FA8650-20-R-4120_Amendment_1_31_October_19.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

See Block #2

PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

31 OCT 2019

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ.NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY AFRL/PZLE CODE FA8650 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

USAF/AFMC

AFRL WRIGHT RESEARCH SITE

2130 EIGHTH STREET, BUILDING 45

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH 45433-7541

JOSEPH D. GLENN 937-713-9830

joseph.glenn.4@us.af.mil

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA8650-20-R-4120

X

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers X is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

(X )

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: ( ) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. ITEM

10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor X is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SUBJECT: FY20 711 HPW Mission Support Service - Amendment 1

PCO EMAIL: jessica.briggs@us.af.mil

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print).

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

JESSICA L. BRIGGS

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

16C. DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

BY________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA ConWrite Version 7.2.2.0 FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 Created 06 Nov 2019 3:20 PM

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

FA8650-20-R-4120 0001 PAGE 2 OF 4

SECTION A - CONTRACT FORM

1. Amendment 1 is being issued to formally capture the changes to Soliciation FA8650-20-R-4120 dated 31 October 2019 and posted to Federal Business Opportunites (FBO) on 31 October 2019.

2. The following is a summary of the changes in Amendment 1:

a. Clause B036

b. Clause F002

c. Section L

i. Paragraph 1.0 (i) and (j)

ii. Paragraph 1.1 (a) - Submittal date is now 1400 EST, 20 November 2019

iii. Paragraph 1.1 (b) - Electronic Proposals shall be submitted on a DVD-R, NOT via email.

iv. Paragraph 1.3 (b)

v. Paragraph 2.2 (3), (5) and (8)

vi. Paragraph 3.1.2 (b) 4

vii. Paragraph 5a, 5b, 5c, 5e, 5f, 5m

d. Section M

i. Paragraph 2.1.3

ii. Paragraph 5a, 5b, 5c, 5e, 5m

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

1. Clause B036 CONTRACT TYPE: TIME-AND- MATERIALS (FEB 1997) (TAILORED) is modified as follows:

(a) The Contractor shall furnish hourly rates in their proposal at the Task Order Level of the Contract for all necessary and qualified personnel in support of CLIN 0005, 0006, & 0007 for the base year and all ordering period out-years. In performance of these CLIN(s), Contractor shall be reimbursed for direct labor (exclusive of any work performed in an unpaid overtime status) at the hourly rates as defined and established in each individual Task Order for the identified labor categories and may include the contractor's required oversight labor categories. (b) For the purposes of the clause of this contract entitled "Payments Under Time-and-Material and Labor-Hour Contracts", the total ceiling price of the CLIN(s) specified in paragraph (a) above is to be determined at the Task Order level.

Applies to Time and Materials CLIN(s) 0005, 0006, 0007 & 1005, 1006, 1007 Applies to Time-and-Materials CLIN(s) only.

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE

1. Clause F002 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (FEB 1997) (TAILORED) is modified as follows:

Period of performance under this contract shall be 72 months from date of award, with a 60 month Ordering Period. Specific period of performance of individual projects will be stated at the Task Order

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

FA8650-20-R-4120 0001 PAGE 3 OF 4

level. Task Order periods of performance shall conform to the contract period of performance specified above.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS & ATTACHMENTS is modified as set forth below:

1. Attachment 3 - Section L, dated 31 October 2019. This revision replaces any previous versions in its entirety.

2. Attachment 4 - Section M, dated 31 October 2019. This revision replaces any previous versions in its entirety.

3. Attachment 5 - Self Evaluation Scoring Sheet, dated 31 October 2019. This revision replaces any previous versions in its entirety.

SCHEDULE OF CHANGES

FA8650-20-R-4120 0001

DOCUMENT PGS DATE TITLE

ATTACHMENT 3 11 31 OCT 2019 SECTION L

ATTACHMENT 4 6 31 OCT 2019 SECTION M

ATTACHMENT 5 1 31 OCT 2019 SELF EVALUATION SCORING SHEET

Section L Attachment 3

Instructions to Offerors

31 Oct 2019

1.0 Section L Instructions to Offerors (ITO)

(a) General Guidance: This is a Highest Technically Rated Offeror source selection. The government will verify/validate all points identified by Offerors on the Self-Scoring worksheet.

There are no underlying “strengths” or “weaknesses” to be evaluated, nor are there any “Trade-

Offs.”

(b) Only one (1) proposal may be submitted by each qualified offeror in response to this requirement. For this solicitation, each Offeror may only be a member of one approved Joint

Venture (JV). Additionally, if an Offeror proposes as a member of an approved JV, that Offeror may NOT also propose as a prime. An Offeror proposing in violation of these instructions will be removed from the competition and, therefore, ineligible for an award.

(c) All proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be in compliance with these instructions.

(d) The proposal shall be clear, specific, coherent, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated against the Technical criteria defined in Section M, Evaluation Criteria. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror’s proposal meets the experience. The Offeror shall assume that the

Government has no prior knowledge of the Offeror’s facilities and experience, and therefore will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal. By the proposal submission, the Offeror is representing that it will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is not necessary or desirable for the proposal to state as such.

(e) Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments shall not be submitted with the Offeror’s proposal.

(f) The completion and submission of all proposal volumes constitutes the Offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions in this Request For Proposal (RFP) including all attachments hereto.

Proposals will be considered late, in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) 15.208, if the hard copy and electronic copy of the proposals are not received by the date and time specified in this ITO.

(g) IAW FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain the original copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the Offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

(h) Upon notification that its proposal was not selected for award, the unsuccessful offeror may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request IAW the requirements of FAR 15.505 or FAR 15.506, as applicable.

31 Oct 2019

(i) For the purposes of this Solicitation, “Federal Government” applies specifically to the United

States Federal Government.

(j) For the purposes of this Solicitation, “OCONUS” excludes Hawaii, Alaska and the U.S.

Territories.

1.1 Proposal Submission

(a) Submission of Hard Copy Proposal Volumes

One hard copy of the proposal shall be submitted to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) at the below address to arrive no later than 1400 EST, 20 November 2019.

AFMC AFRL/PZLE

Ms. Jessica Briggs

1755 Eleventh St.

Building 570, RM 204

Wright-Patterson AFB OH 45433

(b) Submission of Electronic Proposal Volumes

One copy of the proposal shall be submitted electronically on a DVD-R to the above address no later than 20 November 2019 1400 Eastern Standard Time (EST). The content, format and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. The electronic copy of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft (MS) Office suite of programs dated no higher than 2016.

In the event there are any discrepancies between the hard copy and the electronic copy of the proposal, the hard copy will take precedence and will be used for evaluation.

(c) Proposal Validity

The Offeror shall make a clear statement in each proposal volume that the proposal is valid for a period of not less than 180 days from receipt. This period may be extended upon agreement from the Offeror.

(d) Signature

The Offeror shall submit a letter stating that the offeror concurs with all Terms & Conditions within the IDIQ contract

1.2 General Information

(a) Point of Contact

Ms. Jessica Briggs, PCO, is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Written requests for clarification may be sent via e-mail to the PCO at jessica.briggs@us.af.mil.

31 Oct 2019

(b) Joint Venture Agreements

If the Offeror is proposing as a Joint Ventures (JVs), including Mentor Protégé JVs, the JV agreement must be approved by the SBA before award.

(c) Electronic Reference Documents

Official RFP documentation, including RFP amendments, and other related information will be available via Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) at https://www.fbo.gov/. Potential

Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation. Please note that after 08 November 2019, fbo.gov will be transitioning beta.SAM.gov. Please see FBO.gov for further details.

(d) Communications

Exchanges of source selection information between Government and Offerors will be controlled by the PCO, therefore all questions or concerns shall be submitted to the PCO IAW ITO Section

1.2(a) Point of Contact. Email will be used to transmit source selection information to Offerors only. Offerors’ emails shall include “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 & 3.104 in the subject line.

1.3 Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits

The Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table (Table 1 below). The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified in Table 1.

The contents of each proposal volume are described in the ITO paragraph as noted in the table below:

Table 1 - Proposal Organization

VOLUME ITO Paragraph

Number

VOLUME TITLE COPIES PAGE

LIMIT

I 2.0 Contract

Documentation

1 Original Hard

Copy and 1

Electronic Copy

No Page

Limit

II 3.0 Technical Experience 1 Original Hard

Copy and 1

Electronic Copy

No Page

Limit

(a) Page Limitations

There are no page limitations. The Government will only evaluate the submitted documentation until scoring is validated.

(b) Reserved.

https://www.fbo.gov/ file://///periwinkle_vnx/SAF_AQC_ORG/AQCP/5640%20-%20AFFARS/Templates%20Project%20--%20Sep%202013/5315/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/Far02.doc%23T2101 file://///periwinkle_vnx/SAF_AQC_ORG/AQCP/5640%20-%20AFFARS/Templates%20Project%20--%20Sep%202013/5315/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR03.DOC%23b3104

31 Oct 2019

(c) Binding and Labeling

Volumes I and II shall be submitted in separate binders. Both binders shall include proposals bound in a three-ring, loose leaf binder permitting the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. A cover sheet shall be included in each volume identifying the volume number, title, solicitation identification, and the Offeror's name. Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed IAW FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on disclosure and use of data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal

Information and Source Selection Information.

(d) Contract References

All information submitted as substantiating evidence must be ongoing or completed within the last five years as of the date of this RFP release.

When proposing as a prime/subcontractor teaming arrangement, the prime must substantiate at least 51% of the total evaluated points, subcontractors cannot substantiate more than 49% of the total evaluated points. When proposing as a JVA, the SB protégé is required to substantiate at least 40% of the total evaluated points.

Supporting documentation submitted shall specifically identify the requirement being claimed in the Self-Scoring Worksheet. A PWS for a multiple award Indefinite Delivery

Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) shall not be considered as supporting documentation.

2.0 Volume I - Contract Documentation

2.1 General Information

Each offeror shall submit a contract documentation volume with its proposal.

2.2 Volume Organization

Volume I shall contain the information in tabbed sections IAW the following general outline as applicable:

(1) Signed letter confirming the Offeror agrees to all terms and conditions in the IDIQ contract

(2) Assumptions and Exceptions

(3) Representations and Certifications (from SAM.GOV) & completed Section K

Representations, Certifications and Other Statements

(4) Mentor Protégé Agreements (MPAs)

(5) SBA Joint Venture Approval Notice If Applicable, but required by time of award (per

SBA)Approved Joint Venture Agreement (JVAs)

(6) Equal Employment Opportunity Compliance (EEOC) Documentation

2.2.1 Assumptions and Exceptions

file://///periwinkle_vnx/SAF_AQC_ORG/AQCP/5640%20-%20AFFARS/Templates%20Project%20--%20Sep%202013/5315/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR52.215.doc%23b522151 file://///periwinkle_vnx/SAF_AQC_ORG/AQCP/5640%20-%20AFFARS/Templates%20Project%20--%20Sep%202013/5315/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/AFAC%20Working%20Folders%20--%20PM/far/FAR03.DOC%23b31044

31 Oct 2019

Offerors shall provide a list of assumptions and/or exceptions made in developing the response to this RFP. Please be advised that any assumptions made or exceptions taken may render an offeror’s proposal non-compliant with the RFP and therefore, will not receive award.

2.2.2 Representations and Certifications

IAW FAR 52.204-07—System for Award Management and 52.204-08—Annual

Representations and Certifications, offeror shall submit completed representations, certifications, acknowledgments and statements and comply with the System for Award

Management (SAM). Any provisions listed in Section K, Representations and Certifications, of the solicitation which require information to be “filled-in” or submitted as a separate document must be included in the Contracts Volume I. Each separate document shall be labeled and tabbed within the volume.

2.2.3 Joint Venture Agreements (JVAs)

(JVs) interested in proposing on this acquisition were required to submit a JVA approval by the

SBA before award. The JVA shall submit verification with the appropriate signatures of those individuals authorized to bind the company, and for newly established JVs, all SAM information. All SAM information will be verified and validated upon the receipt of proposals and at award. All Mentor Protégé and Joint Ventures shall submit the approval letter signed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) approving the agreement. Any Mentor Protégé or

JVAs found to be inconsistent with the exception of the required signatures and SAM information for those newly established JVs, will be rejected and the Offeror will be deemed ineligible for award.

2.2.4. Equal Opportunity

(a) IAW FAR 22.802(b), no contract or modification involving new acquisition shall be entered into, and no subcontract shall be approved by a contracting officer, with a person who has been found ineligible by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for reasons of noncompliance with the requirements of E.O. 11246.

(b) Furthermore, Offerors shall provide the following documentation (if available): A Notice of

Compliance from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) and be listed in OFCCP’s National Pre-award Registry via the Internet at https://ofccp.dol-esa.gov/preaward/pa_reg.html; and the OFCCP registry is updated daily and only retains data for 24 months thus Offerors shall ensure registry compliance remains valid through contract award.

(c) If an Offeror does not have an active Notice of Compliance at the time of proposal submission, the Contracting Officer is required to submit a pre-award request to OFCCP. A

Notice of Compliance from the OFCCP office must be received by the Contracting Officer prior to contract award.

https://ofccp.dol-esa.gov/preaward/pa_reg.html https://ofccp.dol-esa.gov/preaward/pa_reg.html

31 Oct 2019

3.0 Volume II – Technical Experience

3.1 General

Each Offeror shall submit a Technical Experience volume (Volume II) with its proposal.

Proposals that omit any information from the proposal submission requirements may result in a determination that the Offeror is unresponsive. Omission of information from solicitation requirements will result in the Offeror’s proposal being ineligible for award.

All technical experience claims will be verified by the Government via a review of the substantiating documentation. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their operation and will rely on documentation provided as part of the Offeror’s proposal.

3.1.1 Volume Organization

Volume II shall contain the information in tabbed sections IAW the following general outline:

(1) Table of Contents

(2) Self-Scoring Worksheet

(3) Supporting Documentation

3.1.2 Self-Scoring Worksheet

(a) Offerors shall complete and submit a single Self-Scoring Worksheet located in Section J, Attachment 5 of this solicitation. The worksheet shall be submitted in Excel 2016 format. The

Government will not accept any worksheets that have been password protected or “locked.”

Worksheets submitted in any other format than Excel 2016 format shall be considered to be non-compliant with the instructions of the solicitation and therefore, the worksheet will not be evaluated.

(b) Complete the Self-Scoring Worksheet using the following instructions:

1. Enter the Offeror’s name in Row 6 of the Self-Scoring Worksheet.

2. The Offeror shall check the box in Column D for ID 1 if the offeror currently possesses an active Facility Clearance Level (FCL). If the offeror does not possess an FCL, they may not fill out the rest of the self-scoring sheet and will not be considered for award.

3. In Column D for ID 2 - 5, the Offeror shall check the box if points are being claimed for that technical experience. The worksheet will auto populate the Offeror’s score and running total at the bottom of the worksheet. Offerors shall follow the technical experience instructions in par. 3.2 below in order to meet the corresponding technical experience criteria in Section M.

4. In Column H , the Offeror shall mark “P” indicating the substantiation submitted for the corresponding ID is work performed as the Prime Contractor, the Offeror shall mark “S”

31 Oct 2019 indicating the substantiation submitted for the corresponding ID is work performed as the Sub-Contractor, and the Offeror shall mark “PS” indicating that the substantiation submitted for the corresponding ID contains both work performed as the Prime

Contractor as well as work performed as the Sub-Contractor.

5. In Column I, the Offeror shall list all substantiation documentation submitted. The

Offeror shall use commas to separate the listing of multiple supporting documentation.

6. The Offeror shall not alter columns A, B, C, and E. Column G will auto-populate points and Column J is for Government use only.

(c) Offerors shall ensure the page numbers match for each technical element identified in

Column I of the Self-Scoring Worksheet. If technical experience claimed on the Self-Scoring

Worksheet cannot be verified due to missing/conflicting substantiating documentation, the

Government verification will result in no points for that element.

3.1.3 Supporting Documentation

The Offeror shall provide verifiable supporting documentation for each item claimed on the

Self-Scoring Worksheet. Supporting documentation must demonstrate the specific experience being provided and claimed on the Self-Scoring Worksheet. Supporting documentation can be applied to more than one row on the Self-Scoring Worksheet. Supporting documentation can include any of the following: contract award document, Statement of Work, Performance Work

Statement, invoice, CDRLs, or redacted payroll rosters or CPARS. A Multiple Award (MA)

IDIQ contract or MA IDIQ PWS is not an acceptable form of substantiation. A sole award IDIQ

PWS is an acceptable form of substantiation. The burden of proof rests with the Offeror to provide substantiating documentation that is sufficient to validate the self-score. The

Government reserves the right to review any information related to the supporting documentation for validation only.

3.2. Technical Element Criteria

1. Government Facility Clearance:

1a: Government Secret Facility Clearance (FCL)

The Offeror shall submit a Facility Clearance report based on prime offeror or JV cage code verifying that an active FCL exists. If the Offeror does not currently possess an active

Government Secret Facility Clearance and is unable to claim “pass” on the Self-Scoring worksheet, the Offeror will not be considered for award and the rest of the Self-Scoring worksheet will not be considered for validation. Both members of a JV must hold an FCL to at least a SECRET level.

2. Local Representation:

2a: Local Company Management Representation

The Offeror shall submit the name and address of local company management representation as well as a print-out from MapQuest, or similar application, showing the driving distance between

31 Oct 2019 the local company management office and the address Building 840, 2510 Fifth Street WPAFB, OH 45433.

3. Multiple Locations:

3a, 3b, 3c: Recruited and placed qualified personnel at more than one geographical location

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience recruiting and placing personnel at more than one geographical location. If the Offeror is claiming experience, the offeror shall choose only one of the 3 options based on the highest number of personnel that can be substantiated to meet this technical experience. “Geographical location” is defined as different states, different countries, or cities of the same state which are more than 3 hours driving distance apart.

3d, 3e, 3f: Managed qualified personnel at more than one geographical location

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience managing personnel at more than one geographical location. If the Offeror is claiming experience, the offeror shall choose only one of the 3 options based on the highest number of personnel that can be substantiated to meet this technical experience. “Geographical location” is defined as different states, different countries, or cities of the same state which are more than 3 hours driving distance apart.

3g: Recruited and placed qualified personnel to work Outside the Continental United States

(OCONUS)

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience recruiting and placing personnel to work

OCONUS.

4. Recruiting and placing of Qualified Personnel:

4a: Recruited and placed qualified personnel for the Federal government:

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience recruiting and placing personnel for the Federal

Government in the following areas:

4a(1): Flight Medicine Physician(s) specialized in Human Research

4a(2): Flight Medicine Physician(s) specialized in Education

4a(3): Flight Medicine Physician(s) specialized in Patient Care

4a(4): Specialty Physician(s) specialized in Human Research - Examples of specialty physicians include Neurologists, Cardiologists, Psychiatrists, and Ophthalmologists.

4a(5): Specialty Physician(s) specialized in Education - Examples of specialty physicians include Neurologists, Cardiologists, Psychiatrists, and Ophthalmologists.

4a(6): Specialty Physician(s) specialized in Patient Care - Examples of specialty physicians include Neurologists, Cardiologists, Psychiatrists, and Ophthalmologists.

4a(7): Scientist(s) - Scientists specializing in physical, biological, and medical science.

4a(8): Psychologist(s) specialized in Human Research

4a(9): Psychologist(s) specialized in Patient Care

4a(10): Information Technology Support Personnel

4a(11): Cyber Security- appropriate cybersecurity certification(s) applicable for assigned cybersecurity workforce position IAW DoD 8570.01-M

4a(12): Toxicologist(s)

31 Oct 2019

4a(13): Certified Laboratory Technician(s)

4a(14): Program Manager(s) - A contracted Program Manager is defined as an individual who assists the government in the cost, schedule, and performance of a program.

4a(15): Curriculum Developer(s)

4a(16): Administrative Assistant(s) specialized in Office Support

4a(17): Administrative Assistant(s) specialized in Program Support

4a(18): Public Health Specialist(s)

4a(19): Engineer(s) - Engineers such as Human Systems Engineers or Biomedical Engineers.

4a(20): SCA Labor Categories

4b: Filled vacancies with qualified employees within 10 business days for the Federal government

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience filling vacancies for the Federal government within the specified timeframe.

4c: Filled positions with qualified personnel within two weeks of contract award for the Federal government

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience filling positions for the Federal government within the specified timeframe.

5. Management:

5a, 5b, 5c: Managed employees during the same period of performance

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience managing employees during the same period of performance for the Federal government. This must be accomplished by one (1) company, either Subcontractor or Prime. If the Offeror is claiming experience, the offeror shall choose only one of the 3 options based on the highest number of personnel that can be substantiated to meet this technical experience.

5d: Managed employees requiring classified clearances

Offeror shall substantiate its experience managing employees requiring classified clearances for the Federal government.

5e: Completed travel arrangements IAW JTR

Offeror shall substantiate its experience completing travel arrangements IAW JTR for the

Federal government.

5f: Provided corrective action plans to fix concerns regarding employee performance and professionalism

The Offeror shall submit both: a redacted concern from a Government office, removing all personal identification information; and a Government-approved redacted corrective action plan from the Offeror, removing all personal identification information. In the event that none of the companies have received any concerns submitted by the Federal government, the Offeror shall submit a memo from a Federal Government Contracting Officer (CO) annotating that there

31 Oct 2019 were no performance or professional concerns addressed during the Period of Performance for any contract. The memo shall include the contract number and description of services along with the signature of the CO.”

5g: Managed employee certifications, training, licensure, credential, background checks without assistance from the government

Offeror shall substantiate its experience managing employee certifications, training, licensure, credential, background checks without assistance from the government.

5h: Developed and performed business management strategy for medical service requirements

Offeror shall substantiate its experience in determining number of individuals and schedule of performance to complete workload as defined in the Federal government’s PWS or SOW.

Offeror shall describe its experience in having developed and performed business management strategy for medical service requirements for the Federal government.

5i: Developed and performed business management strategy for research laboratory service requirements

Offeror shall substantiate its experience in determining number of individuals and schedule of performance to complete workload as defined in the Federal government’s PWS or SOW.

strategy for research laboratory service requirements for the Federal government.

5j: Developed and performed business management strategy for IT service requirements

Offeror shall substantiate its experience in determining number of individuals and schedule of performance to complete workload as defined in the Federal government’s PWS or SOW.

strategy for IT service requirements for the Federal government.

5k: Developed and performed business management strategy for biomedical service

Offeror shall substantiate its experience in determining number of individuals and schedule of performance to complete workload as defined in the Federal government’s PWS or SOW.

strategy for biomedical service requirements for the Federal government.

5l: Developed and performed business management strategy for educational service

Offeror shall substantiate its experience in determining number of individuals and schedule of performance to complete workload as defined in the Federal government’s PWS or SOW.

strategy for education service requirements for the Federal government.

5m: Currently possess a company Human Resource Policy Handbook or Website

31 Oct 2019

The Offeror shall submit a Human Resource Policy Handbook signed by the Offeror’s Human

Resource Manager; or the Offeror shall submit a link to the website with a screenshot of the website.

Section M Attachment 4

Evaluation Criteria

31 Oct 2019

1.0 Section M Evaluation Criteria

1.1 SOURCE SELECTION

The evaluation criteria establishes how the Government will make its selection for award, the number of awards contemplated, and how the various considerations and criteria interrelate. The results of the evaluation will be considered by the Government to determine which proposal(s) represents the best value to the Government.

2.0 BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

2.1 General. The Government intends to competitively award, multiple Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts, utilizing the process of evaluation and the evaluation criteria described herein. This source selection will be conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, as supplemented by the Department of

Defense (DoD) Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation

Supplement (AFFARS), and the (DoD) Source Selection Procedures, 31 March 2016, and Air Force Mandatory

Procedures (MP) 5315.3, 25 May 2018. These regulations are available electronically at the Air Force FAR Site, https://www.acquisition.gov/

2.1.1 Notwithstanding the above, in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 2305(a)(3)(C), as amended by Section 825 of the

National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2017, the Government will not evaluate cost or price for the IDIQ contract.

2.1.2 Contract award will only be made to the Offerors who are deemed responsible in accordance with the Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 9, as supplemented, whose proposals conform to the solicitation’s requirements (to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, and certifications) and are judged, based on the evaluation factors, to represent the best value to the Government. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process.

2.1.3 Contract award(s) will be made to the offeror(s) proposing technically acceptable proposals. The evaluation will use a self-scoring system validated by the government. The burden of proof rests with the offeror to provide substantiating data sufficient to validate the self-score.

2.2 Number of Contracts to be Awarded. The Government intends to award a contract to all qualified offerors who meet an Acceptable rating for the Technical Experience Factor and all solicitation requirements.

2.3 Discussions. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contracts without discussions. To prepare for that possibility, each initial proposal should contain the offeror’s complete proposal and the best terms.

If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions

(IAW FAR 15.306(d)), offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror’s proposal has been determined to be acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or exceptions in the FPR are subject to evaluation and may increase the risk that the offeror’s proposal be determined to be unacceptable and thus, ineligible for award.

Exchanges with offerors conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions.

2.3.1 If a competitive range is established, discussions will be conducted with those offerors in the competitive https://www.acquisition.gov/

31 Oct 2019 range.

2.4 Teaming. When proposing as a prime/subcontractor teaming arrangement, the Government will evaluate technical experience for prime offerors and subcontractor offerors, the prime offerors must account for at least 51% of the proposed experience (total evaluated points), subcontractors cannot account for more than 49% of the proposed experience ( total evaluated points). If the prime offeror is a joint venture (JV), the Government will evaluate technical experience for that JV’s members, in accordance with 13 C.F.R. §125.8(e). The SB protégé is required to complete at least 40% of the work (13CFR 125.8(c)) therefore shall account for 40% of the proposed experience (total evaluated points).

2.5 Process of Evaluation:

The Government will make an award determination based on the evaluation process identified below. Each offeror must receive a minimum technical experience score of 2765 based on the Government-verified, offeror self-scored worksheet (RFP Attachment 5) described herein to receive a Technical Experience Factor Rating of Acceptable. If an offeror’s proposal receives a Technical Experience Factor Rating of Unacceptable; the proposal is ineligible for award.

3.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR AWARD:

3.1 Technical Experience Factor

The Technical Experience Factor is an evaluation of the offeror’s ability to meet the requirements for

Technical Experience. For the evaluation of technical experience, the Government will analyze the self-scoring worksheet used by each offeror to claim points in the 5 technical identifications (IDs) and associated

IDs. Offerors will receive an overall Technical Experience Rating in accordance with the ratings defined in

Table 1.

TABLE 1: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

RATING DEFINITION

Acceptable

The offeror obtained a validated score of 2765 points on the self-scoring worksheet.

Unacceptable

The offeror did not obtain a validated score of 2765 points on the self-scoring worksheet.

3.2 Technical Experience Assessment

Offerors will be evaluated on the ability to meet the minimum points required to be determined technically

Acceptable. An offeror’s proposal has met the requirements of the technical element and is considered

Acceptable, when the required minimum score of 2765 is proposed and verified per the Self-Scoring

Worksheet. An offeror’s proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation and is considered

31 Oct 2019

Unacceptable when the minimum score of 2765 points is not proposed OR cannot be verified per the Self-

Scoring Worksheet. No additional credit or greater consideration for award is given for receiving greater than the minimum points required to be determined technically acceptable. Partial points will not be given for any technical ID. Some technical IDs on the Self-Scoring Worksheet are broken into subsequent IDs to allow offerors to receive a sub-set of the maximum allowable points.

The Government will use the contractor-provided substantiation documents to validate the points claimed on the Self-Scoring Worksheet. In order to verify points, the Government will evaluate the offeror’s demonstrated experience in the technical areas for which points are being claimed. The Government will not validate points claimed by the offeror for a technical experience when supporting documentation does not demonstrate the required experience.

3.3 Technical Experience

The evaluation criteria for determining the points earned for each of the five (5) technical IDs is listed below.

1. Government Facility Clearance 1a: Currently possess an active Government Secret Facility Clearance

The Offeror shall demonstrate a currently active Government Secret Facility Clearance. This technical ID is pass/fail and not based on points. If the offeror does not have an active Government Secret Facility

Clearance, no further points can be claimed and the offeror will be rated unacceptable for Technical

Experience Factor.

2. Local Representation

2a: Local Representation

The Offeror shall demonstrate a local company management representative exists within 1.5 hours driving distance, from Building 840, 2510 Fifth Street WPAFB, OH 45433.

3. Multiple Locations (points are not cumulative) 3a: Recruited and placed 1–2 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

The Offeror shall demonstrate experience recruiting and placing 1-2 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

3b: Recruited and placed 3-4 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

The Offeror shall demonstrate experience recruiting and placing 3-4 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

3c: Recruited and placed 5 or more qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

The Offeror shall demonstrate experience recruiting and placing 5 or more qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

3d: Managed 1-2 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

The Offeror shall demonstrate experience managing 1-2 qualified personnel at more than one geographical

31 Oct 2019 location.

3e: Managed 3-4 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

The Offeror shall demonstrate experience managing 3-4 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

3f: Managed 5 or more qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

The Offeror shall demonstrate experience managing 5 or more qualified personnel at more than one geographical location.

3g: Recruited and placed qualified personnel to work OCONUS The Offeror shall demonstrate experience recruiting qualified personnel to work OCONUS.

4. Recruiting of Qualified Personnel

4a: Recruited and placed qualified personnel for the Federal government:

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience recruiting and placing personnel for the Federal Government in the following areas:

4a(1): Flight Medicine Physician(s) specialized in Human Research

4a(2): Flight Medicine Physician(s) specialized in Education

4a(3): Flight Medicine Physician(s) specialized in Patient Care

4a(4): Specialty Physician(s) specialized in Human Research - Examples of specialty physicians include

Neurologists, Cardiologists, Psychiatrists, and Ophthalmologists.

4a(5): Specialty Physician(s) specialized in Education - Examples of specialty physicians include

Neurologists, Cardiologists, Psychiatrists, and Ophthalmologists.

4a(6): Specialty Physician(s) specialized in Patient Care - Examples of specialty physicians include

Neurologists, Cardiologists, Psychiatrists, and Ophthalmologists.

4a(7): Scientist(s) - Scientists specializing in physical, biological, and medical science.

4a(8): Psychologist(s) specialized in Human Research

4a(9): Psychologist(s) specialized in Patient Care

4a(10): Information Technology Support Personnel

4a(11): Cyber Security- appropriate cybersecurity certification(s) applicable for assigned cybersecurity workforce position IAW DoD 8570.01-M

4a(12): Toxicologist(s)

4a(13): Certified Laboratory Technician(s)

4a(14): Program Manager(s) - A contracted Program Manager is defined as an individual who assists the government in the cost, schedule, and performance of a program.

4a(15): Curriculum Developer(s)

4a(16): Administrative Assistant(s) specialized in Office Support

4a(17): Administrative Assistant(s) specialized in Program Support

4a(18): Public Health Specialist(s)

4a(19): Engineer(s) - Engineers such as Human Systems Engineers or Biomedical Engineers.

4a(20): SCA Labor Categories

31 Oct 2019

4b: Filled vacancies with qualified employees within 10 business days for the Federal government

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience filling vacancies for the Federal government within the specified timeframe.

4c: Filled positions with qualified personnel within two weeks of contract award for the Federal government

The Offeror shall substantiate its experience filling positions for the Federal government within the specified timeframe.

5. Management 5a: Managed 1-4 employees during the same period of performance The Offeror shall demonstrate experience managing 1-4 employees during the same period of performance.

This must be accomplished by one (1) company, either Subcontractor or Prime.

5b: Managed 5-9 employees during the same period of performance The Offeror shall demonstrate experience managing 5-9 employees during the same period of performance.

This must be accomplished by one (1) company, either Subcontractor or Prime.

5c: Managed ten (10) or more employees during the same period of performance The Offeror shall demonstrate experience managing ten (10) or more employees during the same period of performance. This must be accomplished by one (1) company, either Subcontractor or Prime.

5d: Managed employees requiring classified clearances The Offeror shall demonstrate experience supervising employees requiring classified clearances.

5e: Completed travel arrangements IAW JTR The Offeror shall demonstrate experience completing travel arrangements on a Government contract IAW

JTR.

5f: Provided corrective action plans to fix concerns regarding employee performance and professionalism The Offeror shall demonstrate experience providing corrective action plans to fix concerns regarding employee performance and professionalism.

5g: Managed employee certifications, training, licensure, credential, background checks without assistance from the government The Offeror shall demonstrate experience managing employee certifications, training, licensure, credential, background checks without assistance from the government.

5h: Developed and performed business management strategy for medical service requirements The Offeror shall demonstrate experience developing and performing business management strategy for medical service requirements.

5i: Developed and performed business management strategy for research laboratory service requirements The Offeror shall demonstrate experience developing and performing business management strategy for

31 Oct 2019 research laboratory service requirements.

5j: Developed and performed business management strategy for IT service requirements The Offeror shall demonstrate experience developing and performing business management strategy for IT service requirements.

5k: Developed and performed business management strategy for biomedical service requirements The Offeror shall demonstrate experience developing and performing business management strategy for biomedical service requirements.

5l: Developed and performed business management strategy for educational service requirements The Offeror shall demonstrate experience developing and performing business management strategy for educational service requirements.

5m: Currently possess a company Human Resource Policy Handbook or website

The Offeror shall demonstrate how it maintains a current, company Human Resource Policy Handbook or website for their employees to follow.

711th Human Performance Wing Mission Support Professional Services Solicitation Number: FA8650-20-R-4120

Attachment#5, dated 31 October 2019

SELF SCORING TECHNICAL CAPABILITY WORKSHEET

(See instructions in *******************, Self Scoring Technical Capability Worksheet)Section L Paragraph 3.1.2)

OFFEROR NAME:

ID Technical Experience Check box to each question as applicable

Point Value Score "P" , "S" or "PS" in each box Supporting Documentation

1 Government Facility Clearance 0

(a) Currently possess an active Government Secret Facility Clearance Pass 0 0

2 Local Representation (Max 50 Points) Score for 2 0 Score for 2 0

(a) Local Company Management Representation to Area B, WPAFB OH 50 0 0

3 Multiple Locations (Max 150 Points) Score for 3 0 Score for 3 0

(a) Recruited and placed 1 -2 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location 15 0 0

(b) Recruited and placed 3 - 4 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location 30 0 0

(c) Recruited and placed 5 or more qualified personnel at more than one geographical location 50 0 0

(d) Managed 1 -2 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location 15 0 0

(e) Managed 3 - 4 qualified personnel at more than one geographical location 30 0 0

(f) Managed 5 or more qualified personnel at more than one geographical location 50 0 0

(g) Recruited and placed qualified personnel to work OCONUS 50 0 0

4 Recruiting and placing of Qualified Personnel (Max 1390 Points) Score for 4 0 Score for 4 0

(a) Recruited and placd the following qualified personnel for the Federal Government: Score for 4(a) 0 Score for 4(a) 0

(1) Flight Medicine Physician Specialized in Human Research 30 0 0

(2) Flight Medicine Physician Specialized in Education 30 0 0

(3) Flight Medicine Physician Specialized in Patient Care 30 0 0

(4) Specialty Physician Specialized in Human Research 25 0 0

(5) Specialty Physician Specialized in Education 25 0 0

(6) Specialty Physician Specialized in Patient Care 25 0 0

(7) Scientist 25 0 0

(8) Psychologist Specialized in Human Research 25 0 0

(9) Psychologists Specialized in Patient Care 25 0 0

(10) Information Technology Support Personnel 100 0 0

(11) Cyber Security 25 0 0

(12) Toxicologist 25 0 0

(13) Certified Laboratory Technician 25 0 0

(14) Program Manager 25 0 0

(15) Curriculum Developer 25 0 0

(16) Administrative Assistants Specialized in Office Support 25 0 0

(17) Administrative Assistants Specialized in Program Support 25 0 0

(18) Public Health Specialist 25 0 0

(19) Engineer 25 0 0

(20) Recruited and placed SCA Labor Categories 25 0 0

(b) Filled vacancies with qualified employees within 10 business days for the Federal Government 400 0 0

(c) Filled positions with qualified personnel within two weeks of contract award for the Federal Government

400 0 0

5 Management ( Max 1450 Points) Score for 5 0 0

(a) Managed 1 - 4 employees during the same period of performance 25 0 0

(b) Managed 5 - 9 employees during the same period of performance 50 0 0

(c) Managed 10 or more employees during the same period of performance 100 0 0

(d) Managed employees requiring classified clearances 100 0 0

(e) Completed travel arrangements for employees utilizing the JTR 100 0 0

(f) Provided corrective action plans to fix concerns regarding employee performance and professionalism

200 0 0

(g) Managing employee certifications, training, licensure, credential, background checks without assistance from the government

100 0 0

(h) Developed and performing business management strategy for medical service requirements 150 0 0

(i) Developing and performing business management strategy for research laboratory service requirements

150 0 0

(j) Developed and performing business management strategy for IT service requirements 150 0 0

(k) Developed and performing business management strategy for biomedical service requirements 150 0 0

(l) Developed and performing business management strategy for educational service requirements 150 0 0

Government Validation

Score for 5

Score

OFFEROR NAME:

ID Technical Experience Check box to each question as applicable

Point Value Score "P" , "S" or "PS" in each box Supporting Documentation

Government Validation

Score

(m) Currently possessing a company Human Resource Policy Handbook 100 0 0

Total Score: 0…