HE125420R0002-DOVER-RFP-1-27-20.pdf

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

HE125420R0002 27-Jan-2020

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

571-372-1470

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

12:00 PM 27 Feb 2020

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

HE12549. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

KRISHANA M. WRIGHT

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

0 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

HE12540104422

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED ORX

SMALL BUSINESS

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

DOD EDUCATION ACTIVITY

ATTN: PROCUREMENT DIVISION

4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE

SUITE 05F09-02

ALEXANDRIA VA 22350-1400

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE 16. ADMINISTERED BY

SEE SCHEDULE

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

FAX:

TEL: SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

$12,000,000

NAICS:

611110

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF75

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

HE125420R0002

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 12 Months

BASE YEAR

FFP

Educational Program at Dover Air Force Base. In accordance with the PWS.

FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: HE12540104422

U009

NET AMT

1001 12 Months

OPTION OPTION YEAR 1

FFP

Educational Program at Dover Air Force Base. In accordance with the PWS.

FOB: Destination U099

2001 12 Months

OPTION OPTION YEAR 2

FFP

Educational Program at Dover Air Force Base. In accordance with the PWS.

3001 12 Months

OPTION OPTION YEAR 3

FFP

Educational Program at Dover Air Force Base. In accordance with the PWS.

4001 12 Months

OPTION OPTION YEAR 4

FFP

Educational Program at Dover Air Force Base. In accordance with the PWS.

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government 1001 Destination Government Destination Government 2001 Destination Government Destination Government 3001 Destination Government Destination Government 4001 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 01-JUL-2020 TO

30-JUN-2021

N/A N/A

1001 POP 01-JUL-2021 TO

30-JUN-2022

2001 POP 01-JUL-2022 TO

30-JUN-2023

3001 POP 01-JUL-2023 TO

30-JUN-2024

4001 POP 01-JUL-2024 TO

30-JUN-2025

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013 52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2018 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2018 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2016 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information

Systems

JUN 2016

52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic

Corporations--Representation

NOV 2015

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

OCT 2015

52.209-7 Information Regarding Responsibility Matters OCT 2018 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns OCT 2018 52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers MAY 2014

52.223-2 Affirmative Procurement of Biobased Products Under Service and Construction Contracts

SEP 2013

52.223-5 Pollution Prevention and Right-to-Know Information MAY 2011 52.223-10 Waste Reduction Program MAY 2011 52.223-17 Affirmative Procurement of EPA-Designated Items in Service and Construction Contracts

AUG 2018

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving

AUG 2011

52.223-19 Compliance with Environmental Management Systems MAY 2011 52.223-19 Compliance with Environmental Management Systems MAY 2011 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.232-18 Availability Of Funds APR 1984 52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award

Management

OCT 2018

52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-2 Service Of Protest SEP 2006 52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004 52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

52.239-1 Privacy or Security Safeguards AUG 1996 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-15 Stop-Work Order AUG 1989 52.242-17 Government Delay Of Work APR 1984 52.245-1 Government Property JAN 2017 52.245-9 Use And Charges APR 2012 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7003 Agency Office of the Inspector General AUG 2019 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information OCT 2016 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7009 Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Third-Party Contractor Reported Cyber Incident Information

OCT 2016

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.204-7014 Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Information by Litigation Support Contractors

MAY 2016

252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support

MAY 2016

252.204-7018 Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services

DEC 2019

252.205-7000 Provision Of Information To Cooperative Agreement Holders DEC 1991 252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism

MAY 2019

252.209-7005 Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus

MAR 2012

252.211-7003 Item Unique Identification and Valuation MAR 2016 252.211-7007 Reporting of Government-Furnished Property AUG 2012 252.215-7003 Requirement for Submission of Data Other Than Certified

Cost or Pricing Data--Canadian Commercial Corporation.

JUL 2012

252.219-7003 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (DOD Contracts) MAY 2019 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or

Hazardous Materials

SEP 2014

252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JUN 2013 252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities DEC 2017 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

DEC 2018

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor

Personnel

JUN 2013

252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013 252.245-7001 Tagging, Labeling, and Marking of Government-Furnished

Property

APR 2012

252.245-7002 Reporting Loss of Government Property DEC 2017 252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration APR 2012 252.245-7004 Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal DEC 2017 252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea FEB 2019

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-26 COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES--REPRESENTATION (DEC

2019)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision, “covered telecommunications equipment or services” has the meaning provided in the clause 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

(b) Procedures. The Offeror shall review the list of excluded parties in the System for Award Management (SAM) (https://www.sam.gov) for entities excluded from receiving federal awards for “covered telecommunications equipment or services”.

(c) Representation. The Offeror represents that it [ ___ ] does, [ ___ ] does not provide covered telecommunications equipment or services as a part of its offered products or services to the Government in the performance of any contract, subcontract, or other contractual instrument.

(End of provision)

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2018)

(a) North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and small business size standard. The NAICS code and small business size standard for this acquisition appear in Block 10 of the solicitation cover sheet (SF 1449). However, the small business size standard for a concern which submits an offer in its own name, but which proposes to furnish an item which it did not itself manufacture, is 500 employees.

(b) Submission of offers. Submit signed and dated offers to the office specified in this solicitation at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Offers may be submitted on the SF 1449, letterhead stationery, or as otherwise specified in the solicitation. As a minimum, offers must show--

(1) The solicitation number;

(2) The time specified in the solicitation for receipt of offers;

(3) The name, address, and telephone number of the offeror;

(4) A technical description of the items being offered in sufficient detail to evaluate compliance with the requirements in the solicitation. This may include product literature, or other documents, if necessary;

(5) Terms of any express warranty;

(6) Price and any discount terms;

(7) "Remit to" address, if different than mailing address;

(8) A completed copy of the representations and certifications at FAR 52.212-3 (see FAR 52.212-3(b) for those representations and certifications that the offeror shall complete electronically);

(9) Acknowledgment of Solicitation Amendments;

(10) Past performance information, when included as an evaluation factor, to include recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar items and other references (including contract numbers, points of contact with telephone numbers and other relevant information); and

(11) If the offer is not submitted on the SF 1449, include a statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation. Offers that fail to furnish required representations or information, or reject the terms and conditions of the solicitation may be excluded from consideration.

(c) Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 30 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(d) Product samples. When required by the solicitation, product samples shall be submitted at or prior to the time specified for receipt of offers. Unless otherwise specified in this solicitation, these samples shall be submitted at no expense to the Government, and returned at the sender's request and expense, unless they are destroyed during preaward testing.

(e) Multiple offers. Offerors are encouraged to submit multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions, including alternative line items (provided that the alternative line items are consistent with subpart 4.10 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation), or alternative commercial items for satisfying the requirements of this solicitation.

Each offer submitted will be evaluated separately.

(f) Late submissions, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers:

(1) Offerors are responsible for submitting offers, and any modifications, revisions, or withdrawals, so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the time specified in the solicitation. If no time is specified in the solicitation, the time for receipt is 4:30 p.m., local time, for the designated Government office on the date that offers or revisions are due.

(2)(i) Any offer, modification, revision, or withdrawal of an offer received at the Government office designated in the solicitation after the exact time specified for receipt of offers is “late” and will not be considered unless it is received before award is made, the Contracting Officer determines that accepting the late offer would not unduly delay the acquisition; and--

(A) If it was transmitted through an electronic commerce method authorized by the solicitation, it was received at the initial point of entry to the Government infrastructure not later than 5:00 p.m. one working day prior to the date specified for receipt of offers; or

(B) There is acceptable evidence to establish that it was received at the Government installation designated for receipt of offers and was under the Government's control prior to the time set for receipt of offers; or

(C) If this solicitation is a request for proposals, it was the only proposal received.

(ii) However, a late modification of an otherwise successful offer, that makes its terms more favorable to the Government, will be considered at any time it is received and may be accepted.

(3) Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date stamp of that installation on the offer wrapper, other documentary evidence of receipt maintained by the installation, or oral testimony or statements of Government personnel.

(4) If an emergency or unanticipated event interrupts normal Government processes so that offers cannot be received at the Government office designated for receipt of offers by the exact time specified in the solicitation, and urgent Government requirements preclude amendment of the solicitation or other notice of an extension of the closing date, the time specified for receipt of offers will be deemed to be extended to the same time of day specified in the solicitation on the first work day on which normal Government processes resume.

(5) Offers may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers.

Oral offers in response to oral solicitations may be withdrawn orally. If the solicitation authorizes facsimile offers, offers may be withdrawn via facsimile received at any time before the exact time set for receipt of offers, subject to the conditions specified in the solicitation concerning facsimile offers. An offer may be withdrawn in person by an offeror or its authorized representative if, before the exact time set for receipt of offers, the identity of the person requesting withdrawal is established and the person signs a receipt for the offer.

(g) Contract award (not applicable to Invitation for Bids). The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. The Government may reject any or all offers if such action is in the public interest; accept other than the lowest offer; and waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received.

(h) Multiple awards. The Government may accept any item or group of items of an offer, unless the offeror qualifies the offer by specific limitations. Unless otherwise provided in the Schedule, offers may not be submitted for quantities less than those specified. The Government reserves the right to make an award on any item for a quantity less than the quantity offered, at the unit prices offered, unless the offeror specifies otherwise in the offer.

(i) Availability of requirements documents cited in the solicitation. (1)(i) The GSA Index of Federal Specifications, Standards and Commercial Item Descriptions, FPMR Part 101-29, and copies of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained for a fee by submitting a request to--GSA Federal Supply Service Specifications Section, Suite 8100, 470 East L'Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC 20407, Telephone (202) 619-8925, Facsimile (202) 619-8978.

(ii) If the General Services Administration, Department of Agriculture, or Department of Veterans Affairs issued this solicitation, a single copy of specifications, standards, and commercial item descriptions cited in this solicitation may be obtained free of charge by submitting a request to the addressee in paragraph (i)(1)(i) of this provision.

Additional copies will be issued for a fee.

(2) Most unclassified Defense specifications and standards may be downloaded from the following ASSIST websites:

(i) ASSIST (https://assist.dla.mil/online/start/).

(ii) Quick Search (http://quicksearch.dla.mil/).

(iii) ASSISTdocs.com (http://assistdocs.com).

(3) Documents not available from ASSIST may be ordered from the Department of Defense Single Stock Point (DoDSSP) by--

(i) Using the ASSIST Shopping Wizard (https://assist.dla.mil/wizard/index.cfm);

(ii) Phoning the DoDSSP Customer Service Desk (215) 697-2179, Mon-Fri, 0730 to 1600 EST; or

(iii) Ordering from DoDSSP, Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094, Telephone

(215) 697-2667/2179, Facsimile (215) 697-1462.

(4) Nongovernment (voluntary) standards must be obtained from the organization responsible for their preparation, publication, or maintenance.

(j) Unique entity identifier. (Applies to all offers exceeding $3,500, and offers of $3,500 or less if the solicitation requires the Contractor to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM).) The Offeror shall enter, in the block with its name and address on the cover page of its offer, the annotation ``Unique Entity Identifier'' followed by the unique entity identifier that identifies the Offeror's name and address. The Offeror also shall enter its Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) indicator, if applicable. The EFT indicator is a four-character suffix to the unique entity identifier. The suffix is assigned at the discretion of the Offeror to establish additional SAM records for identifying alternative EFT accounts (see subpart 32.11) for the same entity. If the Offeror does not have a unique entity identifier, it should contact the entity designated at www.sam.gov for unique entity identifier establishment directly to obtain one. The Offeror should indicate that it is an offeror for a Government contract when contacting the entity designated at www.sam.gov for establishing the unique entity identifier.

(k) Reserved.

(l) Debriefing. If a post-award debriefing is given to requesting offerors, the Government shall disclose the following information, if applicable:

(1) The agency's evaluation of the significant weak or deficient factors in the debriefed offeror's offer.

(2) The overall evaluated cost or price and technical rating of the successful and the debriefed offeror and past performance information on the debriefed offeror.

(3) The overall ranking of all offerors, when any ranking was developed by the agency during source selection.

(4) A summary of the rationale for award;

(5) For acquisitions of commercial items, the make and model of the item to be delivered by the successful offeror.

(6) Reasonable responses to relevant questions posed by the debriefed offeror as to whether source-selection procedures set forth in the solicitation, applicable regulations, and other applicable authorities were followed by the agency.

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2018):

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) – DOVER AIR FORCE BASE (AFB), EDUCATIONAL

PROGRAM

This RFP is in support of Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA), Educational Program at DOVER Air Force Base (AFB). All potential Offerors are encouraged to submit proposals under this request. Only one contract is anticipated resulting from this RFP; however, the Government reserves the right to withdraw, modify, or eliminate various aspects of the requirement determined to be too costly or impractical prior to award.

SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS:

This requirement will be a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract. Performance requirements for this contract are provided in the attached Performance Work Statement (PWS) of this RFP.

1.0 GENERAL

1.1 Addendum to 52.212-1 Paragraph (c) Period of acceptance of offers. This paragraph is changed to read to as follows: The vendor agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an amendment to the solicitation.

1.2 Addendum to 52.212-1 Paragraph (e) Multiple Offers. This paragraph is changed to read as follows:

Multiple offers presenting alternative terms and conditions will not be accepted.

2.0 Offeror Structure, Content, and Additional Instructions

2.1 Proposal Structure and Content - Offerors shall submit proposal packages consisting of the following separate/distinct volumes for evaluation purposes and include the content identified herein:

2.1.1 VOLUME 1 – Administrative Cover Letter. This volume shall include the following:

a. Tax identification number (TIN)

b. Dun & Bradstreet Number (DUNS);

c. Complete Business Mailing Address;

d. Cage Code/NAICS Code; and

e. Contact Name, Phone, Fax and E-mail address

f. Offeror proposal shall be firm for 120 days from the proposal submission date.

g. Completed GPAT (Attachment 2)

h. Completed Cloud Questionnaire (Attachment 4)

i. Completed Terms of Service (Attachment 3)

2.1.2 VOLUME 2: Factor 1. Technical

2.1.2.1 At a minimum, for the objectives and tasks under the subfactors listed below potential offerors shall demonstrate their technical and management approach for the following:

i. The Offeror’s understanding of the work, including creativity and thoroughness shown in understanding the aforementioned objectives and tasks of the PWS.

ii. Descriptions and evidence of specific methods and techniques for completing each discrete objectives and tasks contained within the PWS.

iii. The Offeror’s ability to anticipate and address potential problems or risk areas as well as its creativity and feasibility of solutions to problems and future integration of new processes and technology enhancements.

2.1.2.2 Subfactor 1a: Technical Approach: The Offeror shall submit a written technical approach which effectively demonstrates the Offeror’s clear understanding of all the objectives and the tasks identified below and how their technical approach will meet or exceed the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Additionally, the Offeror shall demonstrate their methodology and their flexibility that will be used in accomplishing the objectives and tasks outlined in the PWS.

a. Objective 1, Task 1-Comprehensive Education Program PWS section 2.1, specifically subsections 2.1.1.1 through 2.1.1.8.

b. Objective 1, Task 2-Education Programs and Services PWS section 2.1.2, specifically subsections

2.1.2.1 through 2.1.2.3)

c. Objective 1, Task 3-Special Education and Related Services PWS section 2.1.3, specifically subsections 2.1.3.1 – 2.1.3.5.

d. Objective 2, Task 6-Facilities and Equipment PWS section 2.2.3, specifically subsections 2.2.3.1 through 2.2.3.6.

e. Objective 2, Task 7-Custodial and Grounds Maintenance Services PWS section 2.2.4

f. Objective 2, Task 9-Transportation PWS section 2.2.6, specifically subsections 2.2.6.1 through

2.2.6.4.

2.1.2.3 Subfactor 1b: Management Approach

a. Objective 4, Task 12-Reporting PWS section 2.4.1, specifically subsections 2.4.1.1 through 2.4.1.6.

b. Objective 4, Task 13-Quality Control Plan PWS section 2.4.2

c. Objective 4, Task 14-Relationship with Dover AFB PWS section 2.4.3, specifically subsections

2.4.3.1 – 2.4.3.2.

2.1.2.4 The technical and management approaches shall thoroughly address the Offeror’s proposed approach to meeting or exceeding the minimum required results.

2.1.2.5 Subfactor 1c: Organizational Experience

a) The Offeror shall submit written information which effectively demonstrates and provides evidence of the Offeror’s relevant experience identical to, similar to or related to services contained within the PWS. The proposal shall provide evidence of the Offeror’s experience (for this purpose, experience refers to what an Offeror has done, not how well it was accomplished) in performing proposed identified objectives, tasks, requirements, processes and procedures.

b) The Offeror’s proposal shall demonstrate the amount of relevant corporate experience the Offeror possesses. The Offeror shall provide evidence that the organization has current capabilities for assuring performance of this requirement. Evidence of supporting sub-contractors, consultants, and business partners will be considered.

c) The Offeror shall provide evidence of existing school operations, student assessments, financial management, hiring, security, and transportation.

2.1.3 VOLUME 3 –

Factor 2. Past Performance:

2.1.3.1 The Offeror shall submit 4 references of relevant contracts within the past 5 years for its own performance.

The Offeror shall also submit 1 reference for each Subcontractor proposed. The contracts may be past or current as long as the performance did not end more than 5 years prior to the due date for the submission of the proposal, and the contracts may have been with Federal, State and/or City agencies and commercial customers.

(a) REFERENCE CONTENT: It is the Offeror’s responsibility to provide valid, current and verifiable references.

References must include:

Name of the Organization that will be providing the reference, Name of the POC, POC Telephone Number, POC Email address, Contract Value Contract Number, Period of Performance, and Scope of Work.

(b) POCs: The above POCs must be either Government personnel (civil service or military) or employees of private sector clients with whom you have provided similar educational services. Information provided by or for POCs who work directly for your company, or indirectly (i.e. in a prime or subcontractor relationship), will NOT be considered relevant. Offerors shall ensure that contact information for designated references is accurate and up-to-date.

(c) SUBCONTRACTOR CONSENT: If a subcontracting relationship is proposed, the Offeror shall submit the consent of its proposed principal subcontractor(s) to disclose their past performance information to the Offeror (Prime Contractor) along with the Offeror’s proposed submission. If the proposed principal subcontractor(s) consent is not provided at the time of the Offeror’s proposal submission, the past performance information for the principal subcontractor(s) may not be considered by the government in assessing the Offeror’s past performance.

2.1.4 VOLUME 4 – Factor 3 Price.

The Offeror shall submit their proposed CLIN prices as a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP), A price summary sheet must accompany the proposal for each individual year plus a consolidated summary sheet for all years. The monthly price shall be fully burdened to cover all the services identified in the PWS.

(1) SUPPLEMENTAL PRICING WORKSHEET: The Offeror’s proposal shall include a supplemental pricing sheet that provides a detailed breakdown of their proposed pricing. Contractor shall ensure mathematical computations are correct. All discounts prices shall be clearly outlined in the proposal.

(2) Offerors must submit a separate roll-up summary sheet that includes all price for all years within their proposal. The summary must break out the base and each option year for labor, subcontractor labor (if any), and travel. The summary must include the following for the base year, for each option year, the transition periods, and for the total contract value that includes:

All Labor Cost Fully Burdened Hourly rates Monthly Transportation Cost Food Service Cost Facilities Cost Special Education Cost

(3) PRICING SHEET: The price propose shall include a completed pricing sheet in the attached format. The Offeror shall ensure mathematical computations are correct. Errors in addition or multiplication may be considered nonresponsive to this RFP. (See Attachment 1).

(a) Offerors shall propose on all contract line items, by price. A zero dollar figure in a proposal means that the line item shall be provided at no charge to the Government. A line item price left blank will be considered nonresponsive to this request and the proposal will not be considered for award.

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS:

3.1 POINT OF CONTACT (POC):

Due to the difficulties in receipt of mail through normal postal services, questions and proposals shall be sent via E-mail to the POC for this RFP. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring receipt by the POC.

The POC is as follows:

Contract Specialist: Krishana M. Wright Contract Specialist e-mail: krishana.wright@dodead.edu and copy to:

Contracting Officer: Alim Koroma Contracting Officer e-mail: alim.koroma@dodea.edu

3.2 PROPOSAL QUESTIONS:

Questions or concerns regarding this requirement, may be submitted to the POC via e-mail no later than Wednesday, 05 FEBRUARY 2020, at 12:00PM Eastern Standard Time (EST). Follow-up/additional questions will not be accepted after this date. Answers to Contractor submitted questions will be provided to all potential vendors via RFP amendment. All responses to substantive questions will be made in writing and included in an amendment to the RFP. Answers to the question will be provided to all Offerors, giving due regard to the proper protection of proprietary information.

The Government reserves the right not to respond to any questions received concerning this solicitation after the question receipt date and time above. Offerors shall submit one set of questions only; multiple sets of questions will not be accepted.

3.3 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND PROPOSAL DUE DATE:

Submission must be sent in electronically to the Contract Specialist and the Contracting Officer on or before the closing date as identified on the SF-1449, Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items, Block 8. Your proposal must cite the solicitation Number and your corporation’s name in your submission. Late submissions will not be accepted.

3.4 SUBMISSION PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

3.4.1 To be considered for selection, the Offeror shall submit a complete response to this Request For Proposal (RFP) using the sequence and format provided herein. The Offerors shall only provide an electronic submission. The electronic version of the text shall be in Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat Portable Data Format (PDF) format, except supporting price information, which shall be in Microsoft Excel format. The electronic spreadsheets shall not be compiled or password protected; all cells and formulas shall be visible, editable and unprotected. Spreadsheets should reflect the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) structure listed in the RFP.

3.4.2 The Offeror shall ensure that the submission is readable, in the format specified in the solicitation, and has been verified as free of computer viruses. Prior to any review, the Government will check all files for viruses and ensure that all information is readable. In the event that any files are defective (unreadable), the Government will only review the readable electronic files. If the defective media renders a significant portion of the Offeror’s proposal unreadable, the Government will consider the submission incomplete and not further consider the proposal for consideration. Failure to submit of the information requested within this solicitation may cause for unfavorable consideration.

3.4.3 Submissions must be clear, coherent, and prepared in sufficient detail for effective evaluation of the Offeror’s proposal against the evaluation criteria. In addition, this documentation must cover all aspects of this solicitation and include the Offeror’s approach for addressing all of the tasks in the PWS. Submissions must clearly demonstrate how the Offeror intends to accomplish the tasks and must include convincing rationale and substantiation of all claims. Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentations beyond those sufficient to present a complete, effective response to the solicitation are not desired. The Offeror shall describe its approach, through the use of graphs, charts, diagrams and narrative, in sufficient detail for the Government to understand and evaluate the nature of the approach.

3.4.4 Content shall be indexed (cross-indexed, as appropriate) and logically assembled.

Information shall be confined to the appropriate volume to facilitate evaluation. The Offeror shall present all information relevant to each evaluation element in the appropriate volume and section. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. Pages over the maximum page limitation for any volume will not be evaluated. Page limitations include all text, graphs, pictures, appendices, references, exhibits, etc. Tabs, index sheets, tables of contents, dividers and other such aids that are solely used to assist the evaluator in locating information and are advisory in nature, imparting no other information other than the identification of content, will not be counted against any page limits stated within this RFP.

3.4.5 Electronic submissions shall be arranged so that it can be printed on 8 ½” x 11” (with no fold-outs) white paper and printed double-sided. The text shall have 1” margins on all sides, be single-spaced, and use Times New Roman font color black, font size of 12. Illustrations (e.g., graphics figures, graphs, and tables) shall be in portrait format with font colors other than black allowable and font sizes 12, 10, 9, and 8 considered acceptable. The Offeror's company name (no logos), the date, solicitation number, volume number and section shall be included on each page of the submission (this information may be included in a header/footer). All pages shall be numbered, using a uniform page numbering system. Page numbers, headers and footers may be outside the page margins, and are not bound by the font, color and point size requirement. If the Offeror uses a different format (font size, margin, etc.), the government reserves the right to adjust the submission to fit the parameters of the format as stated in the RFP, and if this results in the submission exceeding the page limitations in any one area, the government will not consider excess pages.

4.0 PAGE LIMITS

Volume 1: Administrative – No Page Limit Volume 2: Technical No Page Limit Volume 3: Past Performance – No More than 5 references Volume 4: Price – No Page Limit

Note: DoDEA has a maximum email limit of 10MB. Vendors shall confirm receipt of their electronic copy by return email from above email addresses.

(a) Period for acceptance of proposals. Paragraph (c) of 52.212-1 tailored. The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its proposal firm for 120 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of proposals, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

(b) Exchanges with Offerors. Paragraph (g) of 52.212-1 tailored. Notwithstanding any contrary language, as this is a procurement conducted under FAR Part 12 and FAR Part 15, the Government is bound by FAR Part 15 procedures on negotiations, discussions, setting a competitive range, or any other FAR 15.306 requirements.

DOVER FAR 52.212-2:

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Items.

As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:

Evaluation-Commercial Items (Oct 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Factor 1-Technical

2. Factor 2-Past Performance

3. Factor 3-Price

Technical is more important than Past Performance. Technical and past performance, when combined, are more important than price. The technical subfactors are equal in importance.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c)A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

1. PROPOSAL EVALUATION:

The Government intends to make a single contract award without discussions. Offerors shall provide their best offer upon initial submission. The Government reserves the right to hold discussions, if deemed necessary by the Contracting Officer. A Technical Evaluation Panel will evaluate all proposals based on the proposed/documentation provided. The evaluations will be based on the evaluation criteria set forth below.

a. EVALUATION PROCESS: Evaluations will be conducted utilizing the Best Value.

2. EVALUATION CRITERIA –

1. Basis for Award: An award of this contract will be made on a competitive best value basis, using “best value tradeoff” basis. Evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the evaluation criteria below:

I. Factor 1-Technical

a. Subfactor 1a-Technical Approach

b. Subfactor 1b-Management Approach

c. Subfactor 1c_Organizational Experience

II. Factor 2-Past Performance III. Factor 3-Price

3. Evaluation Factors/Sub-Factors are as follows:

Evaluation Factor 1- Technical

SubFactor 1a-Technical Approach: The technical approach will be evaluated to the degree to which the Offeror’s technical approach demonstrates:

• A clear understanding of all the objectives and tasks and how their approach meet and/or exceeds the requirements of the PWS, specifically task 1, task 2, task 3, task 6, task 7 and task 9.

• The methodology and flexibility that will be used in accomplishing the PWS tasks.

• Overall capabilities to perform the specific objectives and tasks as defined in the Performance Work Statement.

SubFactor 1b-Management Approach: The management approach will be evaluated to the degree to which the Offeror’s management approach demonstrates:

• A clear understanding of all the objectives and tasks and how their approach meet and/or exceeds the requirements of the PWS, specifically task 12, task 13, and task 14.

• The methodology and flexibility that will be used in accomplishing the PWS tasks.

• Overall capabilities to perform the specific objectives and tasks as defined in the Performance Work Statement.

SubFactor 1c-Organizational Experience: Organizational experience will be evaluated to the degree to which the Offeror’s organizational experience demonstrates:

Organizational experience that is identical to and/or similar to services specified within the PWS.

Organization has current capabilities that will ensure performance of this requirement in accordance with the PWS and required timelines. Evidence of supporting sub-contractors, consultants, and business partners will be considered.

Existing school operations, student assessments, financial management, hiring, security, and transportation is identical to and/or similar to services specified within the PWS.

(3) Evaluation factor 2-Past Performance: An Offeror’s past performance will be evaluated to determine the confidence the Government has in an Offeror’s ability to provide the product and services that meet the current requirement based on a demonstrated record of recent, relevant performance. In addition to past performance references provided in the proposal, the Government may also consider information obtained through other sources such as Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

Relevant past performance includes efforts of the same or similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity this solicitation requires, include specific examples, if appropriate. E.g., “These include efforts where the Offeror provided services similar to those outlined in the performance work statement.

Recent efforts are defined as those efforts, which have been performed during any portion of the last five years, including those efforts currently being performed.

References and other sources of past performance information will not be individually rated. The Government will consider the collective record of all recent and relevant past performance in assessing a rating.

In the case of an Offeror, together with any proposed major subcontractors, without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, a “Neutral Confidence” rating will be assigned to the Past Performance Factor and the Offeror will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably on past performance.

Rating Standards for the Non Price Proposal

Combined Technical/Risk Rating (Excluding Past Performance)

Adjectival Rating

Description

Outstanding Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

The Government will use the rating scheme listed in table below when conducting the evaluation outlined above for the Past Performance factor.

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Best Value Evaluation Standard Definitions

Rating The evaluators’ conclusions (supported by narrative write-ups) identifying the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies of an evaluation factor or subfactor. The ratings for each Non-Cost/Price Factor and each of its subfactors will be expressed as an adjective.

Strength An aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Risk The potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Performance Confidence Assessment

An evaluation of the likelihood (or Government’s confidence) that the offeror will successfully perform the solicitation’s requirements; the evaluation is based upon past performance information.

Recency Pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the time that has elapsed since the past performance reference occurred. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant.

Relevency Pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

Evaluation Factor 3-Price:

(a) Price will be evaluated separately from technical and past performance.

(b) Price analysis will be conducted to ensure the Government receives a fair and reasonable price in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b)(2).

(c) Total Evaluated Price (TEP): Total evaluated price will consist of the sum of all proposed CLINs and or SubCLINS in the Pricing Worksheet and the Option to Extend Services IAW FAR clause 52.217-8.

(d) FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services. Both the solicitation and the resultant contract(s) shall contain FAR Clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. This clause allows for up to an additional six (6) month continued contract performance if required. Offerors shall not propose pricing for this clause as it will be automatically calculated as part of the TEP in the Pricing Worksheet. FAR 52.217-8 will be calculated by dividing the offeror TEP by 60 to get the per month amount. The per month amount will get the multiple by 6 to account for 6 months of continued services. The offeror 6 months of service will then get added to the offeror proposed TEP. The FAR 52.217-8 calculation and analysis will be done for evaluation purposes only and will not get added as a separate CLIN and or subCLIN.

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (DEC 2019)

The Offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically in the System…