FY26 SBIR Pre-Solicitation Appendix A(508).pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
U. S. Department of Transportation Small Business Innovation Research Fiscal Year 2026 Phase I Solicitation
Solicitation number
6913G626QSBIR1
Issued by

About this file

This document is Appendix A containing the U.S. Department of Transportation Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Proposed Fiscal Year 2026 Phase I Research Topics. It outlines twelve research and development opportunities across five DOT agencies, each designed to address specific transportation safety, efficiency, and innovation challenges.

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) offers two topics: 26-FH1 seeks development of an edge AI-V2X integrated system for real-time traffic congestion detection and mitigation across multiple intersections, with Phase I deliverables including proof-of-concept architecture, hardware-in-the-loop testing, and transition plans for Phase II field deployment; 26-FH2 requires development of an automated mobile catch-basin inspection system using multi-sensor arrays and AI-powered data processing to enable vehicle-based inspections without manual grate removal. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) topic 26-FR1 calls for a mobile, trailer or skid-mounted system capable of safely discharging 400-1,000 kW of stored energy from rail propulsion lithium-ion battery energy storage systems (BESS) with remote operation capability, comprehensive safety interlocks, and interoperability with multiple original equipment manufacturers. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) topic 26-FT1 seeks an AI-powered complete trip planning tool that integrates multimodal transportation data and provides personalized, real-time navigation support addressing barriers to transit adoption across diverse user populations including individuals with disabilities.

The Office of the Secretary (OST) funds two topics: 26-OS1 targets development of predictive safety analytics for commercial transport using trusted intermediary data frameworks to securely aggregate industry telematics with public safety records, enabling proactive safety interventions; 26-OS2 seeks a freight corridor predictive intelligence system leveraging edge AI, generative AI, and federated learning to forecast freight bottlenecks and supply chain disruptions, achieving 80% prediction accuracy for 30–60 minute congestion forecasts with Phase II field pilots across 2–3 representative corridors and Phase III scalability to commercial platforms. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) offers four topics: 26-PH1 requires development of safe, cost-effective methods for removing residual energy from end-of-life lithium-ion batteries to enable safer transportation and rare earth mineral recovery; 26-PH2 calls for thermochromic coating systems that visibly indicate when hazardous materials packaging approaches dangerous internal temperatures with irreversible color changes at predetermined thresholds; 26-PH3 seeks self-repairing packaging materials or coatings for hazardous materials applications meeting existing packaging specifications while reducing transportation costs and extending packaging life; and 26-PH4 requires development of low-cost, easy-to-deploy solutions for rapidly suppressing lithium-ion battery fires across multiple battery chemistries with prevention of reignition and compatibility with existing emergency response protocols.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

APPENDIX A:

U.S. DOT SBIR Proposed Fiscal Year 2026

Phase I Research Topics

Contents Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

26-FH1: Edge AI-V2X Integrated Practical Solutions for Congestion Prevention and Mitigation

26-FH2: Automated Mobile Catch-basin Inspection System

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)

26-FR1: Mobile High-Power Emergency BESS De-energizer System for Rail Vehicle Propulsion ... 9

Federal Transit Administration (FTA)

26-FT1: Person-Centered, Carefree, Complete Trip Planning - Powered by AI

Office of the Secretary (OST)

26-OS1: Predictive Safety Analytics for Commercial Transport Modernization

26-OS2: Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

26-PH1: Increase End-of-Life Battery Safety and Recovery of Rare Earth Minerals

26-PH2: Thermal Indicator Coatings for Hazardous Materials Packaging Safety

26-PH3: Self-repairing Hazardous Materials Packaging

26-PH4: Improved Response to Lithium-ion Battery Fires

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)

About Us: FHWA’s Research, Development, and Technology (RD&T) Program identifies and addresses issues of national significance that other research sponsors cannot or will not address, including areas that require higher complexity, higher risk, longer term research, or specific Federal responsibility. The FHWA RD&T program’s activities produce a clear public benefit, support Federal stewardship roles, meet and address current and emerging needs and challenges, and ensure the coordination of highway RD&T activities.

FHWA’s RD&T program supports research and development to improve safety; the mobility of people and goods; stimulate growth, productiveness, and competitiveness; reduce congestion;

improve durability and extend the life of transportation infrastructure; accelerate project delivery;

and provide an approach that serves all road users.

26-FH1: Edge AI-V2X Integrated Practical Solutions for Congestion Prevention and Mitigation

Topic Description individual congestion may be local in terms of the scope of their impact, collectively they can as V2X (Vehicle-to-Everything) satellite) make it feasible to combine edge and cloud computing to enable real-time, adaptive and

. It can also aid in preventing or mitigating congestion, such as advising lane positioning at ramps, work zones, weaving zones, and detour for lane closures.

For example, AI systems can be engineered to deliver real-time detour recommendations in areas with large sporting maneuvers, such as lane changes, based on each vehicle's position and trip plan. These systems re it as approach- . It can also produce speed guidance for individual drivers depending on their positions on respective approaches to the intersection. Together, these outcomes can help most primarily focus on in-vehicle or single intersection edge computing rather than a cloud-server edge computing solution. With cloud-edge computing, the computing power, learning capabilities, and decision-

-mile by one-mile zone; or adaptively scoped by impact zone), with the total region de approach envisioned for this SBIR topic aligns with this latter category, which is cloud-edge computing.

detecting real-time congestion in a local or regional area, encompassing multiple intersections and roadways. The system will evaluate the situation and deliver e target recipients and preemptively prevent or mitigate congestion within the impacted zone, strategies, to a Transportation Management Center (TMC), and function as a complementary requires real-responses, and secure delivery of the location-impacted area. This requires advanced parallel data processing and decision-making capabilities, partition the data ingestion, parallel computing and decision-making workloads, and establish reliable and secure communication channels. To our knowledge, such integrated solutions are not yet available.

To enable such operational innovations, uncertainties and challenges remain regarding:

1.

vehicles’ trips accordingly;

2. How to partition detection, prediction, and decision workloads of the AI system between edge and cloud components;

3.

infrastructure;

4. How to reliably and securely deliver location-recipients within an impacted zone while under low levels of connected-vehicle penetration; and

5. If multiple local-AI agents are involved, how to seamlessly coordinate between them to achieve network-

Key innovations include:

1. Developing an integrative system assembling cloud-edge computing and AI with V2X and other secure communication technologies for real-mitigation;

2. -spatial coverages, with estimates in range of communication delays and security risks, and then selecting the best practices of the integration; and

3. Scaling up the application and deployment of edge computing, AI and V2X technologies to network-detectors and moving connected vehicle data sources), AI, edge and cloud computing, and diverse communication technologies to deliver the following functionalities:

1. Processing real-to predict or detect congestion within an impact zone, with its scope determined based on

2. Providing optimal operational recommendations to prevent or mitigate congestion within a local impact area (covering multiple intersections and roads prone to recurrent or include location-information from roadside infrastructure (e.g., signal phasing countdown timers) relative to the impact area.

3. Delivering human-centric advisories, designed and evaluated through human factors

4. Transmitting secure, location-trusted communication technologies, ensuring reliable and targeted delivery.

The workload of the system shall explicitly distinguish between:

Latency-sensitive tasks (e.g., real-time congestion detection, localized trajectory prediction, immediate advisories speed, lane assignment, detour) to be executed at the edge.

Data-heavy but non-real-time tasks (e.g., long-horizon prediction, model training, network-wide analysis) to be managed in the cloud.

The system's workload partition and communication technology selection will be designed with privacy, regulatory compliance, resilience to connectivity disruptions, and AI model lifecycle requirements in mind. The integrative system assembling edge, AI, and V2X will complement existing critical infrastructure by leveraging input data from these systems without interference, -time es— — critical infrastructure.

Proposers are encouraged, but not restricted, to utilize data from legacy sensing sources on accessible networks. They may also incorporate data from emerging technologies or third-party

-of-concept, archived historical data from a selected citywide network can be used to develop and test algorithms and system architecture, provided the system is designed to transition seamlessly to real-time data feeds in Phase II.

Proposers are also encouraged to leverage existing infrastructure such as roadside sensing, -to-implement secure V2X and other communication technologies to avoid major extra infrastructure requirements. Collaboration with state or local agencies is encouraged to support implementation and data integration.

Proposers are encouraged to make the product function for operation recommended recipients with diverse V2X and other current secure communication capacities, such as mobile users, transit penetration scenarios.

Desired Outcomes Phase I Phase I shall deliver a proof-of-concept system consisting of AI, edge unit, cloud sever and V2X can detect local congestion and issue location- ories that would contain the spatial growth of congestion. The proof-of-data and validated within a hardware-in-the-loop testbed.

The product shall include human-centric design to convey the same advisory information in and user comprehension.

Hardware-in-the-loop simulation testing should demonstrate the feasibility of the architecture, scenarios. Archived historic data sources, readily substitutable by real-time data feeds, can be predict/detect real-detour, merge, continue) tailored to a vehicle’s location within the impact zone, and securely deliver the location- -centric advisories to the intended recipients. The test shall also compare the conditions without a travel advisory to those in which a certain percentage of drivers receive, accept, and follow the travel advisory. This analysis will help quantify the potential system-

-AI-V2X system prototype in the following aspects:

Data sources used in Phase I and how the data can be transitioned to live data inputs in

Phase II;

The known, ready-to-implement secure V2X communication (such as C-V2X (5G/4G/LTE), Satellite, etc.) or other communication technologies that may be integrated into the system;

AI algorithms for processing data, identifying congestion, and approaches used in formulating congestion mitigation strategies;

The system’s architecture design for integrating edge, AI, V2X and other communication, such as workloads distribution and data transfer between edge and cloud platforms and the receiving terminals;

Hardware-in-the-loop test design and initial simulation results for the technical feasibility of the proposed Edge-AI-V2X system prototype, building upon that framework; and

Possible in Phase II

Phase II The Phase II product is a system integration and implementation of the architecture design acting for testing the product’s performance and scalability and enable the research team and the Government to assess the system’s computing and communication latencies, data accuracy, and security risks.

advisory panel, including the AI algorithm, schemes for partitioning the computing loads tion technologies.

Enhance the advisory messaging designs by conducting more human factor tests to improve the user comprehension and regulatory compliance.

-trained edge and cloud AI algorithms to produce real-time congestion mitigation advisories, and securely deliver location- (intended recipients, such as cell phones, tablets, roadside units, TMCs and L2 and above vehicles)

Provide a cost- -related operating costs and potential revenue streams to sustain the operation of the

References

Freeway Operational Strategies

Examples of previously funded work to better understand interest and avoid duplication of effort include:

An Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based System for Advanced Freeway Data Collection and Analysis, Intelligent Automation, Inc.

A Wireless Sensor Network with Accurate Time Synchronization and Wide Area Coverage for Traffic Signal Timing Analysis, Intelligent Automation, Inc.

Simulating Signal Phase and Timing with an Intersection Collision Avoidance Traffic Model, Harmonia Holding Group, LLC

Edge Server-Based AI Application for Dilemma Zone and Traffic Conflict Events Detection, Aiwaysion Inc.

Delivering In-Vehicle Messages in Temporary Work Zones, Savari Inc.

26-FH2: Automated Mobile Catch-basin Inspection System

Topic Description Currently, there is a trend among state and federal regulatory agencies to require that state DOTs perform frequent or regular catch-basin inspections as part of their Nonpoint Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. This is a time-consuming process that includes pulling onto the side of the road, removing the cover grate, and measuring water, sediment, and trash levels. Inspections also are needed to detect catch-basin conditions because failure or clogging can lead to stormwater ponding on the pavement, which can cause hydroplaning accidents and loss of they commonly own tens of thousands of catch basins dispersed widely across sprawling road networks. Additionally, the roadside environment can be hazardous with hundreds of fatalities and thousands of injuries every year. Therefore, development of a vehicle with a crash attenuator that carries a multi-sensor boom to collect data by multiple sensors (such as optical, lidar, radar, thermal, and/or radiation) as the vehicle travels past catch basins at slow to moderate speeds could provide preliminary inspections at low cost with little danger. The data collected could be telligence (AI) system that would do image and data processing to infer conditions within each catch basin. The system would need testing and calibration to ensure that meaningful measurements could be collected by a vehicle while on-the move, without removing the cover grate, and that the measurements taken could be reliably interpreted by an AI

-out teams on the subset of catch basins that require near-term maintenance. This research would improve environmental decision-making and improve highway operations.

Desired Outcomes Phase I development of the sensor array and data processing system. Phase I will culminate with a working scale prototype of the sensor array, examples of image and data processing results, and preliminary design details for a full-scale device. In addition, Phase I will be used to identify potential partnerships with testing/research organizations that can provide independent, third-party evaluations of the full-scale device. Interest from potential manufacturing or deployment partners for moving from product to commercialization may also be explored. By the conclusion of Phase I, the developers will have a path towards a clear commercialization plan for Phase II.

Phase II Phase II will include the development of a full-scale prototype with road testing and evaluation in a controlled road-side setting, preferably with a state or local agency. The research and testing will interpretation system using results of manual catch-basin inspections. Findings from testing would be used to ensure that results from mobile automated inspections would meet the needs of state DOTs and the requirements of regulatory agencies. In addition, results can be used toward marketing the performance of the device to potential buyers. This phase may also include plans for intellectual property protection.

Ballinger, C.A., and Gade, R.H. 1973, Evaluation of the structural behavior of typical highway inlet grates, with recommended structural design criteria: Federal Highway Administration, 81 p. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/36583

No. 22, Publication No. FHWA-HIF-24-006, https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/74311/dot_74311_DS1.pdf

FHWA, 2024, Catch basin, type 1: FHWA Federal Lands Specification Standard 604-1, 2

p. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/std-drawings/Std604-1.pdf

FHWA, 2024, Catch basin, type 2, with down drain: FHWA Federal Lands Specification Standard 604-4, 2 p. https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/std-drawings/Std604-4.pdf FHWA, 2024, Inlet, Type 6B: FHWA Federal Lands Specification Standard 604-7, 2 p.

https://highways.dot.gov/federal-lands/std-drawings/Std604-7.pdf Law, S.M., Vaccaro, S.J. 1972, Evaluation of catch basin grates: Louisiana Department of Highways, LA Department of Highways evaluation of catch basin grates

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) About Us: FRA’s research, development, and technology (RD&T) mission is to ensure the safe, efficient, and reliable movement of people and goods by rail through basic and applied research, and development of innovative solutions strategic goals because safety-focused projects typically yield solutions toward state of good repair, economic competitiveness, and environmental sustainability goals. The RD&T program also has an important role to play in workforce development.

FRA’s RD&T program is founded on an understanding of safety risks in the industry. Hazard identification and risk analysis allows us to identify opportunities to reduce the likelihood of accidents and incidents, and to limit the consequences of hazardous events, should they occur.

Key strategies to these ends include stakeholder engagement, project prioritization, cost-effective research procurement, and partnerships with other researchers such as the Association of American Railroads (AAR), the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association (ASLRRA), industry, labor, and academia.

26-FR1: Mobile High-Power Emergency BESS De-energizer System for Rail Vehicle Propulsion

Topic Description Rail rolling stock is increasingly adopting high-voltage lithium-ion battery energy storage systems (BESS) for propulsion. Post-accident or during heavy maintenance, these BESS packs can retain hazards during human access. There is a need for a mobile, rugged, safe, and interoperable system -load

(neutralize) a minimum of 400 kW of stored energy from rail propulsion BESS prior to moving, storing, or performing hands-on maintenance. This topic supports the Federal Railroad Administration’s safety priorities by reducing risk to responders and maintenance personnel and enabling safer post-accident vehicle handling and repair.

This topic seeks to develop a concept and subsequent prototype mobile system (skid or trailer mounted) that can: safely connect to a damaged or intact rail propulsion BESS (typical HV DC 600– 1000 V); discharge or transfer at least 400 kW of stored energy through controlled, monitored means (resistive dump, regenerative transfer to grid or secondary energy sink, or hybrid approaches); ; provide comprehensive safety interlocks and diagnostics; and be operable by trained emergency response teams and railroad routine use in maintenance shops. The system can have applicability for use in the marine and bus transit sectors as well.

-load capacity of 400 kW scalable to 1,000 kW.

–1,000 V DC.

Peak continuous current range: up to ~1,500 A; dependent on voltage.

System deployment via trailer or skid mountable mobile vehicle with capability of operating over road and railroad tracks.

Rapid connect/disconnect high voltage interfaces with standardized adaptors and insulated connectors.

Safety features should allow for remote operation capability, high voltage isolation and interlocks, ground fault detection, arc-indicators.

Operational modes should include controlled resistive discharge, regenerative transfer to grid or local energy sink, or controlled discharge for degraded or damaged packs.

Communication: secure telemetry for remote control and data logging; capability to integrate with incident command systems.

Interoperability: adaptors and procedures to support multiple OEM battery access

Standards conformance: adherence to applicable electrical and battery safety standards. A full review of recommended standard compliance should be completed in Phase I.

Environmental consideration: operable outdoors at accident sites. System must be temperature and precipitation tolerant. Rail vehicle maintenance shops are characterized by high ceilings, narrow clearance between maintenance tracks.

Human factors: the system must have controls and user interface suitable for use by trained emergency responders and railroad employees; equipped with clear status indicators, sensors, alerts, and checklists.

Maintenance and training: Digital training manual and user guide must be provided.

procedures.

To the extent possible, system must use commercially available components for manufacturing and maintenance.

mobile discharge/load bank systems used in EV test labs and motorsport, but none are commercially available for rail applications.

Partnership with a rail industry stakeholder is required. Rail industry stakeholders can include passenger railroads, such as Amtrak, commuter rail providers/operators (state departments of transportation or contracted operators), freight railroads, rail vehicle manufacturers and battery suppliers providing BESS to rail manufacturers.

Lithium-ion battery chemistries used for rail propulsion are nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC), Lithium-ion titanate oxide (LTO), lithium iron phosphate (LFP).

-load system capable of handling a minimum of 400kw of stored energy, including mechanical layout of the system, power electronics approach (resistive, regenerative, hybrid), cooling strategy, and connector/adaptor strategy for rail propulsion BESS interfaces.

Comprehensive safety standards and regulatory gap analysis identifying all applicable standards and recommended conformance plan.

Risk assessment and mitigation strategy for accident-scene scenarios such as compromised packs, high impedance faults, thermal runaway risk, and recommended safety features and interlocks.

high-level cost estimate for a Phase II prototype.

A commercialization and deployment plan identifying primary customers, use cases, likely procurement paths, and preliminary test/demonstration plan.

associated adapter kits, including:

Remote operation and monitoring software with logging, incident reporting, and secure communications.

Detailed operator and maintenance training materials, standard operating procedures, emergency procedures, and a training guide for emergency responders and railroad employees.

Field demonstration and validation at one or more rail maintenance facilities or controlled accident simulation site(s), with measured performance data and after-action safety assessment.

A commercialization package: manufacturing plan, unit cost estimates, and pilot agreements or letters of interest from potential customers.

No additional references for rail applications.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA) About Us: The Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) mission is to improve America’s communities through public transportation. We envision a better quality of life for all built on public transportation excellence. The Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation, which directs FTA's research program, provides industry and policy makers with the information and skills to make good business decisions about transit technology, operational, and capital investments. The program uses research results to identify best practices and shares this information with others who can benefit from it. Through its research, FTA shows a range of outcomes that help direct where future transit investments should be made.

26-FT1: Person-Centered, Carefree, Complete Trip Planning - Powered by

AI

Topic Description Travelling by public transportation can be challenging. This is especially true if the trip 1) may involve more than one mode, 2) is not completed within the traditional 9 am – 5 pm commuting pattern, 3) crosses multiple jurisdictions, 4) is in a rural or frontier area, or 5) changes day to day.

stymy even the most seasoned transit user, and which certainly stand in the way of a broader slice of the American population choosing public transportation to meet their needs.

The thoughtful examination of the challenges facing (potential) transit riders is referred to as the Complete Trip. This begins with the conception of the possibility of using transit and includes learning how to: 1) plan for and pay for a trip; 2) travel across the streets as a pedestrian; and 3) know where to go, when to go, and how to adapt to changes. Removing barriers at each step of the Complete Trip can open the potential of transit as a useful choice to many more travelers, with all the attendant be

Current trip planning apps provide today’s travelers with a great deal of information; however, they do little to resolve key elements of the Complete Trip, starting with conceiving of transit as an option. Today, a user must choose to investigate the transit option. They then must delve further to learn all the small details that can help complete their trip such as payment, accessibility, and timing.

We believe that a thoughtfully developed, AI-powered system can resolve the challenges of the Complete Trip. By learning a person’s preferences and travel needs, an AI tool can provide the user e also responding to challenges as they arise in a way that meets that person’s needs. A smart system can make transit an easy, logical choice for many more people. This SBIR topic seeks to investigate the idea that an AI system can be developed that would place comprehensive, comprehensible, and actionable information addressing the myriad challenges of the Complete Trip in the hands of travelers.

The tool to be developed must empower travelers across each segment of the Complete Trip, including trip planning and payment, as well as enroute navigation support across the streetscapes, transit stations and vehicles. A successful prototype will empower the traveler to know when to choose transit. It will also use its capacity to learn to recommend a trip plan that best meets the needs of each person, for each trip. This can provide comparable options for the traveler to make an informed decision on whether to choose transit or another mode of travel.

To do so, the system must be able to collect and bring together data from a range of transportation-cycle path options, etc.). This is a task that requires adherence to existing data standards and necessitates the creation of others. It is also imperative that data be presented in a clear, easy to understand, and actionable way to travelers, whoever they are.

ensuring the tool provides independent travel for all users, including those with diverse physical or cognitive needs. Beyond usability, however, this tool must proactively understand and address travel challenges facing people with disabilities as easily as it would for other travelers.

A Phase I project will result in a proof-of concept report that describes a prototype AI-powered traveler support system. Desired deliverables for this technology would include research to demonstrate technical feasibility during Phase I and show a path toward Phase II software development culminating in delivery of a software package at the completion of the Phase II contract.

Phase II Phase II will result in the development of a minimally viable product (MVP) version of the tool. This MVP must demonstrate the following:

The broad potential sources of data available to support Complete Trips.

Diverse user needs and applied principles of multimodality and universal design to ensure the AI system can support a wide range of travelers.

System Design

An AI system that can address the user needs, create a novel experience, and respond to changes in both user behavior and the mobility data ecosystem.

Prototype and Technical Implementation

Developed the technical architecture and initial algorithms necessary to integrate the data

Produced an interactive demonstration prototype that demonstrates real-time trip planning and personalized updates.

Testing & Validation

Conducted early usability and performance testing to validate the core functionality and documented how the system performs across sample scenarios.

Gathered and properly assessed user feedback from sample scenarios to provide support for future improvements.

Documentation

A Phase II report summarizing the design, prototype capabilities, testing results, and recommendations for next steps beyond Phase II.

Written software documentation listing dependencies and user instructions that demonstrate well-maintained code.

Mobility Data – https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/2024-08/FTA-Report-No-267.pdf

Mobility Standards and Guidelines Resource (MSGR) Tool https://maasresources.com/

Mobility Data Interoperability Principles (MDIP) https://www.interoperablemobility.org/

Mobility Data (Data Standards) https://mobilitydata.org/

Routing Algorithms – Established Literature o Non-Preference

(PDF) Optimization of cold chain multimodal transportation routes considering carbon emissions under hybrid uncertainties

Robust Optimization of Multimodal Transportation Route Selection Based

Transportation Optimal routing and request selection for multiple service routes in a demand-adaptive transit system | Frontiers of Engineering Management o Preference based

-Modal Route Planning: An Efficient Solution

[2502.14528] Dynamic Preference-based Multi-modal Trip Planning of Public Transport and Shared Mobility

A data-driven preference learning approach for multi-objective vehicle routing problems in last-mile delivery - ScienceDirect

Predicting transit crowdedness (Literature and a source) o TransitCrowd: Estimating Subway Stations Demand with Mobile Crowdsensing Data

| Data Science for Transportation o Crowdsourced Transit predictions - Transit Partners Help

Office of the Secretary (OST) About Us: The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), works at the dynamic intersection of new and emerging technologies, transportation data, policy, research and all modes of transportation across the Department. Our mission is to facilitate the transformation of our transportation system–making it safer, more efficient, competitive, and accessible. To do this, we:

Advance innovation, technology development, and breakthrough knowledge Facilitate research and multimodal research collaboration Foster technology transfer through partnerships both within the Department and with other

Federal agencies, academia and private entities Provide decision makers with useful statistics and information of the highest quality and integrity Develop a skilled interdisciplinary transportation workforce for the nation

OST-R coordinates the Department’s research investment, oversees the development of Annual Modal Research Plans, and provides opportunities for research collaboration with public and private sector partners.

26-OS1: Predictive Safety Analytics for Commercial Transport Modernization

Topic Description collaborative environment where government and industry work together to apply cutting-edge -driven predictive analytics to assist the industry in moving toward a proactive, prevention-based safety culture.

Current safety methodologies primarily utilize historical data to understand past events. This R&D before incidents occur. By identifying patterns early, a data-driven approach can support proactive reliability.

A central component of this research is the exploration of "Trusted Intermediary" architectures.

Recognizing the importance of data privacy and commercial sensitivity, this approach seeks to design secure frameworks where voluntary industry data (such as telematics) can be fused with public safety records. This system would prioritize data protection, ensuring that safety insights are generated without compromising proprietary information.

The proposed solution will focus on analyzing these combined data streams to provide actionable insights that optimize safety resource allocation. By leveraging cloud-based computing and advanced modeling, the system aims to create a safety ecosystem that reduces preventable incidents. Furthermore, the system will adhere to "explainability" principles, providing clear reasoning for its safety assessments to ensure transparency and build trust among all transportation stakeholders.

This topic seeks tools that optimize the use of predictive analytics in support of the integration, below.

Secure Collaborative Data Frameworks: Research into "Trusted Intermediary" systems that securely aggregate and anonymize diverse data sets to generate safety insights while

Proactive Safety Indicators: The use of historical data and real-time external feeds (such as weather and infrastructure conditions) to identify "leading indicators" of safety anomalies, enabling preventative measures that save lives and reduce costs.

highest projected need, minimizing disruptions to safe operators.

Transparent & Explainable AI: Development of models that provide understandable, Comprehensive Health Modeling: Exploration of diverse factors—including maintenance trends and environmental conditions—

Phase I shall demonstrate the technical feasibility and deliver a proof-of-concept system design.

This includes a high-level architecture for a Trusted Intermediary and a predictive modeling strategy. The design should demonstrate how disparate data elements can be securely harmonized to generate proactive safety insights. Key outcomes will include a validated framework, an initial prototype design, and supporting analyses showing the system’s potential to improve safety using AI-driven analytics.

Phase II Phase II will focus on developing, validating, and demonstrating a fully functional prototype of the decision-support tool for pilot testing. The model will be built using standardized formats ensuring interoperability to enable broader deployment. Field demonstrations will be conducted to evaluate performance, usability, and the ability to reduce risk. A commercialization and transition plan identifying market pathways, partnerships, and strategies for Phase III scaling will be developed.

potential for modernizing industry safety.

ISO 21448 - Safety of the Intended Functionality (SOTIF): Applies to systems where proper situational awareness is critical for safety, particularly Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and high-level autonomous driving.

(Proposed) SELF DRIVE Act of 2026: House discussion draft focused on updating federal motor vehicle safety law for vehicles equipped with automated driving systems.

ISO/PAS 8800: Covers safety-related systems that include one or more electrical and/or electronic (E/E) systems that use AI technology.

-2026): Federal roadmap emphasizing the shift toward digitally intelligent infrastructure and connected corridors.

26-OS2: Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence of the Secretary . Freight congestion predictive capability. This topic is seeking a Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence tool. Such a tool would investigate the blending of real-time edge analytics, generative AI), and federated learning to enhance both public and private freight operational decision-making and to gain system-other DOT modes (e.g., FHWA, FMSCA, MARAD) and supports the Administration’s priorities in AI and freight simultaneously.

Two overarching objectives are desired: 1) develop an AI-enabled predictive system that fuses multimodal data sources to forecast freight bottlenecks and supply chain disruptions along critical nthetic data generation, and federated learning to deliver proactive corridor management tools for state and local DOTs and private sector freight operators.

Across SBIR phases, the solution will incrementally meet the following high-

Phase I: Demonstrate a functional predictive AI architecture capable of integrating and analyzing combined real-world and synthetic freight datasets, achieving baseline corridor-level prediction accuracy of at least 80% for short-term (30–60 minute) congestion and delay forecasts.

–3 representative freight corridors (urban, rural, and intermodal) featuring real-time data ingestion from sensors, GPS, and connected vehicle feeds, and deliver a decision dashboard with automated alerting and visualization capabilities.

Phase III: Implement and validate system scalability and interoperability with commercial telematics platforms, freight carrier systems, and state and local DOT operations platforms, achieving near-real-time predictive updates (<5 minutes latency) and readiness for larger scale deployment and commercialization.

The proposed solution will meet the following high-level technical parameters:

1) Deploy low-power edge AI devices at strategic freight bottlenecks (e.g., interchanges, bridges) to enable real-time monitoring and analytics with minimal connectivity requirements;

2) Create the ability to integrate multimodal public and private data sources—including GPS, weigh-in-motion (WIM), weather, work zones truck parking availability (based on historic parking data and predictive algorithms to forecast parking availability by time of day and day of week), and connected vehicle (CV) feeds—into an integrated predictive intelligence framework;

3) and system disruptions for scenario testing;

4) Apply federated learning methods to enhance model accuracy across multiple jurisdictions while preserving data privacy and proprietary logistics information; and

5) Provide a cloud-hosted, web and mobile accessible decision-support dashboard compatible with common enterprise platforms (e.g., ArcGIS, Power BI, Tableau) for visualizing corridor performance analysis.

By the end of Phase I, the project will have demonstrated the technical feasibility and proof of concept for the proposed freight corridor predictive intelligence initiative. Key outcomes will include a validated framework, an initial prototype design, and supporting analyses showing the system’s ability to forecast freight corridor performance using AI-driven predictive analytics.

Conceptual Architecture and System Design: Develop a high-level system architecture outlining data elements (traffic, freight, work zones, weather, incidents), predictive modeling, and user dashboard components. The design will show how real-time and historical data streams can be integrated to generate corridor-level insights.

Prototype Predictive Model (Proof of Concept): Build a preliminary model for a selected freight corridor or segment to demonstrate how machine learning and data fusion can predict short-term corridor performance metrics such as travel time reliability, congestion probability, and truck delay.

Data Inventory and Integration Plan: Compile and assess freight, supply chain, and traffic data from public and private sources (e.g., NPMRDS, Freight Analysis Framework, ATRI and system infrastructure data including authorized truck routes, bridge clearance, and weight limits). Develop a data integration strategy defining access methods, availability, and preprocessing steps for Phase II implementation.

Performance Metrics and Validation Approach: Define measurable evaluation criteria (e.g., accuracy, timeliness, completeness) and identify candidate corridors for Phase II validation. Conduct preliminary benchmarking to assess model scalability and sensitivity.

Commercial and Implementation Readiness Assessment: Evaluate Phase II commercialization pathways, partnerships, and integration opportunities with state DOTs, MPOs, and logistics data providers to support transition to a deployable prototype.

The final report should summarize findings, prototype performance, data gaps, and recommended next steps for Phase II, in accordance with SBIR requirements.

Phase II will focus on developing, validating, and demonstrating a fully functional prototype of the Freight Corridor Predictive Intelligence (FCPI) system. The effort will transition the Phase I concept into an operational decision-support platform capable of real-time freight corridor prediction and performance analytics for transportation agencies, freight carries, and logistics partners.

Develop and integrate an operational prototype that combines multimodal freight datasets (traffic, WIM, GPS, weather, truck parking, and connected vehicle feeds) through a unified predictive analytics framework compatible with DOT and commercial systems.

Refine and validate predictive models using large-scale, real-world data from 2–3 pilot corridors, targeting defined accuracy for short-term (30–60 minute) forecasts.

Implement federated and edge AI capabilities to enable distributed model learning and real-time processing while preserving data privacy.

Deliver a cloud-based, web-accessible dashboard (compatible with ArcGIS, Power BI, etc.)

to visualize corridor conditions, predictive trends, and recommended responses.

Conduct field demonstrations with at least two significant freight corridors that are represented by state DOTs, one regional freight partner, and potentially two private sector freight carriers and logistics providers to evaluate performance, usability, and scalability.

Develop a commercialization and transition plan identifying market pathways, partnerships, and licensing strategies for Phase III.

Anticipated Phase II Deliverables

Fully integrated prototype with real-time analytics and dashboard functionality.

Pilot test reports and validation results from selected corridors.

Technical documentation and system design materials.

Performance and evaluation report summarizing model accuracy and system scalability.

Commercialization and transition plan outlining Phase III market readiness.

Final Phase II report consolidating technical results and lessons learned.

References:

(2025):

Systematic academic review identifying over 70 unique AI use cases across freight logistics and supply chain management.

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prediction of Road Freight Transportation (2017):

Demonstrates AI and ML applications for forecasting road freight transport trends using Bayesian networks and smoothing methods.

FHWA Freight Demand Modeling & Data Improvement (SHRP2 C20 Project Results):

decision-making.

Freight Corridor Digital Twin Optimization Market Outlook (2024): Market analysis describing trends and technologies in freight corridor optimization and digital twin markets.

Automated Freight Corridor Assessment (ATRI/INRIX) (2018): Data-driven approach to identify corridors best suited for autonomous freight operations based on volume, congestion, and incident data.

TRB / NCFRP Freight Research Collection: Series of reports providing guidance on freight data collection, modeling, and sharing; multiple resources that are foundational to corridor predictive modeling and analytics.

CSCMP State of Logistics Report (2024): Annual report summarizing freight and logistics trends, technology adoption, cost pressures, and resiliency factors shaping freight corridor operations.

CSCMP White Paper--The Threat of Resiliency and Sustainability in Global Supply Chain Management: Expectations for 2025: Discusses emerging risks and strategies in global supply chains, highlighting the growing need for predictive intelligence and resilient freight operations.

TRB / NCFRP Report 38 — Guide for Conducting Benefit-Cost Analyses of Multimodal, Multijurisdictional Freight Corridor Investments (2017): Comprehensive guide for evaluating freight corridor investments using benefit-cost frameworks; relevant to quantifying predictive intelligence benefits.

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

(PHMSA)

About Us: The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) operates in a dynamic and challenging environment where advances in technology, manufacturing, and energy production impact transportation safety. PHMSA’s mission is to protect people and the environment by advancing the safe transportation of energy and other hazardous materials that are essential to our daily lives.

PHMSA’s Pipeline Safety Research Program sponsors research and development projects focused on providing near-safety, reduce environmental impact, and enhance reliability. Recent R&D projects are focused on leak detection; detection of mechanical damage; damage prevention; improved pipeline system controls, monitoring, and operations; and improvements in pipeline materials. These projects are addressing technological solutions that can quickly be implemented to improve pipeline safety.

PHMSA’s Office of Hazardous Materials Safety carries out a national safety program, including security matters, to protect against the risks to life and property inherent in the transportation of hazardous materials in commerce by all transportation modes. The office regulates the transportation of hazardous materials by air, rail, highway, and water. Over 1.3 million hazardous material products are transported daily over the various transportation modes. The Office of Hazardous Material Safety seeks to improve the safety and reliability of hazardous material transportation.

26-PH1: Increase End-of-Life Battery Safety and Recovery of Rare Earth Minerals

Topic Description Shipping end-of-life lithium-transport. This risk drives up shipping costs and, in turn, the cost of recapturing rare earth minerals.

Rare earth minerals, such as lithium, are essential to support national security and the economy as stated in E.O. 14272. Ensuring National Security and Economic Resilience Through Section 232 Actions on Processed Critical Minerals and Derivative Products1.

To address this issue, PHMSA is seeking a small business to develop a safe, fast, and cost-method for removing residual energy, eliminating the primary hazard and potentially paving the way for regulatory relief and market expansion. PHMSA previously collaborated with the Naval Research Laboratory on the development of a conductive gel designed to neutralize stranded energy and is

1 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/04/18/2025-06836/ensuring-national-security-and-economic-resilience-through-section-232-actions-on-processed-critical now exploring additional strategies or alternative technologies that can be commercialized for broader use.

By the end of Phase I, the awardee will produce a proof-of concept or working prototype that clearly

-of-life lithium-ion batteries. While the solution does not need to be fully optimized, it should show strong technical also seeks to see growth in strategic relationships with early adopters, industry stakeholders, and a potential pilot partner, that will support future testing, validation, and commercialization. These outcomes will help accelerate the development of practical, scalable solutions that enhance safety, reduce costs, and support regulatory innovation.

Phase II method with a focus on cost-beyond proof-of-concept and develop a solution that is practical for real-world application. In addition to technical advancement, the business should be prepared to initiate pilot testing with early adopters and have established relationships that support the transition to commercialization.

sure the solution is scalable, market-ready, and capable of improving -ion battery supply chain.

References Example of accident involving end-of-life lithium-ion batteries:

https://abc3340.com/newsletter-daily/truck-carrying-batteries-explodes-in-birmingham-lithium-explosion- -daniel-payne-hazmat-hazardous-smoke

Report on the cost to recycle end of life batteries:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405829725000364

Conductive Gel report from Naval Research Lab: https://www.mdpi.com/2313- 0105/11/5/201

26-PH2: Thermal Indicator Coatings for Hazardous Materials Packaging Safety

Topic Description responders lack simple, visible failure indicators that signal when hazardous materials packaging is approaching dangerous internal temperatures. While certain hazmat markings are familiar to seasoned HAZMAT professionals, non-HAZMAT-trained responders, such as law enforcement who

, are often less familiar with these markings. This gap, combined with the absence of visual cues about evolving hazards, increases the risk of responder incidents. An intuitive thermal stress indicator would provide critical early warning of rising internal

PHMSA is seeking the development of a thermochromic coating system that can be applied to the external sides of hazardous materials packaging. The proposed coating would change color in r of internal thermal stress or technology preference, it may consider ceramic-based coatings, polymer composites, or nano-enhanced paints that would integrate temperature-sensitive pigments. The system should be low-cost, lightweight, durable under transport and weathering, and scalable to industrial applications.

The solution should not interfere with the outer packaging nor be incompatible with any hazardous material commodities.

The proposed coating must visibly change color at pre-determined temperature thresholds. Color change must be irreversible or long-lasting enough to provide meaningful information to r an incident. It must maintain coating adhesion, visibility, and durability under routine operational exposure; and it must be visible under low-light and smoke conditions. The proposed coating must be compatible with certain hazmat packaging substrates such as steel, aluminum, or other composites. Prototypes should undergo bench-

At the end of Phase I, the small business will demonstrate a proof-of-concept thermochromic coating based on laboratory results. The coating should be able to demonstrate distinct temperature threshold color changes, providing visible indicators when a material is exposed to rising internal heat levels. The initial testing should demonstrate the coating’s adhesion to common substrate materials, its durability under repeated use, and the repeatability of its color-change response under controlled thermal exposure conditions.

Additionally, the small business will include feasibility and initial test data reports that document a structured plan for scaling the application of the coating to larger surfaces.

Phase II Phase II will focus on advancing the technology from laboratory proof-of-concept toward full-scale testing. The small business is expected to develop pilot-scale formulations and produce larger area coating samples suitable for evaluation. The coating will be validated through testing under performance in realistic emergency incidents. Additionally, the coatings must demonstrate durability under long-term operational stressors such as ultraviolet radiation, weathering, impact, and abrasion. The small business will also engage with transportation end-users such as tank car operators, trucking companies, and emergency response organizations. These end users should be involved in pilot demonstrations to ensure that the coatings meet operational needs and integrate into existing safety practices.

Behavior of Thermochromic Coatings under Thermal Exposure; Z. Tatí ková et al., 2023 -https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/13/3/642 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1385894724014529

26-PH3: Self-repairing Hazardous Materials Packaging

Self-repairing materials are used in construction, automotive, and other industries to repair cracks not been approved or used yet in HAZMAT transportation despite the importance of packaging integrity on HAZMAT safety. While performance packaging standards help ensure packages meet a certain level of robustness, incidents can still occur during transportation when packaging integrity is compromised. Metals can crack/corrode, external forces can cause damage (crushing, punctures, or dents), excessive heat can cause deformation, and materials can simply wear over time. Being able to save on packaging damage could not only increase safety but also save direct costs in the HAZMAT transportation industry.

Research on self-repairing materials explores applications in electronics, polymers, corrosion…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .