FR Model Testing_PWS.pdf

PDF 837 KB Posted

Attached to
FR NERC Model Testing
Solicitation number
W9128F-21-Q-0044
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

NWO-CT PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

18 Mar 2021

Fort Randall Unit Modeling

Part 1

General Information

1. GENERAL: This is a non-personnel services contract to provide Fort Randall Unit Modeling. The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.

1.1 Description of Services/Introduction: The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, supplies, facilities, transportation, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform Fort Randall Unit Modeling as defined in this Performance Work Statement except for those items specified as government furnished property and services. The contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract.

1.2 Background: Generator owners are required to provide dynamic data information to transmission operators per North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) standard MOD-32-1. Model validation testing of generators, governors, exciters, and power system stabilizers (PSSs) provide the information needed to meet the requirement. A model validation report that demonstrates compliance with all current NERC and Southwest Power Pool (SPP) requirements must be prepared and submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Omaha District (NWO) Reliability Coordinator.

1.2.1 Occasionally, adjustments to governor and/or excitation system settings are also needed for unit stability and model validation requirements. For this contract, no major tuning is anticipated. Additionally, no PSS tuning or tuning study is anticipated.

1.2.2 The NERC regional entity for compliance monitoring and enforcement for Omaha District Dams and one is the MRO region. It is the contractor’s responsibility to research and demonstrate compliance with all MRO requirements beyond NERC requirements.

1.3 Scope: The Contractor shall perform the testing on the eight hydro generator units at the Fort Randall Power Plant. The Contractor shall at a minimum provide a test team with one professional engineer, and all instruments, meters, transducers, and equipment required to perform testing. The Contractor shall perform the specific tasks listed in Part 5. All models and reports shall meet the requirements of SPP MDWG Model Development Procedures Manual v11.pdf, Ch 13, NERC MOD-32-1, MOD 25-2, MOD 26-1 and MOD 27-1.

1.3.1 All eight units at Fort Randall are identical. The first unit under outage shall be designated as the primary unit which shall require complete testing and the remaining units shall be designated as a sister units requiring cursory tests to compare the performance to the primary unit. IEEE standard models and parameters compatible with NERC / MRO unit modeling guidelines shall be provided for all generators and exciters. Models must be on the Acceptable Model List on the NERC SAMS webpage

1.4 Period of Performance: 240 days. All equipment to be tested will be available during one site visit with no intentional delays between testing units. Test dates will be determined in consultation with the O&M Supervisor at each project. The mutually agreeable dates shall be approved by the Government. Contractor will request dates to perform modeling unit tests. Testing may be requested from Jun 1-Nov 30 2021.

During the course of the tests, each unit will be available to be operated over a range of its rated capability, from speed-no load (not synchronized) to full load and maximum over and under-excited.

1.5 General Information

1.5.1 Quality Control: The contractor shall maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The contractor’s quality control program is the means by which he assures himself that his work complies with the requirement of the contract.

1.5.2 Quality Assurance: The Government shall evaluate the contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance to PRS in Section 6, Technical 1. The government must ensure that the contractor performs in accordance with the contract.

1.5.3 Recognized Holidays: The contractor is not required to perform on these days.

New Year’s Day Labor Day Martin Luther King Jr.’s Birthday Columbus Day President’s Day Veteran’s Day Memorial Day Thanksgiving Day Independence Day Christmas Day

1.5.4 Hours of Operation: The contractor is responsible for conducting business, between the hours of 7-5:00 CST Monday thru Thursday except Federal holidays or when the Government facility is closed due to local or national emergencies, administrative closings, or similar Government directed facility closings. For other than firm fixed price contracts, the contractor will not be reimbursed when the government facility is closed for the above reasons.

1.5.5 Place of Performance: The work to be performed under this contract will be performed at Fort Randall Power Plant, Pickstown, SD.

1.5.6 Type of Contract: The government will award a firm fixed price contract.

1.5.7 Security Requirements: NA

1.5.8 Special Qualifications:

1.5.8.1 Will be Escorted in Restricted Areas: If applicable, all contract employees, including subcontractor employees who are not in possession of the appropriate security clearance, will be escorted in restricted areas.

1.5.9 Post Award Conference/Periodic Progress Meetings: The Contractor agrees to attend any post award conference calls convened by the contracting activity or contract administration office in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation Subpart 42.5.

The contracting officer, Contracting Officers Representative (COR), and other Government personnel, as appropriate, may meet periodically with the contractor to review the contractor's performance. At these meetings the contracting officer will apprise the contractor of how the government views the contractor's performance and the contractor will apprise the Government of problems, if any, being experienced.

Appropriate action shall be taken to resolve outstanding issues. These meetings shall be at no additional cost to the government and shall be over the phone.

1.5.10 Contracting Officer Representative (COR): For Contracts under $250K a government POC will be designated to represent Government. This representative will contact the contractor and act as the primary point of exchange between the Contractor and the Government. The Government Representative will monitor all technical aspects of the contract by performing inspections as necessary and assist in contract administration. They will also coordinate availability of government furnished property, and provide site entry of Contractor personnel and notify both the Contracting Officer and Contractor of any deficiencies. The Government Representative is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.

1.5.11 Key Personnel: The Contractor shall at a minimum provide a test team with one professional engineer. The contract manager or alternate shall have full authority to act for the contractor on all contract matters relating to daily operation of this contract.

1.5.12 Contractor Travel: All travel requires Government approval/authorization and notification to the COR. If Contractor is authorized travel only expenses consistent with the substantive provisions of the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) and the limitation of funds specified in this contract.

1.5.13 Organizational Conflict of Interest: Contractor and subcontractor personnel performing work under this contract may receive, have access to or participate in the development of proprietary or source selection information (e.g., cost or pricing information, budget information or analyses, specifications or work statements, etc.) or perform evaluation services which may create a current or subsequent Organizational Conflict of Interests (OCI) as defined in FAR Subpart 9.5. The Contractor shall notify the Contracting Officer immediately whenever it becomes aware that such access or participation may result in any actual or potential OCI and shall promptly submit a plan to the Contracting Officer to avoid or mitigate any such OCI.

PART 2

DEFINITIONS & ACRONYMS

2. DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS:

2.1. DEFINITIONS:

2.1.1. CONTRACTOR. A supplier or vendor awarded a contract to provide specific supplies or service to the government. The term used in this contract refers to the prime.

2.1.2. CONTRACTING OFFICER. A person with authority to enter into, administer, and or terminate contracts, and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the government. Note: The only individual who can legally bind the government.

2.1.3. CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR). An employee of the U.S. Government appointed by the contracting officer to administer the contract. Such appointment shall be in writing and shall state the scope of authority and limitations.

This individual has authority to provide technical direction to the Contractor as long as that direction is within the scope of the contract, does not constitute a change, and has no funding implications. This individual does NOT have authority to change the terms and conditions of the contract.

2.1.4. DEFECTIVE SERVICE. A service output that does not meet the standard of performance associated with the Performance Work Statement.

2.1.5. DELIVERABLE. Anything that can be physically delivered, but may include non-manufactured things such as meeting minutes or reports.

2.1.6. KEY PERSONNEL. Contractor personnel that are evaluated in a source selection process and that may be required to be used in the performance of a contract by the Key Personnel listed in the PWS. When key personnel are used as an evaluation factor in best value procurement, an offer can be rejected if it does not have a firm commitment from the persons that are listed in the proposal.

2.1.7. PHYSICAL SECURITY. Actions that prevent the loss or damage of Government property.

2.1.8. QUALITY ASSURANCE. The government procedures to verify that services being performed by the Contractor are performed according to acceptable standards.

2.1.9. QUALITY ASSURANCE Surveillance Plan (QASP). An organized written document specifying the surveillance methodology to be used for surveillance of contractor performance.

2.1.10. QUALITY CONTROL. All necessary measures taken by the Contractor to assure that the quality of an end product or service shall meet contract requirements.

2.1.11. SUBCONTRACTOR. One that enters into a contract with a prime contractor.

The Government does not have privity of contract with the subcontractor.

2.1.12. WORK DAY. The number of hours per day the Contractor provides services in accordance with the contract.

2.1.12. WORK WEEK. Monday through Friday, unless specified otherwise.

2.2. ACRONYMS:

ACOR Alternate Contracting Officer's Representative AFARS Army Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement AR Army Regulation CCE Contracting Center of Excellence CFR Code of Federal Regulations CONUS Continental United States (excludes Alaska and Hawaii) COR Contracting Officer Representative COTR Contracting Officer's Technical Representative COTS Commercial-Off-the-Shelf DA Department of the Army DD250 Department of Defense Form 250 (Receiving Report) DD254 Department of Defense Contract Security Requirement List DFARS Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement DMDC Defense Manpower Data Center DOD Department of Defense FAR Federal Acquisition Regulation HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 KO Contracting Officer OCI Organizational Conflict of Interest OCONUS Outside Continental United States (includes Alaska and Hawaii) ODC Other Direct Costs PIPO Phase In/Phase Out POC Point of Contact PRS Performance Requirements Summary PWS Performance Work Statement QA Quality Assurance QAP Quality Assurance Program QASP Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan QC Quality Control QCP Quality Control Program TE Technical Exhibit

PART 3

GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES

3. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES:

3.1. Services: The Government will provide an operator to run required tests.

3.2 Facilities: The Government will provide a workspace while on site. The work areas for parts installation will be the Generator Bay, Turbine Floor, and Machine Shop. The government will provide folding table, chairs, and available cars for the contractors use.

An area will be made available for the Contractor's expert to store any tools and equipment he/she may require.

3.3 For each primary unit, the Government will furnish the following information, as copies at least four weeks in advance of testing:

Generator capability curve Generator open circuit saturation curve Excitation system/Automatic voltage regulator manual and schematics Power system stabilizer manual and schematics (if applicable) Governor speed/droop control schematics and instruction manual Applicable relay calibration sheets (e.g. loss of excitation, V/Hz)

PART 4

CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND SERVICES

4. CONTRACTOR FURNISHED ITEMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

4.1 General: The Contractor shall furnish all supplies, equipment, facilities and services required to perform work under this contract that are not listed under Section 3 of this PWS.

PART 5

SPECIFIC TASKS

5. Specific Tasks:

5.1) Personnel and Equipment. Contractor shall provide test personnel and test equipment necessary for model validation testing on the governors, exciters, and generators. Test personnel shall have experience both with the Contractor’s test equipment and test procedures, and with the operating functionality and configuration of the type of governor or exciter (both manufacturer and model) to be tested. The Government will provide powerhouse operators and technicians to participate in performing the various tests as described in the approved and agreed upon test procedures.

5.2) Test Procedure. Contractor shall prepare for approval detailed test procedures for performing model validation testing of the governors, exciters, and generators. This shall include all required connections, test equipment, test sequence, measurements, and adjustments. The contractor shall provide a detailed test procedure for each unit, two weeks prior to being on-site.

5.3) Baseline Generator Validation Testing. Contractor shall perform steady-state testing to develop and validate the generator characteristics, including magnetic characteristics. Contractor shall further develop dynamic parameters through transient testing. Steady state test results shall be submitted to the Government in a tabular format accompanying graphs demonstrating simulation and equation matching to acquired steady state data. Parameters determined through review and calculation of parameters from drawings and nameplate data shall be noted and the equations shown.

5.4) Model Validation Testing of Exciters. Contractor shall perform testing and gather information necessary to determine the dynamic responses and build, within standard SPP model library models, if appropriate, a dynamic model to describe the excitation system. Contractor shall validate the excitation system model by comparing computer simulations representing the approximate system conditions during testing and displaying test and simulation results on overlaying graphs.

5.5) Model Validation Testing of the PSS. Contractor shall perform testing and gather information necessary to determine the dynamic responses and build, within standard SPP model library models, if appropriate, a dynamic model to describe the PSS.

Contractor shall validate the PSS model by comparing computer simulations representing the approximate system conditions during testing and displaying test and simulation results on overlaying graphs.

5.6) Overall Dynamics Validation. The Contractor shall submit graphs showing good matching between MW and mega-volt-amperes-reactive VAR (MVAR) dynamic responses to online excitation voltage reference steps of at least 2% positive and 2% negative and online power (speed) reference steps of at least ½% positive and ½% negative. The PSS damping effectiveness - if implemented and usually enabled during operation - to a voltage reference step of at least 2% positive and 2% negative shall be demonstrated by comparing MW amplitude and oscillations with PSS on and off.

Contractor shall provide graphs of sufficient size and clarity to demonstrate matching between ramp rates, overshoot, time constants, steady state settling, and other parameters necessary to validate dynamic simulation matching to actual tests. The Contractor shall submit comma-separated value (CSV) raw test data and simulation data with time in column 0, column headers, and scaling factors to allow for reproduction and review of the printed graphs.

5.7) Calculations, Data, and Formulas. The Contractor shall provide a record of the calculations made to support the model validation analysis, records of data taken, and formulas. The report shall contain calculations and formulas necessary to describe interpolations or calculations from gathered parameters to determine model parameters.

5.8) Draft model validation analysis and test report. The Contractor shall submit a test report that includes a subjective evaluation of equipment performance as well as the complete generator, turbine/governor, exciter, and PSS models with correct model parameters. Contractor shall compare actual and simulated data to validate accuracy of models. The model parameters submitted shall be acceptable to SPP for dynamic simulation purposes. This shall be submitted not more than 45 days from completing the on-site tests. Government will have 21 days to review and provide comments to the contractor.

5.9) Final model validation analysis and test report. The Contractor shall submit a final test report incorporating Government review comments or providing responses to comments for non-concurrence. The final test report shall include a subjective evaluation of equipment performance as well as the complete generator, turbine/governor, exciter, and PSS models with correct model parameters. Contractor shall compare actual and simulated data to validate accuracy of models. The model parameters submitted shall be acceptable to SPP for dynamic simulation purposes. This shall be completed 30 days after Government provides comments to the contractor.

PART 6

ATTACHMENT/TECHNICAL EXHIBIT LISTING

6. Attachment/Technical Exhibit List:

6.1 Attachment 1/Technical Exhibit 1 – Performance Requirements Summary

6.2 Attachment 2/Technical Exhibit 2 – Deliverables Schedule

6.3 Attachment 3/Technical Exhibit 3 - Generator Information

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 1

Performance Requirements Summary

The contractor service requirements are summarized into performance objectives that relate directly to mission essential items. The performance threshold briefly describes the minimum acceptable levels of service required for each requirement. These thresholds are critical to mission success.

Performance Objective (The Service required—usually a shall statement)

Standard Performance

Threshold

Method of Surveillance

PRS # 1.

Test Procedures

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although 10%-20% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified.

Zero deviation from standard

Submittal Review

PRS # 2.

Submit Draft Model Validation Analysis and Test Report

a. Submittal approved as submitted, although 10%-20% substantive comments issued for submittal; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified.

Zero deviation from standard

Submittal Review

PRS # 3

Submit Final Model Validation Analysis and Test Report

a. Submittal approved as submitted with no substantive comments; and

b. No technical deficiencies identified.

Zero deviation from standard

Submittal Review

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 2

DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE

Deliverable Frequency # of Copies Medium/Format Submit To

Draft Model Validation Analysis and Test Report

Once

1 copy to be delivered 45 days after tests completed

Via approved electronic delivery method

Melissa.L.Kurtz@u sace.army.mil

Final Model Validation Analysis and Test Report

Once 1 copy to be delivered 30 days after government comments received.

Via approved electronic delivery method

Melissa.L.Kurtz@u sace.army.mil

TECHNICAL EXHIBIT 3

Generator Ratings Fort Randall Units

Ratings Value Units Sbase Generator Base Power 42.105 MVA MCR Turbine continuous rating 42.9 MW Ebase Generator Base Voltage 13.8 kV rpm Rated Speed 85.7 rpm pf Power Factor 0.95 if rated Rated MVA and pf Field Current Adc if base Base Air-Gap Line Field Current Adc ef base Base Air-Gap Line Field Voltage Vdc rf base Field Winding Resistance ohms rf temp Field Winding Base Temperature 75 °C

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .