Section_L_Atch1__PP_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 33rd NWS Air Force Defensive Cyber Operations Maintenance & Enabler (AF DCO M&E) Mission
- Solicitation number
- FA8773-14-R-8002
About this file
SF33_Section L_Atch 1_PP Questionaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA_V2.pdf | ||
| SF_30_Amend_0002.pdf | ||
| ME_PWS_27Jun14.pdf | ||
| Atch_1_Pricing_Table_AFCERT_12Jun14.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| QA_V1.pdf | ||
| SF30_P0001.doc | DOC document | |
| ME_PWS_17Jun14.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_DD_1423_CDRLS.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Atch_2_PP_Questionaire_Tracking_Record.doc | DOC document | |
| SF33_AF_DCO_M_E_30_May_2014.doc | DOC document | |
| 254_Attachments_for_AF_DCO_M E.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Atch_3_Questionnaire_Cover_Letter.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch_1_Pricing_Table_AF_DCO_M E_6_Mar_14.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| AF_DCO_M E_Pre-Award_DD_Form_254.pdf | ||
| M E_PWS_02May14.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
Section L Attachment 1
Past Performance Questionnaire Record Solicitation FA8773-12-R-8002
VENDOR NAME:
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE CONTRACT #:
1. What type of services does the contractor provide under the referenced contract number?
Response:
2. Question: Did the contractor perform the following:
| Router Operations considerations: |
| YES / NO |
A. Experience in configuring, maintaining, operating, and defending service delivery point routers in NIPR and SIPR environments.
B. Experience designing, configuring and maintaining common user VPNs.
C. Experience installing and configuring network infrastructure equipment.
D. Experience installing and maintaining Cat 5, Cat 6, and Fiber cable systems.
E. Experience with Cisco routers, switches and WAN Acceleration appliances.
F. Experience with Riverbed WAN Acceleration appliances.
| Network Security and DNS Operations considerations: |
| YES / NO |
A. Experience configuring, maintaining, operating, and defending boundary protection devices (i.e. firewalls and web proxies).
B. Experience with Cisco, Blue Coat, Palo Alto, and Sourcefire devices.
C. Experience managing and configuring load balancers.
D. Experience managing and maintaining DNS.
E. Experience using Infoblox products.
F. Experience using SonicWall devices.
G. Experience using Bind Berkely Internet Name Daemon application.
H. Experience using McAfee Email Gateway application.
| Contingency of Operations (COOP) Implementation |
| YES / NO |
A. Experience with performing Continuity of Operations without interruption or degradation to the mission.
B. Experience being fully responsible for managing global network operations that includes, at a minimum, Router Operations, Network Security, System Administration, DNS Operations, Infrastructure, and VoIP.
| Analysis: Network Traffic and Bandwidth, Data, and Root Cause considerations: |
| YES / NO |
A. Experience managing bandwidth circuits and troubleshooting network bandwidth problems.
B. Experience identifying, tracking, and reporting network bandwidth traffic utilization.
C. Experience performing trends analysis on bandwidth circuits to improve network performance.
D. Experience conducting deep packet analysis on circuits.
E. Experience with VoIP and VoSIP technology.
| System Administration |
| YES / NO |
A. Experience with Information Assurance.
B. Experience with Storage Area Network.
C. Experience with Backup and Storage.
D. Experience operating, maintaining, and administering Windows and UNIX environments.
E. Experience managing and operating Active Directory.
F. Experience with the CA Technologies products.
G. Experience using Solarwinds.
H. Experience with operating, managing, and administering virtual environments
Remarks:
3. Question: How well did the Contractor perform on the referenced contract. Please use the below rating system to assign a performance rating for the factors listed below. Please provide a detailed narrative to support ratings above satisfactory.
Rating Definition Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the government's benefit.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government's benefit.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor's corrective actions to date are ineffective.
Areas Rated
(1) Quality of Product/Service Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
(3) Cost Control: N/A
(4) Business Relations Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
(5) Management of Key Personnel Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
4. Question: Were there any adverse performance issues/problems? If so, how were they resolved?
| Reports/Letters | Y/N | |
| Contract Discrepancy Report |
Cure Notice
Show Cause Notice
Suspension of Payment
Termination for Convenience/Default
Denial of Claim
Other
Response by:
| ___________________________ | ________________ | |
| Print Name | Title |
| ___________________________ | ________________ | |
| Signature | Date |
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .