Atch_33_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal (RFP) - Halvorsen Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Aquisition Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8519-13-R-30382
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

About this file

Attachment 33 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Request for Proposal (RFP) - Halvorsen Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Aquisition, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA8519-13-R-30382-0003.pdf PDF
Atch_23_Halvorsen_Metrics_Determination_and_Incentive_Fee_Arrangement.pdf PDF
Q A_2.pdf PDF
Q A_1.pdf PDF
FA851913R30382______0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_25 _Contract_Work_Breakdown_Structure_Matrix.pdf PDF
FA8519-13-R-30382-0001.pdf PDF
Atch_28.docx DOCX document
HAL_CDRL_X00A.pdf PDF
Atch_24_Hal_Cross-Reference_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
QASP_OH_PBL.pdf PDF
AFMC_Form_158.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X00B.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X011.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X005.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X010.pdf PDF
Atch_27_GFE.docx DOCX document
HAL_CDRL_X014.pdf PDF
Appendix_C.pdf PDF
QASP_PES_PBL.pdf PDF
HAL_OA_PWS.pdf PDF
Appendix_B.doc DOC document
QASP_MM_PBL.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X00C.pdf PDF
Proposal_Adequacy_Checklist.doc DOC document
HAL_CDRL_X001.pdf PDF
TM-86-01N_TMCR.pdf PDF
Atch_31_Partner_Consent.doc DOC document
HAL_CDRL_X006.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X00D.pdf PDF
Atch_30_Client_Authorization_Letter.doc DOC document
HAL_CDRL_X012.pdf PDF
HAL_MM_PWS.pdf PDF
HAL_PES_PWS.pdf PDF
Atch_23_Halvorsen_Metrics_Determination_and_Incentive_Fee_Arrangement.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X003.pdf PDF
FA851913R30382.pdf PDF
Atch_26_Hal_LaborCate_and_Matl_Add-on_r1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_29_-_CHPMSK-30_and_-90_Parts_Kits.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
HAL_CDRL_X013.pdf PDF
Atch_25_Hal_CWBS_Matrix.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X015.pdf PDF
HAL_OH_PWS.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X007.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X00E.pdf PDF
HAL_CDRL_X009.pdf PDF
Show all 46

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 33

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

RFP #: FA8519-13-R-30382

PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ABOUT YOURSELF:

Name/Signature and Role Relative to Contract (e.g. Buyer, Program Manager):________________________________________________________ Agency or Business: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone No. _______________________________ FAX No. ____________________________________

RETURN YOUR COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE VIA FAX # (478)222-1854. TO ENSURE PROPER HANDLING OF THE INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL (478) 222-1896 or (478) 926-2241 BEFORE TRANSMITTAL.

NOTICE: WHEN COMPLETED, THIS QUESTIONNAIRE WILL BE CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED TO THE OFFEROR.

Part I. SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Contractor/Business: _____________________________________________ CAGE Code: __________

Program Title and Brief Description: _____________________________________________________________________________________

Contractor’s Role in the Program: _____Prime _____Subcontractor _____Vendor/Supplier

Contract Number: ________________________________ Number of Years?: Basic:________ Option: _________

Contract Type(s): List all applicable contract types, i.e. Firm-Fixed-Price, Time & Materials, Cost, etc._________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PART II. GENERAL PROGRAM INFORMATION.

Period of Performance:

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised): Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable) ___________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Dollar Value:

1. Original MAX Contract $ Value (assuming all options exercised):________________________________________________________
2. Current MAX $ Value (assuming all options exercised): ________________________________________________________________
3. Primary Causes of Changes: ______________________________________________________________________________________

NOTE: In Part III., should your response be other than “satisfactory,” please provide supporting documentation in “Additional Remarks” on page 4 of 5.

PART III. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS.

Please check the appropriate rating for each of the following questions:

N/A=Not Applicable U=Unsatisfactory M=Marginal S=Satisfactory V=Very Good E=Exceptional

N/A
U
M
S
V
E

1. Extent to which Company’s products and/or services met the specification /performance requirements:

2. Product consistency (first product delivered same as last):

3. Quality of Completed Product/Service:

4. Overall management of subcontracting efforts:

5. Customer’s Satisfaction with warranty response times and corrective actions:

6. Adequate Number of Dedicated Resources For Your Program:

7. Timely recognition and notification of administrative, engineering, production, problems affecting the program:

8. Company performed independently without significant customer direction/oversight?

9. Monitoring of Program Schedules and Critical Milestones:

10. Completed Work on Time:

11. Company demonstrated positive responsiveness to unscheduled requirements or contract changes:

12a. Company provided real-time status using Electronic Data Exchange (EDE) in required format with multiple users within the specified timeframes:

12b. For this effort ,contractor’s existing EDE efficiently met requirements:

12c. For this effort, contractor provided first-time EDE set-up that efficiently met requirements:

13. Prime maintained obsolescence surveillance/awareness and report findings in a timely manner as not to affect the program negatively:

14a. Contractor’s methods of predicting quantities/availability of hardware requirements (both manufacturing and supply support) adequately met mission requirements:

14b. Contractor provided the bulk of forecast capability for this effort:

15. Contractor successfully implemented Earned Value Management System (EVMS) on their contracts.

16. Contractor consistently remained in compliance with CAS 15.

17. Operated under System Engineering processes to include OSS&E.

18. Consistently completed effort at or below cost.

19. Has action been initiated to cancel or terminate the contract for default? If yes, explain. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

20. Have there been any disputes/claims relative to the contract? If yes, explain.

21. Describe the contractor’s or company’s strong and/or weak points identified as a result of technical performance and any technical performance risk identified during the life of the contract.

22. If given a choice, would you award to this contractor again? If not, please explain.

23. Do you feel you “got what you paid for?” Please explain. ____________________________________________________________________________

24. Additional Remarks:

RFP NUMBER

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

E EXCEPTIONAL: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE: Did not apply to this acquisition; or, questionnaire respondent has no knowledge of, and/or did not observe, the contractor’s performance in this area.

NOTICE TO QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENTS: Please do not transmit this page when faxing your input to the name/address listed on page 1.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .