Attachment_3_-_USAF_TPS_Individual_Evaluation_Checklist_R44.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- R-44 Qualitative Evaluation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA9302-20-T-0002
About this file
Individual Evaluation Checklist
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_2_R-44__Exhibit_A-Price_List_Updated_6-18-2019.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_1_-_R-44_PWS_-_8_Feb_19.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_R-44__Exhibit_A-Price_List.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3
FA9302-20-D-0002
AFTC TECHNICAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST
AIRCRAFT EVAL: R-44
TAIL#:
OFFEROR:
EVALUATOR:
DATE:
| Examination Areas |
| Y/N |
| N/A |
| Notes |
Aircraft Airworthiness Certificate is available and verified valid with Registry at FAA.gov
For Experimental category, Operating Limitations are included with Airworthiness Certificate
Aircraft is registered to an appropriate party, and registration is current.
Aircraft maintenance logs & inspections are current as required for category Standard = Annual & 100-hour Experimental = FAA Approved MX Plan
All modifications on aircraft are signed by an FAA inspector or Designated Engineering Representative (DER)?
A visual examination was conducted of the aircraft exterior. Discrepancies identified are listed in the “Notes” column.
A visual examination was conducted of the aircraft engine(s), including prop(s) and rotor(s) as applicable. Discrepancies identified are in the “Notes” column.
A visual examination was conducted of the aircraft cockpit and other interior spaces. Discrepancies identified are in the “Notes” column.
Additional Comments/Notes:
A visual examination of the aircraft was performed and aircraft forms were reviewed. The aircraft is maintained under current Federal Aviation Regulations and it appears suitable for government use in the desired mission.
USAF TPS QE Program Manager
PILOT EVALUATION: R-44
Evaluator Pilot:
Contractor Pilot:
Tail:
Location:
Date:
| Evaluation Events |
| Req’d Proficiency |
| Score |
| Mission Brief |
| 3 |
| Ground Operations |
| 3 |
| Takeoff |
| 3 |
| Departure |
| 3 |
| Basic Acft Control |
| 3 |
| Touch-and-Go (land) |
| 3 |
| Touch-and-Go (water) |
| 3 |
| Water Taxi |
| 3 |
| In-flight instruction |
| 2 |
| Communication |
| 3 |
| Situational Awareness/Airmanship |
| 3 |
| EP knowledge |
| 3 |
The grading scales is: 1 – Unable, 2 – Partially Proficient, 3 – Competent, 4 – Highly Proficient
Mission Overview:
Overall assessment:
Recommend for USAF TPS QE program Yes/No.
Name of Evaluator Signature/Date
File details come from the government source that posted it.