KC-46TS Request for Information (RFI)_May2025_SAM.pdf

Training Systems Acquisition (TSA) IV

Capability Assessment

KC-46 Aircrew and Maintenance Training Systems

(ATS/MTS) Request for Information (RFI)

22 April 2025

Prepared By:

Air Force Lifecycle Management Center, PEO Training Directorate (AFLCMC/WN)

Simulators Division (AFLCMC/WNS) 2300 D Street, Building 32

Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433

Table of Contents

1. Request for Information (RFI) for Planning Purposes

2. Program Requirements

2.1. KC-46 ATS

2.1.1. Program Description

2.1.2. Capability Required

2.2. KC-46 MTS

2.2.1. Program Description

2.2.2. Capability Required

2.3. Capability Assessment/RFI Response

2.4. General Information

2.4.1. Data Rights

2.5. Capability Information

1. Request for Information (RFI) for Planning Purposes This RFI/Capability Assessment is in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.215-3 – Request for Information or Solicitation for Planning Purposes (Oct 1997).

Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract.

This RFI is being conducted to gather market information and assess industry capabilities related to both the KC-46 Aircrew Training System (ATS) and KC-46 Maintenance Training System (MTS) programs. The information obtained will inform the Government's acquisition strategy.

The Government does not intend to award a contract based on this RFI or to pay for the information solicited except for as an allowable cost under other contracts as provided in subsection 31.205-18, Bid and Proposal costs, of the FAR. Companies responding to this RFI/Capability Assessment are advised that participation does not ensure involvement in future solicitations or contract awards. The Government will not reimburse any company or individual for any expenses associated with preparation or participation in this RFI.

The acquisition strategy for future contracting actions has not yet been determined. Capability Assessment results will assist the Air Force in determining whether these requirements will an unrestricted competition and or if a small business set-aside task order permits under TSA IV. The Government is assessing the capability of all companies that may possess the expertise to competently and competitively respond to the following requirements for the KC-46 Training Systems (TS) to provide:

Program Management/Systems Engineering Upgrades and Modifications (e.g., Concurrency Upgrades, Training Enhancements, etc.)

Training Systems Support (e.g., Contractor Logistics Support [CLS], Training System

Support Center [TSSC], Cybersecurity, etc.)

Instructional Services Products Design Concept and Prototype Development Qualification and Test Interoperability

Although “proposal” and “offeror” are used in this RFI, your response will be treated as information only and shall not be used as or considered a proposal.

2. Program Requirements This section details the requirements for both the KC-46 ATS and for potentially combining with KC-46 MTS. The KC-46 ATS focuses on training pilots, boom operators, and other aircrew personnel through a blended learning approach utilizing simulators, part-task trainers, computer-based training and instructions. MTS provides comprehensive training for maintenance personnel on all aspects of aircraft maintenance, including troubleshooting, repair, inspection, and maintenance procedures. Specific device requirements and locations are outlined in the following subsections.

2.1. KC-46 ATS

For the KC-46 ATS Program, the contractor shall possess the capability to complete development requirements and maintain, sustain, and improve the training systems to reduce the need for aircraft flight training. The end state objective is to have a Weapon System Trainer (WST) that meets both Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Part 60 Level D and Aerial Refueling Aircraft Simulator Qualification (ARASQ) Level II and a Boom Operator Trainer (BOT) that meets ARASQ Level II, while replicating aircraft capabilities such that all formal qualification courses can be completed with two (2) aircraft flights followed by an aircraft evaluation after completion of the contractor provided ATS training.

2.1.1. Program Description

The principal mission of KC-46 ATS Program is to provide initial, upgrade, and continuation training for pilots, boom operators, maintenance, and aeromedical evacuation personnel so they can fully employ the KC-46 aircraft accomplishing its worldwide mission sets.

The KC-46 ATS Program consists of the following Aircrew Training Devices (ATDs):

Device Description

Weapon System Trainers

(WST)

High fidelity full motion FAA Part 60 Level D equivalent cockpit simulation replicating the KC-46 Aircraft. The simulation uses the Rockwell Collins Packaged Avionics Simulation System (PASS) to simulate the 4 Large Display System (LDS) screens running a customized version of the aircraft OFP. The WST utilizes aircraft Multifunction Control Display Units (MCDU) running the aircraft OFP. The other cockpit and non-cockpit systems are simulation/emulation that provide the correct inputs and receive the correct outputs from the MCDU and LDS Data Processing and Concentrator Units.

The aircraft mission systems to include the Tactical Situation Awareness System (TSAS), LINK-16, Radar Warning Receiver (RWR), Mission Data Network (MDN), Intelligence Broadcast Receiver (IBR), Joint Range Extension Application Protocol (JREAP), and Large Aircraft Infrared Counter Measure (LAIRCM) are integrated with the Next Generation Threat System (NGTS) to allow full mission employment training in both stand-alone, linked SVA with a BOT, and DMO environments. The WST will be upgraded to support ARASQ Level II standards as a receiver platform refueling from other tanker platforms

Boom Operator Trainer

(BOT)

High fidelity full motion simulation of the Air Refueling Operators Station (AROS) on the KC-46 aircraft. The BOT is a full simulation/emulation-based device with a fully function AROS allowing training for both boom/receptacle and drogue/probe refueling training. The Air Refueling Operator Control Display Unit (AROCDU) is an emulation of the KC-46 touchscreen line replaceable unit (LRU) that runs a simulation to match OFP functionality. The 3D display matches the specification of the aircraft LRU. Simulated boom and telescope control sticks match the functionality of the aircraft and drive a simulated ACU that runs a simulation of the aircraft boom control laws. The BOT has a simulated air refueling control computer that matches OFP functionality and interfaces with the other simulated aircraft systems. BOT Fly provides the flight simulation for standalone mode, or the BOT can be linked to the WST in SVA mode where the pilot crew in the WST control the aircraft navigation. The BOT supports training multiple heavy and fighter receivers using both boom, centerline drogue, and wing air refueling pod (WARP) configurations.

The BOT will be upgraded to support full ARASQ Level II standards for up to 12 receiver pairs once aircraft flight test data is available. The BOT will also require a full AROS upgrade to match the upcoming KC-46 RVS 2.0 design. The RVS 2.0 upgrade will slowly happen across multiple years at appropriate rates to match aircraft deliveries.

Device Description

Fuselage Trainer (FuT)

The Fuselage Trainer is a full-scale representation of the KC-46 fuselage to include the additional crewmember compartment (ACMC) and main cargo deck. The ACMC includes an AROS monument that allows Boom Operators to accomplish weight and balance tasks necessary for cargo loading. The main cargo deck includes accurate representations to allow training of cargo door opening/closing, cargo onload and offload procedures, emergency egress training, and aeromedical evacuation training.

The exterior of the FuT includes the Single Point Refueling (SPR) panel to allow training of fuel service procedures. Two FuTs use actual aircraft cargo floor components. The remaining FuTs use simulated cargo floor components that match the functionality of the aircraft components. The FuT includes a forklift and Halverson loader to support movement of simulated cargo loads from a cargo storage area to the FuT for cargo load training. A contractor provided Aerial Port team operates the load equipment, configures and maintains the cargo load equipment and paperwork, and supports reconfiguration of the FuT to match cargo load and Aeromedical Evacuation training requirements.

Pilot Part Task Trainer

(PPTT)

The PPTT is a low fidelity touch screen-based cockpit procedures trainer. The PPTT runs a recompiled version of the WST load and provides a transition between academic and WST training to develop procedural familiarization and muscle memory for control locations. The PPTT includes an auto-fly function to allow for procedures training both on the ground and through a mission profile.

Boom Operator Part Task Trainer (BOPTT)

The BOPTT is a low fidelity AROS procedure trainer with touch-screen AROS controls, low fidelity boom and telescope control sticks, a touch screen AROCDU, and a low fidelity flat screen air refueling display that allows a limited simulation of closure to contact position for receiver aircraft to allow for both ground and inflight procedural familiarization and muscle memory for control locations.

The KC-46 ATS ATDs are planned for ten total sites within the CONUS. Six sites are currently in operation with three sites requiring support for stand-up of the location and the final site is under survey:

Location Site/Devices Number of Sites/Devices

Altus AFB, OK TSSC 1 McConnell AFB, KS 1 Engineering

Support Center

(ESC)

Altus AFB, OK

(FTU)

WST

Location Site/Devices Number of Sites/Devices

BOT

FuT 2

PPTT

BOPTT

CBT Learning Center 3

McConnell AFB, KS

WST 3

BOT 2

FuT 1

PPTT 2

CBT Learning Center 1

Pease ANGB, NH WST 1

BOT 1

FuT 1

PPTT 1

CBT Learning Center 1

Seymour Johnson WST 1

AFB, SC BOT 1

FuT 1

PPTT 1

CBT Learning Center

Mc Guire AFB, NJ WST 2

BOT 3

PPTT 2

Location Site/Devices Number of Sites/Devices

CBT Learning Center 2

Travis AFB, CA WST 2

BOT 2

FuT 1

PPTT 2

CBT Learning Center

March ARB, CA (Devices standup in 2027)

WST 1

BOT 1

FuT 1

PPTT 1

CBT Learning Center

Mac Dill AFB, FL WST 2

BOT 2

FuT 1

PPTT 1

CBT Learning Center 1

Selfridge ANGB, MI

(Devices to be contracted and produced)

WST 1

BOT 1

FuT 1 CBT Learning Center 1

MOB 7, TBD

(Devices to be contracted and produced)

WST 1

BOT 1

CBT Learning Center 1

The ATS program includes multiple training courses. The contractor will be required to maintain and update all courses to remain concurrent with the aircraft. As ARASQ is added to the devices, the contractor should anticipate an increased course length to ensure the students are sufficiently trained to achieve the program goal of two aircraft flights and a check ride to complete aircraft qualification. The KC-46 ATS program supports training for International Military Students (IMS). IMS specific versions of the courseware are required. The current training course lengths are:

Course Expected Course Hours

Academic WST BOT FuT PPTT BOPTT PTX1 (Pilot Transition w/no Tanker/heavy Receiver Aircraft Commanders)

1.5

PTX2 (Pilot Transition for non-receiver KC-135 Aircraft

PTX3 (Pilot Transition for prior heavy receiver Aircraft

PIQ (Pilot Initial Qualification for non-prior Aircraft Commanders) 147 90 0 1.5 38 0

PCO (Pilot Checkout to upgrade pilots to Aircraft Commanders) 16 32 0 0 0 0

PRC (Pilot Requalification to return previous KC-46 Aircraft Commanders or Instructors to their prior qualification level

IAC (Instructor Aircraft Commander to upgrade pilot to an instructor qualification

SOC (Senior Officer Course provides a restricted Form 8 qualification for senior leaders)

.5

SOF (Senior Officer Familiarization provides introduction to KC-46 mission and Operation. This course does not result in a Form 8 or allow aircraft operation.)

.5

FTCP (Faculty Training Course prepares current instructors to fly with initial qualification students)

PREF (Pilot Quarterly Refresher Continuation Training) 6 12 0 0 0 0

BTX (Boom Operator Transition for previously qualified KC-135 Boom Operators)

BIQ (Boom Initial Qualification trains individuals to serve as Boom Operators)

BRC (Boom Requalification returns previous KC-46 Boom Operators to the prior qualification level)

IB (Instructor Boom Course Upgrades Boom Operators to an instructor qualification)

FTCB (Faculty Training Course prepares current instructors to fly with initial qualification students)

BREF (Boom Operator Quarterly Refresher Continuation Training) 6 0 4.5 4 0 0

MERQ (Maintenance Engine Run Qualification for KC-46 maintenance personnel to qualify in engine run procedures)

MERR (Maintenance Engine Run Refresher provides continuation training for maintenance engine run personnel)

The KC-46 ATS program expects to require the following notional annual student throughput. The following assumptions should be used to scope the expected effort for student training:

a. Contractor will provide personnel for all Aerial Port support functions to include practice load development, maintenance, configuration management, Halverson operator, forklift support, and all needed load team members to support training.

b. Contractor will develop a training schedule (FTU annual and MOB quarterly) to meet Government requirement for student throughput and provide a guaranteed student with on-time graduation for all formal courses. Contractor will provide a means for students to remotely access the weekly schedule.

c. The FTU and MOB sites will normally operate up to 20 hours per day 352 days per year as needed to support the required student throughput.

d. Notional Annual Student Throughput and Course descriptions for the student training are provided below.

Location Devices

Estimated Annual Number of Formal Courses (2 Students per Course)

Estimated Annual Number of

Quarterly Refreshers (2 Pilots/1 Boom Operator per Refresher)

Altus AFB, OK (FTU) 6 WST, 6 BOT, 2 FuT, 5 PPTT, 4

BOPTT

75 PIQ, 20 PTX1, 54

PTX2/3, 6 PCO, 62

IAC, 5 SOC, 2 SOF, 42

BIQ, 46 BTX, 42 IB, 20

MERQ, 20 MERR

72 PREF, 88 BREF

McConnell AFB, KS 3 WST, 2 BOT, FuT, 2PPTT

20 PCO, 24 MERQ, 48

MERR, 2 SOF

800 PREF, 850 BREF

Pease ANGB, NH WST, BOT, FuT, PPTT

6 PCO, 12 MERQ, 24

MERR, 1 SOF

300 PREF, 300 BREF

Seymour Johnson

AFB, SC

WST, BOT, FuT, PPTT

6 PCO, 12 MERQ, 24

MERR, 1 SOF

300 PREF, 300 BREF

Mc Guire AFB, NJ 2 WST, 2 BOT, FuT, 2PPTT

12 PCO, 24 MERQ, 48

MERR, 2 SOF

600 PREF, 600 BREF

Travis AFB, CA 2 WST, 2 BOT, FuT, 2 PPTT

12 PCO, 24 MERQ, 48

MERR, 2 SOF

600 PREF, 600 BREF

March ARB, CA Training starts Oct 25

WST, BOT, FuT, PPTT

6 PCO, 12 MERQ, 24

MERR, 1 SOF

3000 PREF, 300 BREF

Mac Dill AFB, FL Training starts Feb 25 WST/BOT only)

2 WST, 2 BOT,

FuT, PPTT 12 PCO, 24 MERQ, 48

MERR, 2 SOF

600 PREF, 600 BREF

Selfridge ANGB, MI Training starts Jul 29

WST, BOT, FuT 6 PCO, 12 MERQ, 24

MERR, 1 SOF

300 PREF, 300 BREF

MOB 7, TBD

Training starts Oct 28

WST, BOT, FuT 6 PCO, 12 MERQ, 24

MERR, 1 SOF

300 PREF, 300 BREF

2.1.2. Capability Required

This acquisition will provide OM&S in support of the KC-46 ATS to include but is not limited to CLS, TSSC, Concurrency and core trainer unique modifications and upgrades, contract transition activities including transfer of responsibility from the current OM&S contract, and ATS studies/analysis efforts as requested by the Government.

1) Contractor Logistics Support (CLS). The contractor is responsible for full CLS support for all devices, support equipment (except the Halverson loader), and all training equipment to include, but not limited to:

a) The LMS/TMS and Part Task Trainers.

b) Maintenance of all devices to a 98% availability standard.

c) Spares Management. The Government will provide an initial and follow on spares package that the contractor may use and will be required to track and account for throughout the program.

d) Analysis and development of an obsolescence plan for continued support of systems. Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Management.

e) Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) inputs.

f) Item Unique Identification.

g) Government Furnished Property (GFP)/Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).

h) Maintain and update the system’s technical manuals for hardware and software.

i) Provisioning.

2) Training System Support Center (TSSC) at Altus and Engineering Support Center (ESC) at McConnell. The TSSC and ESC functions include providing full support and management of the KC-46 ATS to maintain training system concurrency with the aircraft. Required functions include but are not limited to all courseware development, maintenance, updates, all ATS configuration management, all ATS logistics support and management, quality control, and all ATS device and software maintenance, modification, and upgrade.

The contractor shall provide the resources necessary to operate and maintain the KC- 46 TSSC, to include configuration management, aircrew student management, maintenance, logistics support, integration, modification, and validation of all software, aircrew courseware, aircrew curriculum, and aircrew training aids for the KC-46 ATS. The contractor shall use the TSSC to design, develop, and implement minor modifications to the fielded ATDs that do not require modification to the contract. The contractor shall ensure that the device OFPs remain concurrent with the aircraft, and that the devices support training will all versions of the currently fielded OFPs.

The contractor shall use the TSSC as the master repository for all data developed and/or used to support the day-to-day operation of the ATS. The contractor shall be responsible for data currency and the distribution of changes to the training sites.

The TSSC shall perform, in a timely manner, all functions necessary for the complete operation of the aircrew training system. As a minimum, the TSSC shall perform the following support functions that include but are not limited to the following:

a. Ensure the reliability, maintainability, and logistics supportability of training components to meet the total system requirements.

b. Identify impending obsolescence issues well in advance of adverse impacts and the necessary steps to avoid adverse impacts to the ATS supporting equipment.

c. Update/modify system components and documentation. The Government will be the final authority in the determination of what constitutes a TSSC developed modification, and what is in or out of scope. The contractor shall have the appropriate manning and personnel required to accomplish the tasks listed in the PWS in a timely manner.

d. Design, acquire/fabricate, modify, inspect, assemble, integrate, test, and validate computational resources, including the associated software, to support ATDs.

e. Continue the discrepancy reporting (DR) program.

f. Manage and track all support system repairable assets, including but not limited to the location, conditions status, source of repair, supply, cost, and lead-time data.

g. Track and record all maintenance actions, spare and repair parts maintenance consumption, and labor consumption by device.

h. Provide the required labor and material to perform revision and maintenance (R&M) changes to hardware, courseware, and software.

i. Maintain and update the KC-46 TCI.

j. Maintain configuration management (CM) for ATS components.

k. Distribute courseware, Technical Data, Air Force guidance (DAFI, DAFPAM, etc.), and any modifications.

l. Maintain an evaluation system and use it to prioritize changes to the ATS and evaluate student progress.

m. Maintain the KC-46 ATS Master Library.

n. Implement a design request process and instructional change request process.

o. The contractor is required to stay abreast of any changes to the weapon system and develop/execute a plan detailing a viable approach for maintaining concurrency with the weapon system for KC-46 ATS, including security and transportation considerations for relocating training devices, if necessary.

3) Associate Contractor Agreements Associate Contractor Agreements (ACAs).

The contractor will be required to have an ACA in place with multiple companies, subs and data rights owners (i.e., Boeing, Flight Safety International, General Eclectic, Rockwell Collins, etc.) within 30 days after the contract award. The contract will require ACAs directed by the Government or deemed appropriate to meet the requirements of this acquisition.

4) Establish a Concurrency Process. The contractor will be required to establish a process to integrate all technical disciplines (including engineering, configuration management, logistics, and test) to upgrade the training system, spares, and support equipment to ensure training is available to support these changes in the aircraft.

5) Engineering Change Proposal Modifications and Upgrades. The contractor will be required to accomplish minor/major concurrency and core trainer unique modifications/upgrades to the KC-46 ATS that exceed the scope of the TSSC. These training system modifications and upgrade efforts will be executed through contract engineering change proposals (ECPs) and utilize an integrated aircraft and trainer development process to ensure the maximum commonality. Upcoming concurrency and core trainer unique modifications and upgrades include but are not limited to hardware and software support.

To maintain the KC-46 training system concurrent with the aircraft and Mobility Air Force (MAF) Distributed Mission Operations (DMO) enterprise standards/configurations, the KC-46 training system contractor shall establish, co-chair with the Government, and participate in a CWG consisting of representatives from the aircraft contractor, the ATS contractor, the Simulators Division Program Manager (AFLCMC/WNS), the Aircraft System Program Manager (AFLCMC/WL), the Lead Command (AMC), and the using major Commands (e.g., AETC). The purpose of the CWG is as follows:

a) Review, clarify, evaluate, and provide direction for the flow of aircraft technical data to the training system contractor.

b) Provide Government guidance for maintaining training system concurrency with the weapon system.

c) Plan for all major modifications to the training system.

d) Identify the impact of all major modifications to any affected Interface

Control Working Groups (ICWGs).

e) Review the configuration update activity of all contractors.

f) Ensure that any long lead parts for the KC-46 training system are identified.

g) Ensure identification of all technical data revisions affecting the KC-46 training system, including those to technical manuals.

h) Consider cost/schedule training effectiveness tradeoffs.

i) Establish time phasing for incorporating aircraft changes in the training system (i.e. implement immediately or as part of a block update).

j) Establish priority of change activity for the training system.

k) Recommend generation of Contract Change Proposals (CCPs) and

ECPs applicable to the training system.

6) Cybersecurity Requirements. The Contractor is required to:

a. Maintain Department of Defense (DoD) cybersecurity authorizations [e.g., Authorization to Operate (ATO), Approval for Use (AfU)]. Currently, an ATO is maintained for the WST/BOT and AfUs are maintained for the FuT and TCI systems.

b. Implement National Institute of Standards and Technology and Air Force Risk Management Frameworks.

c. Execute robust and timely software/firmware patching and secure configuration procedures.

d. Sustain a DoD Manual 8140.03 qualified and certified workforce (e.g., information technology, cybersecurity, software development, system administration/simulator technician personnel).

e. Provide comprehensive security (e.g., physical, personnel, communications, emissions, industrial, information, supply chain, and operational) services.

f. Remain Trade Agreements Act (TAA) compliant.

7) Security Requirements. The Contractor personnel must obtain active DoD/AF Common Access Cards (CAC) to gain access to KC-46 ATS facilities, military installations, and/or Government information systems.

The Contractor shall not involve any foreign national (permanent resident aliens exempt) in work performed under this requirement.

Personnel are required to hold a security clearance (up to Secret) to perform the work. Security/background checks will be performed.

8) Near-Term Potential Upgrades

a. Boom Telescope Actuator Redesign (BTAR) implementation for the BOT.

b. ARASQ Level II implementation in the WST and BOT for up to 12 pairs.

c. RVS 2.0 upgrade to existing BOTs.

d. Upgrade ATDs to latest Operating Systems.

e. Migrate COTS software reaching end-of-life to latest versions.

f. Visual system recapitalization to include Aechelon Image Generator (IG) for the

WST and BOT and new 4 channel IR projectors and back projection screens for the WSTs.

g. KC-46 Block 1 updates.

h. SimVu retrofit into all devices.

i. Simulator Common Architecture Requirements and Standards (SCARS) integration into all WSTs and BOTs.

j. Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) implementation.

9) Contract Specifications. The contract or contracts will commence on or about the 3rd Quarter of CY26 to allow for up to a 3-month transition period. The Government anticipates the contract period of performance to be a 2-year base period post-transition with multiple 1-year option periods. The Government anticipates the use of:

a. Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Contract Line-Item Numbers (CLINs): CLS and

TSSC work, contract transition, and minor modifications/upgrades.

b. Fixed Price Incentive Firm (FPIF) CLINs: Major modifications/upgrades and development efforts (e.g., new trainers).

c. Cost Reimbursable CLINs: Travel and studies/analysis tasks.

2.2. KC-46 MTS

The KC-46 MTS program focuses on providing comprehensive training for maintenance personnel on all aspects of KC-46 aircraft maintenance. This includes troubleshooting, repair, inspection, and standard maintenance procedures. The program utilizes a blended learning approach, combining classroom instruction, Interactive Multimedia Instruction

(IMI), and hands-on experience with high-fidelity Augmented Hardware Training Devices (AHTDs).

2.2.1. Program Description

The KC-46 MTS utilizes a suite of AHTDs, each focusing on a specific aircraft system, to deliver realistic and effective training:

• Flight Deck/Avionics Trainer: Simulates the aircraft's flight deck and avionics systems for familiarization and troubleshooting training.

• Aerial Refueling Trainer: Replicates the aircraft's air refueling systems, including boom operation and fuel transfer procedures.

• Flight Controls Trainer: Provides hands-on experience with the aircraft's flight control systems, including hydraulics, actuators, and control surfaces.

• Landing Gear Trainer: Allows trainees to practice procedures related to the landing gear system, including extension, retraction, and emergency operations.

• Fuel Systems Trainer: Simulates the aircraft's fuel system, enabling training on fuel management, transfer procedures, and troubleshooting.

• Engine/Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) Trainer: Replicates the operation and maintenance procedures of the aircraft's engines and APU.

• Advanced Wiring and Electrical Repair Trainer: Provides a platform for practicing advanced wiring techniques and electrical system troubleshooting.

These AHTDs, augmented by IMI modules, provide a comprehensive training environment for KC-46 maintainers. Currently, the KC-46 MTS is in the Engineering, Manufacturing, and Development (EMD) phase, with technical data and maintenance manuals still under development.

The KC-46 MTS is currently operational at three Main Operating Bases (MOBs):

• McConnell AFB, KS

• Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst (JBMDL), NJ

• Travis AFB, CA McConnell AFB also houses the Training System Support Center (TSSC) and the Software Integration Lab (SIL), which plays crucial roles in the development, sustainment, and evolution of the MTS.

2.2.2. Capability Required

Given the EMD status of the KC-46 MTS, the contractor must demonstrate the following capabilities:

• Manpower and Expertise: Possess the necessary workforce with the technical skills and experience to operate, maintain, and sustain the KC-46 MTS AHTDs, support equipment, and special test equipment.

• Engineering Support Reach-Back: Maintain access to engineering support resources to address technical challenges and troubleshoot issues, especially given the immaturity of technical data and the lack of complete maintenance manuals.

• Experience with Limited Technical Data: Demonstrate proven experience in providing OM&S services for training devices with limited technical data and incomplete maintenance manuals.

• Data Acquisition and Management: Possess the ability to collaborate effectively with Boeing, potentially through a contract arrangement or Associate Contractor Agreement (ACA), to acquire and manage necessary technical data.

• Rapid Deployment and Transition: Demonstrate the capability to deploy personnel to all three MTS locations within a short timeframe and ensure a smooth transition of OM&S responsibilities.

• Cost-Effective Solutions: Provide the Government with a realistic cost estimate for the two-year OM&S effort, acknowledging the unique challenges presented by the EMD phase of the program.

2.3. Capability Assessment/RFI Response

The results of this assessment will allow the Government to decide as to whether these efforts will be set aside for the Small Business Pool or issued under the Unrestricted Pool. It is advised that your company provide a sufficient response to all capability questions to allow the Government to appropriately assess your company’s capabilities.

If there is demonstrated interest and capability sufficiently identified among the small business TSA IV prime contractors, then a Small Business Set-Aside will be considered given that two or more potential small business prime contractors are deemed capable of performing at least 50% of the effort.

2.4. General Information

In your response, please provide the following general information for your company/institution and for any teaming partners:

1) If subcontracts or teaming are anticipated to be used, provide a reasonable expectation for both small and other than small business utilization as a percentage of total task order value. Provide specific details on how your company will comply with FAR clause 52.219-14, Limitations to Subcontracting. Delineate the small business utilization percentage and provide rationale for the recommended percentage. Teaming and/or subcontracting arrangements should be clearly stated, and previous experience in teaming must be provided.

2) What specific technical data do you require of the Government to assemble a proposal for this effort? Certain COTS components of the KC-46 training systems may include proprietary data. How would you collaborate with the current prime contractor, the aircraft OEM, and other relevant vendors to ensure timely and appropriate access to necessary information while mitigating potential risks related to intellectual property?

• What is the minimum documentation needed for you to accomplish CLS?

Provide a list.

3) As the proposed effort is considered by the Government to be one for Services, small business offerors will be required to comply with subparagraph (c)(1) of FAR 52.219-14, which requires that “[a]t least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern.” Please describe in detail how you will satisfy the requirements of FAR 52.219-14(c)(2) for this effort.

4) Small Business offerors will be required to comply with 13 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 121.406, which requires offerors to either be the manufacturer or producer of ECP end items, or comply with an exception as a non-manufacturer, a kit assembler, or a supplier under Simplified Acquisition Procedures. For ECP Modifications and Upgrades, please describe in detail how you will either comply with 13 CFR 406(a)(1) or qualify under 13 CFR 406(a)(2) for one of the exceptions under 14 CFR 406(b), (c) or (d).

5) Does your company presently have the manpower, technical expertise/skill set, and production facilities to complete the production of devices for Selfridge ANGB and MOB 7 (TBD) to meet all the requirements in section 2 above within 24 months from contract award?

• What is the minimum documentation needed for you to complete this production? Provide a list.

• If a production timeframe exceeding 24 months is required, please specify the anticipated timeframe and provide a detailed explanation.

Additionally, outline any setup time and associated costs required for production beyond the initial 24-month period.

6) Describe in detail your company’s experience, during the past five years, performing EMD and/or manufacturing/production of military simulators.

7) Describe in detail your company’s experience with coordinating third-party modifications to an ATD.

8) The aircraft program remains in EMD with ongoing modifications and updates to correct design deficiencies. Describe in detail your company’s experience with obtaining needed proprietary design data from Boeing Defense or other KC-46 aircraft program parts vendors to complete contract requirements.

9) Describe any additional teaming agreements, such as subcontracts, that would be implemented to meet program requirements. This includes partnerships for production activities and manpower additions that would be outside of the prime contractor.

10) Describe in detail, your company’s experience with hiring and sustaining a qualified and certified cybersecurity workforce (e.g., Information System Security Manager/Officers/Engineers), and maintaining DoD/Air Force cybersecurity authorizations (e.g., ATO, AfU).

2.4.1. Data Rights

Describe your approach to obtaining the necessary data rights to perform the work described in this RFI, including any proposed agreements with the current data rights holder (if applicable), alternative technical solutions, or strategies for developing equivalent capabilities without direct access to proprietary data. Be specific about how your approach would mitigate risks and ensure the timely and cost-effective delivery of the required training capabilities.

Please describe any potential impacts on the Government's ability to compete future KC- 46 ATS and MTS requirements based on your proposed approach to data rights.

2.4.2. Tools and Applications Supporting CLS/TSSC/SIL

Provide the following information for all tools/applications/computer programs/databases used or currently in use by your company in support of CLS, TSSC, and SIL activities:

a. Tool/Application Name.

b. Required Operating System.

c. Description of Function/Purpose/Use: Include details on what the tool is used for and its role in supporting CLS, TSSC, or SIL activities.

d. Data Products Generated: List the data products generated by the tool

e. Frequency of data product generation: Specify how often each data product is generated (e.g. daily, weekly, monthly, on-demand).

2.5. Capability Information

This RFI seeks information regarding your company's and any teaming partners' capabilities related to the KC-46 Training System programs. Provide detailed yet concise responses, focusing on your experience and proposed approach, even if incapable of fulfilling all requirements. See the "Acronyms and Definitions" section for term clarification. Marketing materials are insufficient.

1) Program Risks and Mitigation Given an anticipated late EMD completion of the current contract in relation to the RFP timeline, please provide your company's assessment of the risk impact (low, moderate, high, and type—cost, schedule, performance) associated with each of the following potential shortfalls when assessing and responding to an RFP:

i. Incomplete technical data package, spares package, courseware, or EMD requirements.

ii. Proprietary data limitations.

iii. Limited Vendor Experience: Given the specialized nature of aircraft maintenance trainers and the KC-46 system, assess the risk associated with limited vendor experience in the following areas and describe your proposed mitigation strategies:

a. Sustaining/maintaining aircraft maintenance trainers (specify the number of locations, devices, and types/kinds of devices).

b. Developing simulation IMI/graphics utilizing the Unity Real-Time

Development platform/Gaming Engine (within the past 3 years).

Please also detail your experience with:

- Modifying and compiling existing Unity projects.

- Integrating Impressions output with Unity simulations.

c. Operating, maintaining, and modifying training systems containing large aircraft components and aircraft support equipment, including

SERD.

iv. Staffing and Certifications:

a. Describe your proposed staffing levels for this project.

b. Detail the certifications held by your team, specifically:

- Number of staff with A+ certification.

- Number of staff with Network+ certification.

- Relevant Unity certifications.

For each risk identified above, describe your proposed mitigation strategies to minimize the impact on program schedule and cost.

2) OFP Updates and Training Concurrency

The KC-46 relies heavily on software, with the following 16 OFPs targeted for routine updates managed by the TSSC. The systems impacted by these annual releases outside ECP modifications include ARMS, AROCDU, ACU, MDN, AFMC, TSAS, RVS, WARP, MCDU, RWR, TIU, CMCF, LDS, OBIGGS, AR FCSEU, and

CDS.

i. OFP Concurrency: Describe your approach to maintaining training system concurrency with OFP updates and assess the associated risks.

Include the following details:

a. Typical lead time required to implement OFP updates into the training systems.

b. Process for validating OFP updates within the training environment.

c. How you will manage training disruptions during OFP transitions.

ii. Training Baseline Management: Describe your approach for maintaining training baselines, ensuring crews can train on any fielded aircraft OFP baseline in the WST or BOT, including your IMS training approach for countries with different OFP baselines. Specify the maximum number of concurrent OFP baselines your proposed solution can support.

3) WST Mirror Maintenance

Detail your experience maintaining mirrors with specialized proprietary coatings, including specific coating types and procedures. If you lack direct experience, outline your proposed approach to acquiring and maintaining the necessary expertise.

4) Production Timeline and Deliverables

For producing two WSTs, two BOTs, and two FuTs, provide a timeline from contract award, including breakdowns for:

i. CDR (covering changes to the existing production baseline)

ii. Production line standup

iii. Physical production

iv. In-plant PCA

v. Delivery, setup, and internal testing

vi. GAT and SIMCERT

vii. Onsite PCA

a. Describe your approach to WST mirror production/procurement.

b. Please provide a ROM and per device cost estimate to complete these production requirements. In the ROM, state whether this is based on producing the devices individually or under the assumption they will be produced simultaneously.

5) Production component Sourcing and Sustainment The KC-46 ATS relies on a range of specialized components, some of which may have limited availability or extended lead times. Please address the following regarding your company's approach to component sourcing and sustainment:

a. Critical Components: Identify the top three (3) component types or categories (e.g., motion platforms, visual display systems, specialized computing hardware) that you anticipate posing the greatest sourcing and sustainment challenges for the production of the WSTs, BOTs, and FuTs. For each identified component type/category:

- Describe any known supply chain constraints or long-lead items.

- Explain your proposed strategy for mitigating potential sourcing risks, such as:

a. Identifying alternative vendors or manufacturers.

b. Establishing strategic partnerships or agreements.

c. Implementing component stockpiling or buffer inventory strategies.

- Estimate current lead times for procuring these components in quantities sufficient to support the production schedule.

b. Component Obsolescence: Describe your approach to managing component obsolescence over the projected lifespan of the training systems, including:

- Proactive monitoring of component lifecycles and end-of-life notices.

- Strategies for identifying and qualifying replacement components.

- Processes for managing last-time component buys and lifetime support solutions.

c. Supply Chain Risk Mitigation: Outline your overall strategy for identifying and mitigating supply chain risks related to component sourcing and sustainment. This should include:

- Processes for identifying and qualifying suppliers.

- Methods for assessing and mitigating supplier risk.

6) RVS 2.0 Modification and Integration

The RVS 2.0 modification requires a major BOT retrofit, including replacing the Air Refueling Operator Station, integrating a new 3D visual display system (with a columnated mirror), likely support frame modifications, and software updates.

Onsite modification is preferred. Address the following:

i. Engineering Timeline: Estimate the timeline from RVS 2.0 SDP receipt to CDR for the BOT and visual system retrofit.

ii. Fabrication and Delivery Timeline: Estimate the timeline for fabrication, installation, HSI testing, GAT, and delivery. Include a risk assessment and assumptions.

iii. Columnated Mirror Display: Detail your experience with manufacturing or procuring columnated mirror displays meeting aircraft specifications or propose an alternative visual design approach for equivalent performance.

iv. Onsite Retrofit Experience: Describe your experience with major onsite retrofits.

v. OEM Engineering Support: Assess your ability to secure OEM engineering support to maintain concurrency with design changes during development, especially for the concurrent training system.

vi. Concurrent Development Risks: Assess the risks of concurrently updating the WST (LDS updates) and BOPTT while maintaining DMO and SVA capabilities and integrating ARASQ flight test data into the BOT and WST. Detail your experience developing and implementing aerodynamic models based on flight test data to meet ARASQ Level II required tolerances.

7) Engineering Change Proposal/Contract Change Proposal (ECP/CCP) Management and Staffing

i. ECP/CCP Capacity: Describe your approach to timely completion of 1-5 concurrent ECP/CCP modifications. Detail your company's capacity for managing concurrent modifications, including your ability to adjust staffing levels to meet government-imposed completion dates.

ii. Configuration Baseline Management:

- Define your most recent process for taking new requirements and implementing them onto existing configuration baselines (be specific and include all steps).

- What is the highest number of changes you have processed per year? Describe what these changes entailed (hardware only, hardware & software, software only).

- How often (cycle rate) do you perform software updates? Do you have a standard target number, or is it determined by the number of requirements?

8) Other Upgrades and OEM Collaboration Summarize your approach for each upgrade detailed in 2.1.2.8 above that has not already been addressed here, detailing your ability to work with the OEM and draft data packages, considering OEM data arrival timelines. Address delivering training capability before aircraft modification completion. Describe your experience performing CLS and modifications for ATS and MTS programs simultaneously.

- Describe your custom courseware development process.

- Do you currently have access to or a permanent team member who has a PhD in the Instructional Systems Design (ISD) process?

9) Capacity for ATS, MTS, and Production Requirements:

Please assess your company's current capacity to simultaneously manage the KC-46 ATS and MTS Operations and Sustainment (O&S) requirements, as well as the production of two WSTs, two BOTs, and two FuTs, within the specified timeframes outlined in this RFI. If your company's current capacity does not allow you to undertake all three aspects (ATS O&S, MTS O&S, and production), please describe any strategies or plans to rapidly achieve the necessary capacity should your company be awarded the contract.

10) Capability Excluding Production:

In the event that the production of new training devices (WSTs, BOTs, and FuTs) were to be excluded from the scope of work, please assess your company's capability to fully meet all other requirements outlined in this RFI related to the KC-46 ATS and MTS OM&S, including but not limited to CLS, TSSC support, concurrency modifications and upgrades, cybersecurity, and engineering support.

11) Overall Risk Assessment and Mitigation Describe any other major foreseen risks and your mitigation strategies that have not already been addressed.

12) Relevant Experience and Knowledge

This section aims to assess your company's familiarity and experience with systems, procedures, and regulations pertinent to this request.

i. Maintenance Documentation and Processes:

a. Describe your experience with standard industry forms and practices for documenting aircraft maintenance issues and tracking technical order changes.

ii. Software and Systems Familiarity:

a. Describe your experience with software commonly used in aviation maintenance training and simulation, including, but not limited to, O'Neal software.

iii. Supply and Logistics: Describe your experience with complex supply chain and logistics environments, including familiarity with:

a. Supply Chain Management best practices, including risk mitigation strategies.

b. Addressing Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS).

c. Materials Management, including inventory control and forecasting.

d. Publications Management and version control.

e. Configuration Management and change control processes.

f. Packaging and handling standards for sensitive equipment.

g. Experience with relevant Financial Improvement and Audit

Readiness (FIAR) processes.

Submission Instructions:

Formal responses and all questions or concerns should be submitted via e-mail to both Dasia Johnson and dasia.johnson@us.af.mil and Corey Rucker at corey.rucker@us.af.mil.

Limit responses to 15 pages (8.5"x11") in Word or PDF format, including all graphs and charts. Identify a point of contact for further inquiries. Mark any proprietary information accordingly.

Responses are due NLT 11:59 PM Dayton, Ohio time, 07 May 2025. The Government may converse with respondents regarding this RFI. Such conversations are intended to clarify potential capability to perform the requirements.

mailto:dasia.johnson@us.af.mil mailto:corey.rucker@us.af.mil

Acronyms and Definitions:

ACU: Actuator Control Unit AFMC: Avionics Flight Management Computer

AfU: Approval for Use AR FCSEU: ARO Flight Control Stick Electronic Unit

ARASQ: Air Refueling Aerial System Qualification

ARMS: Air Refueling Management System AROCDU: ARO Control Display Unit

ATO: Authorization to Operate ATS: Aircrew Training System

BOT: Boom Operator Trainer BOPTT: Boom Operator Part Task Trainer BTAR: Boom Telescope Actuator Redesign CBT: Computer Based Training

CCP: Contract Change Proposals CDS: Centerline Drogue System

CDR: Critical Design Review

CLS: Contractor Logistics Support CMCF: Central Maintenance Computer Function

COTS: Commercial-Off-The-Shelf DAFI: Department of the Air Force Instruction

DAFPAM: Department of the Air Force Pamphlet DMO: Distributed Mission Operations

ECP: Engineering Change Proposal

EMD: Engineering and Manufacturing Development FMC: Flight Management Computer

FMADES: Flight Management Application Development Environment Station FSI-D: Flight Safety International-Defense

FuT: Fuselage Trainer

GAT: Government Acceptance Testing

HSI: Hardware-Software Integration

ICD: Interface Control Document IMS: Integrated Master Schedule

LDS: Large Display System LMS: Learning Management System MAF: Mobility Air Force

MCDU: Multifunction Control Display Unit MDN: Mission Data Network

MTS: Maintenance Training System

OBIGGS: On-Board Inert Gas Generator System OEM: Original Equipment Manufacturer

OFP: Operational Flight Program OM&S: Operations, Maintenance, and Sustainment

PCA: Physical Configuration Audit PPTT: Pilot Part Task Trainer PoP: Period of Performance

RFT: Ready for Training RFP: Request for Proposal

ROM: Rough Order of Magnitude

RVS: Remote Vision System

SIMCERT: Simulator Certification

SDP: Simulator Data Package SVA: Single Virtual Aircraft

TIU: Telescope Interface Unit

TMS: Training Management System

TSAS: Tactical Situational Awareness System TSSC: Training System Support Center

WARP: Wing Air Refueling Pod WST: Weapon System Trainer