FY-2023-PRM-Indicator-Table-Final.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 177 KB Posted Apr 12, 2023

Attached to: FY 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity for Humanitarian Research
Opportunity number: SFOP0009616
Issued by: Department of State Bureau of Population Refugees and Migration

About this file

From the source

PRM Indicator Table

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
FY-2023-Budget-Narrative-Instructions_Template.docx	DOCX document	Apr 12, 2023
FY-2023-Budget-Detail-Template.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 12, 2023
FY-2023-Budget-Summary-Template.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Apr 12, 2023
Humanitarian Research Proposal Template - Final (1).docx	DOCX document	Apr 12, 2023
Humanitarian Research Proposal Template - Final.pdf	PDF	Mar 30, 2023
FY23 Research Proposal NOFO - 508 Accessible - Final.pdf	PDF	Mar 30, 2023

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Instructions

	Instructions for filling out the PRM Indicator Table (FY 2023)	Links
	The following instructions are pulled directly from PRM's NGO Guidelines, section 4C "Indicator Table & Targets." Any additional explanatory text is displayed in brackets [].
	Proposal stage
	As of Fiscal Year 2023, PRM updated the proposal indicator table to a required Excel template format. This file may be downloaded on PRM’s website. For PRM indicators, partners must use the exact indicator title as listed in [the NGO Guidelines] Appendix D - PRM Standardized Indicators. This will enable data aggregation and use across programs.	PRM funding website
	[For your convenience, PRM has also included the PRM Standardized Indicators in the third tab of this document, "PRM Indicator List" and enabled selection of these indicators from a dropdown menu in the Indicator Table Template tab.]
	The indicator table must include indicator names, associated sector/sub-sector, disaggregates, as reflected in Columns A-C. [For PRM Standardized Indicators, the appropriate sectors, subsectors, and disaggregates are detailed in the "PRM Indicator List" tab and can be selected using dropdown menus.] The table must also include a Year 1 baseline value, year-by-year targets (only if applying for multi-year funding), a cumulative target, associated objectives, a description of how the cumulative target was set, the name of the data collection method to be used, the frequency of collection, and the position responsible for collection [as reflected in Columns D-M].
	Columns (N-Y) should be left blank at application stage; they will be used by awardees for annual reporting.
	Objectives and indicators will be formally referenced in the cooperative agreement for proposals that are selected for PRM funding and will be used by PRM to monitor and evaluate the program.
	PRM Standardized Indicator selection
	Partners must refer to PRM’s indicator list and include all required indicators as part of the application. PRM has two categories of indicators:
	· Required: Indicators marked as “required” in Appendix D must be included in the proposal as applicable. Each sector and sub-sector have at least one required PRM indicator; these must be included in the indicator table if the partner is proposing any activities or budget for that sector/sub-sector. In addition, three indicators are required for all programs regardless of design or sector (unless the NOFO or PRM staff provide specific exemption). If the proposed program will not contribute to one or several of these mandatory indicators, the indicator must still be included in the proposal indicator table but with a target of zero. [For your convenience, these three mandatory indicators have already been placed in the "Indicator Table Template" tab.]
	o Number of individuals directly reached through PRM funding
	o Amount of PRM humanitarian funding distributed to local, national, or refugee-led organizations (in USD) – This amount should include any sub-awards or contracts with local, national, or refugee-led organizations. If the prime applicant is a local, national, or refugee-led organization, they should put the full proposal budget total as the target value. The IASC provides a working definition of “local” and “national” organizations. Applicants can put a target of zero for this indicator if it does not apply to them; it will not affect their eligibility.	IASC working definition of "local" and "national" organizations
	o Percentage of participants who report that humanitarian assistance is delivered in a safe, accessible, accountable, and participatory manner – This is a protection mainstreaming indicator developed by ECHO and adopted by the Grand Bargain.	ECHO indicator measurement toolkit	Additional guidance
	· Recommended if applicable: Partners may consider using these indicators to monitor any related activities as they are aligned with humanitarian standards and best practices. However, inclusion of recommended indicators is not mandatory and will not affect the proposal scoring. Please note that in rare cases PRM may request for a partner to use a particular recommended indicator if there is a strong technical/thematic need to track information on that indicator, or if a similar custom indicator was proposed by the partner.
	Custom indicators
	Applicants may also include custom indicators if desired. If including custom indicators, please limit them to no more than three (3) per objective, in order to keep the overall table length manageable. If including custom indicators, applicants must ensure that they are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, reliable, time-bound, and trackable (SMART). All indicators must be identified in parentheses as an input, output, outcome, or impact indicator.
•	Input: Input indicators tell us what is being invested or done (i.e., staff hired, supplies purchased).
•	Output: A short-term, immediate result of a program or process that leads to longer-term outcomes. Outputs are products, goods, and services that result from activities. Output indicators do not measure change; they answer the question, “What is the immediate product of the activity?”
•	Outcome: A result or effect that is caused by or attributable to the program or policy of the program activities. Outcomes may be short-term or long-term, intended or unintended, positive or negative, direct or indirect. An outcome indicator focuses on change and is a measure of the extent to which a program objective is being achieved.
•	Impact: A result or effect that is caused by or attributable to a program, process or policy. Impact is often used to refer to higher level effects of a program that occur in the medium or long-term and can be intended or unintended and positive or negative.
	[When entering a custom indicator into the Indicator Table, please mark your custom indicator with "Custom-X" prior to the indicator name in Column B, where each custom indicator you include has a different number in place of "X". For example, if you had two custom indicators, they would be proceeded with "Custom-1" and "Custom-2".]
	Baseline values
	For output indicators, NGOs should set baseline values at zero (even for follow-on awards). However, the baseline value for most outcome and impact indicators should be based on primary or secondary data collection. If any baseline values are not available at the time of application, the partner must collect the relevant data and update the baseline values within the first 90 days of the award. These must be updated in the proposal indicator table and re-submitted as an attachment with the first quarterly report.
	For follow-on awards, partners may use endline data from a previous PRM award for new award baseline values only if they are implementing the same interventions in the same area with the same target population.
	Targets
	Sphere Standards should be used as targets whenever applicable. Otherwise, targets should be set based on the partners’ previous experiences and achievements.
	Basis for Setting Cumulative Target
	The new Excel indicator table template requires partners to very briefly (1-3 sentences maximum) state how the cumulative target was determined. If the partner implemented similar activities in a previous award using similar indicators, they can simply state the achieved indicator value for that prior award as justification for the new target.
	Implementation Stage: Reporting Achieved Values
	[For quarterly and annual/final reporting, partners should enter the achieved values for each indicator using the column that aligns with the reporting period. Data must be entered as numbers or percentages - text is not allowed in Columns N-AA. Partners may also include notes on indicator progress as part of the quarterly report Word template "Measuring Results" section.]
	Changes to indicators after proposal stage
	[If partners need to change or remove indicators after the proposal stage, they must provide strong justification and receive approval from their PRM focal point. Partners should then include a comment in Column AB ("Other Comments") noting the date that PRM approved deletion or edits with a short description of the changes made. Any indicators approved for removal must remain in the indicator table along with any previously reported values, but the row can be greyed out or otherwise marked as non-applicable.]

https://www.state.gov/population-refugees-and-migration-funding-opportunities/https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/hftt_localisation_marker_definitions_paper_24_january_2018.pdfhttps://www.dgecho-partners-helpdesk.eu/download/referencedocumentfile/217https://www.dgecho-partners-helpdesk.eu/download/referencedocumentfile/204 Indicator Table Template

	PRM Indicator Table (Insert date of revision here after making any updates)
	Award/Program Title:
	Organization Name:
	Country / Countries of Program:
	Project Start Date (ie. Start of Year 1):
	Project End Date (ie. End of final year):
	Award Number (enter if approved for funding):
		Targets	Proposal Information	Year 1	Year 2 (if applicable)	Year 3 (if applicable)	All-Year Reporting
	Sector / sub-sector
(Select from PRM dropdown)	Indicator Number and Title
(PRM indicators already have numbering. Please number any additional custom indicators using 'Custom-X'.)	Disaggregates

(Select from PRM dropdown or insert custom disaggregates)

	Baseline value
	Year 1 Target	Year 2 Target
(if applicable)	Year 3 Target
(if applicable)	Cumulative Target
(ie. Total across all years)	Objective
	Basis for Setting Cumulative Target	Data Collection Method / Data Source	Data Collection Frequency	Position Responsible for Collection	Year 1

Q1 achieved Year 1 Q2 achieved Year 1 Q3 achieved Year 1 Total (Q1-Q4) achieved (progress in total Yr1, submitted in year-end report) Year 2 Q1 achieved Year 2 Q2 achieved Year 2 Q3 achieved Year 2 Total (Q1-Q4) achieved (progress in total Yr2, submitted in year-end report) Year 3 Q1 achieved Year 3 Q2 achieved Year 3 Q3 achieved Year 3 Total (Q1-Q4) achieved

(progress in total Yr3, submitted in year-end report)

Cumulative Actual

(ie. Total across all years to date)

% of Cumulative Target Achieved

(Usually calculated as Cumul. Actual / Cumul. Target)

Other Comments

0. All sectors / Cross-cutting

PRM-1. Number of individuals directly reached through PRM funding (Output)

Total

N/A

POC: Refugees / asylees / asylum seeker

N/A

POC: IDPs

N/A

POC: Stateless

N/A

POC: Returnees

N/A

POC: Host community

N/A

POC: Other conflict-affected

N/A

POC: Other vulnerable migrant

N/A

Non-POC stakeholders (gov't representatives, NGO/IO staff, health professionals, etc.)

N/A

Sex: Female

N/A

Sex: Male

N/A

Sex: Other / Non-binary

N/A

Age: 0-4.9

N/A

Age: 5-17.9

N/A

Age: 18-49.9

N/A

Age: 50+

N/A

0. All sectors / Cross-cutting

PRM-2. Amount of PRM humanitarian funding distributed to local, national, or refugee-led organizations (in USD) (Output)

N/A

0. All sectors / Cross-cutting

PRM-3. Percentage of participants who report that humanitarian assistance is delivered in a safe, accessible, accountable, and participatory manner (Outcome)

N/A

Data Validation

Sector	PRM Indicators	Disaggregates
0. All sectors / Cross-cutting	PRM-1. Number of individuals directly reached through PRM funding (Output)	N/A
1. Capacity Building	PRM-2. Amount of PRM humanitarian funding distributed to local, national, or refugee-led organizations (in USD) (Output)	Total
1.1. Capacity Building: NGO/CBO	PRM-3. Percentage of participants who report that humanitarian assistance is delivered in a safe, accessible, accountable, and participatory manner (Outcome)	POC: Refugees / asylees / asylum seeker
1.2. Capacity Building: Local Governments	PRM-4. Number of pieces of feedback recorded during the reporting period (Output)	POC: IDPs
2. Cash and Voucher Assistance (CVA)	PRM-5. Number of community meetings or formal consultations held which were focused on program design or adjustments (Output)	POC: Stateless
3. Core Relief Items	PRM-6. Number of individuals indirectly reached through PRM funding (Output)	POC: Returnees
4. Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities	PRM-CS1. Number of individuals trained in international law, international human rights law, and/or international humanitarian law through PRM funding (Output)	POC: Host community
5. Education	PRM-CS2. Number of individuals trained on cross-cutting topics through PRM funding (ex. budget, operations, management, humanitarian standards, accountability, monitoring) (Output)	POC: Other conflict-affected
6. Food Security	PRM-CS3. Number of government staff trained through PRM funding (Output)	POC: Other vulnerable migrant
7. Health	PRM-CS4. Number of NGO/CBO staff trained through PRM funding (Output)	Non-POC (gov't staff, IO/NGO staff, healthcare workers, etc.)
7.1. Health: Reproductive Health	PRM-CV1. Number of individuals receiving Cash and Voucher Assistance through PRM funding (Output)	Sex: Male
8. Livelihoods and Economic Empowerment	PRM-CV2. Total USD value of Cash and Voucher Assistance transferred to PRM program participants (Output)	Sex: Female
9. Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS)	PRM-D1. Number of individuals with disabilities reached through PRM funding (Output)	Sex: Other / Non-binary
10. Nutrition	PRM-D2. Number of individuals participating in physical rehabilitation activities through PRM funding (Output)	Age: 0-4.9
11. Protection	PRM-D3. Number of disability devices distributed (ex. wheelchairs, postural support devices, prostheses, orthoses) through PRM funding (Output)	Age: 5-17.9
11.1. Protection: Legal	PRM-D4. Percentage of individuals with disabilities who are satisfied with the accessibility and quality of services (Outcome)	Age: 18-49.9
11.2. Protection: Child Protection	PRM-E1. Number of individuals reached with education programming through PRM funding (Output)	Age: 50+
11.3. Protection: Gender Based Violence (GBV)	PRM-E2. Number of teachers and administrators trained through PRM funding (Output)	Setting: Camp
11.4. Socio-cultural Inclusion and Social Cohesion	PRM-E3. Percentage of school-age children enrolled in formal or informal education (Outcome)	Setting: Non-camp
12. Shelter	PRM-F1. Number of individuals participating in food security activities through PRM funding (Output)	Persons with disabilities
13. Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-F2. Percentage of households with poor Food Consumption Score (FCS) (Outcome)
N/A	PRM-F3. Percentage of households with moderate and severe Household Hunger Scale (HHS) scores (Outcome)
	PRM-F4. Average Reduced Coping Strategies Index (rCSI) score (Outcome)
	PRM-H1. Number of health care centres supported with supplies, equipment, and/or training assistance through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-H2. Number of total health consultations conducted with PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-H3. Number of vaccine doses provided through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-H4. Number of health care professionals/administrators trained on providing health services to PRM persons of concern (Output)
	PRM-H5. Number of individuals who received targeted messages on health through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-H6. Average number of consultations per clinician per day during the past 30 days (Output)
	PRM-H7. Percentage of beneficiary patients who express satisfaction with services received (Outcome)
	PRM-H8. Mortality rate for children under age five (U5MR) (Outcome)
	PRM-H9. Percentage of individuals with access to health services (Outcome)
	PRM-SRH1. Number of individuals receiving sexual and reproductive health services through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-SRH2. Number of antenatal consultations conducted with PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-SRH3. Percentage of births attended by skilled health personnel (Outcome)
	PRM-SRH4. Percentage of pregnant women receiving at least four antenatal visits (Outcome)
	PRM-SRH5. Percentage of reporting rape survivors given post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) within 72 hours (Outcome)
	PRM-SRH6. Percentage of reporting rape survivors given emergency contraception within 120 hours (Outcome)
	PRM-L1. Number of individuals participating in livelihood and economic empowerment activities through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-L2. Percentage of individuals with an account at a bank or other financial institution or with a mobile-money service provider (Outcome)
	PRM-L3. Percentage of individuals (working age) who are unemployed (Outcome)
	PRM-M1. Number of individuals (community-level) receiving MHPSS services through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-M2. Number of staff or volunteers receiving MHPSS services through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-M3. Number of individuals trained in MHPSS through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-M4. Percentage of individuals who report their MHPSS needs are met as a result of PRM funded programs (Outcome)
	PRM-N1. Number of individuals participating in nutrition activities through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-N2. Number of children under 5 and pregnant/lactating women screened for malnutrition through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-N3. Number of children under 5 years of age with severe wasting and other forms of severe acute malnutrition who are admitted for treatment through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-N4. Percentage of children 6-59 months of age with acute malnutrition (MAM or SAM) (Outcome)
	PRM-N5. Percentage of children 6–23 months of age who receive foods from 5 or more food groups (MDD-C) (Outcome)
	PRM-P1. Number of individuals participating in general protection activities (training on protection concepts, advocacy, monitoring) through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-P2. Number of beneficiaries reporting protection violations who are referred to and receive assistance from appropriate legal, medical, or psychosocial support services through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-P3. Number of staff trained in recognizing and responding to protection incidents and concerns through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-P4. Percentage of beneficiaries satisfied with the timing of the protection and assistance (Outcome)
	PRM-P5. Percentage of individuals who report an improved sense of safety and well-being at the end of the program (Outcome)
	PRM-PL1. Number of individuals receiving legal assistance through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-PL2. Percentage of individuals with legally recognized identity documents or credentials (Outcome)
	PRM-SC1. Number of individuals reached with socio-cultural and social cohesion activities through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-CP1. Number of children under 18 reached with child protection services through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-CP2. Number of adults reached with child protection activities through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-CP3. Number of unaccompanied or separated children newly registered through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-CP4. Percentage of unaccompanied and separated children who are in an appropriate alternative care arrangement (Outcome)
	PRM-CP5. Percentage of children who participate in community-based child protection programmes (Outcome)
	PRM-CP6. Percentage of children at heightened risk who are supported by a Best Interests Procedure (Outcome)
	PRM-GBV1. Number of individuals reached with gender-based violence prevention and training activities through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-GBV2. Number of gender-based violence survivors receiving services through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-GBV3. Percentage of community members who know where to access available gender-based violence services (Outcome)
	PRM-GBV4. Percentage of community members who do not accept gender-based violence (Outcome)
	PRM-GBV5. Percentage of survivors who are satisfied with GBV case management services (Outcome)
	PRM-NFI1. Number of individuals receiving Core Relief/non-food items (NFI's) through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-NFI2. Percentage of individuals receiving Core Relief/NFIs in identified settlement(s) (Output)
	PRM-NFI3. Number of Core Relief/NFIs distributed through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-NFI4. Number of individuals trained on Core Relief/NFI topics through PRM Funding (Output)
	PRM-NFI5. Percentage of households that report having minimum household items that allow all the following: comfortable sleeping, water and food storage, food preparation, cooking, eating, lighting, and clothing (Outcome)
	PRM-NFI6. Percentage of individuals reporting satisfaction with Core Relief Items/NFI received through PRM funding (Outcome)
	PRM-S1. Number of individuals who received shelter assistance through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-S2. Percentage of individuals receiving shelter assistance in identified settlement(s) (Output)
	PRM-S3. Number of individuals trained on Shelter topics through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-S4. Percentage of households that report living in a shelter that has all the following: adequate space, feels safe, feels private and protected from the weather (Outcome)
	PRM-S5. Percentage of individuals who believe shelter interventions met or exceeded expectations (Outcome)
	PRM-S6. Percentage of households that report pressure to leave their shelter for financial reasons (Outcome)
	PRM-S7. Percentage of HHs without clear security of tenure within their community (Outcome)
	PRM-W1. Number of individuals reached with WASH activities through PRM funding (without double counting across disaggregates) (Output)
	PRM-W2. Number of institutional WASH facilities built or improved as a result of PRM Funding (without double counting across disaggregates) (Output)
	PRM-W3. Number of community sites improved through WASH activities through PRM funding (Output)
	PRM-W4. Percentage of households with access to a basic sanitation service (latrine/toilet) (Outcome)
	PRM-W5. Percent of households with soap and water at a handwashing station on premise (Outcome)
	PRM-W6. Percentage of households targeted by the WASH behavior change activities and/or improved waste disposal sites activities that report properly disposing of solid waste (Outcome)
	PRM-W7. Percentage of individuals targeted by WASH behavior change promotion activity who know at least three (3) of the five (5) critical times to wash hands (Outcome)
	PRM-W8. Percentage of households targeted by the WASH behavior change promotion activities who store their drinking water safely in clean containers (Outcome)
	PRM-W9. Percentage of individuals reporting satisfaction with WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits), cash/vouchers (Outcome)
	PRM-W10. Percentage of households using basic drinking water services (Outcome)
	PRM-W11. Percentage of households (HH) reporting that all HH members have access to an adequate quantity of safe water for, cooking, personal, and domestic hygiene (Outcome)
	PRM-W12. Percentage of PRM-funded drinking water services for which water quality tests meet minimum water quality standards (Outcome)

PRM Indicator List

PRM Sector, sub-sector, or policy area	Indicator (with type)	Disaggregates	Level of requirement	Min. reporting frequency	Baseline expectations
All Sectors	PRM-1. Number of individuals directly reached through PRM funding (Output)	PoC (refugees/asylees, IDPs, stateless, returnees, other vulnerable migrants, other conflict-affected, host-community members); Non-PoC (gov't staff, NGO or IO staff, health care workers, etc.); Sex; Age	Required	Quarterly	Set at zero
All Sectors	PRM-2. Amount of PRM humanitarian funding distributed to local, national, or refugee-led organizations (in USD) (Output)	Partner, country (if multi-country implementation), and when possible by refugee-led, IDP-led, stateless-led	Required	Quarterly	Set at zero
All Sectors	PRM-3. Percentage of participants who report that humanitarian assistance is delivered in a safe, accessible, accountable, and participatory manner (Outcome)	N/A	Required	Bi-annual	N/A - No baseline
All Sectors	PRM-4. Number of pieces of feedback recorded during the reporting period (Output)	Resolved, unresolved	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
All Sectors	PRM-5. Number of community meetings or formal consultations held which were focused on program design or adjustments (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
All Sectors	PRM-6. Number of individuals indirectly reached through PRM funding (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Capacity Strengthening	PRM-CS1. Number of individuals trained in international law, international human rights law, and/or international humanitarian law through PRM funding (Output)	Male, Female; Government staff, International NGO staff, Local NGO or CBO staff, Other	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Capacity Strengthening	PRM-CS2. Number of individuals trained on cross-cutting topics through PRM funding (ex. budget, operations, management, humanitarian standards, accountability, monitoring) (Output)	Male, Female; Government staff, International NGO staff, Local NGO or CBO staff, Other	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Capacity Strengthening: Local Governments	PRM-CS3. Number of government staff trained through PRM funding (Output)	National, local, male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Capacity Strengthening: NGO/CBO	PRM-CS4. Number of NGO/CBO staff trained through PRM funding (Output)	International NGO staff, Local NGO or CBO staff, Other, Male, Female	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Cash and Voucher Assistance (CVA)	PRM-CV1. Number of individuals receiving Cash and Voucher Assistance through PRM funding (Output)	Cash, voucher	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Cash and Voucher Assistance (CVA)	PRM-CV2. Total USD value of Cash and Voucher Assistance transferred to PRM program participants (Output)	Cash, voucher	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities	PRM-D1. Number of individuals with disabilities reached through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities	PRM-D2. Number of individuals participating in physical rehabilitation activities through PRM funding (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities	PRM-D3. Number of disability devices distributed (ex. wheelchairs, postural support devices, prostheses, orthoses) through PRM funding (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities	PRM-D4. Percentage of individuals with disabilities who are satisfied with the accessibility and quality of services (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	N/A - No baseline
Education	PRM-E1. Number of individuals reached with education programming through PRM funding (Output)	Formal, Informal, Children (under 18), Adults (18+), Male, Female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Education	PRM-E2. Number of teachers and administrators trained through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Education	PRM-E3. Percentage of school-age children enrolled in formal or informal education (Outcome)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Food Security	PRM-F1. Number of individuals participating in food security activities through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Food Security	PRM-F2. Percentage of households with poor Food Consumption Score (FCS) (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Food Security	PRM-F3. Percentage of households with moderate and severe Household Hunger Scale (HHS) scores (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Food Security	PRM-F4. Average Reduced Coping Strategies Index (rCSI) score (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Health	PRM-H1. Number of health care centres supported with supplies, equipment, and/or training assistance through PRM funding (Output)	Primary, Other	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Health	PRM-H2. Number of total health consultations conducted with PRM funding (Output)	Primary, Urgent, Sex, Age	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Health	PRM-H3. Number of vaccine doses provided through PRM funding (Output)	Disaggregated by vaccine type	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Health	PRM-H4. Number of health care professionals/administrators trained on providing health services to PRM persons of concern (Output)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Health	PRM-H5. Number of individuals who received targeted messages on health through PRM funding (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Health	PRM-H6. Average number of consultations per clinician per day during the past 30 days (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Health	PRM-H7. Percentage of beneficiary patients who express satisfaction with services received (Outcome)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	N/A - No baseline
Health	PRM-H8. Mortality rate for children under age five (U5MR) (Outcome)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Health	PRM-H9. Percentage of individuals with access to health services (Outcome)	N/A	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Health: Sexual and Reproductive Health	PRM-SRH1. Number of individuals receiving sexual and reproductive health services through PRM funding (Output)	Male, Female, 5-17.9, 18+	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Bi-annual	Set at zero
Health: Sexual and Reproductive Health	PRM-SRH2. Number of antenatal consultations conducted with PRM funding (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set at zero
Health: Sexual and Reproductive Health	PRM-SRH3. Percentage of births attended by skilled health personnel (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Health: Sexual and Reproductive Health	PRM-SRH4. Percentage of pregnant women receiving at least four antenatal visits (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Health: Sexual and Reproductive Health	PRM-SRH5. Percentage of reporting rape survivors given post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) within 72 hours (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Health: Sexual and Reproductive Health	PRM-SRH6. Percentage of reporting rape survivors given emergency contraception within 120 hours (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Livelihoods and Economic Empowerment	PRM-L1. Number of individuals participating in livelihood and economic empowerment activities through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Livelihoods and Economic Empowerment	PRM-L2. Percentage of individuals with an account at a bank or other financial institution or with a mobile-money service provider (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Livelihoods and Economic Empowerment	PRM-L3. Percentage of individuals (working age) who are unemployed (Outcome)	N/A	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS)	PRM-M1. Number of individuals (community-level) receiving MHPSS services through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS)	PRM-M2. Number of staff or volunteers receiving MHPSS services through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS)	PRM-M3. Number of individuals trained in MHPSS through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS)	PRM-M4. Percentage of individuals who report their MHPSS needs are met as a result of PRM funded programs (Outcome)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Annual	N/A - No baseline
Nutrition	PRM-N1. Number of individuals participating in nutrition activities through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female, children under 5, pregnant and lactating women	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Nutrition	PRM-N2. Number of children under 5 and pregnant/lactating women screened for malnutrition through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female, children under 5, pregnant and lactating women	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Nutrition	PRM-N3. Number of children under 5 years of age with severe wasting and other forms of severe acute malnutrition who are admitted for treatment through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Nutrition	PRM-N4. Percentage of children 6-59 months of age with acute malnutrition (MAM or SAM) (Outcome)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Nutrition	PRM-N5. Percentage of children 6–23 months of age who receive foods from 5 or more food groups (MDD-C) (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Protection	PRM-P1. Number of individuals participating in general protection activities (training on protection concepts, advocacy, monitoring) through PRM funding (Output)	Staff, community members, female, male	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection	PRM-P2. Number of beneficiaries reporting protection violations who are referred to and receive assistance from appropriate legal, medical, or psychosocial support services through PRM funding (Output)	Male, Female; 0-4.9, 5-17.9, 18-49.9, 50+	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection	PRM-P3. Number of staff trained in recognizing and responding to protection incidents and concerns through PRM funding (Output)	Male, Female	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection	PRM-P4. Percentage of beneficiaries satisfied with the timing of the protection and assistance (Outcome)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	N/A - No baseline
Protection	PRM-P5. Percentage of individuals who report an improved sense of safety and well-being at the end of the program (Outcome)	Male, female; 0-4.9, 5-17.9, 18-49.9, 50+	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Annual	N/A - No baseline
Protection: Legal	PRM-PL1. Number of individuals receiving legal assistance through PRM funding (Output)	N/A	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection: Legal	PRM-PL2. Percentage of individuals with legally recognized identity documents or credentials (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Protection: Socio-cultural Inclusion and Social Cohesion	PRM-SC1. Number of individuals reached with socio-cultural and social cohesion activities through PRM funding (Output)	N/A	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection: Child Protection	PRM-CP1. Number of children under 18 reached with child protection services through PRM funding (Output)	0-4.9 years, 5-17.9 years	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection: Child Protection	PRM-CP2. Number of adults reached with child protection activities through PRM funding (Output)	Parents and caregivers; service providers	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection: Child Protection	PRM-CP3. Number of unaccompanied or separated children newly registered through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection: Child Protection	PRM-CP4. Percentage of unaccompanied and separated children who are in an appropriate alternative care arrangement (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Protection: Child Protection	PRM-CP5. Percentage of children who participate in community-based child protection programmes (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Protection: Child Protection	PRM-CP6. Percentage of children at heightened risk who are supported by a Best Interests Procedure (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Protection: Gender Based Violence (GBV)	PRM-GBV1. Number of individuals reached with gender-based violence prevention and training activities through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection: Gender Based Violence (GBV)	PRM-GBV2. Number of gender-based violence survivors receiving services through PRM funding (Output)	Male, female	Required (if proposing activities under this sub-sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Protection: Gender Based Violence (GBV)	PRM-GBV3. Percentage of community members who know where to access available gender-based violence services (Outcome)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Protection: Gender Based Violence (GBV)	PRM-GBV4. Percentage of community members who do not accept gender-based violence (Outcome)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Protection: Gender Based Violence (GBV)	PRM-GBV5. Percentage of survivors who are satisfied with GBV case management services (Outcome)	Male, female	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	N/A - No baseline
Core Relief Items / Non-Food Items	PRM-NFI1. Number of individuals receiving Core Relief/non-food items (NFI's) through PRM funding (Output)	In-kind, cash-for-Core Relief/NFIs, voucher	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Core Relief Items / Non-Food Items	PRM-NFI2. Percentage of individuals receiving Core Relief/NFIs in identified settlement(s) (Output)	In-kind, cash-for-Core Relief/NFIs, voucher	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Core Relief Items / Non-Food Items	PRM-NFI3. Number of Core Relief/NFIs distributed through PRM funding (Output)	Type of NFI (do not report overall total)	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Core Relief Items / Non-Food Items	PRM-NFI4. Number of individuals trained on Core Relief/NFI topics through PRM Funding (Output)	Training topic	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Core Relief Items / Non-Food Items	PRM-NFI5. Percentage of households that report having minimum household items that allow all the following: comfortable sleeping, water and food storage, food preparation, cooking, eating, lighting, and clothing (Outcome)	N/A	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Core Relief Items / Non-Food Items	PRM-NFI6. Percentage of individuals reporting satisfaction with Core Relief Items/NFI received through PRM funding (Outcome)	Content, quality, quantity	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	N/A - No baseline
Shelter	PRM-S1. Number of individuals who received shelter assistance through PRM funding (Output)	Camp, non-camp; construction materials, cash, voucher	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Quarterly	Set at zero
Shelter	PRM-S2. Percentage of individuals receiving shelter assistance in identified settlement(s) (Output)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Shelter	PRM-S3. Number of individuals trained on Shelter topics through PRM funding (Output)	Training topic	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
Shelter	PRM-S4. Percentage of households that report living in a shelter that has all the following: adequate space, feels safe, feels private and protected from the weather (Outcome)	Camp, non-camp	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Shelter	PRM-S5. Percentage of individuals who believe shelter interventions met or exceeded expectations (Outcome)	Camp, non-camp; construction materials, cash, voucher	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Shelter	PRM-S6. Percentage of households that report pressure to leave their shelter for financial reasons (Outcome)	Urban, rural	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Shelter	PRM-S7. Percentage of HHs without clear security of tenure within their community (Outcome)	Tenure security, tenure security with minor HLP issues, tenure security with significant HLP issues, no tenure security, No tenure security and is evicted with major HLP issues	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W1. Number of individuals reached with WASH activities through PRM funding (without double counting across disaggregates) (Output)	Include as applicable:

- Direct WASH focused training (Excluding cross-cutting trainings) -Solid waste management, drainage, or vector control -Basic sanitation facility construction or repair -WASH behavior change promotion (excluding mass media campaigns) -WASH NFIs -WASH-specific cash/voucher assistance -Construction or repair of basic drinking water services (piped water, boreholes, tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, or packaged/delivered water) -Construction or repair of other water services (unprotected dug wells, unprotected springs, or other sources)

-Construction or repair of WASH communal sites	Required (if proposing activities under this sector)	Bi-annual	Set at zero
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W2. Number of institutional WASH facilities built or improved as a result of PRM Funding (without double counting across disaggregates) (Output)	Include as applicable:

-Basic sanitation facilities -Excreta disposal facilities -Hand washing stations -Bathing facilities -Basic drinking water services (piped water, boreholes, tubewells, protected dug wells, protected springs, or packaged/delivered water) -Other water services (unprotected dug wells, unprotected springs, or other sources)

-Biohazard waste management facilities	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W3. Number of community sites improved through WASH activities through PRM funding (Output)	Include as applicable:

-Standing water sites -Communal solid waste disposal sites -Water points -Communal WASH facilities

-Menstrual hygiene management infrastructure	Recommended if applicable	Quarterly	Set at zero
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W4. Percentage of households with access to a basic sanitation service (latrine/toilet) (Outcome)	Clean, unclean; camp, non-camp	Required (if proposing activities related to sanitation services)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W5. Percent of households with soap and water at a handwashing station on premise (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W6. Percentage of households targeted by the WASH behavior change activities and/or improved waste disposal sites activities that report properly disposing of solid waste (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W7. Percentage of individuals targeted by WASH behavior change promotion activity who know at least three (3) of the five (5) critical times to wash hands (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W8. Percentage of households targeted by the WASH behavior change promotion activities who store their drinking water safely in clean containers (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W9. Percentage of individuals reporting satisfaction with WASH NFIs received through direct distribution (i.e. kits), cash/vouchers (Outcome)	Content, quality, quantity	Recommended if applicable	Bi-annual	N/A - No baseline
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W10. Percentage of households using basic drinking water services (Outcome)	Camp, non-camp	Required (if proposing activities related to drinking water)	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W11. Percentage of households (HH) reporting that all HH members have access to an adequate quantity of safe water for, cooking, personal, and domestic hygiene (Outcome)	N/A	Recommended if applicable	Annual	Set using existing data or baseline study
	Water, Sanitation, And Hygiene (WASH)	PRM-W12. Percentage of PRM-funded drinking water services for which water quality tests meet minimum water quality standards (Outcome)	Site type (institutional, community, household)	Recommended if applicable	Annual	N/A - No baseline

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Apr 13, 2023.