FA8519-13-R-30382-0003.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE Page 1

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

FA8519-13-R-30382-0003

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

5 JUN 2013

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

FD20601330382

5. PROJECT NO (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

SUPPORT EQPT - SERVICES, AFLCMC/WNKBBA

235 BYRON ST STE 19A

BLDG 300 CML PHN 478 222 1901

ROBINS AFB GA 31098-1670

BUYER: Alicia D. Vogel Alicia.Vogel@robins.af.mil Phone: (478) 222- 1896 Fax: (000) 000-0000 No Collect Calls

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6) CODE

FA8519

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE

X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA851913R30382

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

5-NOV-2012

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended. Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods. ( a ) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; ( b ) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or ( c ) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

ROUTINE

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY ________________________________________________________

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY ____________________________________________________

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

FACILITY CODE

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PRESCRIBED BY GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

X

X X

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

Amendment/Modification FA8519-13-R-30382-0003

Continuation of block 14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

A. The purpose of this amendment is to (1) incorporate a revised Attachment 23 and (2) incorporate revised RFP Section M provisions, for Solicitation # FA8519-13-R-30382, as follows:

1) Attachment 23, Metrics Determination and Incentive Fee Arrangement, in Section J, List of Attachments, is hereby amended as follows:

FROM: Attachment 23, Metrics Determination and Incentive Fee Arrangement, 25 FEB 2013, 7 pages

TO: Attachment 23, Metrics Determination and Incentive Fee Arrangement, 30 MAY 2013, 7 pages

2) The “Evaluation Basis for Award” provision in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award, is hereby revised as follows:

EVALUATION BASIS FOR AWARD

1. Basis for Contract Award.

A. This acquisition will utilize the Tradeoff source selection procedures in accordance with FAR

15.3 as supplemented by the DoD Source Selection Procedures referenced in DFARS 215.3 and the AFFARS Mandatory Procedures 5315.3 to make an integrated assessment for a best value award decision. The Government intends to award a contract as a result of this solicitation. A decision on the technical acceptability of each offeror’s proposal will be made. For those offerors who are determined to be technically acceptable, tradeoffs will be made between past performance and cost/price. Past performance is approximately equal to cost/price. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the tradeoff process, by its nature, is subjective;

therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the selection process. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, technical requirements, and also provides the best value to the Government based on the results of the evaluation described in paragraph B below.

B. The Government intends to award without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary. Any discussions will be conducted in accordance with FAR

15.306. If the Contracting Officer determines the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer, with the concurrence of the Source Selection Authority, may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

C. The total compensation plan and supporting information will be evaluated per FAR 52.222-46 to assure it reflects a sound management approach and understanding of the contract requirements. Failure by the offeror/populated joint venture/each joint venture member in an unpopulated joint venture to submit this total compensation plan will result in the offeror being considered as failing to meet the RFP terms and conditions.

2. Proposal Evaluation. The evaluation process will be accomplished as follows:

A. Technical Factor.

Each offeror’s technical proposal shall be evaluated based on the subfactors below to determine if the offeror provides a sound, compliant approach that meets the requirements of the OA, PES, MM, and OH PWSs, and demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of those requirements and their associated risks. The technical proposal must address each of the following subfactors in sufficient detail. For each subfactor, the offeror should identify risks, if any; associated with the proposed approach and actions the offeror will take to mitigate the identified risks. If no risks/mitigations are identified in the offeror’s proposal, the Government will assume that the offeror does not consider there to be any risk associated with their proposed approach.

Subfactor 1: Systems Engineering (SE). This subfactor is met when the offeror’s proposal demonstrates:

i) A Systems Engineering Plan (SEP) that contains all the mandatory elements of

PES PWS paragraphs 4.2.1 and ensures that a sound systems engineering process will be executed;

ii) The offeror’s approach to effectively implement and ensure personnel compliance with SE processes of PES PWS paragraph 4.2 by the time the contractor would become responsible for PES.

iii) The offeror’s approach to effectively qualify any new parts and accomplish a parts fit and function check of the 1,579 parts of PES PWS paragraph 4.2.6.3 by the time the offeror would become responsible for PES;

iv) The offeror’s approach to effectively comply with the reverse engineering and technical data package requirements of PES PWS paragraph 4.3 and its subparagraphs by the time the offeror would become responsible for PES;

v) DCMA certification/approval (if any) of the offeror’s EVMS, or a viable approach to achieving DCMA certification/approval of EVMS;

vi) A comprehensive Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) that ensures the offeror‘s ability to achieve MM Ramp-up, PES Ramp-up, OH Qualification, PES, and OH Low-rate and Full-rate efforts (in accordance with PES PWS paragraph 4.1.1, MM PWS paragraph 4.1.1, and OH PWS paragraph 4.1.1) that correlates to the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) ;

vii) A comprehensive listing of the lower level objective criteria for each of the key exit criteria elements for MM Ramp-up, PES ramp-up, OH Qualification, PES, and OH Low-rate and Full-rate efforts in accordance with PES PWS paragraph 4.1.5, MM PWS paragraph 4.1.5, and OH PWS paragraph 4.1.7; and,

viii) A level 3 Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) that provides a thorough explanation of tasks and resources (i.e., labor hours, labor categories and material requirements narratives) that ensures the offeror’s ability to achieve PES, MM, and OH segments that correlates to the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) (fill out the matrix at attachment 25).

Subfactor 2: Material Management (MM). This subfactor is met when the offeror’s

i) The offeror’s approach to effectively establish a high speed parts pipeline to receive parts orders worldwide, and to purchase, fabricate, alter, finish, repair, overhaul, store, handle, pack, and ship quality parts to Halvorsen users worldwide, including but not limited to, what the offeror intends to provide in the way of facilities, equipment, and personnel, how the offeror intends to establish a shelf-life program and quality assurance program for the parts, and how the offeror intends to forecast pipeline flow requirements and predict parts stock levels, required to meet tempo and performance requirements, in accordance with MM PWS paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3;

ii) The offeror’s process to effectively date/time stamp their parts ordering information in accordance with MM PWS paragraph 4.3.1 such that the Government can verify the information is not corrupt from change; and,

iii) The offeror’s approach to effectively establish supply points to ensure timely deliveries to satisfy the performance requirements, and establish a technical support team to respond in a timely manner to technical requests from the Halvorsen users and contractor personnel in accordance with the MM PWS paragraphs 4.3.1 and 4.3.2.

Subfactor 3: Overhaul Management. This subfactor is met when the offeror’s

i) The offeror’s approach to effectively provide adequate facilities and layout in accordance with OH PWS paragraph 4.1.7; as a minimum, include equipment, facilities square footage, placement of workstations, workflow processes, work area for on-load/off-load of oversized transport vehicles, work area for inspection, work area for wash rack, work area for test, warehousing of parts, and parts flow throughout the plant;

ii) The offeror’s approach to effectively develop types 1, 2, and 3 time standards for Halvorsen overhaul, and the offeror’s ability to effectively gain efficiencies on the overhaul line to reduce costs, in accordance with OH PWS paragraph 4.1.2.4;

and,

iii) ISO 9001:2008 certification or a viable approach to achieving ISO certification of the offeror’s quality program not later than contract award.

Subfactor 4: Small Business Utilization Plan. This subfactor is met when the offeror’s proposal adequately provides:

i) A description of the extent of participation of proposed small businesses when subcontracting possibilities exist; and

ii) A description of the subcontracted work to be performed by small businesses, the company names/CAGE codes and contact information of the small planned for use in the performance of this resultant contract, and the associated goals expressed in terms of percentages of the total contract value. Additionally, if the offeror/joint venture member or critical subcontractor is a small business concern, it should include the work it will be performing when calculating the goals for Small Business Utilization Plan.

iii) The associated goals in paragraph ii above in the offeror’s Small Business

Utilization Plan will be evaluated against the FY13 DoD Small Business Subcontracting goals:

Small Business Category FY13 DoD Small Business Subcontracting

Goals Small Business 36.7%

iv) If limited or no subcontracting possibilities exist for these socio-economic entities adequate rationale for such shall be provided. Offerors are cautioned against only acknowledging a goal is not met, if applicable. Adequate rationale includes specific reasons why a goal is unmet and any actions being taken to increase any unmet goals.

Technical Rating: The technical rating reflects the evaluation of the acceptability of the offeror’s technical solution for meeting the Government’s requirement. The technical risk associated with the offeror’s proposed technical approach will also be considered as part of the technical acceptability decision. Technical risk, which is manifested by the identification of weaknesses, assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach for the requirements of the solicitation may cause disruption of schedule, increased costs, degraded performance, the need for increased government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

The evaluation shall address the Source Selection Team’s identification of any weaknesses as well as the offeror’s identified risks and proposed mitigation (if applicable) and document why that is or is not acceptable. The offeror’s proposal shall be evaluated to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable, using the ratings and descriptions outlined below. One technical rating will be assigned to each technical subfactor. In order to be considered awardable, there must be an “acceptable” rating in every subfactor.

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings:

Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

B. Past Performance Factor. The past performance assessment will assess the Government’s confidence in the offerors’/joint venture members’ ability (which includes, if applicable, the extent of its critical subcontractors’ involvement) to successfully accomplish the proposed effort based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past work record. A critical subcontractor is defined as an entity (subcontractor, teaming contractor) other than the offeror itself that will perform at least 20 percent or more of the total proposed effort based on the total program price for any one of the following four (4) areas: Program engineering Support, Material Management (Infrastructure), Material Management (Parts), and Overhaul. The percentage of work performed is based on the Offeror’s total (including options) proposed dollar value excluding materials. The 20% or more measure applies for any 365 day period as identified in Schedule B of the solicitation.

The Government will evaluate the offeror’s/joint venture members’ and, if applicable, critical subcontractors’ demonstrated record of contract compliance in supplying products and services that meet users’ needs, including cost and schedule. The recency and relevancy of the information, the source of the information, context of the data and general trends in the contractor’s performance will be considered. For purposes of this evaluation, recency is defined as active or completed efforts performed within the past five (5) years from the issuance date of this solicitation. The Government will perform an independent determination of relevancy of the data provided or obtained. A relevancy determination will be made for each of the four (4) submitted contracts for each offeror/joint venture member and critical subcontractor. The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy. The following relevancy criteria apply:

· VERY RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The effort must have included all of the following:

a. Accomplishing overhaul of large complex self-propelled equipment which are hydraulic intensive; and

b. Performing Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Level 1;** and

c. Experience in reverse engineering at a system or platform level;*** and, four of the remaining six requirements below:

d. Performing worldwide supply chain management functions for large, complex systems.

e. Selecting and managing multiple (more than 20) subcontractors. *

f. Implementing engineering modifications for large, complex, hydraulic intensive equipment.

g. Implementing systems engineering.

h. Developing and implementing reduction of total ownership cost (RTOC) plan.

i. Complying with Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E) policies and procedures.

· RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The effort must have included all of the following:

a. Accomplishing overhaul of large, complex, self-propelled equipment which are hydraulic intensive; and

b. Performing Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Level 1;** and

c. Experience in reverse engineering at a part or component level; and, four of the remaining six requirements below:

d. Performing supply chain management functions.

e. Selecting and managing limited (20 or less) subcontractors.*

f. Implementing engineering modifications for large, complex, self-propelled equipment.

g. Implementing systems engineering.

h. Implementing cost reduction efforts.

i. Complying with OSS&E policies and procedures.

· SOMEWHAT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The effort must have included all of the following:

a. Overhauling large complex equipment; and

b. Demonstrate the principles of Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Level 1;** and, one of the remaining two requirements below:

c. Performing some supply chain management functions.

d. Provide Provision of basic engineering services to maintain hydraulic intensive equipment.

· NOT RELEVANT: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

NOTE: Large complex is defined as 15,000 lbs curb weight minimum, 15 feet in length minimum, 2,000 parts minimum, heat-treated metal structures, and hydraulically actuated lift mechanism.

NOTE: Magnitude of effort and complexities includes not only the technical features and characteristics identified, but also the logistical and programmatic considerations (including but not limited to: quantity produced, length of effort, complexity of data deliverables, etc. When assigning a relevancy rating to a contract effort, the Government will consider the technical scope and magnitude of work and complexities, and the program/logistical scope and magnitude of work and complexities as separate aspects. If both these aspects are not reflected in the submitted contract effort, the overall relevancy rating will be affected. For example, if a submitted contract effort meets essentially the same technical scope and magnitude of work and complexities but involves only some of the program/logistical magnitude of work and complexities, a lesser relevancy rating will be assigned (see the relevancy definitions relative to the underlined terms).

*NOTE: In those instances whereby the relevancy criteria includes subcontractors, the definition of subcontractor as stated in FAR 3.1001 applies as follows: “Subcontractor” means any supplier, distributor, vendor or firm that furnished supplies or services to or for a prime contractor or another subcontractor.

**NOTE: Refer to overarching PWS for PBL Level 1 definition.

***NOTE: Definition for reverse engineering at a system or platform level is as follows: "5,000 lbs curb weight, 500 minimum parts, with hydraulically actuated lift mechanism."

In assessing present and past performance, the Government will employ several approaches, including, but not limited to:

(i). The Past Performance Team evaluation is not limited to review of the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance volume. Past Performance information may be obtained from the Government’s Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) and the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS). The Government reserves the right to use performance information from other sources such as Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), Fee Determining Officials, or commercial sources. The Government will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.

(ii). Offerors shall be given an opportunity to address adverse past performance information if the offeror/joint venture member and/or critical subcontractor has not had a previous opportunity to respond to the information. Recent contracts will be examined to ensure that corrective measures have been implemented. The confidence assessment will consider issues including, but not limited to, the number and severity of the problems, the appropriateness and/or effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record. Prompt corrective action in isolated instances may not outweigh overall negative trends.

(iii). For offerors/joint venture members or critical subcontractors that are newly formed entities (in existence less than three (3) years from the issuance date of this solicitation) who either have no prior contracts or do not possess relevant corporate past performance, the quality of any key personnel’s performance under a recent/relevant contract while employed by another entity will also be considered if the contract involves the key personnel performing the same role currently being proposed on the instant acquisition and this performance occurred during the past five (5) years from the issuance date of this solicitation. Any such key personnel must already be employed by the offeror/joint venture member or, in the case of a critical subcontractor, must already be employed by the critical subcontractor.

(iv). The Government may consider an offeror’s/joint venture members’ (including critical subcontractor’s) contracts in the aggregate in determining a confidence assessment rating, should the offeror’s/joint venture members’ past performance lend itself to this approach. That is, an offeror /joint venture member’s contracts (when considering each offeror, joint venture member or critical subcontractor’s proposed role) may, by definition, represent a rating less than Very Relevant when each contract is considered as a stand-alone effort. However, when these contracts are performed concurrently (in part or in whole) and are assessed in the aggregate, the work may more accurately reflect a higher relevancy rating. In this situation, work performed in aggregate will be considered in the assignment of a confidence assessment rating for the team as a whole.

As a result of the recency, relevancy and quality assessments of the contracts evaluated, one confidence assessment rating as described in the DoD Source Selection Procedures will be assigned to the Past Performance factor. The performance confidence assessment ratings are excerpted below.

Rating Definition

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s (Neutral) performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Offerors without a record of past performance or for whom information is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance and, as a result, will receive an “Unknown Confidence” rating.

A strong record of relevant past performance may be considered more advantageous to the Government than an “Unknown Confidence” rating.

(v). Pursuant to DFARS 215.305(a)(2), the assessment will consider whether the past performance demonstrated the offeror’s/joint venture members’ (and critical subcontractor’s, if applicable) compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and/or FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, when these clauses were contained in the submitted contracts. That is, on the four (4) efforts submitted for evaluation by the offeror/joint venture member and critical subcontractor, when subcontracting possibilities existed, did the offeror/joint venture member (and critical subcontractor, if applicable) award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUB Zone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance. (Please note that FAR 52.219-8 does apply to ALL offerors, whereas FAR 52.219-9 applies only to large businesses.) If none of the contracts submitted by the offeror/joint venture members and critical subcontractors included these clauses, when subcontracting possibilities existed in the performance of these contracts, address whether or not it was the offeror/joint venture member and critical subcontractor’s policy to utilize small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUB Zone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance.

C. Cost/Price Factor. The Offeror’s cost/price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness and balance (See paragraphs (i) and ii) below. Total evaluated price will be calculated in accordance with paragraph (iii) below. The prices shall be rounded to no more than two (2) decimal points.

(i) Reasonableness: The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of reasonableness. Price analysis techniques may be used to further validate price reasonableness. If adequate price competition is not obtained or if price reasonableness cannot be determined using price analysis of Government-obtained information, additional information in accordance with FAR 15.4 may be required to support the proposed price.

(ii) Balance: Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items, is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of proposal analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether there are unbalanced separately priced line items or sub-line items. Prices submitted will be compared and evaluated to assure that a logical progression exists as related to price and quantity changes within each Offeror’s response to the pricing structure in the Schedule. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(iii) Total Evaluated Price (TEP):

(a) For Option CLINs x004: Offerors have the option of proposing quantity ranges with economical price breaks.

i. For Offerors that chose not to propose quantity ranges, the evaluated price for each CLIN will be calculated by multiplying the proposed unit price by the corresponding BEQ.

ii. For Offerors that do choose to propose multiple quantity ranges, the evaluated price for each CLIN will be calculated as follows: each proposed unit price for the same CLIN is multiplied by its corresponding quantity per range, yielding a total price. The sum of the total prices of the quantity ranges for that CLIN will be the evaluated price for the CLIN. See example below:

Quantity Range Example

CLIN

From

To

Quantity Per Range

Unit Price

Total Price

X00X 1 10 10 $100 $1,000 11 30 20 $90 $1,800 31 60 30 $85 $2,550

Total Quantity

Evaluated Price for CLIN X00X $5,350

(a) Cost Reimbursable (CR) CLINs for Travel will not be included in the TEP

(Basic CLINs: 0008AC, 0009AC, 0011AD and Options CLINs: x005AC, x006AC, x008AD).

(b) DATA CLINs are NSP.

NOTE: The following is a Summary of how the Total Evaluated Price will be calculated:

Basic Contract Period – 24 months

Basic Ordering Period - Year 1 (12 months)

CLIN 0001 FFP - Offeror to propose one price for 12 months

CLIN 0002 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a firm quantity of 2.

CLIN 0003 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

Basic Ordering Period - Year 2 (12 months)

CLIN 0004 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 0005 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 0006 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 0007

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 0008

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 0009 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 0010

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1 AB 30 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1 AC Kit Transportation will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 0011 Data - NSP

Option I - Year 3 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 1001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 1002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 1003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 1004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 7.

The Option of Quantity ranges is discussed and instructions provided in paragraph (iii)(a) above.

CLIN 1005

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 1006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 1007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 1008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 1009 Data – NSP

Option II - Year 4 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 2001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 2002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 2003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 2004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 25.

CLIN 2005

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 2006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category (IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 2007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 2008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 2009 Data - NSP

Option III - Year 5 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 3001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 3002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 3003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 3004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 50.

CLIN 3005

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 3006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

CLIN 3007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 3008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 3009 Data - NSP

Option IV - Year 6 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 4001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 4002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 4003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 4004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 50.

The Option of Quantity ranges is discussed and instructions provided in paragraph (iii)(a) above.

CLIN 4005

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 4006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 4007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by l Lot.

CLIN 4008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 4009 Data - NSP

Option V - Year 7 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 5001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 5002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 5003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 5004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 50.

CLIN 5005

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 5006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 5007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 5008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 5009 Data - NSP

Option VI - Year 8 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 6001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 6002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 6003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 6004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 50.

CLIN 6005

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 6006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 6007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 6008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 6009 Data - NSP

Option VII - Year 9 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 7001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 7002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 7003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 7004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 50.

CLIN 7005

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 7006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 7007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 7008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 7009 Data - NSP

Option VIII - Year 10 – Ordering Period 12 months

CLIN 8001 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 8002 FPIF- Offeror to propose Price/operating hr to be multiplied by BEQ of 35,000 hours.

CLIN 8003 FPIF- Offeror to propose Monthly rate to be multiplied by BEQ of 12.

CLIN 8004 FPIF Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a BEQ of 50.

CLIN 8005

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

AC Travel will be Cost Reimbursable and not included in the TEP

CLIN 8006

AA Labor FFP-Offeror to propose fully loaded labor rates for each labor category

(IAW Attachment # 26) by year to be multiplied by estimated hours (Government will not disclose the estimated hours/labor category)

AB Material FFP – Offeror to propose Material Add-on factor (IAW Attachment #

26) to be applied to Government estimated material $s shown on Attachment 26.

CLIN 8007 FPIF– Offeror to propose unit price to be multiplied by a l Lot.

CLIN 8008

AA 90 Kit FFP -Offeror to propose a unit price to be multiplied by the BEQ of 1

CLIN 8009 Data - NSP

B. All other terms and conditions of subject solicitation remain unchanged.

END OF AMENDMENT