
LEVs at the NIH will be routinely tested at least once a year. If adjustments or modifications are made to the exhaust system which serves the LEV, the LEV must be re-tested when the changes are completed.
Miscellaneous LEV Survey Report
I. Original Evaluation
Date of Original Evaluation: __________
Bldg/Rm ICD Telephone #______________
Dimensions of LEV (ft.) length width Area_________ Diameter of LEV opening (ft.) Area of Canopy (ft.)
Sampling Point: Number of Sampling Points: __________ Avg. velocity fpm Hi fpm Low fpm
Total Volume (Q) cfm Minimal acceptable velocity Minimum Capture Velocity Required fpm Smoke Test: Pass/Fail_________ Comments:
Sketch of Misc. LEV and Surrounding Area Including Location of Grid Sampling Points:
II. Performance Testing
Date: __________ Avg. Misc.-LEV velocity fpm Hi fpm Low fpm
Refer to Part I for minimal acceptable velocity.
Smoke Test: Pass/Fail_________ Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it.