PWS.docx

Performance Work Statement

(PWS)

for

Multi-Platform Sustainment Engineering Services and Support Contract For the Air Force Sustainment Center 848th SCMG For FD20301802020

Rev L, 12 Sep 2018

Prepared by:

848 SCMG

Oklahoma City Air Logistics Complex (OC-ALC) Tinker Air Force Base (TAFB), Oklahoma 73145

WARNING

This document contains technical data whose export is restricted by the Arms Export Control Act (Title 22, USC, Sec. 2751 et seq) or the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, Title 50, USC, App. 2401, et seq. Violations of these export laws are subject to severe criminal penalties. Disseminate in accordance with provision of DoD Directive 5230.25.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D

Distribution authorized to the Department of Defense and US DOD Contractors, Critical Technology. Other requests shall be referred to 424 SCMS/GUEA.

DESTRUCTION NOTICE FOR UNCLASSIFIED/LIMITED DOCUMENTS

Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document

Table of Contents

PARAGRAPH PAGE

2.0 Service Summary 13

ACRONYM LIST

1.0 SECTION I – DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

1.0.1 This Performance Work Statement (PWS) describes and defines the types of engineering tasks that will be performed by the contractor to support Air Force Sustainment Center (AFSC) 848 Supply Chain Management Group (SCMG) engineering. 848 SCMG engineering is delegated certain Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness (OSS&E) authority. In order to execute the authority vested in 848 SCMG, access to all relevant technical data is required. The Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) retains large amounts of data required to support OSS&E functions associated with the acquisition, repair, remanufacturing, and overhaul of stock listed items managed by 848 SCMG. This is because the OEM designed and/or specified major components of many weapon systems. The types of engineering tasks requiring access to this data include qualifying sources of supply, analyzing design data, resolving diminishing manufacturing sources and material shortages, developing fabrication/repair procedures, developing fabrication/repair fixtures, evaluating damage, evaluating repairs, system integration, and developing technical order source data.

1.0.2 This multi-platform contract provides the 848 SCMG engineering with a vehicle to receive engineering assistance and solutions from the OEM on issues affecting structures, avionics, accessories, ground support, and commodity items managed by the 848 SCMG for which the OEM holds the rights to the data required to produce said assistance or solutions. These commodity items are used on B-1, B-2, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC-135, and AGM-86 weapon systems. The Contractor must have access or can obtain access, and the rights to access, B-1, B-2, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC-135, and AGM-86 OEM internal data systems to retrieve weapon system design data.

1.0.3 Contractor employees shall identify themselves as Contractor personnel by introducing themselves or being introduced as Contractor personnel and displaying distinguishing badges or other visible identification for meetings with Government personnel. In addition, Contractor personnel shall appropriately identify themselves as Contractor employees in telephone conversations and in formal and informal written correspondence.

1.0.4 Emergency Procedures: Contractor employees shall follow the direction of Government employees in regards to emergency procedures, i.e. fire, tornado, active shooter, bomb threats. It is the responsibility of the Contractor to provide guidance and establish procedures for responding to an emergency for their employees. It is the Contractors' responsibility to account for their employees following an emergency evacuation. Contractor Personnel shall participate with Government personnel in all fire and tornado drills at no additional cost to the Government.

1.1 Recurring Engineering Services

The Contractor shall provide engineering services as defined in the specific Technical Inquiry (TI) and Engineering Assignment (EA). The Contractor shall supply the resources needed to effectively and efficiently manage the accomplishment of the task covered by the requirement. Resources shall include: Contractor design, modification, and production data, along with personnel with special skills such as aerodynamics, structural and electrical design, stress analysis, corrosion, maintenance planning, non-destructive inspection, technical writing, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Designated Engineering Representatives (DER).

Note: The only persons who may request services within the scope of an authorized engineering assignment are the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) or their delegate as listed in the attachment. Only the PCO may approve changes in any of the requirements under this contract. Any change made at the direction of any other person will be considered to have been made without direction.

1.1.1 Weapons System Support

The Contractor shall provide engineering services to maintain a continuous engineering program in support of the commodity type items used on B-1, B-2, B-52, C-17, E-3, F-15, KC-135, and AGM-86 for which the original equipment design activity, or the original design specification activity retains the data rights, or the items exist under a Proprietary Limited Rights legend.

1.1.2 Program Management

1.1.2.1 The Contractor shall provide program management to ensure planning, scheduling, control, and performance of the TI and EA requirements. Program management may include conducting management reviews with the Government of the construction of schedules, Funds Expenditure Reports (FERs), spend plans, periodic Task Status Reviews (TSRs) to assure all products and services are accomplished and delivered per the specific requirements. Track and evaluate all TIs and EAs for compliance with cost, schedule, and performance requirements utilizing a data management system (henceforth referred to as the data system).

1.1.2.2 The Contractor shall provide for, via the data system, the integration, integrity and availability of data to facilitate information sharing between the Contractor and the Government. Make the information available for reviews to assist in managing schedule, cost and performance. This includes the tracking of EA submittals, revisions, letters, deliverables, closures, events, and other actions as specified in each TI or EA. Performance thresholds are: 85% of all EAs started in a particular contract year are completed on time, and 100% shall be completed with only one modification to increase period of performance; 85% of all EAs started in a particular contract year are completed on budget, and 100% shall be completed with only one modification to increase funding; 80% of all EAs started in a particular contract year shall meet all requirements as originally awarded, and 100% shall meet requirements with only one modification to reduce requirements.

NOTE: The data system Commodities Engineering Data Management System (CEDMS) is an automated program management system hosted on a Contractor server that is available for sharing across processes and platforms under this contract. The Contractor shall use the data system to enter data into a relational database management system, review data that is in the database, download data from the database, and use data to control applicable contractual process flows. The automation may be a portion or all of a process including EA revision, contract letter development and submittal, and technical inquiry development and response.

1.1.2.3 The Contractor shall track and evaluate all EAs (in-work and authorized) for compliance with cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements. Evaluate problems, processes, procedures, and analyze data, records, technical orders, specifications, and drawings to develop recommendations for problem resolution. At the request of the Government MESPM or designee, provide short duration support by telephone, E-mail, VTCN, or other electronic means. In those instances where the support by electronic means is impractical, provide personnel at the specified location(s) as defined in each EA or TI and in accordance with the Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).

1.1.2.4 The health of the spares supply chain is at risk resulting in significant delays in obtaining quality parts, increased cost, and increased contract terminations. Due to unique and highly specialized technical requirements, OEM expertise shall be provided to enhance Government engineering and logistics for items managed by the 424th SCMS.

1.1.2.4.1 The ability to repair and re-procure Government items is becoming increasingly complex due to the divergence commonality within the mission design series of parts. As a result, product definition has deteriorated to the point that engineering projects are often required before re-procurement or repair of spares can take place. This is due to many factors, including, but not limited to: configuration drift of parts and aircraft over time, the existence of two different drawing repositories (Government and OEM), obsolescence of original materials and manufacturing processes, tooling that is either lost, in poor condition, or inappropriate for 21st century use, and a diminished supplier base.

1.1.2.4.2 The Contractor shall analyze all Joint Engineering Data Management Information and Control System (JEDMICS) Engineering Change Orders (ECOs) applicable to future requirements and document the results.

1.1.2.4.3 Review and reconcile JEDMICs ECOs with the Government Joint Program Office (JPO) engineer.

1.1.2.4.4 Review, assess applicability, and document all Time Compliance Technical Orders (TCTOs) and Technical Order (TO) changes that affect the as built configuration or ability to produce identified parts.

1.1.2.4.5 Review, evaluate, analyze and document tooling requirements.

1.1.2.4.6 Resolve aircraft spare parts non-conformities identified in Tasks 1 through 3 as requested by the Government.

1.1.2.4.7 Support JPO in evaluating technical data packages and tooling requirements for single/sole source Boeing parts. Prepare Statements of Work (SOW) for required items. Consult with Government engineers to clarify item requirements and configuration.

1.1.2.4.8 The Contractor shall support the integration of Government and Contractor drawing repositories in order to obtain the correct configuration for the spares supply chain.

Note: Configuration of the most appropriate item may belong to the Government, or a Contractor or possibly a combination of both.

1.1.2.4.9 Optimize the Government first article process to prevent multi-year delays in obtaining serviceable parts for the operational Air Force lines.

1.1.2.4.10 Identify and contact the relevant Government and Contractor subject matter experts to clarify design decisions and resolve critical configuration issues which prevent the re-procurement and repair of serviceable spares.

1.1.2.4.11 Obtain, review, and revise limited access engineering drawings, specifications, and design documents, when requested using: Work Stoppage (WST), AF Form 202, TO Validations, Verifications, Updates, and Corrections (TOS), Suggestion evaluations (SUG), Mishap Support, and ECO (AF Form 3925).

1.1.2.4.12 Use technical expertise to obtain and interpret Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) specifications, OEM proprietary stress analysis documentation, original design data, and engineering test data.

1.1.2.4.13 Identify fleet usage and mission requirements in the applicable Boeing proprietary data bases and analyze how a change in these requirements affects the spares supply chain.

1.1.2.4.14 Obtain, review, and change limited access engineering drawings, specifications, and design documents to Institute Item Unique Identification (IUID) requirements on commercial derivative platforms.

1.1.2.4.15 Survey tooling, storage costs and inventory records (Government and Contractor) to develop a comprehensive approach to manage tooling in the most effective manner possible.

1.1.2.4.16 Review and coordinate changes to Contractor limited access engineering drawings, specifications, and design documents to develop tooling (assembly/alignment jigs) for use in the Management of Items Subject to Repair (MISTR) repair shop.

1.1.2.4.17 Survey Government and Contractor composite repair technologies and processes for incorporation into the improvement of stock listed parts.

1.1.2.4.18 Prepare status reports. (DI-MGMT-80368A/T, CDRL: A00A)

1.1.2.4.19 Prepare an annual report summarizing the efforts of this task. (DI-MISC-81384/T, CDRL: A00F)

1.1.2.4.20 Performance will be evaluated as follows. Command202: Greater than 85% on time with technically acceptable answers is satisfactory; Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers is very good; and 100% on time with technically acceptable answers is exceptional. Command202 on time is defined as 5 business days for work stoppage, and 15 business days for non-work stoppage. DLA form 339: Greater than 88% on time completion is satisfactory; Greater than 96% on time completion is very good; and 100% on time completion is exceptional. First article test: Greater than 85% completed on time is satisfactory; Greater than 92% completed on time is very good; and 100% completed on time is exceptional.

1.1.3 Principal Point of Contact

The Contractor shall designate a program manager who shall be the principal Point of Contact (POC) on all matters relating to this requirement. The POC shall be responsible for integrating all activities, which may include engineering, configuration management, quality assurance, logistics, technical publications, material/sub-contracting, program management, finance, and material/travel requirements, to assure timely responses to Government requests.

1.1.4 Government Property Management

1.1.4.1 The Contractor shall administer a program to safeguard, secure and condition Government Furnished Property/Equipment (GFP/E). Identify GFP requirements on EA(s) when such items are needed. Maintain and report Government Property at the beginning of each option year exercised and at the end of the last option year exercised. (DI-MGMT-80269/T, CDRL: A00P)

1.1.4.2 The Contractor shall provide engineering support to items that have been identified by the Government as being Nuclear Weapon Related Material (NWRM). Special accounting and reporting of these assets’ location and condition are required and will be specified on the EA. Performance threshold is 100% inspection of GFP annually.

1.1.5 Configuration Management

The Contractor shall maintain and ensure compliance with the Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) program used under the applicable platform.

1.1.6 Data Management, Automation and Delivery

1.1.6.1 The Contractor shall implement, maintain, and ensure compliance with the data management procedures used under the applicable platform. Track the delivery of all data items. Generate, store and submit data generated as a result of this contract via the data system. Data generated as a result of the contract and not required to be submitted by CDRL shall be identified and the items shall be digitally available via the data system.

1.1.6.2 Classified documents requested to meet the requirements of this effort shall be sent via normal procedures used for classified data. Classified Non-CDRL documents shall have unclassified titles and shall be identified in the TI or EA closure plan. Generate, store, and submit unclassified CDRL and data electronically in the data system.

1.1.6.3 The Contractor shall revise the CDRL address/office symbol location for those Government agencies requiring CDRL submittals when formal notification of address/office change is received from the agency.

1.1.7 Engineering Data / Document Files

The Contractor shall retain drawings, specifications, and engineering data/document files at the Contractor’s facilities to support this requirement. This data shall include applicable change documentation to clarify and correct discrepancies or update previously delivered drawings or technical orders. The Contractor requires access to JEDMICS as part of this support.

Note: Data generated under this contract shall not be marked proprietary.

1.1.8 Quality Assurance Program

The Contractor shall perform Quality Assurance in accordance with internal policy and/or the applicable platform procedures for efforts under this requirement.

1.1.9 System Safety Program

The Contractor shall ensure compliance with the applicable platform weapon system safety requirements for efforts under this requirement.

1.1.10 Task Status Review and Meetings

1.1.10.1 The Contractor shall conduct a Task Status Review (TSR) every quarter to include meetings and reviews of all EAs. TSR content shall include, as a minimum, the following items: TI status; EAs awaiting action; EA revisions in-work; action item status from the previous TSR; EAs closed since previous TSR; residual funds available; open commitment status; forecast date for closure of completed EAs; FER for EAs, and cost reimbursable travel.

1.1.10.2 The current funding status of EAs shall be provided in the FER. The Contractor shall support other meetings, briefings, conferences, reviews or Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs), as directed. Develop and distribute agendas, preparation material, minutes and monitoring of action items for closure. Performance threshold is more than 90% of reported information on all tasks shall be less than 45 calendar days out of date, and 100% of reported information shall be less than 90 calendar days out of date. (DI-FNCL-81537/T, CDRL: A003, DI-ADMN-81249A/T, CDRL: A004, DI-ADMN-81373/T, CDRL: A006, and DI-ADMN-81250A/T, CDRL: A005)

1.1.11 Proposal Activity, EA Task Definition, Estimating and Revisions

1.1.11.1 The Contractor shall provide customer support on all EA preparation requests submitted by the Government. Also, develop Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) EAs comprised of a problem statement; background; proposed solution; task description; Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) requirements; cost estimates for labor, travel, and material; ground rules or other special conditions; period of performance; and schedule(s) with milestones and deliveries, as appropriate. For Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF), CPFF, develop price proposals, to include costs for development of estimates and prices, upon receipt of a Request for Proposal (RFP) from the PCO. These RFPs shall include the developed EAs, CDRL requirements; and periods of performance, and will identify required estimating and pricing detail. The EA format is shown in Attachment B of this PWS.

1.1.11.2 The Contractor shall, upon request from the Government, prepare and submit a FFP proposal for program management. The FFP proposal effort for program management shall include contract administration, and database management/updates. Performance threshold for all EA preparation requests in proposal format will be completed (tasking definition and pricing) within 30 calendar days under TINA and 45 calendar days for over TINA proposals

1.1.12 EA Preparation, Submission, and Task Change Request (TCR)

1.1.12.1 The Contractor shall prepare and submit both new EA(s) and TCR(s) in an electronic format approved by the Government Multi-platform Engineering Services Program Manager (GMESPM) or PCO designee, with details and rationale for labor, material and travel requirements. Ensure that the system engineering process is used when specifically required by an EA(s). Accounting Business Unit (ABU) rates will be negotiated within 20 days upon Engineering Assignment Coordination.

1.1.12.2 The Contractor shall, upon request from the GMESPM, or designee, assist the Government with identified and defined EA revision requirements.

1.1.13 Change Analysis and Coordination

The Contractor shall provide on perform a technical review of ongoing program actions and tasks initiated by any source through the PCO against any stock listed item of the weapon system. Determine the potential impact of hardware/software changes on the elements of the weapon system and make recommendations to the Government. Inform the PCO of any situation or anticipated problems that may adversely affect the fulfillment of any requirement for this contract via written notification.

1.1.14 Technical Inquires (TI)

The Contractor shall provide customer support on all TI requests submitted by the Government and respond to inquiries from the GMESPM, or PCO designee for engineering assessments and information on questions relating to design data, flight test data, qualification tests, performance, reliability and other areas of interest or concern. This list shall in no way limit the topics that can be discussed when dealing with TI(s). Such responses shall draw on Contractor experience and readily available engineering data. When requested by the GMESPM or PCO designee, provide copies of said engineering or technical data. In the event that the TI is expected to exceed 21 hours, notify the GMESPM for consideration to authorize the effort as a separate EA. Maintain a log of technical inquiries, approximate time spent, parties involved, and subject. This log shall be made available to the AF for review in the data system. Performance expectations are as follows: 85% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is satisfactory; 92% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is very good; 100% of TIs completed on time with technically acceptable answers is exceptional. On time is defined as 5 business days for urgent TI’s and 10 business days for routine TI’s. Inquiries shall be considered routine unless they are designated as urgent at the time they are submitted.

1.2 Engineering Services

The Contractor shall provide engineering services as authorized by EAs and shall respond to EAs worked under this contract. Unless otherwise specified in the applicable EA, adhere to all performance and interface requirements of the system specifications for the applicable platform and all sub-tier specifications, applicable documents, and design documents shall be adhered to. 85% of all EAs started in a particular contract year are completed on time, and 100% shall be completed with only one modification to increase period of performance; 85% of all EAs started in a particular contract year are completed on budget, and 100% shall be completed with only one modification to increase funding; 80% of all EAs started in a particular contract year shall meet all requirements as originally awarded, and 100% shall meet requirements with only one modification to reduce requirements.

1.2.1 Data

The Contractor shall deliver data and documentation as specified in each EA’s CDRLs. CDRL deliverables other than those in the data system (drawings, T.O.s, etc.) shall have a data entry reference put in the data system. Performance threshold is that 95% percent of all deliverables are submitted to the Government per CDRL and 100% will be submitted per modification of contract.

1.2.2 Meetings

The Contractor shall support meetings, briefings, conferences, reviews, or TIMs. Support shall include coordination with designated Government personnel, development and distribution of agendas, preparation of briefing material, preparation and distribution of minutes, and monitoring action items for closure.

1.2.3 EA Revisions

In coordination with the Government, the Contractor shall identify and define EA revision requirements. Preparation and submission of the EA revision will occur under paragraph 1.1.11. Performance evaluation of individual EA’s will include the number of times a revision is made to increase period of performance, increase budget, or reduce the scope of work. Performance evaluation of the contract shall include the number of times a revision is made to increase period of performance, increase budget, or reduce the scope of work on all EA’s awarded during the base or any option year. No more than three contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes are satisfactory. No more than two contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes will result in a very good rating. Only one contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes will result in an exceptional rating.

1.2.4 Associate Contractors

The Contractor shall prepare, execute, and maintain Associate Contractor Agreements (ACAs) when required.

1.2.5 Configuration Management

The Contractor shall identify any unique Configuration Management requirements for each EA.

1.2.6 Quality Assurance

The Contractor shall identify any unique Quality Assurance requirements for each EA.

1.2.7 Safety

The Contractor shall identify any unique safety requirements for each EA.

1.2.8 System Engineering

The Contractor shall ensure that system engineering process is used when specifically required by EA(s).

1.2.9 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS)

Unless otherwise authorized by the Government, the Contractor shall ensure (based on the most currently available data) any product acquired, modified, or developed under this contract are free of known DMSMS impact at time of selection.

1.2.10 Contractor Manpower Reporting

1.2.10.1 In accordance with the SAF/AQ Memorandum dated 13 November 2012, The Contractor and Subcontractors(s) shall report all Contractor and Subcontractor labor hours required for performance of services under this contract via a secure data collection site. Performance by Boeing Commercial Airplanes, in support of this contract shall not be included in the contract labor reporting requirements. The Contractor and Subcontractor(s) will enter CMR data into DoD's Enterprise-wide Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) not later than 31 October each year for the just completed Government Fiscal Year (FY). This applies to all services including imbedded services equal to or greater than the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) provided in support of Task Orders, engineering assignments or modifications authorized after the incorporating of this requirement/clause into the contract. Services are defined in FAR 37.101. The Contractor and Subcontractor(s) are required to completely fill in all required data fields using the following secure web address: https://www.ecmra.mil/

1.2.10.2 The Contractor and Subcontractor(s) will use the Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) Contractor and Subcontractors Users Guide and the Frequently Asked Questions for instructions on how to input the required information. The guides and frequently ask questions are available at the CRMA link above. The prime contractor will flow this requirement to all Subcontractors meeting the SAP threshold and verify with Subcontractors that inputs are being accomplished as required. In accordance with (lAW) CMRA Contractors User's Guide, the only Contractor that can view the Invoice Amount, Direct Labor Dollars and Direct Labor Hours is the user that enters its original data. All other data is public information. Subcontractors(s) will not be able to view prime Contractor data entered for the Invoiced Amount, Direct Labor Dollars and Direct Labor Hours. At no time will any data be released to the public with the Contractors' name and contract number associated with the data. In accordance with the CMRA Subcontractor User's Guide, only the Subcontractor can input its own data. In addition, the only Subcontractor that view the Direct Labor Dollars and Direct Labor Hours is the user that entered its original data. All other data is public information. Prime Contractors will not be able to view Subcontractor's data entered for the Direct Labor Dollars and Hours. In the event a Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Department of Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) or Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS) clause is established to support CMRA implementation, the Contracting Officer and prime Contractor will review the implementation guidance and determine if it will supersede this special clause and take appropriate action, including the prime Contractor reserving its rights to any equitable adjustment that may be due, in order to incorporate any new clause(s as may be required.

2.0 Service Summary

Contractor Performance Evaluation

2.0.1 The Contractor shall ensure the performance objectives, performance thresholds, and support for surveillance methods are achieved as follows:

2.0.2 The Contractor shall achieve performance thresholds identified in Table 1 below.

2.0.3 The Contractor shall be aware that the evaluation of performance will occur when the Government evaluates the service of the Contractor to determine whether or not it meets the performance measures of the contract. In the event the performance measure is not met, Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will issue written notification to the Contractor. In those cases, the PCO will take appropriate measures. The Contractor shall have fourteen (14) days to submit a corrective action plan to remedy the performance issue.

Table 1

Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers (Urgent) Very Good

100% on time with technically acceptable answers (Urgent) Exceptional

Greater than 85% on time (10 business days) with technically acceptable answers (Routine) Satisfactory

Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers (Routine) Very Good

100% on time with technically acceptable answers (Routine) Exceptional

Review of customer request log, web site, and Customer Complaint Record Forms.

Review of TI’s for WS 5 days and NonWS 15 days metrics

Review of customer request log/ web site, and Customer Complaint Record Forms

100% shall be completed with only one modification to increase period of performance.

Yearly reviews of EAs and reports

100% shall be completed with only one modification to increase funding.

Yearly reviews of EAs and reports

100% shall meet requirements with only one modification to reduce requirements.

Yearly reviews of EAs and reports

Greater than 92% on time with technically acceptable answers (Very Good)

100% on time with technically acceptable answers (Exceptional)

Review of 202’s for Work Stoppage 5 days and Non-Work Stoppage 15 days metrics

Greater than 96% on time completion (Very Good)

100% on time completion (Exceptional) Review DLA 339 Metrics and Integrated Engineering Support (IES) database timelines

Greater than 92% completed on time (Very Good)

100% completed on time (Exceptional) Review of Integrated Engineering Support (IES) database timelines

100% shall be submitted per modification of contract.

Reports and customer complaints

100% of reported information shall be less than 90 calendar days out of date.

Quarterly meetings

Yearly inspection of GFP records

No more than two Contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes (Very Good)

Only one Contract modifications in relation to period of performance changes (Exceptional) Number of Period of Performance contract modifications

ATTACHMENT A Applicable Documents and Other Requirements

Unless otherwise specified in the applicable Engineering Assignment (EA), Contractor procedures and processes listed below shall be used to the maximum extent possible, provided results are in compliance with the intent and objectives of the work authorized. The documents listed below form a part of this PWS only to the extent specified herein.

NA-97-1363

Current Version

B-1 Configuration Management/Data Management (CM/DM) Plan

SS2569AO1C

Current Version

B-1B System Specification

EngrSvcs-RD-20 Jul 98

Requirements Document for B-52 Fleet Support Program

NA-93-1636

Current Version

Integrated System Safety Program plan for the B-1B Conventional Mission Upgrade Program and SIES

NA-96-1423

Current Version Accident Prevention Safety Program Plan for B-1B Conventional Mission Upgrade Program & BONE Delivery Orders

BMS-QM-112

Current Version

Quality Manual

D500-14800 Current Version

Quality Assurance Manual

8427025

USAF E-3 (MELD Mission Equipment Location Data

D204-14772-1, -2, 3 and D204N14772-1, -2, -3 and all subsequent Government approved revisions and dash numbers

Configuration Baseline Documents

R-14876-1

USAF E-3 Modification Summary Report

R-N30017-1

E-3 Modification Summary Report

MIL-STD-100E

Engineering Drawing Practices

MIL-T-310

Technical Data Packages, General Specification for

MIL-STD-882D

Standard Practice for System Safety

Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing

MIL-HDBK-1530

General Guidelines for Aircraft Structural Integrity Program

ASMP, OCT 1997

Aircraft Sustainment Master Plan

2182001D

System Specifications for the ALCM

2182002E

Part I Development Specification

D541-10086-1 (S)

Addendum Specification for B-52/ALCM

AFI-91-103

Air Force Nuclear Safety Certification Program

AFI 63-125

Nuclear Certification Program

AFI 91-205

Non-Nuclear Munitions Safety Board

AFM 91-201

Explosive Safety Standards

DI-9000/ISO 9001 & 9002

Quality Standard

D950-10000-1

Government Property Control

DOD 4000.25-1-M

MILSTRIP

S756-10100

CALCM AGM-86D System Specification

D541-10192-1

ALCM/CALCM Configuration and Data Management Plan

D500-12523-1

WDMC Configuration Management Plan

D675060000-1 thru -10 and -12 thru -29 B-52 Mod Planning Guide

ATTACHMENT B Engineering Assignment Form

Engineering Assignment

The Boeing Company

CONTRACT TYPE:

BUYER:

COMPETITION CODE:

ORGANIZATION:

PHONE NUMBER:

FAX NUMBER:

TITLE

PROBLEM

APPROVALS

DESCRIPTION.

APPROVALS

ATTACHMENT C Technical Acceptance Letter

Predicated on a Technical review of the Title of drawing, modification or change

List of drawings -

The Government hereby accepts the Technical Data Package and approves it for submission and acceptance by AFLCMC/EZGEM SO-Tinker organization at the Oklahoma City data repository.

Government Engineer Organization Date

ATTACHMENT D – Data Item Description (DID) List

The following DIDs apply to this contract:

09/12/2018 1 FD20301802020