Attachment_4_PPQ_MARS-IV.docx

DOCX document 65 KB Posted

Attached to
MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE SERVICES (MARS) IV Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9300-19-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command

About this file

FA9300-19-R-0001 Amendment 2- The purpose of this amendment is to notify all interested parties that all questions for the subject solicitation MUST be received no later than 18 October 2019, 2pm PST. Questions received prior to closing will be reviewed and answered by 24 October 2019. Any questions received after 18 October 2019 may not be answered. Additionally attached you will find the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) in Word Doc format for your convenience.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE SERVICES (MARS) IV, newest first.
File Type Posted
52.222-42__Statement_of_Equivalent_Rates_for_Federal_Hires.pdf PDF
Amended_PWS_for_RPF_30_Oct_2019.pdf PDF
DD_254_Security_Supplemental_Pages.doc DOC document
RFP_Questions_Answers_MARS-IV_FA9300-19-R-0001_20191030.pdf PDF
FA9300-19-R-0001_MARS_IV_RFP_AMDT-1.pdf PDF
FA9300-19-R-0001_MARS_IV_RFP.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MARS IV PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (FA9300-19-R-0001)

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION WHEN COMPLETED IAW FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $

H. Current/final contract cost: $

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

B

P

G

Y

R

N

Program Management P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property and/or Equipment)

P8. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P9. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

B

P

G

Y

R

N

Transition/phase-in T/PI1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T/PI2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

T/P13. Contractor ability to secure Non-Disclosure Agreements.

Employee Retention/Attraction E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified skilled workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

2. Please discuss each response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes

Default

Convenience Pending Terminations No If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire via mail or e-mail to:

Mailing Address: AFTC/PZRB 5 S. Wolfe Ave.

Edwards AFB, CA 93524-1185 Attn: Thania Guillen-Alexander and Joshua P. Vasquez

MARKED FOR: FA9300-19-R-0001

Email Address: Thania.Guillen-Alexander@us.af.mil or Joshua.Vasquez.5@us.af.mil Please call Thania Guillen-Alexander at 661-277-9601 or Joshua P. Vasquez at 661-277-8213 for further questions or concerns.

File details come from the government source that posted it.