2.__Attachment_1_-_FA8651-20-S-0008_Tech_Eval_(White_Paper_Evaluation).pdf
PDF 74 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8651-20-S-0008
About this file
This document contains a technical evaluation form for competitive white papers submitted in response to Broad Agency Announcement FA8651-20-S-0008 from the Air Force Research Laboratory Munitions directorate. The form will be used to evaluate white papers against criteria including an assessment of the proposed technical approach and its potential to advance technologies relevant to air superiority, as well as whether the proposed schedule and rough order of magnitude cost are reasonable given the technical approach. Evaluators will indicate whether the white paper meets criteria, identify strengths and weaknesses, and recommend whether the proposed work should be funded based on the evaluation.
Attachment 1 - Tech Eval for White Paper Submission
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECHNICAL EVALUATION FOR COMPETITIVE ACQUISITIONS
(Used for White Paper ONLY for this BAA)
BAA No: FA8651-20-S-0008 White Paper No:
Type of Instrument Proposed:
Research Area: White Paper Title:
Name of Offeror:
Name of Evaluator:
Date of Evaluation:
Office Symbol:
Phone No:
EVALUATION CRITERIA (AS DETAILED IN THE SYNOPSIS)
1. An integrated, comprehensive and unbiased assessment of the proposed technical approach to include scientific and/or technical merits/feasibility and the potential contributions of the effort to extending the scientific understanding associated with the technologies being pursued by the Air Superiority Technology portfolios and described in the 12 research areas of the BAA.
Meets the criteria (Address key aspects of the white paper which demonstrate why the white paper meets the criteria.)
Does not meet the criteria (Address key aspects of the white paper which demonstrate why the white paper does not meet the criteria.)
Strengths
Weaknesses
2. Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) and schedule commensurate with technical approach.
Meets the criteria (Address how white paper demonstrates it meets the criteria.)
Does not meet the criteria (Address how white paper demonstrates it does not meet the criteria.)
Strengths
Weaknesses
Yes, meets the criteria and will be funded Yes, meets the criteria but will not be funded No, does not meet criteria
Signature Program Manager: _____________________________________________
Typed/Printed Name: ______________________Date:
Signature Branch Chief (or equivalent): ____________________________________
Typed/Printed Name: ______________________Date: ______________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .