Evaluation_Criteria.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HHS-NIH-NIDA-SSSA-2016-158
About this file
Evaluation Criteria
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF18-Request_for_Quotations.pdf | ||
| RFQ.doc | DOC document | |
| Invoice_Instructions.pdf | ||
| Statement_of_Work_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| 52.213-4_TandC_Dec_2014.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Mandatory Criteria:
1. Doctorate of Medicine and Board Certified & Licensed in the State of Maryland The Mandatory requirements will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis.
Technical Evaluation Criteria:
1. Technical Capability (45 POINTS) The proposal should address each of the “Contractor Requirements” of the statement of work scope of work, in sufficient detail to demonstrate a clear understanding of the statement of work and compliance with requirements. The Offeror should provide evidence of sufficient planning to show that work will be accomplished and how it will be accomplished as required and on schedule, utilizing all available resources as well as controlling the execution of assigned activities, tasks, sub-tasks, monitoring progress, status reporting, resolving critical issues and mitigating risks. The proposal should demonstrate a firm understanding of the requirements and goals set forth in the scope of work.
2. Key Personnel Qualifications (40 POINTS) The proposal shall be evaluated to ensure that all key personnel qualifications identified in this statement of work are met, to include, but not limited to the following:
· Documented evidence of the Offeror’s successful performance at a minimum five (5) years of experience evaluating the quality and accuracy of intimal-medial thickness (IMT) measurements and performing clinical evaluation for the presence of atherosclerosis and risk for stenosis and;
· Five (5) years’ experience collaborating on IMT data resulting in published manuscripts.
3. Past Performance (40 POINTS) Documented evidence of the Offeror’s successful performance for a minimum of three (3) recent contracts, similar to requirements specified in the statement of work.
Total possible points 125 Points
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .