FY_2020_TSGP_remediationguide_final_508.pdf
PDF 18 KB Posted
- Opportunity number
- DHS-20-GPD-075-00-01
- Issued by
-
Federal Emergency Management Agency
About this file
FY_2020_TSGP_remediationguide_final_508.pdf
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FY 2020 Transit Security Grant Program Remediation Guide
Prior Assessments:
• What type of assessment(s) is being used as a basis to identify the vulnerabilities, and when/where were they conducted? Please list the assessment(s), what entity conducted them (owner/operator, DHS, including approved sub-contractors), and when they were conducted.
• Does the asset have a significant vulnerability per the assessment that could be exploited by a terrorist causing significant loss of life and/or system disruption?
• Did the assessment recommend specific mitigation options to address vulnerabilities? What types of options were presented (e.g., operational, physical security, electronic security, etc.)?
Remediation Plan:
• Does the remediation plan adequately describe how vulnerabilities were identified?
• Does the remediation plan adequately address all the vulnerabilities as described in the assessment?
• Does the remediation plan call for further resources to be utilized, other than the best estimate developed for the final design component, and are those resources present?
• Is proper documentation for EHP review available? If not completed, is the expected completion date known?
• Are there any other environmental obstacles at the local or state level?
• Does the remediation plan include detailed costs for the mitigation options identified in the assessment?
• Does the remediation plan include detailed timelines for the mitigation options identified in the assessment?
Timelines/Costs:
• Do the timelines, milestones, and cost estimates appear reasonable given the 36-month period of performance?
• Is the budget for the project consistent and are all variances in cost-drivers taken into consideration?
• Based on prior research/experience, does the remediation plan appear to be efficient?
• Based on prior research/experience, are there other more cost-effective mitigation options available?
File details come from the government source that posted it.