Section_L_Atch_1_PP_Questionnaire_Mission.docx
DOCX document 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 33rd NWS AF DCO Mission Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA8773-14-R-8001
About this file
Section L Atch 1_PP Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30_Amend_0001.doc | DOC document | |
| FA8773-14-R-8001_QA_V1_21Oct.pdf | ||
| AF_DCO_MS_PWS_21_Oct_14.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Atch_3_PP_Sample_Questionnaire_Cover_Letter_Mission.doc | DOC document | |
| CDRLS_A001-A008.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Atch_2_PP_Questionaire_Tracking_Record_Mission.doc | DOC document | |
| DD_Form_254_(Mission_Services)Pre-award.pdf | ||
| AF_DCO_MS_PWS_28_Aug_14.pdf | ||
| 254_Attachments_MissionServices.pdf | ||
| Pricing_Table__DCO_MS_11Sep14.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
Section L Attachment 1
Past Performance Questionnaire Record Solicitation FA8773-14-R-8001 33rd NWS DCO MISSION SERVICES
Vendor Name:
Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Name(s):
Past Performance Reference Contract Number:
Was the vendor the Prime or Sub-Contractor?
Period of Performance?
Contract Dollar Value:
1. What type of services does the contractor provide under the referenced contract number?
Response:
2. Question: Did the contractor perform the following:
YES / NO
Network Detection - Experience analyzing network alerts from Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) or Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) on a 24/7/365 basis
Incident Handling - Experience performing incident case handling and report writing
Forensic Analysis - Experience performing system forensic analysis
Remarks:
3. Question: How well did the Contractor perform on the referenced contract. Please use the rating system below to assign a performance rating for the factors listed below. Please provide a detailed narrative to support ratings above satisfactory.
Rating Definition Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the government's benefit.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the government's benefit.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor's corrective actions to date are ineffective.
Areas Rated (1)Quality of Service Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
(3) Cost Control: N/A
(4) Business Relations Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
(5) Management of Key Personnel Rating:
Supporting Narrative:
4. Question: Were there any adverse performance issues/problems? If so, how were they resolved?
| Reports/Letters | Y/N | |
| Contract Discrepancy Report |
Cure Notice
Show Cause Notice
Suspension of Payment
Termination for Convenience/Default
Denial of Claim
Other
Response by:
| ___________________________ | ________________ | |
| Print Name | Title |
Phone No:
Email:
| ___________________________ | ________________ | |
| Signature | Date |
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .