Q and A Aerial Targets Branch (EBAY) Air Force Aerial Target Solutions.pdf

PDF 101 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Information (RFI) for Aerial Targets Branch (EBAY) Air Force Aerial Target Solutions
Solicitation number
FA8678-26-AFSAT-R0001
Issued by

About this file

This is a Questions and Answers document for Air Force Aerial Target Solutions (Notice ID: FA8678-26-AFSAT-R0001) issued by the Aerial Targets Branch (EBAY). The document addresses six key clarifications regarding Tier 3 expendable target systems and related requirements for respondents to the Request for Information (RFI).

The Government is open to both towed and free-flying target implementations and requests supporting information outlining execution approaches for each. For Tier 3 Group 1 and Group 2 expendable targets, flight termination capabilities do not require full integration at RFI response; respondents may identify a planned integration pathway for currently flight-tested platforms. Regarding command and control (C2) architecture, respondents utilizing independent systems may describe current C2 capabilities and operating/maintenance costs while identifying a pathway for future integration with the Government's AATTCS system, including a rough order of magnitude cost estimate. For platforms with alternative C2 architectures, respondents should demonstrate current FIPS 140-2 Level 1 or higher compliance and may identify necessary modifications or integration pathways for higher encryption standards. Concerning swarm scalability, while no target limit currently exists, simultaneously operating greater than ten targets serves as a baseline; respondents with capabilities for scalable batch launches (10, 20, 50+ targets) should detail these options to support Title 10 validation requirements. Finally, the Government is interested in baseline air vehicles with modular SWaP-C capacity and interfaces for future RF, IR, RCS, scoring, or threat-representation payloads, with respondents required to detail which future capabilities can be integrated, along with associated costs and timelines.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Q & A Aerial Targets Branch (EBAY) Air Force Aerial Target Solutions

Notice ID: FA8678-26-AFSAT-R0001

1. Is the U.S. Air Force considering targets that are in tow vs fly on their own?

a. Yes, we are open to all target opportunities. Please provide supporting information in your response outlining how both towed and free-flying implementations would be executed.

2. For Tier 3 Group 1 and Group 2 expendable targets, does the Government expect the onboard flight termination capabilities described in Section 4.0 to be fully integrated at the time of RFI response, or may respondents identify a planned integration pathway for a currently flight-tested platform?

a. Flight termination capabilities do not need to be fully integrated at the time of the RFI response. Respondents are encouraged to identify a planned integration pathway.

3. For Tier 3 systems that currently utilize an independent C2 architecture, are existing AATTCS compatibility expected, or is it acceptable to describe the current C2 system and a potential pathway for future integration with Government target-control systems?

a. It is acceptable to describe your current C2 capabilities as well as the associated operating and maintenance costs. Additionally, the Government is interested in understanding the potential pathway for future integration with AATTCS, to include a rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost estimate for this transition.

4. For platforms utilizing an alternative C2 architecture, should respondents demonstrate current FIPS 140-2 Level 1 or higher compliance at the RFI stage, or may respondents identify the modifications or integration pathway necessary to achieve the required encryption standard?

a. Respondents should demonstrate current FIPS compliance and may identify the specific modifications or integration pathways necessary to achieve a higher encryption standard.

5. Tier 3 Swarm Scale: Section 5.1 describes Tier 3 systems as being optimized for rapid, multi-vehicle swarm launches. Is there a desired or representative number of simultaneously operated targets that respondents should use when describing C2 scalability, production capacity, and swarm capability?

a. While there is currently no limit on the number of targets desired for a demonstration, simultaneously operating greater than ten targets serves as a baseline starting point. If respondents have capabilities to operate targets in scalable batches such as launches of 10, 20, 50, or more, please detail these options, as they provide valuable testing data and support Title 10 validation requirements for representative modern threats.

6. For Tier 3 systems, is the Government interested in baseline air vehicles that provide modular SWaP-C capacity and interfaces for future RF, IR, RCS, scoring, or other threat-representation payloads, even if those payloads are not currently integrated into the platform?

a. Yes, however, we would like respondents to detail which future capabilities can be integrated onto the platform, along with the estimated costs and timelines associated with implementing those future payloads.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .