FY23 NOFO Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training FINAL.pdf

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE

BUREAU OF CYBERSPACE AND DIGITAL POLICY (CDP)

Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO): Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training

This is the announcement of funding opportunity number: SFOP0010032

Federal Assistance Listing/Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.665

Type of Solicitation: Open Competition

Deadline for Applications: 11:59 PM EDT on 18 September 2023

Total Funding: $2,600,000 USD

In funds appropriated under Title III of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act (Div. K. P.L. 117-103 (FY 2022 SFOAA) under the headings “Economic Support Fund” (ESF) and “Development Assistance” (DA).

$2,000,000 USD

Type of Funding: FY22 Economic Support Funds (ESF) Foreign Assistance Data Review (FADR) Data Element(s): Global/EG.8 Information and Communications Technology Services

$600,000 USD

Type of Funding: FY22 Development Assistance Funds (DA) Foreign Assistance Data Review (FADR) Data Element(s): Africa/EG.8 Information and

Communications Technology Services

Anticipated Number of Awards: 1

Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement

Period of Performance: 24 months

Anticipated Time to Award: September 2023 (Pending availability of funds)

Deadline for Questions: 11:59 PM EDT on 1 September 2023

Deadlines for Certain Registrations: 11:59 PM EDT on 5 September 2023 (see pages 21-22)

Eligibility Categories:

• U.S.- based non-profit organizations subject to section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(6) of the U.S. tax code;

• Public International Organizations (PIOs);

• U.S. private, public, or state institutions of higher education (universities and colleges); and

• U.S. for-profit organizations or businesses.

Type of Applicant: Organizations only. Individuals are not eligible to apply.

Number of Applications: One (1) application per organization.

This notice is subject to availability of funding.

Section A: Project Description

A1. Executive Summary The U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (CDP) announces an open competition for organizations with the capacity and interest to carry out the project outlined in this announcement.

Pending the availability of funds, CDP anticipates awarding one (1) cooperative agreement of up to $2,600,000 USD. CDP reserves the right to award more, or less, funding or make no award as is in the best interest of the U.S. Government.

CDP seeks to partner with a capable organization to develop curriculum and provide training to international entities and personnel for the development of responsible cybersecurity and digital policy as further detailed in this announcement.

The training is intended to provide specialized and technical in-person capacity building training primarily to, but not limited to, government officials, from developing countries who are key stakeholders in cyber and digital policy in their respective countries, regional or multilateral institutions.

Training activities are intended to take place in the United States and in other countries. While the training is primarily for developing country participants from every region of the globe, including Africa, a portion of these funds ($600,000 USD) is specifically designated for trainings benefiting the African region.

Background Recognizing the growing role of technology as a cross-cutting national security issue, the State Department created the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (CDP) in April 2022 to lead and coordinate U.S. diplomacy on cyber and digital policy. The bureau addresses the national security challenges and economic opportunities presented by cyberspace and digital technologies and promotes standards and norms that are fair, transparent, and support the rights-respecting use of technology. Through robust engagement in multilateral organizations, bilateral diplomacy with partners round the world, and encouragement of responsible state behavior in cyberspace, CDP empowers U.S. leadership in cyber, digital, and technology diplomacy.

CDP deploys foreign assistance to strengthen international cooperation, create new partnerships, promote economic growth and development, and assist in the defense of our foreign partners to uphold an open, interoperable, secure, and reliable Internet.

Calibrated cyber and digital policies help form the backbone of our deeply interconnected world, are vital to U.S. national and economic security, and are required to fully harness the transformative power of technology. As citizens around the world eagerly seek increased Internet connectivity to access the tremendous opportunities afforded by digital transformation, the United States is working to ensure this connectivity is secure, meaningful, governed fairly, and serves the interests of its users. Foreign assistance programs aim to advance an affirmative vision of technology as a tool that supports collective security, prosperity, and democratic values.

More information on CDP is available at https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/deputy-secretary-of-state/bureau-of-cyberspace-and-digital-policy/.

https://www.state.gov/functional-bureau-strategies/

The Digital Connectivity and Cybersecurity Partnership (DCCP) is a global, interagency initiative led by CDP to promote an open, interoperable, secure, and reliable Internet. DCCP provides foreign assistance to partner nations to promote investments in secure, diverse, and resilient information and communication technologies (ICT) infrastructure; support the adoption of inclusive, rights-respecting, multi-stakeholder models of Internet governance; grow global markets for trusted ICT goods and services; and enhance cybersecurity. CDP foreign assistance programming follows these core tenets of DCCP. More information on DCCP is available at https://www.state.gov/digital-connectivity-and-cybersecurity-partnership/.

A2. Program Goals and Objectives

Program Goals and Objectives https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/deputy-secretary-of-state/bureau-of-cyberspace-and-digital-policy/ https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/deputy-secretary-of-state/bureau-of-cyberspace-and-digital-policy/ https://www.state.gov/functional-bureau-strategies/ https://www.state.gov/digital-connectivity-and-cybersecurity-partnership/

This project should contribute to the following CDP strategic goal and objectives outlined below, and all four DCCP pillars.

CDP Strategic Goals and Objectives:

Bureau Goal 1: Advance cyber and digital policies that align with U.S. national interests and foreign policy objectives:

Objective 1.1: Deepen relationships with existing U.S. partners, forge new partnerships, and engage with a range of countries to advance a common vision for the Internet and digital technologies.

Objective 1.3: Identify, enhance, cultivate, and develop strategic engagements across the private sector and multistakeholder communities.

Objective 1.4: Increase secure and open digital connectivity and access to the Internet.

DCCP Pillars:

Pillar 1: Build Connections by promoting investments in secure, diverse, and resilient ICT (Information and Communications Technology) infrastructure.

Pillar 2: Advance an open, interoperable, reliable, and secure Internet by promoting inclusive, rights-respecting, multi-stakeholder models of internet governance and pro-competition, pro-innovation digital economy policies and regulations.

Pillar 3: Grow Global Markets for U.S. ICT goods and services, especially high-quality, interoperable, secure ICT equipment, software, and services.

Pillar 4: Enhance Cybersecurity by increasing adoption and implementation of cybersecurity best practices.

A3. Project Objectives, Outcomes, Activities, and Indicators Project Objective 1:

This project should be designed to achieve the following Project Objective 1:

Strengthened collaboration and coordination among global stakeholders in cybersecurity and digital policy, resulting in closer alignment with U.S. government policy and priorities, enhanced mutual understanding, and increased capacity for addressing emerging challenges in cybersecurity, telecommunications, and other digital and emerging technologies.

Expected Outcomes:

Achievement of Project Objective 1 is expected to result in the following outcomes:

• 1.1: Establishment and implementation of effective cybersecurity and digital policies, leading to a more secure, resilient, and rights-respecting digital ecosystem.

• 1.2: Increased alignment of partner nations’ cyber and digital policies to U.S.

government cyber and digital policy and priorities.

Project Objective 2:

This project should be designed to achieve the following Project Objective 2:

Improved awareness of regulatory environments conducive for secure, transparent, and trusted cybersecurity and digital policy in the benefiting countries to be determined post award, leading to increased investment and innovation in the digital sector, and ultimately contributing to economic growth, international stability, and digital governance consistent with U.S.

democratic values.

Expected Outcomes Achievement of Project Objective 2 is expected to result in the following outcomes:

• 2.1: Establishment of rights-respecting regulatory institutions and frameworks for cybersecurity and digital policy

• 2.2: Greater investment and innovation in target countries’ digital sector, as demonstrated by an increase in the number of startups; growth of existing companies in areas such as e-commerce, fintech, and digital services; and increased connectivity and digital inclusion.

• 2.3 Increased exchange of best practices and the development of inclusive, innovative solutions to digital policy challenges.

Project Objective 3:

This project should be designed to achieve the following Project Objective 3:

Increased engagement and collaboration among regional alumni of USG funded trainings (networks) on topics related to cybersecurity and digital policy, promote knowledge sharing, and cooperation in the future.

Expected Outcomes Achievement of Project Objective 3 is expected to result in the following outcomes:

• 3.1: Greater understanding and awareness among the alumni of CDP programs about digital policy issues and trends in the region, including emerging technologies and their implications for policy and regulation.

• 3.2: Enhanced capacity of alumni to engage in and contribute to digital policy discussions and initiatives through training, mentoring, and other capacity-building activities.

• 3.3: Increased visibility and influence of alumni networks in regional and global digital policy discussions and initiatives, through partnerships, advocacy, and thought leadership.

• 3.4: Expansion and greater alignment of alumni networks with U.S. government policy and priorities, contributing to the achievement of broader U.S. government goals in the region related to digital policy, economic growth, and regional stability.

Project Activities To achieve the expected project objectives and outcomes, the project must include, but is not limited to, the following:

• Build and maintain an alumni network of beneficiaries of USG funded trainings.

• Develop and submit to CDP relevant and impactful training curriculum materials.

• Deliver in-person or hybrid courses, focused on a range of cybersecurity and digital policy, and emerging technology issues in target countries or regions. The purpose of these courses is to encourage the establishment of strong U.S. aligned cyberspace and digital policy foundations and to develop a diverse, professional base capable of regulating, operating, and maintaining and growing a secure, trusted, and rights-respecting digital ecosystem.

• Include a diverse group of experts from the U.S. government, industry leaders, and other relevant stakeholders among course facilitators and speakers.

• Include interactive sessions, groups exercises, and case studies to encourage active participation and knowledge sharing.

• Incorporate into trainings members of regulatory institutions in targeted countries.

• Develop targeted trainings that address the regulatory environment, to be offered within the first year of the project timeline. Emphasize a multistakeholder approach inclusive of civil society.

• Directly engage with the private sector, by hosting industry roundtables, industry site visits and networking events. Emphasize a multistakeholder approach inclusive of civil society.

• Conduct needs assessments to identify the key issues and challenges in regions of operation to determine the capacity building needs of the alumni networks. This can be done via surveys, interviews, and focus group discussions.

• Develop and deliver training or professional development programs for alumni on key topics and to include expertise from the U.S. government, the multistakeholder community, and regional experts.

• Establish communication channels to facilitate ongoing engagement and collaboration among alumni, such as social media groups, online forums, and/or newsletters. These channels can also be used to share information on upcoming events, training opportunities.

To achieve the expected project objectives and outcomes, the project should address, but is not limited to addressing, the following:

• Cybersecurity threats and challenges: understanding the evolving threat landscape, common attack vectors, and strategies for risk management and mitigation.

• ICT policy and regulatory frameworks: exploring best practices and innovative approaches to policy and regulatory development, with a focus on promoting strong U.S. aligned telecommunications ICT policy and regulatory foundations.

• Digital and cyber strategy development: providing participants with practical tools and frameworks for developing effective digital and cyber strategies that align with national development priorities.

• Secure network deployment: exploring best practices and standards for network security, including supplier diversity, encryption, access control, and intrusion detection and prevention.

• Emerging technologies and their impact on ICT policy: examining the potential of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, the Internet of Things, and others, and their implications for policy and regulation.

• Stakeholder engagement and collaboration: exploring strategies for building partnerships and collaboration between government agencies, private sector entities, civil society organizations, and other relevant stakeholders.

• Gender and ICT policy: examining the gender dimensions of ICT policy and regulation and exploring strategies for promoting gender equality and women's empowerment in the digital ecosystem.

• Digital freedom: understanding digital accessibility and openness by focusing on online freedoms and digital inclusion and promoting the responsible and rights-respecting use of technology.

Performance Indicators If an award is issued, CDP will work with the final selected applicant to develop a holistic set of qualitative and quantitative indicators to measure project performance. For an indicator to be useful it must be specific and unambiguous, observable, measurable, and linked to an outcome/output achievement. Some indicators will be provided by CDP; others may be suggested by the award recipient.

Indicators from CDP that are potentially relevant to this project could include:

• DCCP 1.5: Number of national or sub-national telecom/ICT, internet, or digital economy strategies developed or improved with USG assistance.

• DCCP 1.6: Number of people trained in telecom/ICT or digital economy issues with USG support.

• DCCP 1.7: Number of people trained on telecom/ICT or digital economy issues who demonstrate improved knowledge or skill.

• DCCP 1.10: Number of new secure network connections to households or businesses established with USG assistance.

• DCCP 2.1: Number of instances of U.S. telecom/ICT policy positions presented in international or regional fora by the U.S. or DCCP partner countries.

• DCCP 2.2: Number of telecom/ICT governance policies, laws, or regulations drafted, proposed, adopted, improved, or implemented with USG assistance.

• DCCP 3.2: Number of telecom/ICT public-private partnership opportunities identified or established with USG assistance.

• DCCP 4.1: Number of people trained in cybersecurity with USG support.

• DCCP 4.2: Number of people trained in cybersecurity who demonstrate improved knowledge or skill.

A4. Key Considerations

The following list of program considerations is provided to help applicant(s) develop a responsive, robust proposal. Strong preference will be given to applicant(s) that:

• Demonstrate administrative and technical capacity and experience in administering successful and similar projects with a global participant base.

• Demonstrate thoughtful project design to address the key objectives and activities for the target audiences described in the NOFO.

• Demonstrate thoughtful monitoring and evaluation and report results.

• Prove existing, collaborative, and successful partnerships with U.S. and foreign partners on issues and engagements related to cybersecurity and digital policy.

• Demonstrate experience in building an active network of alumni.

• Demonstrate adherence to ethical best practices including “do no harm” and gender equity.

All applicants will also be required to address the entirety of Section A.3 within this NOFO in their completion of the Scope of Work. (Suggested Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Draft Scope of Work Template is attached to this NOFO; see Section D2.1, item #5).

Section B: Federal Award Information

Organizations may submit one (1) application per organization in response to this NOFO. If more than one (1) application is submitted by an organization, only the first application received will be reviewed for eligibility and funding.

The U.S. government may make award(s) based on initial applications received, without discussions or negotiations. Therefore, each initial application should contain the applicant's best terms from a cost and technical standpoint. The U.S. government reserves the right (though it is under no obligation to do so), to enter discussions with one or more applicants in order to obtain clarifications, additional detail, or to suggest refinements in the project description, budget, or other aspects of an application.

CDP anticipates awarding a cooperative agreement. The final determination on award mechanism will be made by the Grants Officer.

The authority for this funding opportunity is found in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), as amended. Funds were appropriated under Title III of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act (Div. K. P.L. 117-103 (FY 2022 SFOAA) under the headings “Economic Support Fund” and “Development Assistance.” The countries for the benefit of which appropriated funds are authorized to be expended may vary from year to year. Accordingly, CDP reserves the right to adjust proposed target countries during the award and post-award processes.

To maximize the impact and sustainability of the award(s) that result(s) from this NOFO, CDP reserves the right to execute a non-competitive continuation amendment(s). The total duration of any award, including potential non-competitive continuation amendments, shall not exceed 54 months. Any non-competitive continuation is contingent on availability of funds, and satisfactory performance of the program. A non-competitive continuation is not guaranteed, and the Department of State reserves the right to exercise or not exercise this option.

The distinction between grants and cooperative agreements revolves around the existence of “substantial involvement.” Cooperative agreements require greater federal government participation in the project. If a cooperative agreement is awarded, CDP will undertake reasonable and programmatically necessary substantial involvement. Examples of substantial involvement could include but are not limited to:

• Active participation and collaboration with the recipient in the implementation of the award.

• Collaboration on the selection of target countries.

• Review and approval of one stage of work before another can begin.

• Collaboration on selection and/or review and approval of sub-award partnerships or sub-contracts beyond existing federal policy.

• Review and final approval of course curricula and associated documents.

• Review participant training acceptance and rejection letters.

Note: All products developed by the award recipient must be appropriately branded in accordance with the DCCP Message Manual unless specific waivers are requested and approved by CDP. See Section H: Other Information for more details.

Section C: Eligibility Information

C1. Eligible Applicants CDP welcomes applications from U.S.- based non-profit organizations subject to sections 501(c)(3) or 501 (c)(6) of the U.S. tax code; Public International Organizations (PIOs); U.S.

private, public, or state institutions of higher education (universities and colleges); and U.S. for-profit organizations or businesses.

C2. Cost Sharing or Matching Providing cost sharing, matching, or cost participation is not an eligibility factor or requirement for this NOFO and providing cost share will not result in a more favorable competitive ranking.

Per 2 CFR §200.306, items that are proposed for cost share must be allowable per 2 CFR §200, Subpart E—Costs Principles.

C3. Other To be eligible to receive an award, all organizations must have a unique entity identifier (UEI), as well as a valid registration on System for Award Management (SAM.gov). Please see Section D3.2 for information on how to obtain these registrations.

Applicants must be organizations, and only one application from any organization will be considered. If more than one application is submitted by the same organization, only the first received will be reviewed for eligibility and funding.

Please note, any applicant listed on the Excluded Parties List System in theSystem for Award Management (SAM.gov), as well as any applicant with a current debt to the U.S. government, is not eligible to apply for an assistance award in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR,1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR,1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” Additionally, no entity or person listed on the Excluded Parties List System in SAM.gov can participate in any activities under an award. All applicants are strongly encouraged to review the Excluded Parties List System in SAM.gov to ensure that no ineligible entity or person is included in its application.

Section D: Application and Submission Information

D1. Address to Request Application Package Application forms and other required materials are available at Grants.gov (http://www.grants.gov) and SAMS Domestic (https://mygrants.servicenowservices.com) under the announcement title “Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training,” and funding opportunity number “SFOP0010032”. Once the NOFO deadline has passed, the Department of State may not discuss this competition with any applicant until the proposal review process has been completed. If requesting reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities or for security reasons, please contact the CDP point of contact listed in Section G. Please note that reasonable accommodations do not include an extension of any deadline.

D2. Content and Form of Application Submission For all application documents, please ensure that:

• The proposal clearly addresses the goals and objectives of this funding opportunity.

• All documents are in English. (All forms submitted by the recipient must be the official

English versions.)

• All budgets are in U.S. dollars.

• All pages of any components subject to page limitations are numbered.

• All documents are formatted to 8 ½ x 11 paper.

https://sam.gov/ https://sam.gov/ https://sam.gov/ http://www.grants.gov/ https://mygrants.servicenowservices.com/

• All narrative components prepared for this application by the applicant are formatted in single-spaced, 12-point Calibri font, with a minimum of 1-inch margins.

• Captions and footnotes are in 10-point Calibri font.

Any prospective applicant who has questions concerning the contents of this NOFO should submit them by email to the contact listed in Section G. Any updates about this NOFO will also be posted on Grants.gov.

D2.1 Application Requirements In order to be deemed technically eligible, applications must submit the following as individual documents:

1) Completed and signed SF-424, SF-424A, and SF-424B forms.

2) Organizations that engage in lobbying the U.S. government, including Congress, or pay for another entity to lobby on their behalf, are also required to complete the SF-LLL “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities” form. Applicants that do not lobby the U.S.

government are not required to submit the SF-LLL.

3) Cover Page and Executive Summary (not to exceed three (3) pages, preferably as a PDF file, pages numbered). The cover page should include the applicant organization’s name, its legal status (see eligibility categories), the project title, target countries, total funding requested, and the name and contact information for the applying organization’s main point of contact. The executive summary should succinctly outline (1) the problem statement addressed by the project, (2) research-based evidence justifying the applicant’s approach, and (3) quantifiable project outcomes and impacts.

4) Proposal Narrative (not to exceed ten (10) pages, preferably as a Microsoft Word document, pages numbered). The Proposal Narrative must include the following:

• Introduction to the Organization: Description of past and present operations, showing ability to carry out the project, including information on all relevant or similar type projects from previous grants from U.S. Department of State, CDP and/or U.S. government agencies.

• Problem Statement: Clear, concise, and well-supported statement that summarizes the problem and how the applicant’s unique project/approach will address it and support CDP’s Strategic Goals and Objectives.

• Project Goal: The “goal” describes the larger outcomes intended.

• Project Objectives: The intermediate accomplishments and measurable targets to achieve a goal. Objectives of the project should be SMART:

Specific: Detailed and specifies what will be achieved Measurable: Has associated metrics or measurements of success http://www.grants.gov./

Attainable: Appropriately challenging, objectives can be reasonably attained given the available resources

Relevant: Aligns with the policy/program goal and is appropriate for the country or beneficiary audience

Time-Bound: Achievable within the timeframe of the project

• Project Activities: Specific actions taken to achieve Project Objectives. All activities should be clearly developed and sufficiently explain the resource and time requirements (inputs) and things done or produced (outputs). Activities should detail target areas, participant groups, or selection criteria for participants; how relevant stakeholders will be engaged; and actions taken by local partners as appropriate/relevant.

• Future Funding or Sustainability: Applicant’s plan for continuing the project beyond the grant period, or the availability of other resources, if applicable.

Include ways project activities will ensure sustainability.

• Risk Analysis: Internal and external risks associated with the proposed project, rate the likelihood of the risks, rate the potential impact of the risks on the project, and identify actions that could help mitigate the risks.

5) Scope of Work (SOW) (preferably as a Microsoft Word document). Applicants are encouraged to use the Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Draft Scope of Work Template provided and attached to this NOFO to articulate a summary of the applicant’s unique operational approach to delivering the concept presented in its Proposal Narrative. The SOW should address the:

• Project Objectives

• Project Activities

• Project Indicators: Identify key indicators and milestones to measure progress towards project objectives. Methods for collecting and monitoring project indicators should be described and those responsible for doing so identified.

• Sustainability The SOW is not subject to a page limitation; please do not convert the Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Draft Scope of Work Template to a PDF File.

6) Project Design and Logic Model (PDLM) (preferably as a Microsoft Word document).

Building out a logic model with an accompanying theory of change can be helpful when planning and designing a program, project, or activity. These tools can be used to visually depict or outline how and why a project will work (i.e., the rationale behind your project approach). Detailing how a project’s planned activities lead to certain outcomes can often help applicants understand the assumptions within the approach. Detailing factors outside your control, such as policy shifts, within a logic model can identify areas that should be included within your project’s risk analysis. It details planned activities, the immediate services or product of project activities (outputs), and the expected changes or benefits that occur after activities have been implemented (outcomes).

Applicants should specify objectives, identify what resources (inputs) are needed, outline proposed activities (outputs) and beneficiaries, and illustrate how activities lead to desired results in the theory of change. Applicants are encouraged to use the attached Project Design and Logic Model Template but are welcome to use their own templates so long as they provide the requisite information for thorough review of the proposed project. See Attachment 2) Project Design and Logic Model template.

The PDLM is not subject to a page limitation.

7) Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (PMP) (preferably as a Microsoft

Word document). This document details how a project’s performance monitoring and evaluation system will be carried out and by whom. It:

• Explains how the project’s performance toward its objectives will be tracked over time.

• Identifies which performance indicators the project will report against, the indicator type, baseline values, performance targets, and data sources or collection methods.

• Provides a clear description of the approach and data collection strategies and tools to be employed (e.g., pre- and post-test surveys, interviews, focus groups).

• Identifies what, if any, external evaluations will be conducted.

A sample Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan Template is provided as an attachment to this NOFO. Applicants are encouraged to refer to the Defining M&E Terms in the Project Design and Logic Model Template for concise explanations of M&E terms and definitions used by the Department of State.

The PMP is not subject to a page limitation.

8) Detailed Budgets (preferably as one Excel workbook with several linked worksheet tabs). Applicants must submit Detailed Budget proposals with requested funding broken down by (1) the type of funding and (2) the Foreign Assistance Data Review (FADR) Data Element(s). Applicants may also break down the funding by year of funds.

Using the OMB-approved budget categories (see SF-424A), applicants must include three (3) columns containing the request to CDP for federal funds, any cost sharing contribution by the applicant, and the total project cost. Costs must be in U.S. dollars ($ USD). Budget proposals must include a separate Detailed Budget worksheet tab in the Detailed Budget Excel workbook for each type of funding identified in the NOFO. Please reference the Total Funding section on the Cover Page for Type of Funding and Foreign Assistance Data Review (FADR) Data Elements allocated to this NOFO.

Applicants must submit a separate Detailed Budget worksheet tab for ESF funding (up to $2,000,000 USD) and for DA funding (up to $600,0000 USD). ESF funding may benefit any ESF-eligible country, including countries of Africa. DA funding must benefit only countries of Africa. Please see the attached Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Detailed Budget Template for more information.

Using the OMB-approved budget categories (see SF-424A), a Summary Budget worksheet tab should also be included in the Detailed Budget Excel workbook (see SF- 424A as a sample). Costs must be in U.S. dollars ($ USD). Please see the attached Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Detailed Budget Template for more information.

Detailed Budgets for sub-grantees should also be included as additional worksheet tabs within the Detailed Budget Excel workbook (if available at the time of submission).

Please see the attached Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Detailed Budget Template for more information.

Applicants should use the following NOFO-specific budget assumptions when preparing their budget proposals:

Budget proposals should be illustrative of the personnel, fringe benefits and administrative costs specifically associated with the project. Travel and related costs should assume the design and delivery of 16 courses throughout the project period, at least four of which to be held in the African region. Similarly, the budget should assume 16 industry and alumni network roundtables, at least four of which to be held in the African region. Courses should be in-person (and hybrid, as appropriate) and round tables should offer a mix of in-person and virtual attendance.

The Detailed Budget is not subject to a page limitation.

9) Budget Narratives (one for ESF funding Detailed Budget worksheet tab, one for DA funding Detailed Budget worksheet tab, and one for each sub-recipient worksheet tab if included in the Detailed Budget Excel workbook; preferably as Microsoft Word documents). Justify each line item in the budget and explain how the amounts were derived, consistent with the applicants’ documented policies, as well as the source and description of all proposed costs (and cost-share, if applicable). Each Budget Narrative should complement the corresponding Detailed Budget worksheet tab rather than repeat information provided in the Detailed Budget worksheet tab. For example, the budget narrative should provide details on the purpose of costs, reasonability of costs, cost or price analysis, explain allocations, explain any yearly variances, and tie expenses to project activities or objectives. Sources of all cost-share offered in the application should be identified and explained in the budget narrative. See Tab 1 of Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Detailed Budget Template, Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Budget Narrative Template (ESF), and Global Cyber and Digital Policy Training Budget Narrative Template (DA) for more information.

Budget Narratives are not subject to a page limitation.

10) Timeline (not to exceed one (1) page, preferably as a Gantt Chart or similar visualization of time-linked data, pages numbered), showing overlaps and dependencies, and covering the entire proposed duration of the project. The timeline should include activities and monitoring and evaluation efforts outlined in either a monthly or quarterly format. It should also include sufficient time for project closeout and to conduct and finalize any internal and external evaluations and afford sub-recipients (if any) adequate time for final reporting.

11) Key Personnel and Subject Matter Experts (not to exceed two (2) pages, limited to six individuals, preferably as a Microsoft Word document, pages numbered). This can present staff within your organization or outside of your organization (sub-recipients, consultants, contractors), carrying out administrative or technical responsibilities, who are integral to the success of the project. Please provide names, titles, roles, and biographic information that highlight relevant experience/qualifications of key personnel involved in the project. Next to the name of each proposed individual listed, the applicant must state whether the individual has agreed to their name being submitted as either key personnel and/or subject matter expert(s).

12) Resumes/CVs (not to exceed three (3) pages per person, preferably as a combined PDF file) for key personnel and subject matter experts.

13) Contingency Plan (not to exceed three (3) pages, preferably as a Microsoft Word document, pages numbered) for proposed activities should the originally planned activities not be able to be implemented. Applicants should demonstrate consideration of the risks identified in the submitted risk assessment and include specific alternative activities or locations as part of the Contingency Plan. Any proposed contingency plan must comply with 2CFR200.433 – Contingency provisions. Plans shall not include un-allocable or unallowable expenses and must not result in a larger Total Award Value than the identified as the total funding. CDP requires prior approval by the Grants Officer of the plan before any activities can take place, or costs can be incurred against the plan.

14) Additional Required Attachments and their possible acceptable alternatives:

• Audit (Single/Independent Financial Audit). A PDF file copy of your organization’s most recent single audit is required, if your organization meets the threshold as defined in 2 CFR 200 Subpart F. If your organization has not had a recent single audit (within your organization’s previous three (3) fiscal years), you must submit your organization’s most recent independent financial audit. If your organization has not been audited, you must explain the lack of an audit and provide independent confirmation of the adequacy of your organization’s internal controls.

• NICRA If your organization has a Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) and includes NICRA charges in the budget, your latest NICRA letter should be included as a PDF file. This document will not be reviewed by the Merit Review Panel but will be used by project and grant team if the submission is recommended for funding. Organizations that have previously established indirect cost rates must submit timely indirect cost proposals to their cognizant agency as required by Appendix III & IV of 2 CFR 200. If indirect cost proposals have not been submitted for re-negotiation, as required, out-of-date NICRAs may not be considered. If your proposal involves subawards to organizations charging indirect costs, please document those organizations’ NICRA.

• Letters of support from project partners describing the roles and responsibilities of each partner, if the project partner has been identified and the project partner’s participation is essential to executing the SOW.

15) Additional Optional Attachments:

Such additional documentation as the applicant organization believes is essential to understanding its proposal. Applicants are discouraged from providing optional attachments unless they are essential.

Please Note: The Proposal Narrative ten-page limit does not include the following documents, each of which should be uploaded as a separate file in the format specified above and below. File names that include the title of the required, if applicable, or optional documents (e.g., “Scope of Work”, “Timeline”) within the first thirty characters are encouraged:

• SF-424, SF-424A, and SF-424B (PDF or system-generated)

• SF-LLL (PDF or system-generated; Organizations that engage in lobbying the U.S.

government, including Congress, or pay for another entity to lobby ONLY)

• Cover Page and Executive Summary (not to exceed three (3) pages, preferably as a PDF file, pages numbered)

• Scope of Work (SOW) (preferably as a Microsoft Word document, not subject to page limitation)

• Project Design and Logic Model (PDLM) (preferably as a Microsoft Word document, not subject to page limitation)

• Project Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Plan (PMP) (preferably as a

Microsoft Word document, not subject to page limitation)

• Detailed Budgets (preferably as one Excel workbook with several linked worksheet tabs, not subject to page limitation)

• Budget Narratives (one for ESF funding Detailed Budget worksheet tab, one for

DA funding Detailed Budget worksheet tab, and one for each sub-recipient worksheet tab if included in the Detailed Budget Excel workbook; preferably as Microsoft Word documents, not subject to page limitation)

• Timeline (not to exceed one (1) page, preferably as a Gantt Chart or similar visualization of time-linked data, pages numbered)

• Key Personnel and Subject Matter Experts (not to exceed two (2) pages, limited to six individuals, preferably as a Microsoft Word document, pages numbered)

• Resumes/CVs (not to exceed three (3) pages per person for key personnel and subject matter experts, preferably as a combined PDF file)

• Contingency Plan (not to exceed three (3) pages, preferably as a Microsoft Word document)

• Additional Required Attachments (Audit PDF file, NICRA Letter PDF file, Letters of Support)

• Additional Optional Attachments (essential optional attachments ONLY)

Applications that do not include the elements listed above will be deemed technically ineligible and will not be reviewed for possible award. To ensure that all applications receive a balanced evaluation, the merit review panel will not be provided pages of documents that exceed specified page limits.

D.2.2 Additional Information Requested for Those Receiving Notification of Intent Successful applicants must submit, after notification of intent to make a federal award, but prior to issuance of a federal award:

● Written responses and revised application documents addressing conditions and recommendations from the merit review panel.

● A copy of the applicant’s latest NICRA as a PDF file, if the applicant has a NICRA and includes NICRA charges in the budget.

● A completed copy of the Department’s Financial Management Survey, if receiving U.S.

government funding for the first time.

● Submission of required documents to register in the Payment Management System managed by the Department of Health and Human Services, if receiving CDP funding for the first time (unless an exemption is provided).

● Other requested information or documents included in the notification of intent to make a federal award or subsequent communications prior to issuance of a federal award.

● Applicants who submit their applications through Grants.gov will be required to create a SAMS Domestic account in order to accept the final award. Accounts must be logged into to every 60 days in order to maintain an active account.

D3. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and System for Award Management (SAM.gov) All organizations, whether based in the United States or in another country, must have a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) and an active registration with SAM.gov. A UEI is one of the data elements mandated by Public Law 109-282, the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), for all federal awards.

Note: As of April 2022, a DUNS number is no longer required for federal assistance applications.

The 2 CFR 200 requires that sub-grantees obtain a UEI number. Please note the UEI for sub-grantees is not required at the time of application but will be required before an award is processed and/or directed to a sub-grantee.

Note: The process of obtaining or renewing a SAM.gov registration may take anywhere from 4-8 weeks. Please begin your registration as early as possible.

● Organizations based in the United States or that pay employees within the United States will need an Employer Identification Number (EIN) from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and a UEI number issued through SAM.gov. Once the UEI number is received continue with the remainder of the SAM.gov registration.

● Organizations based outside of the United States that do not pay employees within the United States do not need an EIN from the IRS but do need a UEI number – obtained by registering as an entity in SAM.gov.

● Please note that as of November 2022 and February 2022 respectively, organizations based outside of the United States that do not intend to apply for U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) awards are no longer required to have a NATO Commercial and Government Entity (NCAGE) code or CAGE code to apply for non-DoD foreign assistance funding opportunities.

● If an applicant organization is mid-registration and wishes to remove a CAGE or NCAGE code from their SAM.gov registration, the applicant should submit a help desk ticket (“incident”) with the Federal Service Desk (FSD) online at www.fsd.gov using the following language: “I do not intend to seek financial assistance from the Department of Defense. I do not wish to obtain a CAGE or NCAGE code. I understand that I will need to submit my registration after this incident is resolved in order to have my registration activated.”

Organizations based outside of the United States and that DO NOT plan to do business with the DoD should follow the below instructions:

Step 1: Proceed to SAM.gov to obtain a UEI and complete the SAM.gov registration process. SAM.gov registration must be renewed annually.

All prime organizations must also continue to maintain active SAM.gov registration with current information at all times during which they have an active federal award or application under consideration by a federal award agency. SAM.gov requires all entities to renew their registration once a year in order to maintain an active registration status in SAM. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure it has an active registration in SAM.gov and to maintain that active registration. If an applicant has not fully complied with the requirements at the time of application, the applicant may be deemed technically https://usg02.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fsd.gov%2Fgsafsd_sp%3Fid%3Dgsafsd_kb_articles%26sys_id%3Dc81018e71b1601d0937fa64ce54bcb57&data=05%7C01%7Carichardson%40guidehousefederal.com%7C78cee3cc704f48fee1b508db0f6cc096%7C8a628aaf2f064dc5a00733a134d5e988%7C1%7C0%7C638120733344255669%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ayerbxBQalx3edzK86ZVynOhlbhOZLdZJVNjgawR7Ps%3D&reserved=0 http://www.fsd.gov/ ineligible to receive an award and use that determination as a basis for making an award to another applicant.

Note: SAM.gov is not the same as SAMS Domestic. It is free to register in both systems, but the registration processes are different.

Information is included on the SAM.gov website to help international registrations:

https://www.fsd.gov/gsafsd_sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0016380&sys_kb_i d=194695221bfe4d983565ed3ce54bcbbb&spa=1

Please note, guidance on SAM.gov and the guidance on GSA’s website about requirement for registering in SAM.gov is subject to change and currently being updated. Applicants should review the website frequently for the most up-to-date guidance.

Organizations based outside of the United States and that DO plan to do business with the DoD in addition to Department of State should follow the below instructions:

Step 1: Apply for an NCAGE code by following the instructions on the NSPA NATO website linked below:

NCAGE Homepage:

https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/sc/CageList.aspx NCAGE Code Request Tool (NCRT):

https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/Codification/CageTool/home

D3.1 SAM.gov and UEI Exemptions An exemption from the UEI and SAM.gov registration requirements may be permitted on a case-by-case basis if:

• An applicant’s identity must be protected due to potential endangerment of their mission, their organization’s status, their employees, or individuals being served by the applicant.

• For an applicant, if the federal awarding agency makes a determination that there are exigent circumstances that prohibit the applicant from receiving a unique entity identifier and completing SAM.gov registration prior to receiving a federal award. In these instances, federal awarding agencies must require the recipient to obtain a unique entity identifier and complete SAM.gov registration within 30 days of the federal award date.

Organizations requesting exemption from UEI or SAM.gov requirements must email the point of contact listed in Section G of the NOFO at least two (2) weeks prior to the deadline in the NOFO providing a justification of their request. Approval for a SAM.gov exemption must come from the warranted Grants Officer before the application can be deemed eligible for review.

https://www.fsd.gov/gsafsd_sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0016380&sys_kb_id=194695221bfe4d983565ed3ce54bcbbb&spa=1 https://www.fsd.gov/gsafsd_sp?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB0016380&sys_kb_id=194695221bfe4d983565ed3ce54bcbbb&spa=1 https://usg02.safelinks.protection.office365.us/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feportal.nspa.nato.int%2FAC135Public%2Fscage%2FCageList.aspx&data=05%7C01%7Carichardson%40guidehousefederal.com%7C78cee3cc704f48fee1b508db0f6cc096%7C8a628aaf2f064dc5a00733a134d5e988%7C1%7C0%7C638120733344255669%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RzF60kwplVm%2BMPTs3Bu8PTNOnfBZmHdcN063KiLE1y8%3D&reserved=0 https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/Codification/CageTool/home

D3.2 Registering/Submitting Applications in SAMS Domestic and Grants.gov and Associated Deadlines All application submissions must be made electronically via Grants.gov or SAMS Domestic (https://mygrants.servicenowservices.com/ilms/). Both systems require registration by the applying organization. Please note that the Grants.gov registration process can take ten (10) business days or longer, even if all registration steps are completed in a timely manner.

Instructions for registering and submitting applications in each system are provided below.

All applicant organizations, whether submitting their applications through Grants.gov or SAMS Domestic are required to have an organization account in SAMS Domestic in order to accept the final award should the applicant organization be selected for funding.