The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
ATTACHMENT 13: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SHEET
Provide the information requested in this form for each contract/program being described. Provide frank, concise comments regarding your performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract/program submitted. Limit the number of past efforts to (10) submitted and the length of each submission to (4) pages.
| 1 |
| Offeror Name (Company/Division) |
| 1b |
| Contract Number (only one) |
| 1c |
| Task Order Number (only one) or Option year(s) |
| 3 |
| Contracting Agency or Customer |
| 4 |
| Contract Type: Task Order___ Stand Alone ____ |
| 4a |
| ___FFP ___Cost Reimbursable ___Other (Explain) |
| 6 |
| Original Contract $ Value (Do not include unexercised options) |
| 6a |
| Current Contract $ Value (Do not include unexercised options) |
| 6b |
| If amounts for 6 & 6a are different, provide brief description why |
| 7 |
| Was the effort performed as the prime or the sub? |
| 8 |
| Original Completion date |
| 8a |
| Current Completion Schedule |
| 8b |
| Estimated Completion Schedule |
| 8c |
| How many times has schedule changed? |
| 8d |
| Briefly state the cause for the schedule change |
| 9 |
| Program Manager and/or Site Manager |
| 11 |
| Administrative Contracting Officer |
For each of the areas listed below, describe how your past experience citations relate to these areas.
The offeror should reference efforts that have been performed at locations worldwide to have the greatest impact on the Performance Confidence Assessment. Other references will be accepted and may be considered but those performed at locations worldwide are preferred.
Metadata Environments (Citation shall be at the task order or stand-alone contract level) Relevant PWS paragraph is 3.1.1.4. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past efforts for:
a. Provided services and solutions that help generate and manage Metadata and Metadata Environments (MDEs). Addressed experience with eXtensible Markup Language (XML)-based metadata catalogs.
b. Referenced efforts designing and implementing a metadata population service for assigning metadata values to discoverable assets, query processing, relevance calculation, and result presentation services.
c. Shown experience creating runtime metadata registries for storing semantic vocabulary artifacts.
Network Management and Network Defense (NM/ND) (Citation shall be at the task order or stand-alone contract level) Relevant PWS paragraphs are 3.2.1.1 GIG Enterprise Management and 3.2.1.2 GIG Network Defense. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past efforts for:
a. Addressed Security Management efforts that have provided rapid identification and response to anomalous activity, network probe and exploitation efforts, and implement appropriate defensive actions or countermeasures.
b. Provided services and solutions that enable network command and control. Including Configuration Management, User Account Management and Fault and Performance Management to include trend analysis and correlation of network incidents, outages, and degradation events.
c. Demonstrated experience in rapid implementation of security countermeasures by facilitating the coordination of network restoration priorities and actions after an intrusion or adverse network event. Computer Network Defense Response Actions
Network Management and Enterprise Services (Citation shall be at the task order or stand-alone contract level) Relevant PWS paragraph is 3.2.1.6 Network Management and Enterprise Services. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past efforts for:
a. Provided services and solutions to accomplish network boundary management and control such as that needed to establish and secure a corporate intranet.
b. Provided services and solutions to accomplish cross-domain security.
Information Management Transport Systems (Citation shall be at the task order or stand-alone contract level) Relevant PWS paragraphs are 3.2.2, 3.2.3.2, 3.3.1, 4.2.5, 4.2.5, 4.2.6, and 4.2.7. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past efforts for:
a. Provided integrated engineering, installation, and maintenance of a high bandwidth/high-performance survivable fiber optic backbone to include “wired” and “wireless” networks
b. Provided information transport capability that includes data, voice, video, sensor and imagery traffic
Management (Citation shall be at the task order or stand-alone contract level)
The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past efforts for:
a. Addressed the contractor’s overall ability to manage the contract to include the contractor’s ability to achieve and maintain customer satisfaction, management of subcontractors, and their ability to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract.
b. Demonstrated their ability to staff appropriately to include staffing the right number of people, skill levels required to accomplish the mission, and the ability to retain.
Cost (Citation shall be at the task order or stand-alone contract level) The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past efforts for:
a. Demonstrated their ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs and the sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting.
b. Their ability to alert the Government of any unforeseen costs before they occur.
Specific Content per L5.1.1.1
Offerors may use this area to describe efforts accomplished by the offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk.
Section J, Attachment 13
FA8771-09-R-0019-0007
