FP - Logic Model Template and How to Guide.docx

DOCX document 66 KB Posted

Attached to
Western Hemisphere Counterterrorism Legal and Financial Disruption Program
Opportunity number
DFOP0018070
Issued by

About this file

This file is a Logic Model How-To Guide designed to assist applicants and grantees in developing logic models and theories of change for counterterrorism programs administered by the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Counterterrorism. The guide fulfills the requirement in 18 FAM 301.4-2 that every program create a logic model articulating how the program contributes to stated counterterrorism outcomes. The logic model serves as a visual representation mapping the sequence of related events connecting program goals and objectives with desired outcomes, documenting expected linkages between inputs (resources), activities (actions undertaken to meet needs), outputs (direct products and tangible results), and outcomes (changes and achievements).

The guide provides a template and detailed component explanations for applicants to complete their logic models. Key components include Inputs (staff, equipment, facilities), Activities (trainings, meetings, equipment provision), Outputs (participants trained, curricula completed), CT Outcomes (changes expected from the program, drawn from the NOFO), Objectives (incorporated from the NOFO), and Goals (incorporated from the NOFO, pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, NSPM-2, and Executive Orders). The guide also requires applicants to identify Assumptions (factors necessary for program success) and develop a Theory of Change (brief statement explaining why program activities will result in particular outcomes, typically structured as "If X activities, then Y outcomes"). An illustrative example demonstrates how these components apply to a counterterrorism prosecutions program focused on training recipient country officials in legal standards and investigative techniques to increase terrorist convictions.

Logic Model

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Logic Model How-To Guide This How-To Guide is designed to help CT grant applicants and grantees develop and refine logic models and theories of change. 18 FAM 301.4-2 requires every program to create a logic model to articulate how and why the program is expected to contribute to achieving the stated CT program outcomes.

The logic model documents expected linkages between program inputs, activities, outputs, and outcomes, and sets the foundation against which progress can be monitored and evaluated. It is a visual representation that maps and shows the sequence of related events connecting planned goals and objectives with desired outcomes.

This visual “map” depicts the logical relationships between the need for the program, the resources (inputs), and activities that will address those needs, what will be produced or delivered or who will be trained from these activities (outputs), and the changes/achievements deriving from these outputs (outcomes).

The logic model has several components, which are described below:

I. Logic Model: Components/Examples

Component
Explanation
Examples

Inputs What are the resources you need to carry out the program?

The resources you will need to carry out the program activities and deliverables.
· Staff

· Equipment

· Facilities

Activities What activities will be conducted to meet the needs or address the problem?

An action or process undertaken over a specific period by an organization. Activities convert inputs (resources) to products or services to achieve outputs and outcomes.

· Trainings

· Meetings

· Provision of equipment

Outputs What will be produced or delivered or who will participate in activities?

Direct products, services, equipment or other tangible results produced as a result of the activities.
· Participants

· Trainings completed

· Curricula completed

· Equipment delivered

CT Outcomes What changes do we expect the program to achieve?

The outcomes for this program should already be written into the program’s NOFO, and applicants should incorporate these into their proposal and, if the applicant wins the award, into a SOW. Please also copy and paste those into your logic model.
See “III. Logic Model: Example” below for illustrative CT outcomes.

Objectives

The objectives are written into the program’s NOFO, and applicants should incorporate these into their proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW. Please also copy and paste these into your logic model.

This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.

Goals

The goals should be written into the program’s NOFO, and applicants should incorporate these into their proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW. Please also copy and paste these into your logic model.

This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.

Assumptions What factors need to occur, or which recipients or grantees need to be involved, for the program to be successful?

Beliefs that the program and the people involved have about the ways in which the program will work. Assumptions frequently involve: the country’s political, social, economic, and security conditions; skills and knowledge level of intended recipients; organizational expertise; anticipated level of engagement by recipients, etc. If these hypotheses do not hold true, they can affect the progress or success of a program.
· Recipients will be motivated to engage in the program activities.

· Staff will have the necessary skills and knowledge to deliver the program effectively.

· Recipient country organizations will collaborate and support the program.

· Relevant policies and regulations will remain stable throughout the program duration.

Theory of Change
A brief statement that ties a logic model together by summarizing why, based on available evidence and consideration of other possible paths, the changes described in the model are expected to occur. It explains why we believe our program activities will result in particular outcomes. These can be written as “If X (activities), then Y (outcomes).”
See “III. Logic Model: Example” below for illustrative CT outcomes.

U.S Department of State Bureau of Counterterrorism February 2026

II. Logic Model: Template Use the template below to fill in each column to develop the logic model for your program.

Inputs

Activities

Outputs

CT Outcomes

Objectives
Goals

Which resources will you need to carry out the program?

Which activities will be conducted to meet the needs or address the problem?

What will be produced or delivered or who will participate in activities?

[Add from the NOFO into proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW]

What are the changes we expect the program to achieve?

[Add from the NOFO into proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW]

[Add from the NOFO into proposal and, if applicant wins the award, into a SOW]

Assumptions: Which factors need to occur, or which recipients or grantees need to be involved, for the program to be successful?

Theory of Change: Why do we think the particular changes described in our logic model are expected to occur?

III. Logic Model: Example The following is an illustrative example of a logic model intended to provide additional guidance to applicants in preparing their proposals’ logic model. Applicants should therefore view this as a reference tool rather than as a substitute to use in place of developing their own logic model.

Inputs

Activities

Outputs

CT Outcomes

Objectives
Goals

Staff Equipment Facilities Implementers Training and technical assistance activities are provided.

Needs assessment conducted.

Resident Legal Advisors, Intermittent Legal Advisors provide mentoring to recipient country officials.

Events on prosecutions across recipient country organizations are coordinated.

Priority recipient country officials complete training courses.

A curriculum is developed based on a needs assessment.

Priority recipient country officials complete mentorship.

Prosecutions (CT Standard Outcome) - Outcome 1: Adopt U.S.-approved legal standards and practices enabling the prosecution of Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and other terrorist actors that threaten the U.S. homeland, persons, and facilities.

Prosecutions (CT Standard Outcome) – Outcome 2: Protect U.S. citizens and interests by strengthening the prosecution of FTOs and other terrorist actors, consistent with U.S.-approved legal standards and practices.

This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.

This will already be included in the NOFO, likely pulling from the National Security Strategy, Agency Strategic Plan 2026-2030, National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM)-2, Executive Orders, and/or other relevant, high-level strategies.

Assumptions:

The threat of terrorism affecting the recipient country and the surrounding region will remain at or near levels experienced at the start of the program.

CT, DoS, and the U.S. government will continue to prioritize CT prosecutions programming.

Recipient country’s political will in support of the program will remain strong.

Theory of Change:

If recipient country officials’ abilities to investigate and prosecute terrorist crimes are improved under a strengthened prosecutions-based legislative framework, then successful conviction of terrorist suspects will increase.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .