FA8224-17-R-0021_B-52_Brake_Housing_Solicitation.pdf

PDF 569 KB Posted

Attached to
Chromate Coating and Resin Impregnation of B-52 Brake Housing
Solicitation number
FA8224-17-R-0021
Issued by

About this file

FA8224-17-R-0021 B-52 Brake Housing Solicitation

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SEE ADDENDUM

(No Collect Calls)

FA822417R0021 23-Dec-2016

b. TELEPHONE NUMBER

801-586-0642

8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME

02:00 PM 24 Jan 2017

5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

(TYPE OR PRINT)

(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)

ADDENDA X ARE

26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )

23.

CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS

SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER

17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT

BELOW IS CHECKED

TELEPHONE NO.

FA82249. ISSUED BY

18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK

7. FOR SOLICITATION

INFORMATION CALL:

a. NAME

CYSON PREECE

2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER

(TYPE OR PRINT)

30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X

25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

1. REQUISITION NUMBER

20.

ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.

OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

ARE NOT ATTACHED

27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED

(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE

SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:

. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION

28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN

% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED ORX

SMALL BUSINESS

17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY

OFFEROR CODE

OL:H/PZIM

CYSON PREECE 6038 ASPEN AVE BLDG 1289

HILL AFB UT 84056-5805

18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE

RATED ORDER UNDER

DPAS (15 CFR 700)

13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A

13b. RATING

CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE F2DCBX 16. ADMINISTERED BY

12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-

TION UNLESS BLOCK IS

MARKED

SEE SCHEDULE

14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION

RFQ IFB RFPX

309 CMXG

RABON CAHOON

5760 SOUTHGATE AVE, BLDG 507

HILL AFB UT 84056-5228

TEL: 801-586-5285 FAX:

FAX:

TEL: 801-586-0642

SERVICE-DISABLED

VETERAN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS

8(A)

HUBZONE SMALL

BUSINESS

SIZE STANDARD:

NAICS:

332812

X

OFFER DATED

29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.

DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY

COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND

EMAIL:

TEL:

31c. DATE SIGNED

SEE SCHEDULE

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

24.22.21.19.

WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)

ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED

SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM

EDWOSB

32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

(CONTINUED)

PAGE 2 OF51

ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________

32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN

RECEIVED INSPECTED

32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT

REPRESENTATIVE

32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE

37. CHECK NUMBER

FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE

36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED

CORRECT FOR

34. VOUCHER NUMBER

FINAL

33. SHIP NUMBER

PARTIAL

38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY

41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT

41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE

42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)

42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)

42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS

STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK

Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION

PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE

SEE SCHEDULE

20.

SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES

21.

QUANTITY UNIT

22. 23.

UNIT PRICE

24.

AMOUNT

19.

ITEM NO.

FA822417R0021

Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES EST

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0001 300 Each B-52 Main Brake Housing Resin Impreg

FFP

Perform a chromate coating application and resin impregnation of Air Force supplied magnesium B-52 brake housings. The work will be performed at the contractor’s facility in support of the 309th Commodities Maintenance Group

(309 CMXG) at Hill Air Force Base (AFB), Utah. IAW attached PWS dated

October 31, 2016. Ordering Period February 17, 2017 - February 16, 2018.

FOB: Destination

SIGNAL CODE: A

MAX

NET AMT

FSC CD: 1630

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

0002 1 Lot Data

FFP

Data IAW CDRL A001 and A002. The CLIN is not seperatly priced. DO NOT

PROVIDE A PRICE ON THIS CLIN.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

1001 254 Each B-52 Main Brake Housing Resin Impreg

FFP

Perform a chromate coating application and resin impregnation of Air Force supplied magnesium B-52 brake housings. The work will be performed at the contractor’s facility in support of the 309th Commodities Maintenance Group

(309 CMXG) at Hill Air Force Base (AFB), Utah. IAW attached PWS dated

October 31, 2016. Ordering Period February 17, 2018 - February 16, 2019.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

1002 1 Lot Data

FFP

Data IAW CDRL A001 and A002. The CLIN is not seperatly priced. DO NOT

PROVIDE A PRICE ON THIS CLIN.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

2001 296 Each B-52 Main Brake Housing Resin Impreg

FFP

Perform a chromate coating application and resin impregnation of Air Force supplied magnesium B-52 brake housings. The work will be performed at the contractor’s facility in support of the 309th Commodities Maintenance Group

(309 CMXG) at Hill Air Force Base (AFB), Utah. IAW attached PWS dated

October 31, 2016. Ordering Period February 17, 2019 - February 16, 2020.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

2002 1 Lot Data

FFP

Data IAW CDRL A001 and A002. The CLIN is not seperatly priced. DO NOT

PROVIDE A PRICE ON THIS CLIN.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

3001 283 Each B-52 Main Brake Housing Resin Impreg

FFP

Perform a chromate coating application and resin impregnation of Air Force supplied magnesium B-52 brake housings. The work will be performed at the contractor’s facility in support of the 309th Commodities Maintenance Group

(309 CMXG) at Hill Air Force Base (AFB), Utah. IAW attached PWS dated

October 31, 2016. Ordering Period February 17, 2020 - February 16, 2021.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

3002 1 Lot Data

FFP

Data IAW CDRL A001 and A002. The CLIN is not seperatly priced. DO NOT

PROVIDE A PRICE ON THIS CLIN.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

4001 281 Each B-52 Main Brake Housing Resin Impreg

FFP

Perform a chromate coating application and resin impregnation of Air Force supplied magnesium B-52 brake housings. The work will be performed at the contractor’s facility in support of the 309th Commodities Maintenance Group

(309 CMXG) at Hill Air Force Base (AFB), Utah. IAW attached PWS dated

October 31, 2016. Ordering Period February 17, 2021 - February 16, 2022.

UNIT UNIT PRICE MAX AMOUNT

4002 1 Lot Data

FFP

Data IAW CDRL A001 and A002. The CLIN is not seperatly priced. DO NOT

PROVIDE A PRICE ON THIS CLIN.

CONTRACT MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CONTRACT VALUE

The minimum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not be less than the minimum quantity and contract value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and contract value for all orders issued against this contract shall not exceed the maximum quantity and contract value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

AMOUNT

5.00 1,564.00

DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for each Delivery/Task Order issued shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for each

Delivery/Task Order issued shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

5.00 10.00

CLIN DELIVERY/TASK ORDER MINIMUM/MAXIMUM QUANTITY AND CLIN ORDER VALUE

The minimum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not be less than the minimum quantity and order value stated in the following table. The maximum quantity and order value for the given Delivery/Task Order issued for this CLIN shall not exceed the maximum quantity and order value stated in the following table.

CLIN

QUANTITY

MINIMUM

AMOUNT

MAXIMUM

QUANTITY

MAXIMUM

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 Destination Government Destination Government

0002 Destination Government Destination Government

1001 Destination Government Destination Government

1002 Destination Government Destination Government

2001 Destination Government Destination Government

2002 Destination Government Destination Government

3001 Destination Government Destination Government

3002 Destination Government Destination Government

4001 Destination Government Destination Government

4002 Destination Government Destination Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 POP 17-FEB-2017 TO

16-FEB-2018

N/A 309 CMXG

RABON CAHOON

5760 SOUTHGATE AVE, BLDG 507

HILL AFB UT 84056-5228

801-586-5285

F2DCBX

0002 POP 17-FEB-2017 TO

16-FEB-2018

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1001 POP 17-FEB-2018 TO

16-FEB-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

1002 POP 17-FEB-2018 TO

16-FEB-2019

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2001 POP 17-FEB-2019 TO

16-FEB-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

2002 POP 17-FEB-2019 TO

16-FEB-2020

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3001 POP 17-FEB-2020 TO

16-FEB-2021

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

3002 POP 17-FEB-2020 TO

16-FEB-2021

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4001 POP 17-FEB-2021 TO

16-FEB-2022

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

4002 POP 17-FEB-2021 TO

16-FEB-2022

N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.202-1 Definitions NOV 2013

52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984

52.203-6 Alt I Restrictions On Subcontractor Sales To The Government

(Sep 2006) -- Alternate I

OCT 1995

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal

Transactions

OCT 2010

52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement

To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights

APR 2014

52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-7 System for Award Management OCT 2016

52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

OCT 2016

52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic

Corporations--Representation

NOV 2015

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting

With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for

Debarment

OCT 2015

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic

Corporations

NOV 2015

52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items OCT 2016

52.212-2 Evaluation - Commercial Items OCT 2014

52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items MAY 2015

52.216-18 Ordering OCT 1995

52.216-19 Order Limitations OCT 1995

52.216-22 Indefinite Quantity OCT 1995

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990

52.222-3 Convict Labor JUN 2003

52.222-17 Nondisplacement of Qualified Workers JAN 2013

52.222-21 Prohibition Of Segregated Facilities APR 2015

52.222-26 Equal Opportunity SEP 2016

52.222-35 Equal Opportunity for Veterans OCT 2015

52.222-36 Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities JUL 2014

52.222-37 Employment Reports on Veterans FEB 2016

52.222-40 Notification of Employee Rights Under the National Labor

Relations Act

DEC 2010

52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards MAY 2014

52.222-43 Fair Labor Standards Act And Service Contract Labor

Standards - Price Adjustment (Multiple Year And Option

Contracts)

MAY 2014

52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons MAR 2015

52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification OCT 2015

52.223-11 Ozone-Depleting Substances and High Global Warming

Potential Hydrofluorocarbons.

JUN 2016

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging

While Driving

AUG 2011

52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008

52.225-18 Place of Manufacture MAR 2015

52.232-1 Payments APR 1984

52.232-8 Discounts For Prompt Payment FEB 2002

52.232-17 Interest MAY 2014

52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims MAY 2014

52.232-33 Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award

Management

JUL 2013

52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013

52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-1 Disputes MAY 2014

52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996

52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004

52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And

Vegetation

APR 1984

52.237-3 Continuity Of Services JAN 1991

52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995

52.242-15 Stop-Work Order AUG 1989

52.242-15 Alt I Stop-Work Order (Aug 1989) - Alternate I APR 1984

52.243-1 Changes--Fixed Price AUG 1987

52.245-1 Government Property APR 2012

52.245-9 Use And Charges APR 2012

52.246-4 Inspection Of Services--Fixed Price AUG 1996

52.247-34 F.O.B. Destination NOV 1991

52.249-2 Termination For Convenience Of The Government (Fixed-

Price)

APR 2012

52.249-14 Excusable Delays APR 1984

52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated By Reference FEB 1998

52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated By Reference FEB 1998

52.252-5 Authorized Deviations In Provisions APR 1984

52.252-6 Authorized Deviations In Clauses APR 1984

52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms JAN 1991

252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991

252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013

252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information OCT 2016

252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992

252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014

252.204-7006 Billing Instructions OCT 2005

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By

The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of

Terrorism

OCT 2015

252.209-7993 (Dev) Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid

Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any

Federal Law -- Fiscal Year 2014 Appropriations (Deviation)

FEB 2014

252.211-7007 Reporting of Government-Furnished Property AUG 2012

252.225-7001 Buy American And Balance Of Payments Program-- Basic

(Aug 2016)

AUG 2016

252.225-7002 Qualifying Country Sources As Subcontractors AUG 2016

252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities AUG 2016

252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013

252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006

252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor

Personnel

JUN 2013

252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991

252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012

252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013

252.245-7001 Tagging, Labeling, and Marking of Government-Furnished

Property

APR 2012

252.245-7002 Reporting Loss of Government Property APR 2012

252.245-7003 Contractor Property Management System Administration APR 2012

252.245-7004 Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal SEP 2016

252.247-7023 Transportation of Supplies by Sea APR 2014

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.204-5 WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS (OTHER THAN SMALL BUSINESS) (OCT 2014)

(a) Definition. Women-owned business concern, as used in this provision, means a concern that is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women; or in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of its stock is owned by one or more women; and whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

(b) Representation. [Complete only if the offeror is a women-owned business concern and has not represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of FAR 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations, of this solicitation.] The offeror represents that it ( ___ ) is a women-owned business concern.

(End of provision)

52.204-19 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (DEC

2014)

The Contractor's representations and certifications, including those completed electronically via the System for

Award Management (SAM), are incorporated by reference into the contract.

(End of clause)

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2015)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or

State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.;

and

(D) Have , have not , within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent

Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,500 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;

head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.

(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.

52.209-11 REPRESENTATION BY CORPORATIONS REGARDING DELINQUENT TAX LIABILITY OR A

FELONY CONVICTION UNDER ANY FEDERAL LAW (FEB 2016)

(a) As required by sections 744 and 745 of Division E of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations

Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235), and similar provisions, if contained in subsequent appropriations acts, the Government will not enter into a contract with any corporation that--

(1) Has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability, where the awarding agency is aware of the unpaid tax liability, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that suspension or debarment is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government; or

(2) Was convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months, where the awarding agency is aware of the conviction, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.

(b) The Offeror represents that--

(1) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability; and

(2) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that was convicted of a felony criminal violation under a Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS ADDENDUM

1. PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES

1.1. The Government intends to select one contractor to perform a chromate coating application and resin impregnation of Air Force supplied magnesium B-52 brake housings. The work will be performed at the contractor’s facility in support of the 309th Commodities Maintenance Group (309 CMXG) at Hill Air

Force Base (AFB), Utah. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract if the Source

Selection Authority determines that it is in the Government’s best interest considering the expected volume of work over the period of the contract, available funding, the quality of proposals and prices submitted, and the availability of best-value for the Government. The Government reserves the right to award contracts without discussions.

1.2. Budget/Funding Information – Funding will be obligated at the individual task order level.

2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1. This section provides general guidance for preparing proposals as well as specific instructions on format and content. The Offerors proposal shall include all data and information requested and shall be submitted in accordance with these instructions. An Offeror who submits an incomplete package may not be considered for award. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Performance

Work Statement (PWS), Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs), and Model Contract. Non-conformance with these instructions may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

2.2. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the

Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. An Offeror shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the proposal.

2.3. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

2.4. The proposal acceptance period is specified in Block 9 of Section A (front page) of the model contract/solicitation. An Offeror providing less than the specified calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due may be considered non-responsive and may be eliminated.

2.5. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all proposals.

2.6. Point of Contact – The Contracting Officer (CO) and Contract Negotiator are the sole point of contacts for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the POC’s. Contact information is as follows:

OL:H/PZIMB

Attn: Cyson Preece

6038 Aspen AVE, Bldg. 1289 Upstairs

Hill AFB, UT 84056

Office (801) 586-0642 cyson.preece@hill.af.mil

Attn: Cameron Korth

6038 Aspen AVE, Bldg. 1289 Upstairs

Hill AFB, UT 84056

Office (801) 775-5306 cameron.korth@hill.af.mil

2.7. Discrepancies – If an Offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall IMMEDIATELY notify the CO and Contract Negotiator in writing with supporting rationale. The Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

2.8. Electronic Reference Documents – All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the

Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOps) website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov.

2.9. Oral Presentation – Oral presentations will not be allowed.

2.10. Amendments to Solicitation – If this Request for Quote (RFQ) is amended, all terms and conditions that are not amended remain unchanged. An Offeror shall acknowledge receipt of any amendment to this request by the date and time specified in the amendment(s) by signing and returning the front page of each amendment (as applicable).

2.11. Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals

2.11.1. Proposals and modifications to proposals shall be submitted in electronic format to the address located in paragraph 2.6 of this document, showing the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the Offeror. Late proposals will only be considered

IAW FAR 15.208.

2.11.2. Acceptable evidence to establish the time of receipt at the Government installation includes the time/date receipt of email proposal (local receipt time), or oral testimony or statements of

Government personnel.

2.11.3. Proposals may be withdrawn by written notice received at any time before award. Proposals may also be withdrawn in person by an Offeror or an authorized representative, if the identity of the person requesting the withdrawal is established and the person signs a receipt for the proposal before award.

2.12. Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits

2.12.1. The title page of each volume must show:

2.12.1.1. Solicitation Number

mailto:cyson.preece@hill.af.mil mailto:cameron.korth@hill.af.mil http://www.fedbizopps.gov/

2.12.1.2. Company name, address, cage code and DUNS

2.12.1.3. Primary point of contact name, telephone number and email address

2.12.1.4. Volume number and name (e.g. Volume I, Price)

2.12.2. An Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies specified. The volumes identified in the table shall be separated into three (3) electronic files. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the ITO paragraph as noted in the table below.

Table 1 - Proposal Organization

VOLUME INSTRUCTIONS

PARAGRAPH #

TITLE COPIES PAGE LIMIT

I 3.0 Price 1 electronic copy Unlimited

II 4.0 Technical Capability 1 electronic copy 10 pages

III 5.0 Past Performance 1 electronic copy 3 pages

IV

6.0 Contract Documentation

1 electronic copy

Unlimited

2.13. Page Limitations – Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Page limitations may be placed on responses to

Evaluation Notices (ENs) if applicable. The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the Offerors. Each page shall be counted except the following: blank pages, title pages, tables of contents, tabs, glossaries, and those noted in the Proposed Organization Table as “Unlimited.”

2.14. Pricing Information – All pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Price Volume.

2.15. Cross Referencing

2.15.1. Each volume shall be written on a standalone basis so that its contents may be evaluated without cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal. Information required for proposal evaluation that is not found in its designated volume will be assumed to have been omitted from the proposal.

Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted.

2.16. Electronic Offers – Electronic copies of proposals shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft

(MS) Word 2013, MS Excel 2013, MS-Power Point 2013, and PDF. Indicate on each electronic file the volume number and title. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

2.17. Distribution – Proposals shall be addressed to the Contracting Officer and Contract Negotiator and emailed to:

Attn: Cyson Preece

Office (801) 586-0642 cyson.preece@hill.af.mil mailto:cyson.preece@hill.af.mil

Attn: Cameron Korth

Office (801) 775-5306 cameron.korth@hill.af.mil

3. VOLUME I – PRICE

3.1. General Instructions

3.1.1. The price evaluation criteria of completeness, reasonableness, and Total Evaluated Price (TEP) as defined in the addendum to 52.212-2 of the RFQ will be assessed from the information provided in this volume. An Offeror should review 52.212-2 addendum criteria to ensure the minimum requirements are met.

3.1.2. The offeror shall complete the pricing for each line item in the SF1449 as follows:

3.1.2.1. For Line Items 0001, 1001, 2001, 3001, and 4001 a single Firm Fixed Price for each Period of

Performance. CLIN’s 0002, 2002, 3002, and 4002 are not seperatly priced.

3.1.3. Cost or Pricing Information Requirements – In accordance with FAR 15.402, 15.403-1(b) and

15.403-3(a), “information other than certified cost or pricing data” may be required to support price reasonableness. If after receipt of proposal, the CO determines that there is insufficient information available to determine the reasonableness of the proposed pricing the Offeror may be required to submit additional information other than certified cost or pricing data.

3.1.4. Pricing Assumptions - Summarize all significant pricing assumptions, scope limitations and/or qualifications of the Price proposal.

3.1.5. Estimating Techniques and Methods – An Offeror shall use generally accepted estimating techniques to develop their estimates for the category rates in the TEP.

4. VOLUME II – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

4.1. The Technical Capability Volume shall be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Responses will be evaluated against the Technical Sub factors defined in the addendum to

52.212-2, Evaluation Factors for Award. An Offeror should review the addendum to 52.212-2 criteria to ensure the minimum requirements are met. Provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying each sub factor. It is imperative that you fully describe how you will meet the sub factor requirements. Do not simply copy and paste, rephrase or restate

PWS/Maintenance Manual language for the technical volume.

4.2. Sub factor One: – The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they use impregnating materials that are rated for service at 400 degrees Fahrenheit, IAW PWS paragraph 2.6. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

4.3. Sub factor Two: – The offerors proposal must show that they have equipment and experience for acid pickle process, IAW PWS paragraph 2.3. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

4.4. Sub factor Three: – The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they have micrometers calibrated to +/-

0.0005” or better for dimensional measurements, IAW PWS paragraph 2.4. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

4.5. Sub factor Four: – The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they have a vacuum impregnation chamber large enough to process and impregnate magnesium B-52 brake housings that are approximately

26.5” in diameter and ~ 4.0” high. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

mailto:cameron.korth@hill.af.mil

4.6. VOLUME III – PAST PERFORMANCE

4.7. An Offeror may submit recent, relevant contracts as defined in the addendum to 52.212-2. The government will consider this information, along with information obtained from other sources (e.g. Past Performance

Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), customer interviews, etc.).

4.7.1. An Offeror is encouraged to address any performance problems/issues that the Government may identify and explain corrective action taken and current status. The Government will consider this information in determining the Offerors past performance rating.

4.7.2. An Offerors failure to address performance problems/issues within this volume does not preclude the government from using such information in determining a past performance rating.

5. VOLUME IV – CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION

5.1. Model Contract/Representations and Certifications – Provide electronic copies in the formats and quantities identified in Table 1.

5.1.1. STANDARD FORM 1449 – Solicitation/Contract Form: Complete blocks 12 (Offerors must input

60 days for acceptance), 17a, 30a, 30b and 30c of the SF1449. Signature by the Offeror on the

SF1449 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.

5.1.2. Continuation Sheets –Input pricing information for each line item.

5.1.3. Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements – An Offeror is required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. An Offeror must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format and content of Table 2.

Table 2 – Solicitation Exceptions

5.2. Other Information Required

5.2.1. Authorized Offeror Personnel – Provide the name, title, telephone number, and email address of the company/division point of contact responsible for negotiating with the Government.

SOLICITATION

Document

Page/

Paragraph

Requirement/

Portion

Rationale

PWS, Model Contract, ITO, etc.

Applicable Page and

Paragraph Numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Describe why the requirement can/will not be met

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS - ADDENDUM

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1. Basis for Contract Award

This acquisition will utilize Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures. Technical tradeoffs will not be made and no additional credit will be given for exceeding acceptability. Award will be made to the Technically Acceptable Offeror with the lowest evaluated price, satisfactory past performance and whose proposal conforms to the solicitation requirements. The solicitation requirements include all stated terms, conditions, representations, and certifications. The Government intends to award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the

Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined necessary by the Source Selection Authority.

1.1. Number of Contracts to be Awarded

The Government intends to select one contractor for the performance of chromate coating application and resin impregnation of Air Force supplied magnesium B-52 brake housings. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract if the Source Selection Authority determines that it is in the

Government’s best interest considering the expected volume of work over the period of the contract, available funding, the need to sustain adequate competition, the quality of proposals and prices submitted, and the availability of best-value proposals following completion of evaluations of the proposals received.

1.2. Rejection of Unrealistic Offers

The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, including contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically high or low in price when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

1.3. Correction Potential of Proposals

The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any proposal uncertainty. The judgment of such "correction potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government.

If an aspect of an Offeror's proposal not meeting the Government's requirements is not considered correctable, the Offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

2. Evaluation Factors and Sub factors

The Government will evaluate for acceptability the factors and sub factors described below:

Factor One – Price

Factor Two – Technical

Sub factor One – The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they use impregnating materials that are rated for service at 400 degrees Fahrenheit, IAW PWS paragraph 2.6.

(Acceptable/Unacceptable).

Sub factor Two – The offerors proposal must show that they have equipment and experience for acid pickle process, IAW PWS paragraph 2.3. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

Sub factor Three – The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they have micrometers calibrated to +/- 0.0005” or better for dimensional measurements, IAW PWS paragraph 2.4.

(Acceptable/Unacceptable).

Sub factor Four – The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they have a vacuum impregnation chamber large enough to process and impregnate magnesium B-52 brake housings that are approximately 26.5” in diameter and ~ 4.0” high. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

Factor Three – Past Performance

2.1. Evaluation Methodology

2.1.1. A price evaluation will be performed for all Offerors in accordance with Section 2.2 and proposals will be ranked from lowest to highest price based on a Total Evaluated Price (TEP).

2.1.2. Next, a technical and past performance evaluation will be performed beginning with the lowest priced Offerors. Evaluations will cease when the first two technically acceptable proposals receive a satisfactory past performance rating for price comparison purposes. Only those Offerors determined to be technically acceptable with a satisfactory past performance rating, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

2.1.3. Award will be made to the lowest evaluated priced proposal meeting the acceptability standards for the non-cost factors.

2.2. Price Factor

2.2.1. The pricing criteria used for evaluation are (1) completeness, (2) price reasonableness, and (3) Total

Evaluated Price (TEP).

2.2.2. Completeness – The Government will review the pricing submissions for completeness and compliance with the RFP. Incomplete price submissions will NOT be evaluated and the proposal may be eliminated from the competition.

2.2.3. Price Reasonableness – The Offerors price proposal will be evaluated using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404-1 (Proposal Analysis Techniques). Generally, adequate price competition will satisfy the criteria for price reasonableness.

2.2.4. Total Evaluated Price (TEP) – The TEP will be calculated as the sum of the proposed prices for the base period and all options (including FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services) the price(s) proposed for the last ordering period will be multiplied by 150 units for a total price of that 6 month option and will be included in the total evaluated price (TEP). The TEP will be used for evaluation purposes only; evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

The TEP is for award purposes only and is not contractually binding; however, all prices that comprise the TEP are contractually binding and thus all prices must be populated. An omitted price may result in proposal elimination.

2.2.5. Unbalanced Pricing – Offerors are cautioned against submitting an offer that contains unbalanced pricing. Unbalanced pricing may increase performance risk and could result in payment of unreasonably high prices. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques. The Government shall analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to separately priced line items or subline items. Offers that are determined to be unbalanced may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

2.3. Technical Factor

2.3.1. The Technical Volume will be evaluated for acceptability in accordance with the criteria set forth in this section. The Offeror’s Technical Volume must convey to the Government that the Offeror is capable, possesses adequate technical expertise and experience, possesses sufficient resources, and is able to plan, organize, and use those resources in a coordinated and timely fashion to meet the needs of the Government. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s Technical Volume to ensure that each requirement in the PWS is addressed adequately. The Technical Volume shall explain how the contractor will accomplish/satisfy the requirements. The Technical Volume shall NOT simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet the requirements in the PWS. If an Offeror rephrases/restates the PWS, their Technical Volume will be unacceptable.

2.3.2. The Government Technical Evaluation Team will evaluate the technical proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning one of the ratings in the table below. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. The

Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. The proposals shall be evaluated against the Technical

Sub factors and all requirements found in the PWS.

2.3.3.

Rating Description

Acceptable The proposal meets specified minimum requirements necessary for acceptable contract performance.

Unacceptable The proposal fails to meet specified minimum requirements necessary for contract performance. Proposals with an unacceptable rating are not awardable.

3. The proposals will be evaluated against the following sub factor criteria:

3.1. Sub factor One: The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they use impregnating materials that are rated for service at 400 degrees Fahrenheit, IAW PWS paragraph 2.6. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

3.2. Sub factor Two: The offerors proposal must show that they have equipment and experience for acid pickle process, IAW PWS paragraph 2.3. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

3.3. Sub factor Three: The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they have micrometers calibrated to +/-

0.0005” or better for dimensional measurements, IAW PWS paragraph 2.4. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

3.4. Sub factor Four: The offerors proposal must demonstrate that they have a vacuum impregnation chamber large enough to process and impregnate magnesium B-52 brake housings that are approximately 26.5” in diameter and ~ 4.0” high. (Acceptable/Unacceptable).

3.5. Past Performance

3.5.1. Past performance information may be gathered from both Government and Commercial sources.

Offerors will not be penalized if no past performance information is available. Past performance will either be satisfactory, neutral, or unsatisfactory. Satisfactory equals a neutral or determination of responsibility for past performance. The Government reserves the right to use systems and resources available to find past performance information beyond what the offeror provides.

Unsatisfactory equals a determination of non-responsibility for past performance. Any unsatisfactory rating given to a small business will be referred to the Small Business Administration pursuant to FAR 15.101-2(b) and 19.6 for resolution.

3.6. Discussions

3.6.1. It is the Government’s intent to award without discussions; therefore, it is imperative that Offerors submit their best terms initially. However, if during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, Offeror responses will be considered in making the award.

4. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or sub factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

(End of Addendum)

52.212-3 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2016)

The Offeror shall complete only paragraph (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site located at https://www.sam.gov/portal. If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (s) of this provision.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision --

“Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) Concern” means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in accordance with 13 CFR part 127. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business eligible under the WOSB Program.

"Forced or indentured child labor" means all work or service-

(1) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or

(2) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which can be accomplished by process or penalties.

“Highest-level owner” means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

“Immediate owner” means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror. Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: Ownership or interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and equipment, and the common use of employees.

“Inverted domestic corporation” means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).

“Manu…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .