George Washington Carver Center Parking Lot Restriping Project PWS (Draft).pdf

George Washington Carver Center Parking Lot Restriping Project

United States Department of Agriculture

Office of Safety, Security, and Protection

Safety, Training, Emergency Management

George Washington Carver Center 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705

Date: May 2026

Draft

Description of Requirement (Product Specifications/SOW

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

Introduction This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the requirements for providing commercial restriping services at the George Washington Carver Center located in Beltsville Maryland. The Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, management, and supervision necessary to restripe the facility parking lot in accordance with this SOW.

1. Purpose The purpose of this contract is to restore clear, visible, and compliant pavement markings to support safe vehicular circulation, pedestrian movement, ADA accessibility, and emergency access throughout the facility’s parking areas.

2. Scope of Work The Contractor shall provide full restriping services including site preparation, layout, removal or blackout of obsolete markings, and application of new traffic markings as specified. Work shall be completed in accordance with all federal, state, and local standards.

3. Applicable Documents and Standards The Contractor shall comply with the most current editions of:

• Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)

• Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards for Accessible Design

• Maryland Municipal Regulations for traffic markings

• Manufacturer specifications for all applied materials

• OSHA safety standards

4. Requirements and Technical Tasks

4.1 • Total Stalls: 965

• Standard stall size: 9 ft × 18 ft

• All parking stall lines shall be repainted using traffic marking paint with reflective glass beads for enhanced nighttime visibility.

• Lines must be straight, uniform, and fully compliant with MUTCD standards.

4.2 Stenciled Numbering

• Provide 12-inch stenciled numbering for spaces 1 through 965.

• All numbers must be consistent in placement, orientation, and font style.

• Use commercial-grade, high-durability traffic marking paint.

4.3 ADA-Compliant Handicap Markings

• Install 12 ADA-compliant handicap symbols, using blue and white traffic marking paint.

• All symbols meet ADA Standards for Accessible Design.

• Access aisles must include the required blue hash-marked striping.

• Method of Surveillance:

• Visual inspection prior to painting

• Performance Rating: Acceptable/Unacceptable

• Corrective Action: Contractor must re-clean and re-prep at no cost.

Performance Objective: Pavement Marking Restriping

• SOW Reference: Section 5.3

• Performance Standard:

• Lines straight, uniform width, proper alignment

• Symbols correctly placed and compliant with ADA, MUTCD

• Reflective beads applied where required

• Colors match regulatory standards

Method of Surveillance:

• 100% visual inspection upon completion

• Measurements as needed

• Performance Rating: Acceptable/Unacceptable

• Corrective Action: Redo work that fails compliance.

Performance Objective: ADA Compliance

• SOW Reference: Sections 5.1, 5.3, 3.0

• Performance Standard:

• Correct number and layout of ADA spaces

• Proper symbols and hash zones

• Van-accessible markings meet required dimensions

• Method:

• Visual inspection and measurement

• Performance Rating: Acceptable/Unacceptable

• Corrective Action: Contractor must bring markings into compliance.

Performance Objective: Work Schedule & Coordination

• SOW Reference: Section 5.5

• Performance Standard:

• Work Schedule submitted on time

• Lot closures coordinated effectively

• Minimal disruption to Government operations

• Method:

• COR review and daily progress monitoring

• Performance Rating:

• Acceptable/Unacceptable

• Corrective Action: Contractor must re-coordinate scheduling.

Performance Objective: Safety & Security Compliance

• SOW Reference: Section 5.6 and Section 9

• Performance Standard:

• Adherence to OSHA, MUTCD, ADA, and facility safety protocols

• Barricades, cones, and signage used appropriately

• All Contractor staff badged and checked-in

• Method:

• On-site observation

• Incident reports as required

• Performance Rating: Acceptable/Unacceptable

• Corrective Action: Immediate correction; repeated issues may result in cure notice.

Performance Objective: Deliverables

• SOW Reference: Section 6

• Performance Standard:

• Deliverables submitted on time and complete

• Reports accurate and formatted appropriately

• Method:

• Document review by COR

• Performance Rating:

• Acceptable/Unacceptable

• Corrective Action: Contractor must revise and resubmit.

3.0 Surveillance Methods

The Government will use the following monitoring methods:

• Direct observation – COR or facility staff visually inspect work.

• Periodic sampling – Spot checks of line dimensions, reflectivity, and layout.

• Review of reports – Daily progress reports and final completion documentation.

• Customer feedback – Reports from facility managers on access or disruption.

• Checklist inspections – Using project inspection forms tailored to striping.

Surveillance may be announced or unannounced.

4.0 Rating Scale

The contract uses a two-tier rating system suitable for construction-like compliance work:

1. Acceptable: Meets SOW requirements.

2. Unacceptable: Does not meet requirements; Contractor must correct deficiencies at no additional cost.

Repeated unacceptable performance may result in:

4.1.1 Cure notice

4.1.2 Suspension of work

4.1.3 Termination actions (per CO determination)

5.0 Documentation and Records

All QASP records shall be maintained by the COR and include:

5.1.1 Inspection checklists

5.1.2 Notes from site visits

5.1.3 Photos taken during inspections

5.1.4 Records of deficiencies and corrective action

5.1.5 Copies of reports and correspondence These records support:

5.1.6 Contractor performance evaluations (CPARS, if applicable)

5.1.7 Payment approval

5.1.8 Contract closeout

6.0 Risk Areas and Focus Points

The Government will pay special attention to:

5.1.9 ADA compliance (high visibility and regulatory risk)

5.1.10 Accuracy of layout versus existing configuration

5.1.11 Environmental controls near storm drains

5.1.12 Scheduling to avoid disruption of employee parking

5.1.13 Safety of pedestrians during work hours

1.4 Vegetation Removal

• Grass/weeds trimmed in marking areas Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

1.5 Surface Dryness

• No standing water or moisture Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

2. Pavement Markings Application

2.1 Standard Parking Stalls

• Lines uniform, correct width, straight

• Correct spacing Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

2.2 ADA & Van-Accessible Spaces

• Correct symbols and stenciling

• Hash zones correctly placed and sized

• Van-accessible markings correct

• Meets ADA 2010 Standards Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

2.3 Fire Lanes and Emergency Access

• “Fire Lane” markings legible

• Red/yellow curb paint consistent Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

2.4 Traffic Arrows & Directional Markings

• Correct orientation

• Proper dimensions Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

2.5 Stop Bars

• Proper width, alignment, reflectivity Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

2.6 Crosswalks

• Parallel lines uniform

• Correct spacing and width Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

2.7 Curb Painting

• Yellow/red curb paint applied neatly

• No overspray Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

3. Material Compliance

3.1 Paint Type

• High-durability pavement marking paint

• Meets MUTCD and SHA standards Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

3.2 Reflective Glass Beads

• Applied where specified Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

3.3 Material Data Sheets Provided

• All SDS and spec sheets submitted Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

4. Workmanship & Quality

4.1 Line Straightness & Consistency

• No waviness, breaks, or double lines Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

4.2 Coverage & Thickness

• Fully opaque, uniform application Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable

4.3 Overspray Control

• No paint on unintended surfaces Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

5. Safety & Compliance

5.1 OSHA and MUTCD Compliance

• Cones, barricades, signs used correctly Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

5.2 Pedestrian / Vehicle Safety

• Safe routing maintained during work Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

5.3 Contractor Badging and Access Control

• All personnel checked in Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

6. Documentation & Reporting

6.1 Daily Progress Reports Provided

• Accurate, complete, timely Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable Notes:

6.2 Final Completion Report

• Photos included

• Quantities documented

• Compliance certified Status: Acceptable / Unacceptable

EXHIBIT Draft

1. Assumptions

Inspection Result Summary

EXHIBIT