FY23 ORC_Carolina Group_PWS_Draft.pdf

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

FOR

CAROLINA GROUP

OPTIMIZED REMEDIATION CONTRACT

AT

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON-AIR, SOUTH CAROLINA

JOINT BASE CHARLESTON-WEAPONS, SOUTH CAROLINA

NORTH AUXILIARY AIRFIELD, SOUTH CAROLINA

SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA

CONTRACT NUMBER:

DATE

FY21 Version 1.4

Contents

1.0 SCOPE

1.1 INTRODUCTION

1.2 OVERVIEW OF ORC SCOPE AND REQUIREMENTS

1.2.1 Scope Discussion and Limits

1.2.2 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection, Remedial Investigation or Remedial Investigation/Feasibility

Study (including Supplemental Investigations), and Decision Document

1.2.3 Response Complete or Site Closeout

1.2.4 Remedial Action-Operation with Optimization

1.2.5 Remedial Action-Operation and Reduce Life Cycle Cost; Long Term Management and Reduce Life

Cycle Cost

1.2.6 Remedial Action-Operation or Long Term Management (as appropriate)

1.2.7 Alternate Objectives

1.3 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

1.3.1 Table 1: Performance Table

1.3.2 Additional Scope Discussion and Limits

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND PROPERTY

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN AND WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE

4.2 SCHEDULE AND PLANNING REQUIREMENTS – INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE

4.3 MILESTONE PAYMENT SCHEDULE

4.4 COST AND STATUS REPORTING

4.5 ORC DOCUMENT REPOSITORY

4.6 MEETING AND CONFERENCE REQUIREMENTS

4.6.1 Meeting/Teleconference Support

4.6.2 Public Meetings and Hearings

4.7 SPATIAL DATA (MAP) REQUIREMENTS

4.8 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

4.9 PERMITS

4.9.1 Environmental Permits

4.9.2 Rights of Access to Non-AF Real Property

4.10 PHOTO DOCUMENTATION

4.11 REMOTE AND/OR AUSTERE SITES

4.12 SITE ACCESS

4.13 WORKSITE ACTIVITIES AND COORDINATION

4.13.1 Coordination of Activities

4.13.2 Radiological Waste, Hazardous Material, and Hazardous Waste Permitting and Reporting

5.0 CHEMISTRY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE

5.2 LABORATORY SELECTION

5.3 ANALYTICAL DATA MANAGEMENT

5.4 RECORD KEEPING

5.5 PERFLUOROOCTANE SULFONATE AND PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS

6.0 PLANS AND REPORTS

6.1 QUALITY PROGRAM PLANS

6.1.1 Work Plans

6.1.2 Health and Safety Plan

6.1.3 Construction Quality Plan

6.2 TECHNICAL PLANS AND REPORTS

7.0 SITE WORK

7.1 CONSERVATION

7.2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION AND FIELD INVESTIGATION

7.3 SITE PREPARATION

7.4 DEMOLITION

7.5 SITE RESTORATION

8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS

8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROCESS APPLICATION

8.1.1 Conceptual Site Model Guidance

8.1.2 Exit Strategy

8.1.3 Performance and Optimization

8.2 TRANSITION OF WORK

8.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRUCTION

8.3.1 Design

8.3.2 Inspection

8.3.3 Delivery and Warranty

8.4 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PROGRAM INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

8.5 INNOVATIVE AND PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES

8.6 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

8.7 ORDNANCE REMOVAL AND SUPPORT

8.8 RADIOLOGICAL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL AND SUPPORT

8.9 STUDY EFFORT INCIDENTAL TO REMEDY OR CORRECTIVE ACTION

8.10 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUPPORT

9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN

10.0 POINTS OF CONTACT

11.0 KEY PERSONNEL

12.0 CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

1.0 SCOPE

This requirement is for environmental remediation activities at Joint Base Charleston-Air

(JBCA), Joint Base Charleston-Weapons (JBCW), and North Auxiliary Airfield (NAAF), in

South Carolina (SC); and Seymour Johnson Air Force Base (SJAFB), North Carolina (NC). This

Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the scope of environmental services necessary to conduct site restoration under the Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC). The range of activities includes maintenance of established remedies, optimization at applicable sites, and achievement of site-specific objectives. The Contractor shall undertake Environmental

Remediation activities to achieve Performance Objectives (POs) at 48 Installation Restoration

Program (IRP) sites and 11 Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) sites.

NOTE: For purposes of this ORC, the term “Government” includes the Air Force (AF) and

United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). While regulators are a governmental entity, they are also a third party over whom the Air Force has no control and, as such, will be referred to as “regulators”.

1.1 Introduction

Joint Base Charleston-Air

JBCA is located on the west bank of the Cooper River about ten miles north of Charleston, SC and is within North Charleston city limits. JBC Air is home to the 437th Airlift Wing (AW), 315th Airlift Wing (AW) (Reserves), and 628th Airbase Wing (ABW) and encompasses approximately 3,400 acres of land. The 315th AW operates the C-17 Globemaster III strategic airlift aircraft and shares the same aircraft with 437th AW. The 437th AW provides airlift of troops and passengers, military equipment, cargo, and aeromedical equipment and supplies worldwide in support of tasking by Air Mobility Command and unified combatant commanders.

The 628th ABW provides installation support to 53 Department of Defense (DOD) and federal agencies as well as mission-ready expeditionary Airmen to combatant commanders in support of joint and combined operations.

Under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program, Naval Weapons Station

Charleston, SC (JBC Weapons) was realigned by relocating the installation management functions to JB Charleston, SC.

Remediation activities at JBCA are being conducted pursuant to the Resource Conservation and

Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements. Regulatory oversight and coordination are provided by the

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC).

Joint Base Charleston-Weapons

JBCW, located in the town of Goose Creek, Berkeley County, is approximately 10 miles from the Air Base and 14 miles from downtown Charleston. The Naval Weapons Station was commissioned in 1941 with two distinct missions: home for two strategic submarine squadrons and a tender, and an ordnance station with capacity for more than 60 million pounds of conventional ordnance. The ordnance mission continues today. JBCW is the only military installation in the continental US with completely unencumbered explosive safety arcs. JBCW is also a training center for the Naval Nuclear Power Training Command, Nuclear Power Training

Unit, and other tenants.

Remediation activities at JBCW are being conducted pursuant to the National Oil and Hazardous

Substances Contingency Plan (NCP) and RCRA requirements. Regulatory oversight and coordination are provided by the SCDHEC.

North Auxiliary Airfield

NAAF is located 65 miles northwest of JBC Air and 45 miles southeast of the state capital of

Columbia. NAAF has 2,400 acres of land, of which 1.150 acres is undeveloped. The original dirt runway was constructed in 1943 and used by Hughes Aircraft Company for testing. Today the base has a 12,000 ft runway and a 3,000 ft assault runway. The 628th Civil Engineer Squadron operates the base. The base supports the 437th and 315th Airlift Wing’s C-17 Globemaster III aircrew training and proficiency training.

Remediation activities at NAAF are being conducted pursuant to the Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended by the

Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) and NCP. Regulatory oversight and coordination are provided by the SCDHEC.

Seymour Johnson Air Force Base

Seymour Johnson Air Force Base (SJAFB) is annexed to Goldsboro, North Carolina, and occupies 3,300 acres in the southeast section of Goldsboro. Seymour Johnson Field was opened in April 1942 as Headquarters, Technical School, Army Air Forces Technical Training

Command. Seymour Johnson Field was deactivated in May 1946. Seymour Johnson Air Force

Base was reactivated as a Tactical Air Command base on April 1, 1956. Seymour Johnson has been an active Air Force base since it reopened. The 4th Fighter Wing is the host unit at

Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, and accomplishes its training and operational missions with

92 F-15E Strike Eagle aircraft. Two of the Wing’s four fighter squadrons are operational units capable of deploying world-wide on short notice and immediately generating combat power. The other two squadrons are responsible for training all F-15E aircrews for the Air Force.

Remediation activities at SJAFB are being conducted pursuant to the CERCLA, as amended by the SARA, and the petroleum spill program. Regulatory oversight and coordination are provided by the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). Cleanup may also be performed under RCRA, but the Air Force maintains its CERCLA authority.

1.2 Overview of ORC Scope and Requirements

The Contractor shall perform all the necessary environmental remediation activities required to achieve the POs of this PWS. This PWS and enclosures listed below include requirements of the project to meet the AF objectives:

• Enclosure 1 – Acronyms and Definitions http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/seymour_johnson.htm http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/seymour_johnson.htm

• Enclosure 2 – Government Furnished Information (GFI) o Enclosure 2A – Administrative Record Spreadsheet o Enclosure 2B – GFI CD (if not applicable, add NOT APPLICABLE) o Enclosure 2C – Alternate Objective Site Consideration Summaries o Enclosure 3 – Government Furnished Property (GFP) (if not applicable, add NOT

APPLICABLE)

The intent of the ORC initiative is to advance site cleanup during the Period of Performance

(POP) in the most efficient and cost-effective manner as supported by a cost benefit analysis and exit strategy that achieves the greatest reduction in life-cycle cost (LCC). The AF is interested in substantial reduction of long-term environmental liabilities and total LCC. The AF is required to implement remedies as necessary to enable the mission, protect human health and the environment, and comply with laws and regulations. The goal of the ORC initiative is to ensure the AF continues to fulfill all facets of its Environmental Restoration Program (ERP) mission, while effectively and efficiently managing the program in a performance-based, results-oriented, and cost-conscious framework.

The AF desires that all sites be cleaned up to standards that allow for the current or reasonably anticipated future land use of the property. Hand in hand, accurate documentation and reporting of contaminant removal and cost savings are critical adjuncts to optimization success. In keeping with Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) and Air Force Instruction

(AFI) 32-7020, the AF defines optimization, under the ORC, as the reduction of contaminant mass and concentrations, reduction in LCC, or any combination of activities leading to acceleration of Response Complete (RC)/Site Closeout (SC), as a result of remedial implementation the Contractor undertakes, above and beyond what is required to maintain compliance in accordance with an approved Decision Document (DD).

The Contractor shall maintain compliance with all DDs/Records of Decision (RODs) and

Proposed Plans (currently in place or to be approved)/RCRA Permits until no longer required or an alternate approach is approved. Conduct DD/ROD amendments or modifications as required to implement new approach(es).

The Contractor shall function as an integral team member in support of the Air Force Civil

Engineer Center (AFCEC) mission to include the sharing of information with USACE, other

AFCEC Contractors, and AF personnel; and cooperation with community stakeholders, regulators, and other Government entities.

Requirements for efficient management of this contract include, but are not limited to, the achievement of the POs in the Performance Period (PP) per Table 1 of this PWS, and timely identification and solution of impediments to successful project execution. The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, tools, materials, and other items necessary to perform the tasks defined in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their independent, professional conclusions/interpretations of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract within PP specified for each site.

AFCEC will rely on the Contractor’s expertise in recognizing and addressing problematic issues during the execution of this contract. The Contractor shall perform all work in accordance with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. The Contractor shall also comply with installation regulations. Remedies shall conform to environmental permits, DD requirements, or other legal requirements. The Contractor shall continue work throughout the entire duration of the POP.

Site specific POs are identified in Section 1.3 Table 1: Performance Table. POs that are in keeping with standard DERP milestones are defined in Enclosure 1. In addition, for certain categories of sites, the AF has set POs based on current site conditions and consistent with the

POP of the contract and ORC goal.

1.2.1 Scope Discussion and Limits

The scope of this contract is to perform environmental restoration services for the sites listed in

Table 1. The ORC Contractor shall assume contractual liability and responsibility for achieving the POs. If the selected technical approach is not working, as demonstrated by the trends in the performance model, the Contractor shall develop and implement a revised technical approach to achieve the POs, including DD amendments if required to implement the remedial approach.

This scope includes all known contaminants linked to the specific sites (includes contaminants on, under, or sourced at/migrating from the specific sites) without regard to quantity (e.g., plume size, concentrations). The AF remains statutorily responsible for all sites listed in Table 1.

1.2.2 Preliminary Assessment/Site Inspection, Remedial Investigation or Remedial

Investigation/Feasibility Study (including Supplemental Investigations), and

Decision Document

NOT APPLICABLE

1.2.3 Response Complete or Site Closeout

Table 1 of the PWS identifies RC or SC as PO for selected sites. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these objectives as identified in Table 1. See PO definitions in Acronym and

Abbreviations in Enclosure 1. The performance components are described in Section 8.1.

1.2.4 Remedial Action-Operation with Optimization

Table 1 of the PWS identifies the following POs utilizing with optimization as follows: 1.

Remedy in Place (RIP) and Remedial Action-Operation (RA-O) with Optimization, 2. DD

Amendment (or Explanation of Significant Differences [ESD]) with Remedy Implementation and RA-O with Optimization, or 3. RA-O with Optimization as POs for selected sites in accordance with the optimization initiative. The Contractor is responsible for achieving these

POs as identified in Table 1. See PO definitions in Acronym and Abbreviations in Enclosure 1.

The optimization and performance components are described in Section 8.1.

1.2.5 Remedial Action-Operation and Reduce Life Cycle Cost; Long Term Management and Reduce Life Cycle Cost

Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O and Reduce LCC or Long Term Management (LTM) and

Reduce LCC as the PO for selected sites. The goal of these POs is to minimize future AF liability and cost to the greatest degree feasible. Reduce LCC sites have achieved RIP or RC, have remedies that are effective (source control, risk mitigation, and plume stability), and have the potential for LCC reduction by optimizing some component of the existing remedy, by, for example:

• Reducing sampling frequency

• Reducing system operations

• Reducing number of wells sampled per event

• Reducing number of analytes per sampling event

The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each Reduce LCC site:

• Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the POP.

• For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all Contaminants of Concern

(COCs) and breakdown products. Refer to Section 8.1.3.1, Performance Models.

• Deliver a Reduce LCC Plan, as a stand-alone plan or in the Project Management Plan

(PMP), that identifies opportunities to improve cost efficiency of RA-O or LTM activities, and the planned approach for implementation. The Reduce LCC Plan shall:

o Provide a basis for proposed reductions in LCC throughout the POP compared to the cost of status-quo RA-O activities (those required to maintain compliance).

The planned reduction can be illustrated using a line graph (current, planned, achieved) or verbiage describing the current and planned reductions.

o Document risk and mitigation strategies for implementing optimization activities to reduce LCC.

• Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or DDs, as appropriate.

• Deliver Reduce LCC Reports to document progress in achieving the planned reductions when those reductions are achieved. Reduce LCC Reports may be combined with monitoring reports. Reductions in required RA-O activities are contingent upon regulatory approval.

• Deliver an RA-O & Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report two years prior to the

POP end date. The Reduce LCC Summary and Forecasting Report shall:

o Document optimization activities to date and forecast remaining activities and assumptions to further reduce LCC 10 years post-POP.

Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the POP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint). See PO definitions in Acronym and Abbreviations in

Enclosure 1.

1.2.6 Remedial Action-Operation or Long Term Management (as appropriate)

Table 1 of the PWS identifies RA-O or LTM in accordance with the approved DD/ROD as the

PO for selected sites. The Contractor shall achieve the following objectives for each RA-O and

LTM site:

• Maintain compliance with all DDs and permits (currently in place or to be approved) throughout the PP. Update or revise site-specific work plans, monitoring plans, and/or

DDs, as appropriate.

• For RA-O sites, develop performance models addressing all COCs and breakdown products. Refer to Section 8.1.3.1, Performance Models.

• Provide a realistic projection to achieve SC or RC after the POP (the Contractor shall identify which PO is the optimal endpoint).

1.2.7 Alternate Objectives

This section and the subparagraphs below describe the Alternate Objective Sites and a general overview of the work associated with these sites. Please see Table 1 for specific elements of work required for each site with an Alternate Objective PO. These sites have complex attributes that have, to date, inhibited progress towards the achievement of RC. For Alternate

Objective sites, as for all sites in Table 1 of the PWS where applicable, the Contractor shall maintain compliance throughout the POP of the contract with all existing regulatory requirements including but not limited to regulations, FFAs, RCRA Permits, final or interim

RODs, or other equivalent remedial DDs. The Contractor is responsible for implementing changes to the monitoring program based on activities conducted in the Advanced Site

Characterization (PWS Section 1.2.7.1) including the addition and decommissioning of wells in the monitoring well network as agreed by all parties and the addition of new delineation monitoring where new information indicates our understanding of the plumes is changed.

Based on technical review of existing site conditions/activities, the AF placed sites in the category of Alternate Objective if one or more of the following conditions exist:

1. Achieving RC is expected to require substantially longer than 30 years.

2. Achieving RC is unattainable with standard characterization and/or existing remediation technology due to technical or other limitations related to site conditions.

3. Achieving RC is anticipated to require advanced site characterization technologies to improve the Conceptual Site Model (CSM), determine appropriate remedial technology, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants.

The AF will use data and information obtained during execution of this PWS to determine restoration potential and future investment strategies at Alternate Objective sites. Each

SubCLIN for the Alternate Objective sites will only be awarded if the activities are needed to determine the future investment strategy for the site. The decision to award each SubCLIN resides solely at the discretion of the AF.

For each Alternate Objective site, a summary of site-specific considerations is provided as GFI.

As with all GFI provided, this GFI is provided for informational purposes only; the Contractor remains responsible for developing their own independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to achieve the PO. The Contractor shall conduct project scoping sessions before work plan development and throughout the planning and execution of the project to meet the PO including the Installation Point(s) of

Contact (POC[s]), the AFCEC Program Manager, the AF technical support team, and the

USACE Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). Upon approval by the AF and the USACE

COR, the Contractor shall participate in scoping sessions with the regulators, as appropriate.

1.2.7.1 Advanced Site Characterization

Add Section language

1.2.7.1.1 Supplemental Site Investigation

The Contractor shall conduct a Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI) to collect data necessary to improve the CSM, determine appropriate remedial technology, support remediation design and construction, and/or characterize recently regulated contaminants. The Contractor shall implement advanced characterization methods, both established approaches and state-of-science techniques consistent with AF, regulatory, Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council

(ITRC), and Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program/Environmental

Security Technology Certification Program (SERDP/ESTCP) guidance to attain these objectives.

Data collection includes better definition of the geology, hydrogeology, geochemistry, and/or source(s) and distribution of COCs, as required. The Contractor shall evaluate the need for, and collect the following data where appropriate: (1) Source Zone Delineation; (2) Source

Mass/Extent1,2,3; (3) Vertical and lateral extent of contamination, if not sufficiently defined; (4)

Plume Stability4; (5) Migration pathway, rates, and fluxes in 3-D; (6) Mass distribution; (7)

Biogeochemical conditions and influences on contaminant degradation pathways; (8) Impact of recent and historical remedies on site conditions; and (9) Comprehensive Risk including the vapor intrusion pathway.

The SSI report shall document data collection efforts to include a risk evaluation, if appropriate.

The Contractor shall evaluate and provide recommendations regarding whether additional source control is needed or whether the plume, or portions of the plume, are amenable to natural attenuation by conducting source strength and plume stability evaluations as needed.

1.2.7.1.2 Conceptual Site Model

The Contractor shall develop a revised CSM in 3-D to include establishing or updating existing fate and transport models based on existing data and data gathered during the SSI. The CSM should cover the source area and the distal plume, to include the lateral and vertical extent of the contaminants in the context of geologic/hydrogeological parameters and the remedial actions conducted to date.

1.2.7.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring Program Update

The Contractor shall evaluate the current horizontal and vertical well distribution to determine if the following can be properly evaluated:

Remedy performance in treatment areas

Hydrogeology, plume geometry, horizontal and vertical plume stability, and matrix diffusion across site

Plume migration through use of perimeter/boundary wells and sentinel wells

Based on the well network evaluation, coordinated and approved by the Government and regulators (if required), the Contractor shall optimize the monitoring well network to include adjusting sample collection frequency and the addition of new wells as appropriate. The

1 ITRC. (2015). Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization and Tool Selection.

2 SERDP/ESTCP. (2012). Matrix Diffusion Tool Kit.

3 USEPA. (2009). Evaluating Natural Source Zone Depletion at Sites with LNAPL.

4 USEPA. (2014). High Resolution Site Characterization for Groundwater Short Course, 23rd Annual NARPM

Training Program.

Contractor shall update the Basewide or Site-Specific Monitoring Plan or other equivalent document, as appropriate.

1.2.7.2 Remedy Evaluation and Recommendation

Add Section language

1.2.7.2.1 Cost/Benefit Analysis

The Contractor shall provide a cost/benefit analysis for proposed alternatives. Alternatives may include optimizing the remedy in the DD or other remedies with the potential for better performance. All alternatives identified should be evaluated against one another to determine which alternative can achieve RC in the shortest time and has the lowest overall LCC. The cost/benefit analysis should include:

• A focused analysis of alternative approaches, to include conceptual designs and engineering cost estimates. The analysis should identify the total cost of executing the optimized remedy (including the plan and reports).

• An estimate of the reduction of LCC of each alternative evaluated.

• Any risk inherent in implementing the alternative optimized remedy.

• A summary comparison of the LCC and risk of each alternative in a cost/benefit analysis that clearly states the recommended alternative.

1.2.7.3 Decision Document Amendment

Based on the results of the remedy evaluation and recommendation, it may be necessary to amend the Decision Document to augment, modify, and/or replace the existing remedy. If warranted, the Contractor shall update the Decision Document.

1.3 Performance Requirements

1.3.1 Table 1: Performance Table

Table 1 presents the POs, PPs, and Performance Standards associated with all installations/sites under this ORC. The PP specified in Table 1 starts from the Obligation Date of the first Sub-

Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) for the site unless otherwise specified. All approvals (both

Government and regulator) per the Performance Standard are required in writing. Additional scope discussion and limits can be found in Section 1.3.2.

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

N/A Project Management Plan (PMP):

1) Draft PMP

2) Final PMP

3) Updates as necessary

Draft PMP within 60 calendar days from contract award, Final

PMP within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and update as necessary throughout the POP. The AF and

USACE will determine when whole document

PMP updates are warranted

AF and USACE approval of

PMP.

The PMP should be maintained with accuracy and completeness based on the current technical approach for each site, management structure, etc.

N/A Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Draft QASP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

QASP.

N/A Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)/Milestone

Payment Schedule (MPS)

Draft IMS/MPS within

60 calendar days from contract award, Final

IMS/MPS within 14 calendar days of receipt of AF and USACE comments on the draft, and updates monthly throughout the POP

AF and USACE approval of

IMS/MPS.

N/A Basewide Quality Program Plans (QPP) for each Installation

Draft Basewide QPP within 60 calendar days from contract award and update as necessary throughout the POP

AF and USACE and regulatory approval of

Basewide QPP.

Joint Base Charleston-Air

DD540 RA-O with Optimization in accordance with the approved ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual

Groundwater Monitoring

Reports, Monthly

Operations and Maintenance

[O&M] Reports, etc.).

FT003 RA-O in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RA-O documentation (e.g., Annual

Groundwater Monitoring

Reports, Monthly

Operations and Maintenance

[O&M] Reports, etc.).

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

LF002 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF004 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF006 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF017 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

OT011 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

OT012 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

OT016 Response Complete (RC)

Upon achievement of RC, continue Long

Term Management (LTM) in accordance with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, Final Remedial Action

Completion Report).

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

OW507 Site Closeout (SC) Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site

Closeout Report and Well

Abandonment Confirmation

Report).

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

RW052 Site Closeout (SC) Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site

Closeout Report and Well

Abandonment Confirmation

RW532 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

SS042 Alternate Objectives:

1) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program

Update)

2) Remedy Evaluation and

Recommendation (including results of any pilot study)

3) Decision Document Amendment

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SSI Report, revised CSM and Basewide

Monitoring Plan.

the remedy evaluation and recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot or field test) showing decreasing trends in COCs.

approval of ESD or ROD

Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on

Final ESD or ROD

Amendment).

ST027 Site Closeout (SC) Seven (7) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site

Closeout Report and Well

Abandonment Confirmation

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

TS837 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

TU522 Site Closeout (SC) Seven (7) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site

Closeout Report and Well

Abandonment Confirmation

TU542 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Within the POP AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

TU543 Site Closeout (SC) Seven (7) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site

Closeout Report and Well

Abandonment Confirmation

Report).

TU544 Site Closeout (SC) Seven (7) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site

Closeout Report and Well

Abandonment Confirmation

Report).

Joint Base Charleston-Weapons

AB062 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

CG074 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

CS023 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

DA017 Alternate Objectives:

4) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program

Update)

5) Remedy Evaluation and

Recommendation (including results of

6) Decision Document Amendment recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot

Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on

Final ESD or ROD

Amendment).

DA951 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

ED17178B LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

FL066 Alternate Objectives:

7) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program

Update)

8) Remedy Evaluation and

Recommendation (including results of

9) Decision Document Amendment recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot

Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on

Final ESD or ROD

Amendment).

FL073 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

ID068 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF003 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

LF010 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF016 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

MU17175

A

LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

SA036 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

SS012 Alternate Objectives:

10) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program

Update)

11) Remedy Evaluation and

Recommendation (including results of

12) Decision Document Amendment recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot

Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on

Final ESD or ROD

Amendment).

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

ST042 Alternate Objectives:

13) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program

Update)

14) Remedy Evaluation and

Recommendation (including results of

15) Decision Document Amendment recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot

Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on

Final ESD or ROD

Amendment).

TU014 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

TU927 Alternate Objectives:

16) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program

Update)

17) Remedy Evaluation and

Recommendation (including results of

18) Decision Document Amendment recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot

Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on

Final ESD or ROD

Amendment).

TU933 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

TU939 Alternate Objectives:

19) Advanced Site Characterization

(Supplemental Site Investigation (SSI), Revised Conceptual Site Model (CSM), and Recommended Monitoring Program

Update)

20) Remedy Evaluation and

Recommendation (including results of

21) Decision Document Amendment recommended proposed remedial strategy including successful demonstration of the existing or alternate remedy (e.g., through pilot

Amendment (i.e., Air Force and regulatory signatures on

Final ESD or ROD

Amendment).

XE001 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

XE002 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

XE003 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

XE004 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

XE005 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

XE006 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

XE007 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

XU018 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

ZZ075 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Eight (8) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

North Auxiliary Airfield

DA100 Site Closeout Five (5) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of SC documentation (e.g., Site

Closeout Report and Well

Abandonment Confirmation

Report).

Seymour Johnson AFB

FT007 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports, Reduce LLC

Summary Report, etc.).

LF006 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF008 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF015 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

LF016 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Site Performance Objective Performance Period Performance Standard

OT029 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports, Reduce LLC

Summary Report, etc.).

RW502 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports, Reduce LLC

Summary Report, etc.).

SA501 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Seven (7) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

SS009 Response Complete (RC) with the ROD/DD throughout the duration of the POP

Seven (7) years AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of RC documentation (e.g., Regulator approval of, and

Air Force signature on, documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports).

SS033 LTM in accordance with the approved

ROD/DD and Reduce LCC

Through the duration of the POP

AF, USACE, and regulatory approval of LTM documentation (e.g., Land

Use Control Inspection

Reports, Reduce LLC

Summary Report, etc.).

1.3.2 Additional Scope Discussion and Limits

In addition to the requirements identified in Table 1, the Contractor shall be responsible for:

Operations and Maintenance (O&M) of all wells associated with requirements in this

PWS and well abandonment with AF, USACE, and regulatory acceptance (if required) when the well is no longer necessary.

Establishing a quality control/quality process to ensure documents are of an acceptable quality and do not contain typos, formatting issues, contradictory information in tables and text, etc.

Contaminants for which there are promulgated federal, state, or local standards.

In the case of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate/Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOS/PFOA), Office of the General Counsel (OGC) approval for use of promulgated state or local Maximum

Contaminant Level (MCL) standards as Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate

Requirements at the time of final solicitation. [ADD AF REQUIREMENTS HERE e.g., existing approved State promulgated Standards.]

Contaminants which become regulated under new or revised federal, state, or local standards, or OGC approval for PFOS/PFOA, after award (e.g., reduction in MCL levels, promulgation of emerging contaminants, etc.) may be managed via modification.

Implementing phase 1 sampling as described in “Interim Air Force Guidance On

Sampling and Response Actions for 1,4-Dioxane at Operational and [Base Realignment and Closure] BRAC Installations,” dated 24 May 2013. The Contractor shall perform the phase 1 sampling as described in the interim guidance for the following sites:

JBC Air:

FT003, LF006, OT016, SS042

JBC Weapons:

DA017, SA036

Seymour Johnson AFB:

FT007, OT029, SS009

The Contractor shall present results in one Tech Memo/Report per installation documenting the analytical methods and maps depicting sampling locations within the trichloroethene (TCE) plume and sample analysis results.

Management and disposal of waste media associated with PFOS/PFOA in accordance with the “AF Guidance Memorandum Establishing Aqueous Film Forming Foam

(AFFF)-Related Waste Management Implementation Guidance” dated 05 September

2019. The following sites have confirmed PFOS/PFOA contamination and/or are in close proximity to sites with confirmed PFOS/PFOA contamination; therefore, the

Contractor shall test waste media for PFOS/PFOA and dispose of in accordance with the guidance.

JBC Air:

FT003, SS042

North Auxiliary Airfield:

LF100

Seymour Johnson AFB:

FT007

Ensuring that remedial actions do not negatively impact the distribution of any other contaminants and/or emerging contaminants (e.g., PFOA, PFOS, 1,4-dixoane).

Conduct a Base Wide Background Study for Metals, Arsenic, Pesticides and PAHs at

JBC Air, JBC Weapons.

Conduct a Base Wide Vapor Intrusion Study in the first 2 years of the Contract at JBC

Air, JBC Weapons.

Maintain a Base wide well inventory and Base wide maps at Seymour Johnson AFB.

[Other items as identified by the Installation Specific Acquisition Plan (ISAP) Team during the ISAP Meeting]

The Contractor shall NOT be responsible for:

Reasonably unanticipated contaminants at sites identified in Table 1 (e.g., previously undetected mercury within a TCE plume); however, Contractors would be responsible for reasonably anticipated contaminants (e.g., vinyl chloride in a TCE plume).

Remediation or treatment of contaminants for which there are no promulgated federal, state, or local standards or AF agreements at time of contract award unless included via modification.

Sites not identified in Table 1.

Execution of modification of deeds or other real property documentation unless otherwise specified.

Sites containing radiological waste. [REMOVE THIS ITEM IF RADIOLOGICAL

SITES ARE INCLUDED IN THE PWS.]

Remediation of sites with unexploded ordnance (UXO), Discarded Military Munitions

(DMMs), munitions constituents (MCs) present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard, and chemical warfare material (CWM).

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes;

Department of Defense (DoD) and AF instructions, manuals, handbooks, regulations, guidance, and policy letters (including AF policy and guidance for IRP, and MMRP); Executive Orders

(EOs), American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), American Petroleum Institute

(API) Codes, National Association of Corrosions Engineers (NACE), National Fire Protection

Association (NFPA), Steel Structures and Painting Counsel (SSPC), National Electrical Code

(NEC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and International Building Code (IBC) including all changes and amendments in effect on the date of issuance of this contract. It is the Contractor’s responsibility to identify and comply with all applicable requirements. In addition, the

Contractor shall refer to the current versions of the DoD Policy and Guidelines for Acquisitions

Involving Environmental Sampling or Testing and The United States AF Construction

Management Implementation Guide.

The Contractor shall identify and comply with all applicable documents for the Installations including RODs, ROD Amendments, ESDs, RCRA Permits and subsequent modifications, Risk

Evaluation Corrective Action Program (RECAP) documents, the Endangered Species Act, other

Decision Documents, Deeds, and conveyance notices.

The information provided in this PWS is not intended as a substitute for complete analysis of technical data available, nor is it intended to be a guide on how the Contractor should address achievement of the POs.

3.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND PROPERTY

Government Furnished Information is contained in the Administrative Record

(http://afcec.publicadmin-record.us.af.mil) or listed in Enclosure 2. The AF believes the documentation provided represents the most recent and appropriate documentation available for the Installation(s) and sites identified in this PWS. The Contractor is solely responsible for reviewing all available information and forming their own independent, professional conclusions/interpretation of site conditions and requirements to achieve the POs of this contract.

Specific documents not included in the Administrative Record or in Enclosure 2 may be made available following a request to the USACE Contracting Officer (KO), if the documentation can be distributed in a timely manner. Electronic format is not guaranteed.

The Contractor shall properly account for and manage all new and existing GFP procured and utilized at the Installations as-is where-is in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR). Lists of current GFP are provided in Enclosure 3. All Real Property installed during the contract shall be turned over to the Government consistent with procedures identified in section

8.3.3.

The Contractor is responsible for providing all other supplies and equipment, not already installed and not listed in Enclosure 3, that are required to achieve the POs of this contract. All

AF-owned property, including real property used for remediation purposes must be maintained by the Contractor in accordance with applicable maintenance requirements and usability for the intended purpose. The Contractor is responsible for disposal of unneeded, unusable, or obsolete

GFP as required, and transition of remaining GFP to other AF Contractors at the end of the contract POP. Prior to disposal of excess or unserviceable equipment listed in Enclosure 3, the

Contractor shall coordinate activities with the USACE KO for disposition instructions.

4.0 MANAGEMENT, PLANNING, AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

The Contractor shall implement a full range of environmental remediation activities as required to meet objectives of this contract and in accordance with all applicable or relevant and appropriate federal, state, and local laws and regulations; DoD policies; and Installation-specific orders, agreements or rules. The Contractor shall supply all labor, equipment, and materials necessary to accomplish the work through the entire POP of the contract. The Contractor shall perform management and planning functions, including performance measurement and fund status reporting. The Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), Milestone Payment Schedule (MPS), and PMP shall be consistent.

4.1 Project Management Plan and Work Breakdown Structure

The Contractor shall develop and maintain a detailed PMP. The PMP shall specify the project’s resources and tasks corresponding to the SubCLINs for this contract as required for the planning, execution, control, and completion of the stated POs.