FSRM Suite Sources Sought Questions .pdf

FSRM Suite Sources Sought Questions

1. Name of Firm:

2. Business Address:

3. POC First Name:

4. POC Last Name:

5. POC Phone Number:

6. Phone (XXX-XXX-XXXX)

7. POC Email Address:

8. Cage Code:

9. Unique Entity Identifier (UEI):

10. Website:

11. Do you have an ACTIVE SAM.gov account?:

• Yes

• No

12. Can your firm complete work under NACIS Code 236220?:

• Yes

• No

13. For NACIS Code 236220, please state the firm's socio-economic category?:

• Small Business

• Small Disadvantaged Business

• Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

• Section 8(a)

• Women Owned Small Business

• HUBZone

• Other Than Small Business

14. State whether your company would be interesting in performing as a PRIME Contractor under the proposed MATOC:

• Yes

• No

• NA

15. State whether your company would likely team with another company to perform work under the proposed MATOC:

• Yes

• No

• NA

16. State whether your company would likely pursue a joint-venture relationship or some other formal teaming arrangement?:

• Yes

• No

• NA

17. How many professional employees does your company have in house to manage and execute work described?:

• Up to 10

• 11-30

• 31-50

• Greater than 50

18. On an annual basis, what is the workload capacity that your company could execute?:

• Less than $5M

• $5M-$10M

• $10M-$20M

• $20M-$30M

• Greater than $30M

19. What is the maximum aggregate capacity your company can perform?:

• Less than $0.5M

• $0.5-$2M

• $2M-$5M

• $5M-$10M

• Greater than $10M

20. What is the maximum capacity your firm can perform on a single task order?:

• Less than $0.5M

• $0.5M-$2M

• $2M-$5M

• $5M-$10M

• Greater than $10M

21. Assuming projects are not co-located, how many projects could your company simultaneously execute?:

22. What is your company's current bonding capacity?:

23. In what geographic areas has your company performed construction/renovation work?:

• Colorado

• Wyoming

• Montana

• North Dakota

• South Dakota

• Nebraska

• Minnesota

• Wisconsin

• Iowa

• All the above

• None of the above

24. Identify where your company would likely compete for work under the proposed

MATOC?:

• Colorado

• Wyoming

• Montana

• North Dakota

• South Dakota

• Nebraska

• Minnesota

• Wisconsin

• Iowa

• All the above

• None of the above

25. Identify where your company would NOT likely compete for work under the proposed MATOC?:

• Colorado

• Wyoming

• Montana

• North Dakota

• South Dakota

• Nebraska

• Minnesota

• Wisconsin

• Iowa

• All the above

• None of the above

26. Would your firm be interested in a contract with work primarily completed in North Dakota and South Dakota?

• Yes

• No

27. If applicable, please provide up to 3 examples of similar type work you have completed as a prime contractor in North Dakota and/or South Dakota.

• (text box)

28. Does your firm have an active DD254?:

• Yes

• No

29. Does your firm have experience in repairs and/or renovations in secure spaces secure areas and/or secure spaces including but not limited to facilities constructed to ICD/ICS 705, AFI 16-16-1404, and/or AFI 31-101?:

• Yes

• No