GT 250K SS JnA_ SPY_1 Computer Module_Redacted.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVAL SURFACE

WARFARE CENTER

PORT HUENEME

DIVISION

4363 MISSILE WAY

PORT HUENEME, CALIFORNIA 93043-4307

In reply refer to:

J&A No. NSWC-PHD-JA-25-112

JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL

FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

1. Contracting Activity.

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division (NSWC PHD), Code E24.

2. Description of the Action Being Approved.

NSWC PHD intends to award a single contract on the basis of other than full and open competition to General Micro Systems as a Sole Source requirement for Single Board Computers (SBCs) to support the Aegis Weapon System (SPY-1) Radar, Multi-Mission Signal Processor (MMSP).

3. Description of Supplies/Services.

This contract shall provide Procurement from General Micro Systems, Inc. (GMS) for:

1. Qty. 20 Single Board Computers (VSB2102 2.4GHZ i7, 16GB RAM P/N: 97- 2561)-000. General Micro Systems' SBC is a high performance, ruggedized computer designed to replace legacy Versa Module Europa (VME) SBCs in demanding applications requiring real-time performance and reliability.

This part is in the Multi-Mission Signal Processor (MMSP).

Estimated Dollar Value

FY25

Total

OPN $347,369.46

Total $347,369.46

4. Statutory Authority Permitting Other Than Full and Open Competition

10 U.S.C. 2304(c)(1) Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.

5. Rationale Justifying Use of Cited Statutory Authority.

This specific VSB2102 2.4GHZ i7, 16GB RAM manufactured by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), specifically listed onboard Allowance Parts Lists (APL), Technical Data Package (TDP) and supported by Naval Education and Training curriculum. These components are compatible in all aspects (form, fit, function) with existing systems presently installed. No other brand has been tested and verified to be compatible in all aspects with the existing systems presently installed and, therefore, no other brand can meet NSWC PHD’s needs. Furthermore, the OEM does not have any approved third-party vendors and/or manufacturers and, therefore, no other source, other than the OEM, can meet NSWC PHD’s needs.

The use of a different brand would require additional testing and validation for functionality and compatibility which would result in a substantial duplication of cost of approximately $50k and an unreasonable delay of at least 12 months. These estimates are based on the estimated cost and time to undergo testing and validation including First Article Testing, ECP development, qualification, and approval prior to use within Multi- Mission Signal Processor. A 12-month delay would prevent the ISEA from supporting any request from the fleet since this part has not reached the Material Support Date.

6. Description of Efforts Made to Solicit Offers from as Many Offerors as Practicable.

This part is not available in the Navy Supply System. I reviewed all other Navy approved supply sources like GSA Advantage, UNICOR and ability one to determine if there were any capable sources and none were found.

7. Determination of Fair and Reasonable Cost.

The Contracting Officer has determined the anticipated cost to the Government of the supplies/services covered by this J&A will be fair and reasonable.

8. Actions to Remove Barriers to Future Competition.

NSWC PHD will continue to conduct market research as warranted to provide a broader vendor base for the types of supplies/services covered by this document. If another potential source emerges, NSWC PHD will assess whether competition for future requirements is feasible.

CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this Justification and its supporting acquisition planning documents, except as noted herein are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVAL

TECHNICAL/REQUIREMENTS CERTIFICATION

I certify that the facts and representations under my cognizance which are included in this Justification and its supporting acquisition planning documents, except as noted herein are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Technical Cognizance:

SPIESSL.KELLY.HANN

AH.1527683862

Digitally signed by

SPIESSL.KELLY.HANNAH.1527683862

Date: 2025.09.04 13:35:36 -07'00'

9/4/25

Kelly Spiessl, Supportability Integrator, Code E20, 805-228-1868 Date

[Note that this page includes certification that the acquisition planning documents are complete and accurate. If a single individual has cognizance over both technical and requirements information included in the J&A, use of only one signature line is encouraged and "Technical Cognizance:" and Requirements Cognizance:" above the signature lines may also be deleted.]

LEGAL SUFFICIENCY REVIEW

I have determined this Justification is legally sufficient.

DEBERRY.JULIANNE.SU

RANE.1522887796

Digitally signed by

DEBERRY.JULIANNE.SURANE.1522887796

Date: 2025.09.08 09:43:07 -07'00'

Julianne Deberry, Assistant Counsel, 00L, 805-228-8520 Date

CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I certify that this Justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

WYNN.ARTHUR.P.JR.1

080480870

Digitally signed by

WYNN.ARTHUR.P.JR.1080480870

Date: 2025.09.08 09:48:12 -07'00'

Arthur Wynn, Contracting Officer, Code 0271, 805-330-0370 Date