FY2022 FINAL STATEMAP PA 10142021.docx

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

-- STATEMAP --

The State Component of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program

Re-authorized in 2019 by the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act (Public Law 116-9)

PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT No. G22AS00055

For Fiscal Year 2022

ISSUE DATE: October 15, 2021

CLOSING DATE & TIME:

December 16, 2021- @ 3:00 p.m. EST

PLEASE READ THE ENTIRE ANNOUNCEMENT CAREFULLY AND NOTE ANY CHANGES

Paperwork Reduction Act Approval – OMB control number 1028-0088, Expiration Date 10/31/2024 ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS i

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS i

PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT CHANGES ii

PART I. Public Law, Program Priorities, and Geologic Map Products 1

PART II. Timetables, Eligibility, Format Instructions, and Proposal Evaluation 6

PART III. Proposal Delivery and Submission Instructions 16

PART IV. General Provisions 17

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Proposal Submission Forms and their Instructions

A. STATEMAP Proposal Summary Sheet B. STATEMAP Statement of Outcome C. Budgets Sheets (for both entire proposal and individual projects) D. Special Terms and Conditions E. Instructions for Uploading Deliverables F. Data Management Plan- Example Template

Form required at the end of the project period (form is online only) i G. Standard Form 425 – Federal Financial Report (submitted through FedConnect); form is available online at https://www.grants.gov/forms/post-award-reporting-forms.html

FY2022– STATEMAP Program Announcement – G22AS00006

PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT CHANGES

This Program Announcement contains extensive changes compared to recent years. We encourage any questions or comments to be sent to the NCGMP Office by emailing Mike Marketti (mmarketti@usgs.gov).

Part I, A and throughout: Updated information about the U.S. GeoFramework Initiative and related possible deliverables.

Part I, A, and throughout: A two-year performance period is now an option for FY2022 STATEMAP projects. A mid-year progress report after 12 months of a two-year Cooperative Agreement is now required. All funding for a two-year project would be awarded in FY2022. States may still submit a proposal every fiscal year.

Part I, B: U.S. GeoFramework Initiative is now listed as one of the mapping priorities.

Part I, C: A GIS Shapefile must now be submitted with each proposal which shows the location of all proposed project areas.

Part I, C, 12, d, Non-Allowable Expenses: STATEMAP funds can now be used for training course fees; however, STATEMAP funds still cannot be used for tuition.

Part I, D: Applicants must now identify on their proposal cover sheet all Guidance Criteria being met for each proposed project. Please note that multiple Guidance Criteria can be selected for one project.

Part I, D: Two categories of Guidance Criteria for STATEMAP Geologic Map Products were created in FY2022 – Category 1, or New Mapping Options, and Category 2, U.S. GeoFramework Initiative Options.

Part I, D, Categories 1 and 2: Applicants may now request up to $500,000 for activities that fall under under Category 1, and may request up to $500,000 for activities that fall under Category 2.

Part I, D and throughout: All submitted maps must be GeMS-compliant (Level 3) starting in FY2022.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 2: Criteria has been updated to allow derivative map submission based on geologic maps of any age, so long as they have not been superseded (i.e., they are still geologically relevant).

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 3: This is a new Guidance Criteria this FY. New mapping can be considered a part of the U.S. GeoFramework Initiative Option if required for needed framework syntheses.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 4: This is a new Guidance Criteria this FY. New subsurface geologic maps and databases based on three-dimensional mapping/modeling can be submitted. This Guidance Criteria also allows the conversion of raster data for 3D surfaces of interest, digitization of structure contour and isopach data, digitization of cross section traces, and extraction of XYZ data from cross sections. Additionally, these data must be submitted in an approved format to be provided.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 5: Compile and submit to the NCGMP citable, GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases of specific areas (e.g., multiple counties, multiple 30’x60’ quadrangles, or areas of similar size), or of the entire state, at scales of 1:500,000 or more detailed, preferably 1:250K or more detailed. See Guidance Criteria for more information.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 6: This is an updated Guidance Criteria this FY. Projects can now include conversion of relevant paper or digital maps of any age, so long as they have not been superseded, to GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 7: This is a new Guidance Criteria this FY. Projects can now resolve interstate and intrastate stratigraphic correlation issues in their project proposals. The resulting product must be an updated stratigraphic chart and submission of any new stratigraphic nomenclature to the U.S. Geologic Names Lexicon. If interstate stratigraphic correlation is intended, each collaborating State must request their own funding via STATEMAP for this work, and Letters of Support must be drafted by all participating States to be submitted with each collaborating State’s proposal.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 8: This is a new Guidance Criteria this FY. Projects may now include organization and submission of existing geochronological sample data. This will be done via a NCGMP-provided template, and these data will be submitted by NCGMP to the USGS National Geochronological Database.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 9: This is an updated Guidance Criteria this FY. The Guidance Criteria now allows updating the NGMDB Catalog to include citations and links to downloadable files for all published maps and related reports for your state, and make corrections to existing records (e.g., make sure existing records in NGMDB are up to date). Projects can also (or) update existing entries in NGMDB to appropriately tag these items to ensure that they are searchable in the Catalog.

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 10: This is a new Guidance Criteria this FY. Projects may now inventory all of their completed/existing publications for your state that include digital 3D models or products amenable to the creation of 3D models (e.g., regional structure contour maps, isopach maps, stratigraphic cross sections, gridded or raster surfaces, etc.) and work with the NGMDB staff to appropriately tag these items to ensure that they will become searchable in the NGMDB Catalog. Projects may also (or) inventory on-going and/or planned publications for your state (e.g., 2D maps, 3D models and products amenable to the creation of 3D models such as regional structure contour maps, isopach maps, stratigraphic cross sections, gridded or raster surfaces, etc.).

Part I, D, Guidance Criteria 11: This Guidance Criteria has been updated this FY. Projects may request funds to develop the capability to produce fully-attributed GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases through GIS training or other training that is appropriate to the needs of the proposing State Geological Survey. A report detailing the workflow and a resulting GeMS-compliant map must be delivered to the NCGMP. Note that if your state previously received funds under this criterion, you may not receive FY2022 funds for this criterion.

Part I, D, FY2022 Requirements for New Mapping Products: New requirements for 2D map product deliverables are now listed. If performing new mapping (Guidance Criteria 1 or 3), map(s) must be submitted as GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases, along with a PDF map graphic, by the end of the one- or two-year performance period. Additionally, within one year after the end of the performance period, all previously submitted GeMS files must be published and therefore, citable, and usable by the USGS. Citation must be delivered to NCGMP no later than one year after the end of the applicable performance period. If publishing the GeMS file(s) is not feasible, we request the State contact the NCGMP STATEMAP Program Officer for publication assistance. Prior to submission of GeMS files to NCGMP, the database(s) must be verified, and the resulting QA/QC Compliance File must accompany each database upon submission.

Part I, D, FY2022 Requirements for New Mapping Products: New requirements for 3D map/model product deliverables are now listed. All must be submitted by the end of the one- or two-year performance period. Prior to submission of deliverables to NCGMP, the files must be verified in collaboration with NCGMP.

Part I, D, FY2022 Requirements for New Mapping Products: Any questions regarding the upload process for all deliverables may be addressed to the STATEMAP Administrative Officer, Mike Marketti (mmarketti@usgs.gov).

Part I, D, FY2022 Requirement for New Mapping Products: If receiving STATEMAP funds for this FY to digitize, compile, or otherwise produce maps without performing new mapping, all delivered Level 3 GeMS files must be published and citable prior to the end of the performance period.

Part II, A, Timetables: Please note the new FY2022 Proposal Announcement Date and Closing Date and Time for Proposal Submission.

Part II, C, Proposal Format Instructions: FY2022 Proposals must now include Letters of Support if project(s) involve interstate stratigraphic reconciliation. In this scenario, each state involved must account for their own funding to perform said project in their Project Proposal and must collect Letters of Support from each collaborating State. For example, if States A and B intend to apply for separate funding to address stratigraphic nomenclature issues across the State A and State B border, State A must provide a Letter of Support for State B’s proposal, and State B must provide a Letter of Support for State A’s proposal. These must be written by the State Geologist (or equivalent authority) for each participating State. A short summary (no more than one page long) is requested to describe the proposed work in a succinct format. This Letter of Support must not exceed 2 pages.

Part II, C, Proposal Format Instructions: The STATEMAP Proposal Summary Sheet must now include a list of the Guidance Criteria being addressed with each proposed project.

Part II, C, Proposal Format Instructions: Note that at the end of the FY2022 one- or two-year Cooperative Agreement period, all new maps produced during the immediately preceding STATEMAP Cooperative Agreement (in this case, FY2021) must be published and therefore usable and citable by the USGS. Citations for these maps must be delivered to the USGS with FY2022 deliverables.

Part II, C, Proposal Format Instructions: In the Proposal Technical Section, note that items B, Location and Geologic Setting, and D, Strategy for Performing the Geologic Mapping, may be excluded if geologic mapping is not proposed as part of the project (e.g., Guidance Criteria 8). Please note that compilations are considered geologic mapping.

Part II, C, Proposal Format Instructions: Item F – Note that products other than geologic maps are now included. Mapping products must also be submitted as verified Level 3 GeMS databases.

Part II, C, Proposal Format Instructions, and throughout: Item G – Note that specific employee names are no longer required, just strongly suggested. Job titles may be used in lieu of names for high-turnaround positions.

Part II, C, Proposal Format Instructions, Budget Sheets: For Conference/Workshop Travel, it is now required to travel to a NCGMP-branded conference/workshop/training if requesting funds under Category 2: U.S. GeoFramework Initiative Objectives. A State may now request up to $6,000 for travel, increased compared to FY2021.

Part II, D, Proposal Evaluation: The State Mapping Advisory Committee portion of the evaluation process has been decreased from 15 points to 10 points for Category 2 proposals. A new evaluation category for Category 2 proposals has also been added, “Relevance to the requirements of the U.S. GeoFramework Initiative,” worth 5 points.

Attachment A: Under each Project, a new section for the Guidance Criteria Number(s) has been added.

Section A.4, Definitions: The definition for the STATEMAP Program Officer has been updated, specifically, the Officer has changed from Darcy McPhee to Jenna Shelton.

Attachment E: Please use mmarketti@usgs.gov when selecting a myUSGS sponsor. Please no longer choose dmcphee@usgs.gov.

Attachment F, Data Management Plan: The GeMS format was added to each section that requires the selection of data format.

Section A7 in Terms and Conditions, Pre-Agreement Costs: Pre-agreement costs may be considered and approved on a case-by-case basis. However, approval must be requested and granted prior to any incurring any expenses. Written approval must be given by the USGS Office of Acquisitions and Grants.

ii

PART I. Public Law, Program Priorities, and Geologic Map Products A. The National Geologic Mapping Act The 102nd Congress recognized that the USGS and the State Geological Surveys needed a coordinated program to prioritize the geologic mapping requirements of the Nation, and to increase production of these geologic maps. The National Geologic Mapping Act (Public Law 102-285) was signed into law in 1992 and created the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP). The Act has been re-authorized four times since then, most recently by the 116th Congress in 2019 (S. 47: John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act, sec. 5002). The Act recognizes that geologic maps are the primary database for virtually all applied and basic earth-science investigations.

The objectives of NCGMP as outlined in the Act are to:

1. Determine the Nation’s geologic framework through the systematic development of geologic maps; such maps will contribute to the National Geologic Map Database.

2. Develop complementary national databases that provide value-added information to the National Geologic Map Database (NGMDB).

3. Apply cost-effective mapping techniques that assemble and disseminate geologic-map information, and that render such information of greater application and benefit to the public.

4. Develop public awareness of the role and application of geologic-map information to the resolution of national issues of land use management.

In 2016-2017, NCGMP went through a process of renewing its vision and mission by developing a new Strategic Plan. The vision of the USGS NCGMP is to create an integrated, three-dimensional, digital geologic map of the United States and its territories to address the changing needs of the Nation by the year 2030. The mission of the USGS NCGMP is to characterize, interpret, and disseminate a national geologic framework model of the Earth through geologic mapping and associated research in order to support the responsible use of land, water, energy, and minerals and to mitigate the impact of geologic hazards on society, thereby facilitating national security and economic growth through informed earth resource management.

The STATEMAP Program continues to carry out NCGMP’s mission and address the Department of Interior’s Secretarial priorities (see https://www.doi.gov/ourpriorities) by developing a national geologic framework through the development of two-dimensional and three-dimensional geologic map databases. Geologic mapping supported by STATEMAP provides the foundational information necessary to manage the Nation’s land and water resources, adapt to changes in the environment, and secure the Nation. Geologic maps and associated STATEMAP products provide the data necessary to assess our natural resources, including critical and rare earth minerals, and to maintain the health of our forests. STATEMAP mapping efforts continue to support the development of modern infrastructure, including our highways, bridges, and pipelines, in almost every State by providing information necessary for the exploration of aggregate resources and building materials as well as land-use planning. In addition, STATEMAP support helps to maintain strong geologic mapping programs and a healthier workforce at geological surveys throughout the Nation.

B. STATEMAP Component of the NCGMP The primary objectives of the STATEMAP component of the NCGMP are to establish the geologic framework of areas determined to be vital to the economic, social, or scientific welfare of individual States and the Nation. The State Geologist shall determine mapping priorities in consultation with a multi-representational State Mapping Advisory Committee. These priorities shall be based on: a) State requirements for geologic-map information in areas of multiple-issue need or areas of compelling single-issue need, b) State requirements for geologic-map information in areas where mapping is required to solve critical earth-science problems, and c) the requirements of the NCGMP’s U.S. GeoFramework Initiative. Priorities are not dependent on past agreements with the USGS.

With the onset of the U.S. GeoFramework Initiative (USGI) in 2020, the FY2022 STATEMAP Program Announcement includes new guidelines and opportunities that directly support the goals of the Initiative. The USGI is defined as an initiative that builds on the National Geologic Map Database Phase 3 Concept, and works to: (1) construct a multi-resolution and seamless national 2D/3D geologic framework model, (2) leverage existing and new geologic mapping, and (3) provide new syntheses and enhanced databases to support scientific discovery and informed decision-making. In designing a national 2D/3D geologic framework model, it is necessary for the USGS to foster a comprehensive approach to planning, data management, workflow, and other elements (i.e., a standardized workflow for implementation). While all previously funded STATEMAP projects fundamentally contribute to the USGI via new mapping products, the USGI also calls for an array of new deliverables that extend beyond the range of previously funded STATEMAP projects. The complexity of incorporating those new features is recognized in this FY2022 Program Announcement through explicit attention to those deliverables and the funding needs they create.

C. STATEMAP Proposals

Only one proposal will be accepted from each State each fiscal year. Proposals may contain several geologic mapping projects and/or related efforts in support of the USGI. Projects may contain one or multiple quadrangles in an area. Each project should: (1) be clearly defined and justified, (2) be organized around a credible issue or area to be mapped, and (3) respond to the FY22 Guidance for STATEMAP Geologic Map Products below. A 1:1 Federal/State funding match is required for the total budget. A graphic or index map showing the project areas should be included in the body of the proposal, and a GIS shapefile showing all proposed project areas must also be submitted with the proposal. The performance period for FY2022 STATEMAP Cooperative Agreements can now be either one or two years, and a completely new proposal subject to full review may be submitted each year. The STATEMAP Proposal Evaluation Panel will recommend a funding level for each proposal submitted in each Fiscal Year cycle. The evaluated strength and quality of proposals will be considered in making funding decisions. If full funding is not granted, an applicant is required to submit to the STATEMAP Program Officer and Grant Specialist a revised form SF 424, revised summary sheet, revised budget sheets, and revised deliverables if they will change, limited to the projects and amount recommended for funding. Alternatively, an applicant can decline to participate in the program.

D. FY2022 Guidance for STATEMAP Geologic Map Products

Applicants may submit proposals for geologic mapping projects following at least one of the Guidance Criteria that follow and must identify on their cover sheet which of the following Guidance Criteria are being met in the proposal of their projects.

Category 1. New Mapping Options (Up to $500,000 can be requested under Category 1):

1. Create and submit to the NCGMP GeMS-compliant (Level 3) new geologic maps at a scale deemed appropriate for the geologic problem being addressed, typically at or more detailed than 1:100,000 scale, but not limited to this scale range. See NGMDB | GeMS (usgs.gov) for documentation and other information about GeMS. Please note that a published and therefore citable version of all produced Level 3 GeMS file(s) must be delivered to NCGMP no later than one year after the end of the performance period.

2. Create and submit to the NCGMP derivative maps that augment the new mapping proposed according to Guidance Criteria #1 above or a previously produced yet still relevant geologic map product from any source. This may be done only if the derivative map provides additional value to a significant geologic problem. In all cases, the purpose of the derivative product should be adequately explained and the geologic map(s) on which it was based should be clearly identified. If applicable, a published Level 3 GeMS file must accompany the derivative map submission(s).

Category 2. U.S. GeoFramework Initiative Options (up to $500,000 may be requested under Category 2):

3. Create and submit (by the end of the performance period) to the NCGMP new GeMS-compliant (Level 3) new 2D geologic maps required for needed framework syntheses. Please note that a published and therefore citable version of all produced Level 3 GeMS file(s) must be delivered to NCGMP no later than one year after the end of the performance period.

4. Create and submit to the NCGMP new subsurface geologic maps based on 3D mapping/modeling. This Guidance Criteria allows conversion of raster data for surfaces of interest, digitization of structure contour and isopach data, digitization of cross section traces, and extraction of XYZ data from cross sections. Digitized contour maps should be submitted as published, citable Level 3 GeMS-compliant geospatial databases. Digital (grid or raster) surfaces should be submitted as CSV files containing XYZ coordinates and geologic attributes.

5. Compile and submit to the NCGMP citable, GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases of specific areas (e.g., multiple counties, multiple 30’x60’ quadrangles, or areas of similar size), or of the entire state, at scales of 1:500,000 or more detailed, preferably 1:250K or more detailed. Statewide compilations can include gaps (i.e., areas without mapping). Compilations of surficial geology, bedrock geology, and/or basement geology/topography are acceptable. The compilation should be internally stratigraphically reconciled, edge matched, and accompanied by metadata or other descriptions (e.g., a README file) of how the compilation was constructed. Depending on the geology, the method for managing bedrock and surficial content may vary; please consult the GeMS documentation and address technical questions to gems@usgs.gov. Funds for necessary field-checking, especially along map boundaries, to reconcile conflicts in geologic mapping can be requested to support the compilation process.

6. Convert relevant paper or digital maps (of any age, as long as they have not been superseded) to published, citable GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases (see https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Info/standards/GeMS/draftimplplan.pdf), and submit to the NCGMP Office.

7. Resolve interstate and intrastate stratigraphic correlation issues, resulting in the delivery of an updated stratigraphic chart and submission of new and/or revised stratigraphic nomenclature to the NCGMP Office for inclusion in Geolex (U.S. Geologic Names Lexicon). If the proposal requests funding to resolve interstate stratigraphic correlation issues, the intention to propose this work must be listed on the proposals for each state involved, each requesting their own funds to perform said project, and each proposal must include letters of support from the collaborating State Geological Surveys.

8. Organize and submit to the NCGMP Office, via an NCGMP-provided template, existing geochronological sample data for inclusion in the USGS National Geochronological Database, managed by the NGMDB.

9. In collaboration with the NGMDB staff, update the NGMDB Catalog to include citations and links to downloadable files for all published maps and related reports for your state, and make corrections to existing records (e.g., make sure existing records in the NGMDB are up to date). Update existing entries in the NGMDB to appropriately tag these items to ensure that they are searchable in the Catalog.

10. Inventory all completed/existing publications for your state that include digital 3D models or products amenable to the creation of integrated 3D models (e.g., regional structure contour maps, isopach maps, stratigraphic cross sections, gridded or raster surfaces, etc.) and work with the NGMDB staff to appropriately tag these items to ensure that they will become searchable in the NGMDB Catalog, AND/OR inventory on-going and/or planned publications for your state (e.g., 2D maps, 3D models and products amenable to the creation of 3D models such as regional structure contour maps, isopach maps, stratigraphic cross sections, gridded or raster surfaces, etc.). The required file format for all inventory work will be provided by the NCGMP.

11. Develop the capability and capacity to produce fully-attributed GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases (https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Info/standards/GeMS/draftimplplan.pdf) through GIS training (or other training) that is appropriate to the needs of the proposing State Geological Survey. A report detailing the resulting new workflow and a resulting GeMS-compliant map must be delivered to the NCGMP. Note that if your state previously received funds under this criterion, you may not receive FY2022 funds for this criterion.

A total proposal request may not exceed $1,000,000. No more than $500,000 can be tagged to Criteria #1 and #2, and no more than $500,000 can be tagged to Criteria #3 through #11.

E. FY2022 Requirements for New Mapping Products

All new 2D map product deliverables defined in FY2022 STATEMAP Cooperative Agreements (see Guidance Criteria #1 and #3 above) must be submitted as a GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map databases. If generating 2D map product deliverables that do not require new mapping, a published, citable, and therefore usable GeMS-compliant (Level 3) geologic map database must be submitted at the end of the performance period for each product. Prior to submission, all GeMS (Level 3) geologic map databases must be verified for compliancy, using the validation and geologic names checking scripts provided through the GeMS website; these scripts and related documentation (e.g., GeMS Checklist) provided at the GeMS website must be included in the submission.

All 3D map product deliverables defined in FY2022 STATEMAP Cooperative Agreements (see Guidance Criteria #4 above) must be submitted as published, GeMS-compliant geospatial databases if appropriate. Digital (grid or raster) surfaces should be submitted as CSV files containing XYZ coordinates and geologic attributes. Prior to submission, all maps in vector format (e.g., structure contours) must be in GeMS (Level 3) format and must be verified for compliancy, using the validation and geologic names checking scripts provided through the GeMS website; these scripts and related documentation (e.g., GeMS Checklist) provided at the GeMS website must be included in the submission.

If proposing project work under Guidance Criteria #1 or #3, all maps delivered under a Cooperative Agreement must be delivered as published, citable Level 3 GeMS files no later than one year after the end of the performance period. These GeMS files must contain published data that can be publicly distributed by the USGS given proper citation.

Geologic mapping should be done at a scale deemed appropriate for the geologic problem being addressed (except when submitting under USGI Guidance, as noted above). At the minimum, a geologic map should include: (1) a clear and legible base (include base map credit and map projection), (2) scale and contour interval, (3) north arrow and magnetic declination, (4) title, authorship, publisher, and date, (5) location index map, (6) field data or field data stations, (7) description of map units, (8) explanation of map symbols, and (9) unit symbols on map. A geologic map may also include correlation or sequence of map units, stratigraphic columns, cross sections, other down-hole or three-dimensional data, derivative maps, and text, but these additions are not required. Geologic maps in digital form also may contain a variety of point data for specific sites, essentially comprising a 3-dimensional database. For cartographic elements, please use the FGDC standard whenever feasible (see https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Info/standards/#CartoStnd).

As you prepare your geologic maps, compare the stratigraphic nomenclature used on your map to the U.S. Geologic Names Lexicon (Geolex) (http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Geolex/). The GeMS geologic names checking script will assist in identifying formal geologic names on the map that are in Geolex, which will assist the authors and the NGMDB in modifying the established nomenclature as needed. The script produces a spreadsheet in which the author provides guidance on corrections or additions that should be considered for Geolex. Include in this guidance any relevant bibliographic citations (e.g., for names that have been introduced, modified, or abandoned).

All deliverables must be uploaded to the NCGMP Grants Management database. Additionally, all GeMS files must also be submitted directly to the NGMDB by emailing Dave Soller (drsoller@usgs.gov). Please see Attachment E for instructions on uploading deliverables. Any questions regarding the upload process can be addressed to the NCGMP STATEMAP Administrative Officer, Mike Marketti (mmarketti@usgs.gov).

PART II. Timetables, Eligibility, Format Instructions, and Proposal Evaluation A. Timetables Proposal Announcement Date: October 15, 2021 Closing Date and Time for Proposal Submission: December 16, 2021 @ 3:00 p.m. (EST) B. Eligibility – Who May Submit a Proposal Only State Geological Surveys are eligible to apply to the STATEMAP component of the NCGMP pursuant to the National Geologic Mapping Act (Public Law 116-9). Because many State Geological Surveys are organized under a State university system, such universities may submit a proposal on behalf of the State Geological Survey.

State Geological Surveys must have a State Mapping Advisory Committee (or equivalent) that meets annually to qualify for funding. This committee shall advise the State Geological Survey on geologic mapping priorities within their State. A letter of support from the Chair of the State Mapping Advisory Committee must accompany the proposal (see Section C5 below for more details).

State Geological Surveys that have been funded previously under STATEMAP must follow requirements specified in previous STATEMAP awards and must have no outstanding deliverables (transmittal letter, geologic maps, and technical reports) due. Failure to meet previous award requirements will be grounds for ineligibility (see Attachment D, Section A.5 6).

C. Proposal Format Instructions

PROPOSALS MUST BE ARRANGED ACCORDING TO THE FORMAT AND ORDER PROVIDED BELOW. Following this format ensures that every proposal contains all essential information and is evaluated equitably. All documents should be combined and submitted as one Portable Document Format (PDF) file.

All proposals must include the following documents:

1. Standard Form 424, Application for Federal Assistance (mandatory form provided in grants.gov). The person who electronically submits the SF-424 must have the authority to bind the State to the terms of the assistance award.

2. Standard Form 424A, Budget Information – Non-Construction Programs (mandatory form provided in grants.gov).

3. Standard Form 424B, Assurances—Non-construction Programs (mandatory form provided in grants.gov).

4. Negotiated Rate Agreement/Indirect Cost Rate Agreement. Most States and Universities have a rate agreement. They are usually titled “State and Local Rate Agreement” or “Colleges and Universities Rate Agreement”. The document provides the rates approved for use on grants, contracts, and other agreements with the Federal Government. New regulations (2 CFR 200.414) went into effective in 2015 stating that a recipient must provide a federally approved negotiated rate agreement or their indirect costs cannot exceed 10%. The language states the agency will comply with the recipients approved rate, however, that is exempt for individual program regulations that have restrictions regarding indirect costs. The program authority for STATEMAP has a cap of 18%. If you request fringe benefits that are not referenced in your approved rate agreement or if you do not have a rate agreement to provide please include a reference on how your fringe benefit rate(s) are determined for your university/organization.

5. Letter from the Chair of State Mapping Advisory Committee (SMAC). The letter should discuss state priorities, the long-term mapping plan, the process used to prioritize geologic mapping projects selected for the current proposal, and how the proposed mapping fits into the long-term mapping plans for the state. The date of the committee meeting and a list of committee members who attended the meeting including their affiliations and expertise are also required. Attendance via virtual means is encouraged to increase representation. This letter is NOT a summary of the proposed projects. SMAC letters should be limited to no more than 4 pages (not including the list of members). Voting SMAC members must not be listed on any projects as personnel.

6. Letter of Support from Collaborating State Geological Surveys (only applicable if applying for funding in response to Guidance Criteria #7). This/These letter(s) should indicate the intent for specific states to propose work on addressing interstate stratigraphic correlation issues. For example, if States A and B intend to apply for separate funding to address stratigraphic nomenclature issues across the State A and State B border, State A must provide a Letter of Support for State B’s proposal, and State B must provide a Letter of Support for State A’s proposal. These must be written by the State Geologist (or equivalent authority) for each participating State. A short summary (no more than one page long) is requested to describe the proposed work in a succinct format. This Letter of Support must not exceed 2 pages.

7. STATEMAP Proposal Summary Sheet (Attachment A). Using the provided or similar format in Attachment A, submit a proposal summary sheet that includes project dates, proposed projects, Guidance Criteria (#1 through #11) aligned with those proposed projects, deliverables, funds requested per project, and total funding requested.

8. Statement of Outcome (Attachment B). This should be one page with a bibliographic citation showing how one of your state’s recently published STATEMAP products was used by another organization or person. It is beneficial to include a letter from the organization stating that the geologic map or product was a critical component of their decision-making process.

9. Table of Contents.

10. Proposal Technical Section. The technical section of the proposal is limited to 25 single space pages, with no smaller than 11-point font size, and 1-inch margins. Proposals shorter than 25 pages are encouraged if they contain sufficient content. Remember that a graphic is worth a thousand words, and the Proposal Evaluation Panel has many proposals to read. The use of tables and charts for clarity and conciseness is encouraged. Figures must be labeled, of high quality, and easy to read. Please keep in mind that any figures/images included should be of sufficient resolution such that they are legible when your proposal is printed. References ARE NOT included in this 25-page limit. The technical section of your proposal includes the following:

a. Introduction. The introduction should include the relevance of the proposed projects to the State’s long-range geologic mapping plan. It should give a clear and concise overview of the project objectives and societal and scientific problems to be addressed. A graphic showing how your long-range plan may relate to population growth, transportation corridors, or some other societal need can be very helpful.

b. Location and Geologic Setting. IF APPLICABLE, a clear, readable map (with scale) showing the location of each project area should accompany the text. A separate generalized geologic map of your State may also be helpful. If submitting a project applicable to Guidance Criteria 3 – 11, a specific area may not need to be specified, and this section can be skipped. Provide justification as to why this section is skipped in the text.

c. Purpose and Justification. This section should answer a few simple, but important questions. Why are you doing this mapping? Who are your customers? What are the fundamental scientific contributions? What benefits will society receive from the mapping? If geologic maps already produced nearby have been used by local or state agencies in making decisions, reporting on these outcomes is encouraged.

d. Strategy for Performing the Geologic Mapping. IF APPLICABLE, this section should emphasize how the geologic mapping will be accomplished, who will be mapping where, and for how long. Include logistics of how the geologic mapping will be accomplished. If drilling, sample collection, and/or other analyses are proposed, please include a justification as to why these are included in the mapping strategy and how they will inform the proposed mapping. Provide an explanation for more expensive work, such as drilling or helicopter support. If a project is part of a multiyear effort, explain what will be completed for each year. This section should be consistent with the budget justification and budget itemization sections. NCGMP strongly encourages geologic mapping projects to be a team approach to promote safe field practices.

e. Preliminary Results and Prior Work. If you or others have done any work in the proposed study area, including work not funded by STATEMAP, include a summary of findings or outcomes. This is not a list of prior STATEMAP work, but rather a summary of the current state of science and mapping in the proposed study area.

f. Deliverable Geologic Maps and/or Products. You must provide an explicit list of geologic maps and/or products that will be delivered at the end of the one- or two-year Cooperative Agreement period. If a deliverable is a partial quad, you must indicate exactly which section of the quad will be mapped and delivered. When PDF map graphics are submitted at the end of the period of performance, it is recognized that they may be in review, and not in final form; regardless, the accompanying GeMS Level 3 file must be complete and fully verified, and citable if not produced from a new mapping effort. All necessary map components must be included on the PDF map graphic (see Part I, section D). At the end of the FY2022 one- or two-year Cooperative Agreement period, all new maps generated during the immediately preceding STATEMAP Cooperative Agreement (in this case, FY2021) must be published and therefore usable and citable by the USGS. Note: It is expected that all map deliverables will reflect what you propose and what your budget requests. For example, if you request funding for the collection of new geochemical or geochronological data, your deliverables must include these data.

g. Project Personnel. Provide a table or list that includes information about the Principal Investigator, staff, and support positions (such as geologist, field assistant, or cartographer). Briefly discuss each person’s role on the project so that it links to the budget and mapping strategy section. For each person give a brief statement of their background or vita and indicate whether the person works for your Survey or elsewhere (contractor or volunteer). To support changes in staffing, specific person’s names do not need to be included if applicable; however, it is strongly suggested that names are included. Rather, job titles (e.g., Geologist) may be used in lieu of employee names.

h. Budget explanation and justification. This section should explain and justify in detail your budget. It is important that you itemize your supplies, laboratory and drilling expenses, travel expenses, and any unusual costs in this section for the proposal evaluation panel over the two-year performance period. If travel to a conference is included, provide justification for this trip regarding geologic mapping in your state.

11. USGS Data Management Plan

Proposals submitted to USGS must include a supplementary document of no more than two pages labeled "Data Management Plan" (DMP). This supplementary document should describe how the proposal will conform to USGS policy on the dissemination and sharing of research results and associated data. A valid DMP may include only the statement that no detailed plan is needed (e.g. “No data are expected to be produced from this project”), if the statement is accompanied by a clear justification. This supplementary document may include:

a. the types of data, samples, physical collections, software, curriculum materials, and other materials to be produced during the project;

b. the standards to be used for data and metadata format and content (where existing standards are absent or deemed inadequate, this should be documented along with any proposed solutions or remedies);

c. policies for access and sharing including provisions for appropriate protection of privacy, confidentiality, security, intellectual property, or other rights or requirements;

d. provisions for re-use, re-distribution, and the production of derivatives; and

e. plans for archiving data, samples, and other research products, and for preservation of free public access to them.

An example template for data management plans is provided in Attachment F. Additional guidance on data management plans is available from the USGS Data Management web site here: https://www2.usgs.gov/datamanagement/plan/dmplans.php Note: The DMP does not count towards the 25-page technical section limit.

12. Budget sheets (Attachment C) Your proposal must include one budget sheet for the entire proposal, and one budget sheet for each project. These attachments are only a format guide. You may create your own budget sheet with the same format which has more lines for needed itemization. The amount of contributions from a State Geological Survey must be equal to or greater than the amount requested from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and must be derived from non-Federal sources. All budget costs must be itemized and consistent with the strategy and budget justification sections, and each budget item must be tagged with the specific Guidance Criteria/Criterion it supports. If it is an expensive item, or a significant proportion of your proposal request, the Proposal Evaluation Panel will want to know its details. NOTE: STATEMAP proposal budgets are Not to Exceed $1,000,000 total requested budget.

PLEASE READ EACH CATEGORY DESCRIPTION BELOW AND PROVIDE THE DETAILED BREAKDOWN THAT IS REQUIRED FOR EACH. THIS WILL HELP AVOID POSSIBLE DELAYS IN PROCESSING A FUNDED PROPOSAL, AS AN AWARD WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.

The budgets shall contain the following:

Salaries and Wages. List names and/or positions and the rate-of-compensation for each person. Salaries or wages for student assistants (both undergraduates and graduate students) are an acceptable cost to the program. This should only include personnel actively involved in the proposed projects. The portion of staff time involved in, for example, digitizing, reviewing and map production (to open-file status) can be charged here. If senior management personnel do some of this actual work, include an explanation of their roles. Non-state survey staff working on the project should also be included if they are being supported by other state funding (see below under cost share). The budget sheet should include the total time worked on the project(s) (in units of months, weeks, days, hours, or percentage of time), rate-of-compensation (dollars/hour for hourly employees, salary/year, or salary/month), and job title or role for each person. If contract employees are hired under a different category in the budget, their total time, rate-of-compensation, job titles, and roles should also be explained. Unfilled positions should not be listed as a funding match.

Example Salary/Wage Budget Section

Employee B OR GIS Specialist

$7560

a. Fringe Benefits. Propose your rates/amounts. If rates are audit approved, include a copy of the audit agreement and/or the name of the audit agency. If you request fringe benefits and not indirect costs you still have to provide an indirect cost rate agreement or show how the fringe benefit rate(s) is calculated.

b. Field Expenses. Itemize the estimated travel costs (i.e., number of people, number of travel days, per diem rate, mileage rate, airfare, transportation, and any other travel costs).

c. Other Direct Cost Line Items to List.

i. Supplies. List costs for office, field, and laboratory supplies, including base maps, aerial photographs, petrographic thin sections, and other office and laboratory supplies. Itemize by including the number and cost for each item. Do not list a lump sum for each category; a breakdown needs to be provided to show how the costs were determined.

ii. Equipment. List expendable equipment costs. Federal STATEMAP funds are not intended for the purchase of computer hardware, GPS, vehicles, or other nonexpendable property. STATEMAP funds may, if necessary, be used for the purchase of software site licenses (e.g., software required for 3D modeling) that are used specifically for the completion of STATEMAP products. Requests for software must be accompanied by a copy of an up-to-date cost quote from the software company and prorated for STATEMAP use only.

iii. Drilling. Itemize and describe drilling costs and rates.

iv. Contractual services. Identify proposed contractors (individual or corporate) and provide the criteria by which contractors will be or have been selected. Provide breakdown of all costs.

v. Data. If utilizing datasets like LiDAR or geophysics, you must show how this information will be used to enhance the proposed mapping or map product. If these datasets are used as a match, make sure no Federal funds were used to collect the data. Also, you must pro-rate the data cost for the area covered by the proposed map.

vi. Conference/Workshop Travel. Travel expenses not to exceed $6,000 are allowable for staff to attend scientific conferences/workshops. If any Guidance Criteria under Category 2 (#3 - #11) are selected, one individual must request funds to attend a USGI/NCGMP-sponsored conference/workshop/session. The staff member(s) should be identified, and a detailed breakdown for all costs related to conference/workshop travel needs to be provided. Conference travel fund requests for contractors are prohibited. Note: travel expenses for state mapping advisory committee meetings are not acceptable expenses.

d. Non-allowable Expenses

i. Equipment and nonexpendable property. Federal STATEMAP funds are not intended for the purchase of computer hardware, GPS, vehicles, or other nonexpendable property, nor can these expenses be used as matching costs for Federal funds.

ii. University or College Tuition. Federal STATEMAP funds are not intended to pay university or college tuition nor can student university or college tuition be used as a matching cost for Federal funds. However, course fees are allowable expenses (e.g., ESRI GIS course, R Software training, etc.) as long as their purpose is justified in the context of the proposed work.

iii. Computer maintenance. Routine computer maintenance contracts and charges for computer time are not acceptable costs (these should be covered by indirect costs).

iv. Printing. Federal STATEMAP funds are not intended for State printing of multicolored or quality black-and-white versions of geologic maps produced in the program, nor can the cost to a State for such printing be used as a matching cost for Federal funds.

e. Total direct charges. (Items a - e) The total of the proposal (all projects combined) MUST show a 1:1 Federal/State match of direct charges.

f. Indirect Charges. Show proposed rate and amount. Proposals must include a copy of the negotiated indirect cost rate agreement. Be sure that indirect charges apply only to those direct cost items allowable under the negotiated cost rate agreement. Usually sub-contract direct costs are either excluded from indirect charges, or there is a cap on the amount of subcontract costs eligible for indirect charges. NOTE: The 2019 Re-authorization of the National Geologic Mapping Act in the John D. Dingell, Jr.