Amendment_002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION (Nonappropriated Funds) PAGE 1 OF 2

1. AMENDMENT NO.

2. EFFECTIVE DATE

29 May 2014

3. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUEST NO.

4. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

5. ISSUED BY Headquarters, United States Marine Corps

NAF Business and Support Services Division (MR)

Procurement Branch (MRB)

3044 Catlin Avenue

Quantico, VA 22134-5099

6. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than block 5)

7. CONTRACTOR NAME AND ADDRESS (Include Street, City, County, State, and ZIP Code)

8. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

DATED: 1 May 2015

No. H0115-I-0002

DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT

Questions and responses as follows:

Question 1: Does the Performance Management Solution require a “Development Planning” feature?

Response: Ideally, yes.

Question 2: Is there a requirement for interfacing the Performance Management Solution with a

Learning Management System?

Response: We would use PeopleSoft for this.

Question 3: Does the Performance Management Solution require assessment in the context of the employee’s job or position of their competencies and their related behaviors, skills, knowledge and abilities?

Response: Yes

Question 4: If competencies, behaviors, skills, knowledge and abilities are required for performance appraisal, do you have those attributes defined for each job or position in MCCS?

Response: Competencies, skills, knowledge and abilities are on the Position Descriptions.

Question 5: Do you expect the new system to mirror the current Performance Appraisal process and, if so, can you provide the forms and workflow?

Response: No

Question 6: What types of performance metrics are required?

Response: The core requirements as established by the Department of Defense is mainly a five level rating system at the discretion of the Marine Corps.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in block 8, as heretofore changed, remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT

_XX__ CONTRACTOR IS NOT REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT.

__ CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE

10. NO APPROPRIATED FUNDS OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BECOME DUE, OR BE PAID, THE CONTRACTOR BY REASON OF THIS CONTRACT.

12A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

13A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

12B. OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

12C. DATE SIGNED 13B. SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

George W. Herndon

13C. DATE SIGNED

Question 7: Is 360-degree multi-rater assessment required?

Response: No

Question 8: Should the system provide compensation management capabilities, such as the ability to compare performance to compensation for a group of like-individuals?

Response: Ideally, yes.

Question 9: Approximately how many employees will the system support worldwide?

Response: Over 13,000

Question 10: Should the Annual Appraisal be printed for the record, or can electronic signatures

(CAC/PIV or application e-signature) be used?

Response: Ideally we would have both capabilities.

Question 11: What unique challenges are facing MCCS that this system is expected to address.

Response: As explained in the RFI, the main challenge is to do a standardized performance appraisal that fits an occupational diverse workforce.

*************************************Nothing Follows**********************************************