Section_L_Atch_3__Past_Performance_Cover_Letter_and_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 40 KB Posted

Attached to
Air Force Research Laboratory Information Technology Services Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8604-16-R-7005
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Wright Patterson Air Force Base

About this file

Section L Attachment 3 Past Performance Cover Letter and Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Air Force Research Laboratory Information Technology Services Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
AFRL_ITSS_Section_L_28October2016.pdf PDF
TO0002_DRAFT_ORDER_rev1.pdf PDF
TO0001_DRAFT_ORDER_rev1.pdf PDF
ADDITIONAL_CHANGES_28_OCTOBER_2016.pdf PDF
Section_L_Atch_4_Labor_Rate_Matrix_and_Task_Order_Price_Template_28October16.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TO0003_DRAFT_ORDER_rev1.pdf PDF
FA8604-16-R-7005_DRFP_QA_Answers_FINAL.pdf PDF
FA8604-16-R-7005.pdf PDF
CDRLs.pdf PDF
Section_L_Atch_6_Past_Performance_Consent_Letter.pdf PDF
Section_L_Atch_4_Labor_Rate_Matrix_and_Task_Order_Price_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
AFRL_ITSS_IDIQ_PWS.pdf PDF
TO0001_RQ_AFRL_ITSS_PWS.pdf PDF
TO0002_DSO_AFRL_ITSS_PWS.pdf PDF
Section_L_Atch_1_Cross_Reference_Matrix.pdf PDF
Section_L_Atch_5_Labor_Category_Descriptions.pdf PDF
AFRL_ITSS_Section_L.pdf PDF
AFRL_ITSS_Section_M.pdf PDF
Section_L_Atch_2_Past_Performance_Information_Tool_Instructions.pdf PDF
DD254_DRAFT.pdf PDF
TO0003_RCB_AFRL_ITSS_PWS.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb —
Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SECTION L

ATTACHMENT 3

PAST PERFORMANCE COVER LETTER

FROM: AFLCMC/PZIT

2275 D. St., Bldg. 16, Room 128 Wright-Patterson AFB, OH45433

TO:

SUBJECT: AFRL IT Support Services (AFRL-ITSS) Present/Past Performance Assessment

1. The Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio is in the process of selecting a contractor for award of the AFRL-ITSS contract. The AFRL-ITSS contract includes Computer Support (Specialized Helpdesk), Software Application Development, IT Planning, Network Implementation, Systems Integration, Systems Support, Communication Support, Network Media Devices, Asset Management, Cybersecurity Management, Video Teleconference Capabilities and meeting support, and Computer- Communication Maintenance for the Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson

AFB, OH.

2. In the selection process, the Government intends to evaluate the past performance of each offer through verification of the Offeror’s past and present performance on other contracts. For this, we must depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had experience with an Offeror. We would appreciate if you complete the attached questionnaire and include any comments qualifying your ratings and answers. If you have any questions or difficulty completing the questionnaire, please contact the undersigned.

3. Please return your completed questionnaire to Ms. Jamie L. Parks via e-mail Jamie.Parks@us.af.mil no later than 10 working days from date of receipt. As an alternative, you can mail the completed questionnaire to:

AFLCMC/PZIT

Jamie Parks 2275 D. St., Bldg. 16, Rm. 128 Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433

(937) 656-7370 Jamie.Parks@us.af.mil Reference: FA8604-17-D-(TBD)

Please do not return or e-mail the questionnaire back to the Offeror or contractor.

Completed questionnaires are source selection information and must be protected. The Government will not release this information to the Offeror.

Thank you for your time and valuable comments.

Jamie L. Parks

(937) 656-7370 Jamie.Parks@us.af.mil mailto:Jamie.Parks@us.af.mil mailto:Jamie.Parks@us.af.mil mailto:Adam.Smith.71@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: _________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ____________________________________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________________________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _______________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Was a CPAR or other official evaluation completed? Yes _____ No _____

If other system was used please list name(s):__________________________

K. Contractor performed as: ___Prime Contractor ___Sub-Contractor ___Key Personnel

L. Description of product or service provided (use additional sheets, if necessary):

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________ B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ____________________________________

___Air Force ___Other DoD Component ___Other Federal Gov’t ___Industry/Academia C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands: ____________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: ___________________________________________________________ B. Evaluator's title: _____________________________________________________________ C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: _________________________________________________ D. Evaluator’s email address: ____________________________________________________ E. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:______________________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY- Contractor performance substantially met contract requirements.

US UNSATISFACTORY- Contractor performance did not substantially meet contract requirement.

N/A NOT AVAILABLE- Quality or performance information is not available.

Technical Performance S US N/A

T1. Transition Approach

a. Was the contractor able to appropriately obtain and maintain personnel?

b. Did the contractor obtain/maintain sufficient quantities and labor mix of personnel to meet performance requirements?

T2. IT Support

a. Did the contractor have a clear understanding of the required skillsets?

Technical Performance S US N/A

b. Did the contractor provide an appropriate management approach to providing and retaining qualified personnel?

c. Did the contractor provide appropriate oversight of subcontractors, personnel, hiring, travel, training and other direct costs?

d. The contractor demonstrated a clear understanding of: (Mark one for each)

a. Computer Support

b. Application Development and Configuration

Management

c. Planning

d. Network Implementation

e. System Integration

f. System Support

g. Computer-Communication Maintenance

h. Network Multimedia Devices

i. Asset Management

j. Computer Aided Design Drawing

k. Video Teleconference and Meeting Support

l. Cybersecurity Management

General S US N/A

a. Was the contractor responsive to government concerns/requests (e.g.

Problem resolution, Prompt and accurate billing, timely purchasing)?

b. Was the contractor prompt and accurate with invoices?

c. What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?

d. Would you contract with this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Acceptable/Unacceptable in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract? (use additional sheets, if necessary)

What were the contactor’s most negative aspects in the performance of the contract? (use additional sheets, if necessary)

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

(use additional sheets, if necessary)

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

jamie.parks@us.af.mil mailto:jamie.parks@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE COVER LETTER
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .