FA811720R0010_Section_J_Attachments.pdf

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title: COMMERCIAL ASSET VISIBILITY (CAV) REPORTING

Number: DI-MGMT-81838 Approval Date: 20110914 AMSC Number: N9211 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility: SA/WSS 071.02 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship:

The Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV) application provides a web-based, automated method of tracking Government owned reparable assets as they flow through the repair cycle at the contractor's repair facility. The main purpose of CAV is to provide an inventory management system for reparable assets while they are at commercial repair vendors. CAV on the World Wide Web allows the contractor to report transactions as they occur. These transactions automatically update the CAV database. An integrated, relational database allows the commercial repair vendors to access their repair data to produce all of the required status and activity reports.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement, as delineated in the contract.

Requirements:

1. Format. The CAV System transactions are processed via the World Wide Web. Input formats and methodology are defined in the Contract Statement of Work.

2. Content. The Contractor reporting shall contain the following transactions, status code changes and report types, as described in the Contract Statement of Work:

A. Receipt of Asset

1) On Contract

2) Not on Contract

3) Procurement

4) "A" Condition

5) Rotable Pool

6) Loaned Asset

B. Inductions C. Items Awaiting Parts D. Re-inductions E. Completions F. Shipments

DI-MGMT-81838

G. Bulk Shipments H. Proof of Shipment I. Items that are Beyond Economic Repair (BER) J. Survey/Scrap Items K. Reversals L. Report of Discrepancies M. Print DD Form 1348's N. Print Material Movement Documents O. Print CAV Inventory Labels P. Print Item Action Reports Q. Print Repair History Reports R. Print Condition Code Reports S. Print Awaiting Parts Report T. Print Proof of Shipment Reports U. Perform Item Maintenance V. Print Report of Discrepancies (RODs) W. Add and Delete Carriers

3. End of DI-MGMT-81838.

Title: CONTRACT DEPOT MAINTENANCE (CDM) PRODUCTION REPORT

Number: DI-PSSS-81995 Approved Date: 20150904

AMSC Number: 9576 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: 11 (AFMC/A4) Project Number: PSSS-2015-009

Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship: The Contract Depot Maintenance (CDM) Production Report is a two-part report which provides the Government with monthly maintenance production figures, status and accountability of assets at the contractor facility, performance to schedule, anticipated production for the next month, and a summary of unresolved problems at the end of the report period.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format, content and preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.

b. This DID may be used on any depot level maintenance contract.

Requirements:

1. Format. This report shall be provided in the format of Table I.

2. Content. The report shall consist of two parts and contain the following information:

a. Part I:

(1) As of date: The year, month and day applicable to the report. Data must be through the end of the month.

(2) Block 1, Issuing/Procuring Agency. Include address and Point of Contact.

(3) Block 2, Contractor and activity address code (AAC). The name of the business and the DoDAAC assigned to your business for shipment of material.

(4) Block 3, Contract number and Program or Weapon System supported.

(5) Block 4, Government item manager or technical Point of Contact.

(6) Block A, Item identification. The National Stock Number (NSN), A-1 is the Federal Supply Class (FSC) and A-2 is the National Item Identification Number (NIIN) of the item being reported.

(7) Block B, Delivery/Call Order number. When the awarded contract is a call/delivery order type, this is the applicable order number. When an item is awarded on more than one order, it is repeated for each order until completed. If the current report completes the call, the word “completed” will be added.

(8) Block C, The contract line item number (CLIN). The CLIN assigned to the NSN in the contract.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

DI-PSSS-81995

(9) Block D, The document/voucher number the item was received under. The document number listed on the shipping documentation the item was received against.

(10) Block E, Quantity on contract or call. E-1 is the quantity of the end items to be repaired on each call/delivery order or contract quantity when orders do not apply. E-2 is the total quantity scheduled for repair cumulative to date.

(11) Block F, Reparables received. Number of reparable items received for repair. F-1 is the quantity of reparables received during the report month. F-2 is the quantity of reparables received cumulative from the start of the contract through report month.

(12) Block G, Reparables inducted into repair during report month.

(13) Block H, Reparables on hand. Number of reparables on hand waiting induction into repair.

(14) Block I, Quantity produced. The quantity produced during the month.

(15) Block J, Serviceables shipped. Serviceables shipped from repair facility. J-1 is the serviceables shipped through report month. J-2 is serviceables shipped cumulative from start of contract.

(16) Block K, Serviceables on hand. The quantity of serviceables on hand awaiting shipping action.

(17) Block L, Quantity condemned. The quantity condemned. L-1 is the quantity condemned during report month. L-2 is the quantity condemned cumulative from start of contract.

(18) Block M, Forecast to complete. The quantity of items scheduled to be produced next month.

(19) Block N, Report date. Enter date of report.

b. Part II, Production problems. Report shall be in narrative format and only required if:

(1) Previous reports production forecast was not shipped.

(2) Current forecast does not equal contract scheduled quantity.

(3) Contract anticipates a problem in the near future.

DI-PSSS-81995

End of DI-PSSS-81995.

Title: GOVERNMENT PROPERTY INVENTORY REPORT

Number: DI-MGMT-80441C Approval Date: 20171101 AMSC Number: 9865 Limitation:

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable:

Preparing Activity: MDA Project Number: MGMT-2017-059 Applicable Forms: None

Use/Relationship: This report enables the contractor to periodically provide to the DoD Service/Agency an inventory listing of Government Property (i.e., both Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Contractor Acquired Property (CAP)) in the contractor’s possession (to include subcontractors) by contract.

This DID is applicable to all contracts where Government Property will be furnished by the Government (i.e., GFP) or acquired, fabricated, or otherwise provided by a contractor (i.e., CAP) in performance of a contract.

This DID contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in the solicitation.

This DID supersedes DI-MGMT-80441B.

Requirements:

Format. The report shall be electronic .xls or .xlsx compatible.

Content. The report shall contain the following columns/data fields:

Contract Number Manufacturer CAGE Code (if known) Item Name Item Description Manufacturer Name Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Model Number Material Control Number (MCN) (if applicable) Serial Number National Stock Number (NSN) Quantity Unit of Measure Unit Acquisition Cost Location Sub Location (if applicable) Unique Item Identifier (as registered in the IUID Registry) Type of Government Property (i.e., Government Furnished Property (GFP) or Contractor Acquired Property (CAP) Classification of Government Property (i.e., Communication Security (COMSEC), Equipment (EQP), Material (MAT), Special Test Equipment (STE), or Special Tooling

(ST))

DI-MGMT-80441C

Posting Reference Date of Transaction / Date of Acquisition Date Placed in Service Date of Last Physical Inventory Condition Code

END OF DI-MGMT-80441C

Title: Technical Order Improvement Report and Reply Number: DI-TMSS-80229D Approval Date: 19991006 AMSC Number: F7356 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility: F–MSG/ILMP Applicable Forms: AFTO Form 22 Use/relationship: a. This Data Item Description contains the format and content preparation in-structions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.

b. This item is applicable to contracts where the contractor is responsible for operating and main-taining Air Force centrally-acquired and managed equipment according to procedures in published TOs. Additional information and guidance is contained in TO 00-5-1, available through the Internet at http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/toprac/to-syste.htm under the link to “Technical Orders.”

c. This data item supersedes DI-TMSS-80229C.

Requirements:

1. Format. Paper or electronic format (EF) AFTO Form 22, Technical Order Improvement Report and Reply, or message/e-mail containing the same information. Electronic forms are available from the web site listed above.

2. Content.

2.1. REPORT DATE. The date the Improvement Report Number is assigned.

2.2. Block 1, TO (Major Command or Equivalent). The complete address of the Administrative or Procuring Contracting Officer (ACO/PCO).

2.3 Block 2, TO (T.O. Manager). The address of the TO Manager responsible for the deficient TO as indicated in the TO Index. (Addresses are available on the Air Force TO System Information Internet Page, http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/toprac/to-syste.htm.)

2.4. Block 3, FROM (Product Improvement Manager or Equivalent). The address of the reporting organization's Quality Assurance function which reviewed and approved the form for submission.

2.5. Block 4, TECHNICAL ORDER DATA. The Technical Order Number (Record Positions (rp) 6-30) and the Improvement Report Number (rp 31-45). Only one character is used in each position.

Rp 5 is left blank. Capital letters and slashed zeros ( /0) (if completing by hand) are used. Specific entry formats:

a. TECHNICAL ORDER NUMBER. The basic TO number (only) as it appears on the title page. Parentheses and dashes are used, but not blanks. Unused positions through rp 30 are left blank. When a change affects a TO supplement, the supplement’s number is referenced in block 11A.

b. IMPROVEMENT REPORT NUMBER. All positions (rp 31-45) are alpha-numeric char-acters (only). Rp 31 is a pre-printed “2.” Rps 32-33 will be “4N” to indicate contractor submission.

Rps 34-38 will be the contractor’s Commercial And Government Entity (CAGE) code number from the H4/H8 cataloging handbooks. Rps 39-40 may be used for internal identification or may be ze-ros. Rp 41 is the last digit of the calendar year. Rps 42-44 are the sequential numbers (starting with

“001”) of the reports submitted in the calendar year. Rp 45 indicates the urgency category of the report (E for Emergency, U for Urgent or R for Routine – see TO 00-5-1 for definitions).

2.6. Block 5, BASIC DATE OF T.O. The first date appearing on the lower right corner of the TO Title page.

2.7. Block 6, DATE/NO. OF CHANGE. The change number and date, if any, appear just under the TO's basic date on the title page. If there is no change listed, block 6 may be left blank or have N/A entered.

2.8. Block 7, PAGE NUMBER. The first page affected by the proposed change. Additional pages should be indicated in Block 11A. For work cards, the routine number and card number (e.g., TR3.1, Card 2 of 3).

2.9. Block 8, PARAGRAPH NO. The number of the paragraph to be changed or which precedes added material, the grid number for microfiche, or the System/Subsystem/Subject Numbers (S/S/SN) for manuals using this system. When multiple paragraphs are affected, the range (e.g., 5-1 thru 5-5).

2.10. Block 9, FIGURE NO. Used when illustrations or tables are involved. "Table" is used before the number if applicable.

2.11. Block 10, AFTO 22 TYPE. Two check boxes indicating whether the AFTO Form 22 is being submitted to make a Correction to the TO (see TO 00-5-1, para 5-2.1 for definitions), or an Im-provement to procedures or processes which, while correct as written, can be performed bet-ter/faster/cheaper/safer, etc.

2.12. Block 11A, BRIEF SUMMARY OF DEFICIENCY AND RECOMMENDED CHANGE (Use continuation sheet, if needed). Completed as follows:

a. For work package TO reports, the first entry in this block is "APPLICABLE TO WP NUM- BER xxxxx."

b. Identity of the military system when this is not included in the TO number. If not a system, identity of commodities by Mission/Design/Series (MDS) or Type/Model/Series (TMS) and Na-tional Stock Number (NSN) or part number. Omitted for general purpose Methods & Procedures TOs (MPTOs).

c. Brief description of the TO deficiency and reason for change. When appropriate, identity or copy attached of the source document for changes in voltage, part number and so forth.

d. The recommended changes worded as closely as possible to the exact language which should appear in the corrected TO. If the correction will require engineering research or extensive verification, the type of correction ("Add more in-depth fault isolation procedures.") and a statement such as "Unable to develop at local level."

e. Continuation sheets, if needed, shall show the improvement report number in the upper right hand corner of each sheet. (The EF version of the AFTO Form 22, available from the ACO/PCO, includes a continuation sheet with automatic entry of the improvement report number.)

2.13. Blocks 11B & 11C, SAVINGS/YR – DOLLARS and SAVINGS/YR – MANHOURS. These blocks are for rough order of magnitude (ROM) estimates of annual saving (in dollars and man-hours) resulting from the TO change recommendation. If minimal or no savings are anticipated, leave the blocks blank.

2.14. Block 12, REPORTED BY (Initiator’s Signature, Off Symb, Phone). Signature, printed or typed name, and office symbol of the individual reporting the problem or enhancement. Telephone number (Defense Switched Network (DSN) number preferred, if available) where individual can be contacted during normal duty hours.

2.15. Block 13, APPROVED BY (Supervisor’s Signature, Off Symb/DSN). Same as Block 12 for the initiator’s supervisor.

2.15. Block 14, PIM OR EQUIVALENT (Signature/Off Symbol/DSN). Same as Block 12 for the Product Improvement or Quality Assurance representative who reviews and approves the form for submission.

2.16. Blocks 16 & 17, TO. These blocks contain the same addresses as Blocks 1 and 3. They are auto-filled by the EF version of the form.

3. (Information Only).

3.1. Block 15, MAJOR COMMAND ACTION. Blocks 15A through 15C are left blank unless the reported improvement/correction could cause a change in contract scope or cost. In this case, the blocks are completed by the Procuring or Administrative Contracting Officer (PCO/ACO). Reports are routed through the weapon system’s or commodity’s Lead Command point of contact for review (Blocks 15D through 15F), unless specifically exempted by the Lead Command.

3.2. PART II, Blocks 19 thru 27. Completed by the government during evaluation of the improve-ment report.

End of DI-TMSS-80229D.

Title: TEARDOWN DEFICIENCY REPORT

Number: DI-PSSS-81534A Approved Date: 20160608

AMSC Number: F9670 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: 11 (AFLCMC/EZSC) Project Number: PSSS-2015-024

Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship: The Teardown Deficiency Report provides a factual narrative analysis of a deficiency which has been noted on equipment.

a. This Data Item Description (DID) is applicable when contractors are responsible for maintaining custodial records for government property being repaired.

b. This DID contains the format, content and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in the solicitation.

c. This DID supersedes DI-ALSS-81534.

Requirements:

1. Reference documents. None.

2. Format.

3. Content. This report shall include an analysis of the deficiency which includes cause of failure, recommended corrective action and recommendations for actions to prevent recurrence of the failure/deficiency, and the applicable category of the failure defined as follows:

a. Workmanship and non-conformance. Any deficiency (e.g., physical, chemical, electrical, functional) noted in materiel which is attributed to non-conformance to applicable specifications, drawing, standards, or Technical Order (TO); or workmanship during manufacture, repair modification or maintenance.

b. Material failure. The failure of an end item which was attributable to neither the repair nor the manufacturing process, but was due to an unpredictable failure of an internal component or sub-assembly.

c. No defect found/could not duplicate: Investigation of the exhibit revealed no deficiency.

Equipment conforms to specifications and TO standards and procedures.

d. Technical data, deficiency: Technical data (including TOs, drawings, and work specifications) was deficient or inadequate so as to cause the deficiency/failure on the item.

e. Field induced deficiency. Deficiency confirmed by the investigation to have been caused by operator error, i.e., wrong voltage applied, misaligned, maladjusted, mishandling, or not used for intended purpose.

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

DI-PSSS-81534A

f. Maintenance deficiency. An unfavorable characteristic of an item that impedes the accomplishment of maintenance operations which results in excessive maintenance operations and/or in excessive maintenance man-hour consumption.

g. Design deficiency. A condition that limits or prevents the use of material for purpose intended or required where the material meets all other specifications.

h. Handling or shipping deficiency. A deficiency induced by improper handling or shipping, i.e., improper packaging, which prohibits the use for intended purpose.

i. Packaging specifications inadequate - not complied with. Unsatisfactory conditions including item damage resulting from improper packaging.

End of DI-PSSS-81534A.

TITLE: COUNTERFEIT PREVENTION PLAN

Number: DI-MISC-81832 Approval Date: 20110121 AMSC Number: 9181 Limitation:

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No Office of Primary Responsibility: NRO Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/Relationship: The Counterfeit Prevention Plan will be used by the procurement activity to determine and evaluate the effectiveness of the contractor’s counterfeit protection plan and award fee.

a. This Data Item Description contains the format and content preparation instructions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirements delineated in the statement of work.

b. This DID is related to Parts, Materials and Processes Selection List (PMPSL).

c. This DID is related to “As Designed” and “As Built” Parts List.

d. The Counterfeit Prevention Plan will be updated as counterfeiting methods evolve to include any new indicators, as well as new prevention processes needed (either discovered directly or provided by the Government).

Requirements:

1. The Counterfeit Prevention Plan shall be in contractor format and shall include the following, as a minimum:

a. Procurement practices and procedures to include procurement of all parts and materials from original qualified parts/materials equipment manufacturer (OEM) or it franchised/authorized distributor.

b. Procurement practices and internal processes used for exceptions to buying from OEM or OEM franchised distributors in cases where items are no longer available including a process to qualify/certify non-OEM parts & materials.

c. Monitoring procedures to include the delivery of test results from random sampling and supply chains surveillance that does not assume any source is safe to identify possible penetration of OEM supply chain.

d. Training/certification program for receiving inspectors.

e. Process to verify counterfeit.

f. Processes to identify, store, and report counterfeit parts.

g. Process to ensure subcontracts contain the following requirements (As a minimum):

(1) Requirements to procure only from Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) or OEM franchised distributors

(2) Procurement practices and internal processes used for exceptions to buying from OEM or OEM franchised distributors including a process to qualify/certify non-OEM parts & materials obtained

(3) Requirements to monitor supply (including delivery of test results from random sampling and supply chain surveillance that does not assume any source is safe) to identify possible penetration of OEM supply chain

(4) Training/certification program for receiving inspectors

(5) Process to verify counterfeit

(6) Processes to identify, store, and report counterfeit parts.

(7) Notification procedure (tailored to specific sub-contractor based on following Notification Procedure)

h. Self-audit of internal processes.

i. Monitor processes at all subcontractor levels processes and verify compliance through on-site audits.

j. Notification Procedure:

(1) Step 1: The contractor shall quarantine all suspect products pending further direction. The contractor shall provide a statement, with problem description, justifying why this is considered suspect and how it was detected. The contractor shall NOT notify the supplier that the items are suspected as being counterfeit items. However, consultation with the OEM is authorized. Make certain the parts and all members of the lot procured for use on this contract are stored in correct environmental controls. These parts need to be protected as evidence.

(2) Step 2: Contractors that identify suspect items shall immediately notify their customer that is the next link toward the prime contractor.

Notification shall be passed up the customer chain until reaching the prime contractor. The prime contractor shall immediately notify the cognizant Contracting Officer (CO) and Contracting Office Technical Representative (COTR) of all suspect items identified.

(3) Step 3: The contractor shall make certain that the original documentation is secured as evidence and maintain any and all documentation associated with the part to include:

a. Part information such as part identifying number, lot date code, manufacturer information and originator/point of contact information

b. Any information reflecting part procurement/acquisition traceability which should include a copy of the purchase order, any and all correspondence between the buyer and the supplier to include: e-mails, records of phone conversations and paper letters of correspondence

c. Part documentation from the purported original manufacturer, distributors and suppliers (certificate of compliance and certificate of conformance)

d. All visual examination and physical analysis/testing results and the technical data package showing that the parts passed the required screening and qualification tests

e. List of company products affected

(4) Step 4: Determine that the part is or is not counterfeit (Usually accomplished as part of root cause analysis of non-conforming parts and/or materials)

(5) Step 5: If the parts are found to be counterfeit, they shall be isolated and controlled pending direction from law enforcement.

(6) Step 6: The contractor shall provide any additional required information to the government’s investigation team

END OF DI-MISC-81832

Title: ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL (ECP)

Number: DI-SESS-80639D Approval Date: 20150407

AMSC Number: N9521 Limitation: N/A

DTIC Applicable: No GIDEP Applicable: No

Preparing Activity: NM Project Number: SESS-2015-011

Applicable Forms: DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP)

Use/relationship: An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) provides the documentation in which the engineering change is described and how the proposed change will be implemented.

a. This DID contains the format, content, and intended use information for the data deliverable resulting from the work task described in paragraph 3.3.1 (1) of EIA-649-1 and the principles of EIA-649.

b. This DID may be used in conjunction with DI-SESS-80642, Notice of Revision (NOR). A requirement for NORs should be contractually imposed in conjunction with this DID.

c. This DID supersedes DI-CMAN-80639C and DI-SESS-81880.

d. Copies of these standards are available online at http://www.sae.org or from SAE International, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001, Tel 877-606-7323 (inside USA and Canada) or 724-776-4970 (outside USA).

e. An electronic version of DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), is available online at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/forms/index.htm.

Requirements:

1. Reference Documents. The applicable issue of the documents cited herein, including their approval dates and dates of any applicable amendments, notices, and revisions, shall be as specified in the contract.

2. Format. The ECP shall be in one of the following formats:

a. DD Form 1692, Engineering Change Proposal (ECP),

b. The schema required by the Acquirer s Integrated Digital Environment (IDE), or

c. The Supplier s preferred format.

3. Content. The ECP shall contain all the information in DD Form 1692.

End of DI-SESS-80639D

Title: BILL OF MATERIALS (BOM) FOR LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN RISK

MANAGEMENT

Number: DI-PSSS-81656B Approval Date: 20160901 AMSC Number: N9724 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: No Preparing Activity: SA Project Number: PSSS-2016-021 Applicable Forms: N/A

Use/relationship: The Bill of Materials (BOM) will provide information that can be used to establish the production status of parts used in a system. The BOM will also provide Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) management essential information that enables the identification, forecasting, mitigation, and management of Hardware and Software obsolescence as a part of System Life Cycle Management responsibilities. The data will be used in DMSMS forecasting tools to allow for standard and efficient sharing of information on common items.

The BOM will also provide logisticians and supply chain risk managers with additional data they require to ensure supportability requirements and supply chain risks are identified or mitigated during the development of a system.

This Data Item Description (DID) contains the format, content, and intended use of information for the data product resulting from the work task described by the contract.

The data may be obtained during any program life cycle phase.

This DID supersedes DI-PSSS-81656A.

Requirements:

1. Format. The BOM shall be in a format similar to that of Figure 1.

2. Content. The BOM shall contain all of the information specified in Figure 1, with the path to the system level identified using the part/Next Higher Assembly method detailed in the table.

All fields shall be included. Fields which do not require data shall be left blank. The information shall be included to the lowest indenture level (component level) specified in the contract

26 DEC 2019

i

FD2030-20-00793

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE SUSTAINMENT CENTER

TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA 73145

Performance Work Statement (PWS)

TYPE OF WORK: Repair of C130H Air Speed Computer and Pressure Altimeter

PURCHASE REQUEST: FD2030-20-00793

REVISION: 00 DATE: Dec 26, 2019

PREPARED BY:

Robert L Smith

422 SCMS/GUMC

TINKER AFB, OK. 73145-3031

DSN 339-3443

ii

FD2030-20-00793

REVISION SHEET

Note: All revisions to the contents of this PWS will now be listed on this Revision Sheet. The original content of this PWS will not be removed, but will be superseded or added to by the paragraph revisions shown on this page.

Revision Date Paragraph Paragraph is added or revised to read as follows:

No revisions iii

FD2030-20-00793

PREFACE SHEET

END ITEM RECEIVED AS END ITEM TO BE DELIVERED AS

END ITEM NO NATIONAL STOCK

NO(S)

PART NO(S) NATIONAL STOCK

NO(S)

PARTS NO(S)

0001 - Pressure Altimeter 6610-01-212-6464 518-28007-921 6610-01-212-6464 518-28007-921 0002 - Air Speed Computer 6610-01-101-1905 630-37070-235 6610-01-101-1905 630-37070-235 iv

FD2030-20-00793

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REVISION SHEET ii

PREFACE SHEET iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS iv

1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES/GENERAL INFORMATION 1

1.1 PURPOSE 1

1.2 INITIAL PRODUCTION EVALUATION (IPE) REQUIREMENTS 1

1.3 QUALITY PROGRAM AND INSPECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 2

1.4 OBSOLESCENCE STATEMENT 3

1.5 CONDEMNATION CANDIDATES 3

1.6 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE), INCLUDING SPECIAL TOOLS (ST) AND SPECIAL

TEST EQUIPMENT (STE) 3

1.7 PRECIOUS METALS RECOVERY PROGRAM 4

1.8 NUCLEAR HARDNESS REQUIREMENT 5

1.9 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT 5

1.10 PARTS CONTROL PROGRAM 5

1.11 COUNTERFEIT PREVENTION PLAN (CPP). 6

1.12 OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES (ODS) 8

1.13 LEAD (Pb) FREE ELECTRONICS 8

1.14 TECHNICAL ORDER MAINTENANCE 9

1.15 CONTRACTOR IDENTIFICATION 9

1.16 GENERAL WORK REQUIREMENTS 9

1.17 SPECIFIC WORK REQUIREMENTS 10

1.18 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS 13

1.19 SAFETY AND HEALTH REQUIREMENTS 13

1.20 PRODUCTION SURGE PLAN 13

1.21 MISSION ESSENTIAL SERVICES 14

1.22 DELIVERY SCHEDULE 14

1.23 INFORMATION REQUESTS 15

1.24 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 15

2 SERVICE SUMMARY 17

v

FD2030-20-00793

2.1 SERVICE SUMMARY 17

3 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 19

3.1 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, AND PROPERTY 19

3.2 DISPOSITION OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 19

3.3 REPORTING LOSS OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 19

3.4 DISCREPANCIES INCIDENT TO SHIPMENT 20

APPENDIX A 22

Definitions 22

APPENDIX B 26

Applicable Documents, Technical Orders, Directives, and Technical Guidance 26

APPENDIX C 29

Contractor Full-Time Equivalent Reporting 29

APPENDIX D 30

Data Item Description (DID) List 30

APPENDIX E 31

Category of Repair Descriptions 31

APPENDIX F 32

CAVAF CFM Reporting Requirements Error! Bookmark not defined.

FD2030-20-00793

1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES/GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1 PURPOSE

1.1.1 The purpose of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) is to define the repair requirements for the items specified on the Preface Sheet of this PWS. The Contractor is responsible for having the repair capabilities to include appropriate technical data, repair documents, and license agreements, required to accomplish this repair. The Contractor is responsible for the scheduled delivery of a quality product.

1.2 INITIAL PRODUCTION EVALUATION (IPE) REQUIREMENTS

1.2.1 An Initial Product Evaluation(IPE) is not required if the contractor is the OEM or is the incumbent repair contractor, however, if the Contractor moves this workload to a new facility, or novates/divests his rights during the life of this contract an IPE may be required at the Governments discretion.

1.2.2 If an IPE is required:

All Support Equipment, including Special Tools and Special Test Equipment required to accomplish the scope of work to be completed on end-items under this contract shall be in possession of the Contractor prior to the Initial Production Evaluation (IPE) team visit. Such equipment is listed in the Technical Orders or OEM repair procedures listed in Appendix B of this PWS.

The Contractor shall show documentation certifying the accuracy of all calibrated SE to the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) prior to work being performed, as outlined in this PWS, paragraph 1.7.2, Support Equipment Calibration Requirements.

The IPE will be conducted on three units of each line item. The condition of the items at IPE will be as follows: one unit removed from shipping container and packaging and ready to follow the entire repair procedure, including disassembly and functional testing, one unit fully disassembled, cleaned, and ready for assembly and functional testing, and one unit assembled and ready for functional testing. The Contractor shall furnish a written notice to the PCO through the ACO within fifteen (15) calendar days after the required quantity of units are available for the IPE.

1.2.3 The PCO will notify the Contactor of the projected dates that the Government IPE Evaluation Team will arrive at the Contactor’s facilities to conduct the IPE. The Contractor shall permit the Government’s IPE Evaluation Team members entrance into its facilities. This includes access to Contractor telephones and other communication devices that will allow the Government IPE Evaluation Team members to consult with appropriate Government personnel in the accomplishment of the IPE evaluation.

1.2.4 Under no circumstances shall the Contractor accomplish repair on any other quantity of items on order. Other than the three IPE units that will be evaluated by the Government IPE Team members prior to the accomplishment of the IPE. Only after written approval of the IPE by the cognizant Engineer and/or Equipment Specialist (the Government IPE Evaluation Team Leader)

FD2030-20-00793

and direction of the PCO shall the Contractor proceed with repair on the remaining items on order. The Government’s delivery schedule will be IAW IPE CLIN Order as negotiated.

1.3 QUALITY PROGRAM AND INSPECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

1.3.1 The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain a quality system as a means of ensuring that the end item conforms to specified requirements. The quality system shall be in accordance with contract requirements.

1.3.2 The Contractor shall assist the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) investigation of all Deficiency Reports (DRs) submitted against reportedly defective items repaired by the Contractor to determine the root cause for deficiencies reported by the customer. The Contractor shall ensure each DR is processed in accordance with (IAW) T.O. 00-35D-54, USAF Deficiency Reporting and Investigating System, and investigation results reported IAW Data Item Description (DID) DI-PSSS-81534A within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of deficient part. When the Contractor receives a DR the Contractor shall ensure DR responses include: Analysis of data to determine extent and cause of deficiencies, analysis of trends in processes or performance of work to prevent recurrence, and introduction of required improvement, corrections, and monitoring of the effectiveness of corrective action taken. Timely correction and reporting of defects found and corrective action to prevent repeated discrepancies shall be an integral part of the Contractor’s procedures. Corrective action will extend to the performance of all subcontractors. When defective trends begin to develop or when the specific cause(s) of defects that render a product unserviceable cannot be identified and corrected without an evaluation of an exhibit, such exhibit(s) shall be requested by the Contractor for purposes of investigation.

1.3.3 The Contractor shall report any Government Furnished Property (GFP), for the work accomplished as outlined in this PWS that is damaged, malfunctioning, or otherwise unsuitable for use to the ACO using a Report of Shipping (Item) and WebSDR. Reports shall be accomplished in accordance with the current issue of T.O. 00-35D-54.

1.3.4 The Contractor shall support quality audits as required by the ACO. These audits could require that one or more end items be removed from the production line and subjected to any combination of inspection, testing, disassembly, or assembly, to determine that the standards of performance and technical conformance meet the requirements of this PWS. Upon completion of the quality audit, the Contractor shall incorporate into the repair process such corrective action(s) as are necessary to eliminate the cause(s) of any defects as directed by the ACO.

1.3.5 The Contractor shall support quality assurance reviews to be conducted at the site of repair at the request of the Government throughout the contract period.

1.3.6 The Contractor shall support a quality acceptance review by the DCMA representative at the site of repair for each end item generated under the terms of this contract.

1.3.7 Requests for deviation/waiver shall be submitted to the PCO through the ACO. Work shall not be initiated on assemblies/components affected by deviation/waiver pending approval/disapproval.

Requests shall include the consideration to be provided if the government accepts the deviation and, where applicable, the following: contract number; NSN and P/N of end item and lowest part/assembly affected, a complete description of the contract requirement affected and the nature of the deviation, effect on cost/price and delivery schedule, description of deviation/waiver, FD2030-20-00793 number of units (and serial numbers as applicable) to be delivered in this configuration, any impacts to logistics support element, justification for deviation/waiver, and information on remedial or corrective actions to prevent recurrence.

1.4 OBSOLESCENCE STATEMENT

1.4.1 The Contractor is responsible for identifying sources for required components prior to commencing work under this contract. Upon receipt of the contract or subsequent delivery order, the Contractor shall identify any required components that are no longer available. Within thirty

(30) calendar days after receipt of this contract or subsequent delivery order, the Contractor shall notify the ACO in writing if it is unable to perform the contract or delivery order due to unavailability of required components, and that there is no suitable substitute available for such component. The notification shall include supporting documentation showing the Contractor has made a reasonable effort to obtain the parts and is unable to do so. The government may consider an equitable adjustment in the specification, delivery time/or price rather than terminating the contract or delivery order.

1.5 CONDEMNATION CANDIDATES

1.5.1 The Contractor shall repair all items unless the ACO provides direction in writing that a particular item is excluded from these requirements. The Contractor shall report end items that have been determined to be Beyond Economical Repair (BER) in which the repair cost will exceed 75% of the latest procurement cost amount. The contractor shall provide pictures of each BER item in JPEG format, as well as the estimated cost of hours and parts to bring the part to serviceable condition. The Contractor shall report condemnation candidates to the PCO through the ACO within thirty (30) calendar days of discovery. The Contractor shall not condemn repairable or recoverable items without prior approval of the PCO through the ACO. The Contractor shall ensure non-repairable items are disposed of IAW the Contractor’s Government-approved property procedures.

1.5.2 The Government reserves the right to accept or reject the BER assessment by the Contractor.

1.5.3 The disposition of condemned items will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the PCO.

1.6 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE), INCLUDING SPECIAL TOOLS (ST) AND

SPECIAL TEST EQUIPMENT (STE)

1.6.1 The Contractor shall provide the necessary equipment required to disassemble, analyze, troubleshoot, repair, and test assets, assemblies and/or parts that are maintained under this contract.

1.6.2 The SE required to accomplish the scope of work to be completed on end-items under this contract is listed in the Technical Orders (TOs) or original equipment manufacturers (OEM) repair procedures listed in Appendix B of this PWS. If the equipment specified in the TO or OEM repair procedures is not designated as Government furnished in the contract, the Contractor shall be responsible for furnishing identical or suitable substitute SE from commercial sources.

FD2030-20-00793

1.6.3 If the Contractor intends to substitute SE, a list of the proposed substitute SE shall be provided to the PCO with the proposal. If a Pre-Award Survey (PAS) is required, at the time of the PAS conference, the Contractor shall demonstrate to the PAS team that suitable substitute SE can be acquired and meets the standards stipulated in the technical data or OEM repair procedures by the following actions:

Displaying drawings, schematics, or specifications which illustrate that the prospective Contractor understands the exact nature of the work to be performed and the SE required performing the tasks.

Explaining the capabilities of substitute SE to ensure that it is adequate to perform the specified testing requirements.

Defining how substitute SE will be designed, built, and calibrated without assistance from the Government, by an internal engineering capability, or the services of a recognized outside engineering agency as approved by the cognizant engineering activity.

1.6.4 The equipment shall be in possession of the contractor prior to the Initial Production Evaluation (IPE) team visit if an IPE is required.

1.6.5 The Contractor shall show documentation certifying the accuracy of all calibrated SE to the ACO prior to work performed as outlined in the PWS.

1.6.6 Support Equipment Calibration Requirements. The Contractor shall ensure documentation certifying the accuracy of all calibrated SE is made available to the ACO prior to performing work. The Contractor shall ensure SE calibration is maintained throughout the performance of this contract. Upon request, the Contractor shall show calibration data to the ACO for each SE item as follows:

a. SE part number and serial number

b. Date calibrated

c. Calibration due date

d. Calibration source

e. Calibration procedure used

f. Is and was data

g. Facsimile of the current stamped calibration sticker affixed to SE item

h. Verification of full performance compliance IAW this PWS for SE items that received a limited calibration or not requiring calibration

i. Traceability to the National Institute of Standards and Technology

1.6.7 Repair Line Maintenance. The Contractor shall maintain repair lines needed to accomplish the scope of work to be completed on end-items under this contract.

1.7 PRECIOUS METALS RECOVERY PROGRAM

1.7.1 The handling and control of precious metals shall be IAW AFI23-101, AIR FORCE MATERIEL

MANAGEMENT.

FD2030-20-00793

1.8 NUCLEAR HARDNESS REQUIREMENT

1.8.1 Overall nuclear hardness of the system/subsystem shall not be reduced due to the repair procedures. Nuclear hardness requirements cannot be waived. The Contractor shall notify the PCO if the work degrades the nuclear hardness of the item within one (1) business day of determination. The Contractor shall not continue maintenance actions until Government approval is obtained from the PCO.

1.9 CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT

1.9.1 Engineering Change Proposal (ECP): The Contractor shall submit to the PCO, who shall inform the appropriate government entity of any change notice, design change notice, engineering order, engineering change order, engineering change notice, specification change notice or other change that would affect the configuration of the item. Any changes made without written approval from the contracting agency shall require removal at the Contractor’s expense.

The Contractor shall request government approval of all ECP changes, including substitute parts changes, through Notice of Revision (NOR) within five (5) calendar days of receipt of the Delivery Order. ECPs shall be submitted in accordance with (DID) DI-SESS-80639D. ECPs submitted shall be technically accurate, complete, clearly written, and systematically account for the proposed configuration changes. The NOR is forwarded to the custodian of each specification, drawing, associated list, or other applicable document(s) so they can make the required documentation changes.

1.9.2 Configuration Change: Changes to the configuration shall be made only when approved by the Cognizant Engineer. Examples of such changes are ECPs generated as the result of diminishing sources, reliability and maintainability, safety, and preferred spares. Records shall be maintained which readily and systematically account for configuration changes from the baseline configuration.

1.10 PARTS CONTROL PROGRAM

1.10.1 The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain an internal parts control program (PCP) for the work associated with this PWS.

1.10.2 The Contractor shall establish the Program Parts Selection List (PPSL) for an end-item or system from the applicable documents in the following order of precedence:

a. Illustrated Parts Breakdown (IPB) TO

b. OEM Parts List.

1.10.3 Contractor shall obtain approval through the PCO to use any parts not contained in the PPSL.

The Contractor shall maintain configuration of items worked under the scope of this contract as identified in the applicable end-item or system IPB TO or OEM Parts List if there is no IPB TO.

The Contractor shall notify the PCO via e-mail of any configuration discrepancies noted between the applicable IPB and OEM Parts List, the engineering drawings, and the current configuration of the end-item. The Contractor shall obtain written authorization from the cognizant engineering activity through the PCO for deviations from the IPB or OEM Parts List prior to implementation.

FD2030-20-00793

1.10.4 Contractor shall ensure all Contractor Furnished Material (CFM) or parts used for replacement equals or exceeds the quality of the original material or parts. The material or parts shall be entirely suitable for repair of the end item for its intended purposes, and shall be completely interchangeable without alterations of either the subassemblies or the end item. The Contractor shall only use replacement parts purchased directly from the end-item OEM or purchased from DLA. In the event that parts are not available from either of these two sources for a pending repair operation, the Contractor shall receive written authorization from the cognizant engineering activity through the PCO for any deviations from the aforementioned sources. In the instance that surplus components are available, the cognizant engineering activity reserves the right to approve or disapprove the material. Contractor shall obtain written authorization for its usage from the cognizant engineering activity through the PCO.

1.10.5 The Contractor shall keep records for the life of the contract to allow traceability of the sourcing of replacement parts for each end item repaired. These records shall be furnished for inspection upon Government request.

1.11 COUNTERFEIT PREVENTION PLAN (CPP).

1.11.1 Contractors that supply electronic parts or systems that contain electronic parts shall establish policies and procedures to avoid, detect, mitigate and disposition counterfeit electronic parts to prevent such parts from entering the USAF/DoD supply chain. These policies and procedures shall be documented in a CPP for submission and approval in accordance with (DID) DI-MISC- 81832 and accomplished for all specified contract items. DI-MISC-81832 is applicable to Parts, Material and Processes Selection (PMPS) associated with delivery of systems and assemblies to the USAF and DoD. The requirements established by DI-MISC-81832 also apply to electronics components procured in sustainment of such systems and assemblies. The requirements of the recently DoD-adopted SAE 5553, Aerospace Standard, Counterfeit Electronics Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition shall also apply.

1.11.2 At a minimum, the CPP shall address:

1.11.2.1 Applicability: The Contractor shall identify all Business locations and programs to which the CPP applies. The CPP shall address materials, hardware, electronic parts, and procured assemblies.

1.11.2.2 Parts Availability and Use of Parts Brokers: The Contractor shall not procure materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts from parts Brokers when available from Original Manufacturers (OM) or their Authorized Distributors. In cases where materials, systems, assemblies, subassemblies or parts are no longer available from the OM or their Authorized Distributors, procurement from Brokers may be authorized as defined by the Contractor’s policy and their CPP. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.1, 4.1.2.e., appendix A)

1.11.2.3 Procurement Policies: The Contractor shall provide and implement policy directing development and implementation of business practices and procedures, and processes to prevent procurement of Counterfeit materials and parts. The Contractor shall identify the appropriate office(s), business units, functional organizations, and programs, which shall have responsibility for development, maintenance and implementation of the CPP. The CPP shall

FD2030-20-00793

identify the specific roles and responsibility for each. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

1.11.2.3.1 Risk Assessment. The Contractor shall address the risk of using unknown sources and or unauthorized suppliers in the CPP. Application or technical risk assessments shall establish the effect that counterfeit parts may have on performance. Vendor or source of supply risk assessments shall establish the potential for obtaining counterfeit parts. Using any risk analysis tool acceptable to the Government, the Contractor shall conduct a risk assessment based upon item characteristics and how likely it is that a counterfeit part will be received. The Contractor shall identify and describe in the CPP how parts are selected for assessment and what risk is acceptable based upon the parts design, construction, material and functional requirements. As a minimum, analysis shall be completed for flagging high risk items, such as items that are obsolete, discontinued, rare, etc. The Contractor shall require completion of a trade study, documented within the CPP that shall facilitate determining whether 100% testing of parts procured from after-market sources is more cost effective than qualification or requalification of a manufacturer. (Ref. AS5553, paragraph 4.1.2, 4.1.3, appendix B, C, D)

1.11.2.4 Detection and Avoidance Responsibilities: The Contractor shall establish processes for the review and approval of Contractor and applicable subcontractor systems for the detection and avoidance of counterfeit electronic parts and suspect counterfeit electronic parts, which processes shall be comparable to the processes established for contractor business systems under section 893 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4311; 10 U.S.C. 2302 note).