IAC Industry Day 7Mar2012 FINAL.ppt

PPT presentation 5 MB Posted

Attached to
Homeland Defense and Security Technical Area Tasks (HDTATs)
Solicitation number
FA8075-12-R-0002
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_3_HD_TATs_RFP_SF30.doc DOC document
HD_TATs_RFP_Compiled_QandA_11Dec12.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_2_HD_TATs_RFP_SF30.doc DOC document
HD_TATs_RFP_Compiled_QandA_6Dec12.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment_1_HD_TATs_RFP_SF30.doc DOC document
ESG_HD_TATs_RFP.doc DOC document
Pre-Solicitation_Notice.docx DOCX document
HD_TATs_Draft_RFP_Compiled_QandA_Final_08Oct12.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_HD_TAT_RFP.doc DOC document
Industry_Day_7Mar12_QA_Final.docx DOCX document
Industry Day Attendees 7Mar12.xls XLS spreadsheet
Draft_HD_TATs_PWS.docx DOCX document
HD_TATs_Special_Notice.doc DOC document
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Agenda

TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston

“We need to strengthen small businesses, which are the backbone of our economy and critical to job creation and sustained economic growth… Expanding contracting opportunities with the Federal Government is one of the most powerful small business development tools we can utilize.”

President Obama on Small Business
http://www.whitehouse.gov/economy/jobs/supporting-small-businesses

“I can’t keep buying stuff at the prices I paid in the past.”

Maj. Gen. Wendy Masiello
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Contracting
United States Air Force
TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston

Information Analysis Centers

Industry Day

Mr. Terry Heston Program Manager, DoD Information Analysis Centers

7 March 2012

See welcome notes

TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston

The Department’s Acquisition Directive: “Do More Without More”

– Ash Carter, Deputy Secretary of Defense (former Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (AT&L))

Today’s Uncomfortable Reality
HeadlineSourceDate
Pentagon Says Projected Spending Cuts Could Undermine SecurityLos Angeles Times4 August 2011
Panetta Sounds Alarm on Threat of Pentagon Budget CutsThe New York Times3 August 2011
Defense Spending on the Chopping BlockWashington Post12 November 2011
Defense Budgets: Are Deeper Cuts on the Horizon?The Wall Street Journal26 July 2011
Debt Deal Could Cut Defense $900B Over Next DecadeUSA Today16 August 2011
Pentagon Could See Deep Cuts in Debt DealNPR.org25 August 2011
Incoming! More Defense Spending CutsTime Magazine15 July 2011

I know I don’t need to read you these headlines. Today’s uncomfortable reality is one we are all familiar with: funding is tight, and our leadership has asked us to “do more without more”

GAO Report (March 2011)*– “Reducing or eliminating duplication, overlap, or fragmentation could potentially save billions of tax dollars annually and help agencies provide more efficient and effective services.”

*GAO Report: Opportunities to Reduce Potential Duplication in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and Enhance Revenue (March 2011)

Last March, GAO released a report that highlighted several inefficiencies across the federal government. In this report, GAO calculated that we could save BILLIONS of tax dollars each year by simply reducing or eliminating duplication and overlap.

Question How do you “do more without more” AND eliminate duplication and overlap of efforts?

So, the question we are all faced with is this: how do you “do more without more” while also eliminating duplication and overlap?

Answer The Information Analysis Center (IAC) Program

The answer is simple: DoD’s Information Analysis Center Program has been dedicated to this mission for over 65 years.

Traditional Contracts IAC Contracts Limited Knowledge Base (Internal and Sub-contract) Extensive Knowledge Base (“Leverages the network” and builds on existing work at DTIC/IACs. Maintains a broad network that spans government/industry/academia.)

Deliverables Flow ONLY to Customer (Usually unavailable to others) Deliverables Flow to DTIC (Become available to the broadest possible audience for reuse. The IAC Process requires each effort to build on this historical foundation.)

Best Case Scenario: Information is reused within the company or program.

Best Case Scenario: Information is reused across the government (including contractors).

We are all familiar with typical contracts:

At best, they build on the existing knowledge of the contractor
Deliverables are read by 1 or 2 people, and end up in an over-stuffed file cabinet
Or maybe, if the program really has their act together, the deliverables are filed where that office can re-use them; but that’s the BEST CASE SCENARIO

IAC contracts are different:

IACs are chartered to establish knowledge centers that reach across government, industry and academia
These centers pro-actively pull together information in areas of strategic importance
As individual operational requirements come about, IACs leverage this knowledge base to respond to those emerging needs
Results of this new work is then fed back into the IAC knowledge base, to be reused again in the future

Through this model, the IACs take advantage of a unique characteristic of information: that it is the only commodity that increases in value the more it is used.

As historic information that may have originated in one operational context is applied in new environments, our understanding grows. In this way, the IACs build on the past in order to anticipate and respond to the evolving needs of the future.

IAC BCOs IAC TATs IAC Model BCOs Serve as Foundation for TATs

Interdependence between “Core” and TATs defined in DoD guidance
DoD Instruction 3200.14 establishes IACs to provide Core and Additional Tasks (Technical Area Tasks, or TATs)
BCO/Core establishes knowledge base in areas of strategic importance
Intent of TATs is to leverage Core knowledge base to increase efficiency and effectiveness

Here we see a graphic representation of the IAC model.

The BCO serves as the foundation. IAC BCOs are established in areas of strategic importance to serve that technical community as the central knowledge resource. What does that mean? IACs are charged not only with hosting historic research data from their technical community, but also with maintaining information on the latest developments within that community – including work by government, industry, and academia. To facilitate this, they maintain databases, publish journals, provide web-based resources, attend and host conferences, and much more. IACs also maintain a SME network, through which they reach out to key leaders and members of their technical community.

The IAC Program also offers Technical Area Tasks, or “TATs” which are externally-funded research and analysis efforts driven by emerging operational requirements. In order to increase efficiency and effectiveness in addressing today’s most challenging problems, TATs build on the knowledge base of the BCO.

Current Structure

10 Single-award IDIQ contracts for all requirements for each IAC Way-Ahead 3 Single-award contracts for the IAC Core (BCO) requirements 3 Multiple-award IDIQ contracts for TATs Defense Systems TATs Weapon Systems Survivability/Vulnerability

RMQSI

Advanced Materials Military Sensing Energetics Autonomous Systems Directed Energy Non-lethal Weapons Homeland Defense & Security TATs Homeland Defense & Security Critical Infrastructure Protection Weapons of Mass Destruction CBRN Defense Biometrics Medical Cultural Studies Alternative Energy SNIM TATs Software Analysis Information Assurance Information Sharing Knowledge Management Modeling & Simulation Some existing coverage New Area for IACs

IAC PMO (DTIC)

IAC Program Way-Ahead Scale Back IAC Overhead / Align with New Priorities Data to Decisions Cyber Science & Technology Engineered Resilient Sys, EW, Autonomy, Human Sys Counter WMD S&T Priorities Mapping:

AMMTIAC

Core & TATs

MSIAC

Core & TATs

SURVIAC

Core & TATs

WSTIAC

Core & TATs

RIAC

Core & TATs

CBRNIAC

Core & TATs

CPIAC

Core & TATs

DACS

Core & TATs

SENSIAC

Core & TATs

IATAC

Core & TATs

Cyber Security & Information Systems IAC (CSIAC) DACS, IATAC, MSIAC + new scope

Defense Systems IAC (DSIAC) WSTIAC, SURVIAC, RIAC, AMMTIAC, CPIAC, SENSIAC + new scope

Homeland Defense & Security IAC (HDIAC) CBRNIAC + new scope

The IAC Program is reshaping to respond to emerging areas of interest, while simultaneously reducing overhead and increasing opportunities for small business.

In the past, both BCO and TAT efforts were performed under the same contract. Our way ahead separates these efforts, allowing each contract to focus on the unique characteristics of either the BCO or the TAT efforts.

Core/BCO contracts will allow us to proactively build knowledge in these areas, while TAT contracts provide a cost-reimbursable avenue for customers to apply the core knowledge base to meet deeper requirements.

So far, we have awarded the SNIM contract, with 9 prime awardees. We are in source selection for the CSIAC, the BCO counterpart to SNIM; CSIAC was competed as a 100% SB set-aside. And we are about to release the formal RFP for HDIAC BCO, also as a 100% SB set-aside.

We’ll have additional detail on dollar values and schedules later in today’s presentations.

Data to Decisions Developing a Community of Practice

These next three charts provide examples of IAC work, moving from raw data to actionable information – what OASD(R&E) calls “data to decisions.”

CBRNIAC was tasked with conducting technical forums across the interagency, to facilitate information sharing and standardization in areas of technical interest. CBRNIAC conducted 4 forums on the following topics:

Bioforensics resources and repositories
Biological decontamination
Food protection from radiological threats
Biosurveillance

CBRNIAC successfully served as a third party facilitator, bringing all stakeholders together on common ground.

This is an example of the value of the IACs in bringing together stakeholders across a broad technical community to exchange information and agree on opportunities for standardization in solving the day’s most challenging technical problems.

Information Products for Operational Users

DoD scientists and engineers simply do not have the time to sift through mountains of data to uncover essential information to address emerging requirements. This situation underscores the value of and necessity for organizations that provide analysis, synthesis, and dissemination of relevant, timely knowledge and information. The Information Analysis Center Program is just such a resource.

Rather than simply providing users large quantities of raw data, leaving it to users to sift through and make sense of the details, IACs pull together data from numerous sources to create meaningful information products. These products are focused on a specific question or topic of interest. For example, State-of-the-Art Reports provide a summary of the latest in technology and practice across government, industry, and academia; here we have found some innovative practices in sectors that are not typically seen as resources for DoD (e.g., best practices in addressing the insider threat come from the private finance and entertainment industries).

Analytical Tools for Informed Decisions

IACs also provide analytical tools to help make sense of raw technical data, enabling more informed decisions. The DACS Software & Systems Cost and Performance Analysis Toolkit, or S2CPAT, is an example of one we just released (and which we continue to develop).

The goal of S2CPAT is to capture and analyze software and software engineering data, that can be used to improve:

The quality of software-intensive systems; and
The ability to predict the development of software-intensive systems with respect to effort and schedule

The toolkit allows users to search for similar software projects and use the data to support:

ROM estimates for software development effort and schedule
Project planning and management: life cycle model information, key risks, lessons learned, templates, estimation heuristics
Software engineering research

This toolkit, developed in conjunction with the University of Southern California, builds on the COCOMO model (another USC product). We have integrated data from current Air Force systems, and are finalizing an international agreement with the Australians to integrate data from upcoming modernization projects which will replace 80% of their defence infrastructure.

Better Buying Power Case Study Center for Strategic & International Studies

CSIS completed case study on IACs, reviewing alignment with Better Buying Power (aka “efficiency”) Initiatives
CSIS served as venue for then Under Secretary (now DEPSECDEF) Ashton Carter to unveil his efficiency initiatives
DTIC requested outside perspective to ensure alignment as IACs undergo restructuring
Findings: IACs are a “value-added resource” for the acquisition community
“With multiple avenues to support USD(AT&L), IACs represent an essential tool for cost-effectively fielding superior warfighting capabilities in today’s ever-changing high-technology environment.”
The restructured IAC Program will be in an even better position to improve affordability, productivity, and standardization within defense acquisition programs
CSIS identified 8 specific Better Buying Power initiatives that “would benefit most significantly” from IAC products
DTIC is working to maximize impact through restructured IACs (BCOs and TATs)

See notes on chart; add only that CSIS is a bipartisan policy institution (aka “think tank”)

IACs are a valuable resource for accessing evaluated STI culled from efforts to solve new and historic challenges
Integrate knowledge base and customer-funded work to provide increased value in a time of shrinking budgets and growing requirements

Provide tactical relevance by responding to an immediate need Develop strategic capabilities by analyzing trends and recommending improvements to the acquisition community

IACs are actively contributing to achieving ASD(R&E) imperatives
Focused on reducing development cycle, by building on existing knowledge base
Minimize unknowns by building a community of knowledge
Reduce cost and risk by identifying and applying lessons learned
Directly contribute to STEM through collaboration with academia
IACs are integrated in research communities
Composed of scientists and engineers
Closely connected to DoD labs
Reach across government, industry, and academia
IACs are directly contributing to solving immediate Warfighter needs
Currently supporting all 9 COCOMs
Technical Inquiry Service and TATs leverage knowledge base and information resources to respond to operational challenges
New structure provides sustainable value
Alignment of BCO and TAT efforts
Governance role of DTIC as sponsor
IAC role in enabling efficiencies across DoD (“Better Buying Power”)

IAC Value Proposition Leveraging Research for Operational Application

See text; highlight:

The IAC model of using evaluated STI to solve new challenges saves time and resources in a constrained environment
IACs are focused on the top priorities of the Department, integrating the work of the research community with operational users, to ensure our research remains relevant and useful
The new IAC structure provides a model for sustainable value, aligning BCO and TAT efforts, while enabling efficiencies across DoD as we focus on achieving better buying power

Information Analysis Center (IAC) Overview:

“Think Tanks” focused on topics of strategic interest to DoD Who We Are: The IACs are research and analysis organizations established by the DoD and managed by the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC), to help researchers, engineers, scientists and program managers utilize existing Scientific and Technical Information (STI). IACs establish and maintain comprehensive knowledge bases that include historical, technical, scientific, and other data and information collected worldwide. IACs also work directly with customers on Technical Area Tasks (TATs), which yield new STI; this is added to one of the ten IACs, based on its technical focus.

Our Model: Invest in areas of strategic importance; invite others to build on that foundational knowledge base.

Where We Work: The IAC Program comprises over 5,700 scientists and engineers in 49 states (+ Korea and Germany).

Top States by Jobs Produced

Virginia 1,5786. Ohio 266
Maryland 1,0437. Texas 249
Georgia 3798. Michigan 193
Florida 3079. District of Colombia 172
California 29310. Hawaii 159

Total investment was over $1.9 billion in Government Fiscal Year 2011; funds are utilized for military research and analysis, building knowledge for reuse by government, industry, and academia.

Value to the DoD Community: Customers who use the IAC program are able to save federal dollars by not duplicating work that’s already been performed while simultaneously strengthening the scientific community by adding new STI for others to use.

The IAC Program Serves as a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community, and is recognized as an “essential value-added resource for the acquisition community” by one of the world’s preeminent bipartisan policy institutions. The IACs will consolidate from 10 centers into three centers in order to reduce overhead costs, while simultaneously expanding scope.

Examples of our Work: IED Defeat, MRAP Reliability, Helicopter Survivability

What We Do: Improve productivity of researchers, engineers, and program managers in the Defense research, development, and acquisition communities by collecting, analyzing, synthesizing, and disseminating worldwide STI in clearly defined, specialized fields or subject areas.

Who We Serve: IACs serve as a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community. The IACs currently provide support to all 9 Combatant Commands (COCOMS) with over 100 researchers deployed for “in theater” support.

http://iac.dtic.mil

I’ll leave you with this chart, which summarizes who we are. More detailed information on specific IAC processes and products can be accessed via our website; the industry day charts from Oct 2010 document in detail each process and its outputs and objectives.

TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston
CBRNIAC covers 20 scope areas; individual TATs often touch multiple areas
Breakout of open TATs by scope area as follows:
Over the last 3 years, the average CBRNIAC TAT has been $5.7M
Average of 50 new TATs / year are broken out as follows:

CBRNIAC

Historical Information

Amount# TATs
>$10M8
$5M-$10M8
$2M-$5M12
<$2M22
TOTAL # TATs (3-yr avg)50
Chemical & Physical Properties (13%)Combat Effectiveness (7%)
Chemical Identification (9%)Smoke & Obscurants (2%)
Environmental Fate & Effects (12%)Demilitarization (3%)
Medical Effects & Treatment (31%)International Tech, Proliferation, & Control (7%)
Toxicology (4%)Defense Conversion & Tech Transfer (10%)
Warning & Identification (21%)Mfg Processes for NBC Defense Syst (4%)
Treaty Verification (2%)Counterproliferation (4%)
Individual & Collective Protection (25%)Force Protection (34%)
Decontamination (13%)Domestic Preparedness (32%)
NBC Survivability (11%)Counter-Terrorism (12%)

CBRNIAC TAT

Chemical Terrorism Biomonitoring Response

Objective:

The objective of task is to provide information about human exposure to chemical toxicants and their metabolites by: 1) providing literature searches to identify the present state of science in biomonitoring methods; 2) developing ways to identify and measure metabolites and other biomarkers of human exposure using modern state-of-the-art instrumentation and sample preparation techniques; 3) developing and implementing measures to ensure the integrity of samples from earliest handling to final disposition; and 4) applying the newly developed and robust methods to samples so that data are verified and validated.

Key Tasks:

Human Exposure to Chemical Agents and Toxicants
Biomonitoring Methods
Sample Collection Techniques
Analyses of Research Samples
Proficiency Testing for Biomonitoring Methods
Information Technology Solutions for Handling Laboratory Information and Analytical Data

Deliverables:

Biomonitoring Methods
Sample Collection Techniques
Analysis of Research Samples
Proficiency Testing Materials and Procedures
Information Technology Solutions for Handling Laboratory Information and Analytical Data.

Sponsor: US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), Division of Laboratory Sciences (DLS)

20th Support Command (CBRNE) Gap Analysis, Plans and SOPs

Objective:

The objective of this task is to design, develop, analyze and produce various plans and missions to refine 20th SUPCOM (CBRNE) and Joint Task Force – Elimination (JTF-E) Concept of Operations (CONOP) plans, Contingency Operations Plans (CONPLAN), Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in accordance with the military decision making process (MDMP) and the Joint Operational Planning Process (JOPP).

Continuity of Operations (COOP) planning and coordination.
CBRNE / WMD contingency planning in support of multiple Combatant Commanders (COCOM) for elimination operations.
Domestic CBRN Response Force (DCRF) operational planning & coordination with USNORTHCOM, ARNORTH, and JTF-CS.
JTF-E mission planning in support of Ulchi Freedom Guardian, Key Resolve, Liberty Focus, and other multi-national exercises.
Literature Search. The CBRNIAC shall perform a search of the DTIC and CBRNIAC databases for information relevant to this effort.
Gap Analysis, Plans and SOPs.
Planning Development and Documentation.
Readiness Mission Planning Recommendations.

Sponsor: US Army 20th Support Command (SUPCOM) Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear and High Yield Explosives (CBRNE)

Individual Protective Clothing and System Testing and Design

Objective:

The primary objective of this task is to provide test development, test analyses, and program and system analyses for individual protective clothing and system programs, addressing initiatives for individual NBC, and/or HAZMAT protection integrated equipment, such as microclimate conditioning, respiratory protection and sensors. A secondary objective is to provide technical research in support of the development of advanced CB protective textiles and prototype clothing systems and designs.

Conduct technical testing and provide analyses.
Provide technical research in the development of textiles for CB protective clothing and systems.
Market Investigations.
NBC / HAZMAT Initiative Analyses.
Chemical/Biological (CB) Protective Textiles and Systems.
Clothing Materials and Equipment Performance Assessments.
Hazard/Threat Assessments.
Test and Evaluation Master Plans.
Chemical Agent Testing Reports.
Knowledge Management.
CB Workshop Curriculum Materials.

Sponsor: US Army Research Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM) Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Warfighter Science Technology and Applied Research (WARSTAR) Directorate, Materials and Defense Sciences Division, Chemical Technology Team

Objectives
Draw from and build on Homeland Defense and Security knowledge base
Conduct HD studies, evaluations, and analyses
Promote standardization in HD technical domain across the interagency
Scope
Matrix represents technical focus areas with types of tasks across each area

Homeland Defense & Security TATs Technical Scope and Requirements

HD TAT

Scope

Technical DevelopmentEvaluationPlans & FrameworksImplementationResearch & AnalysisTraining (non-routine)O&S Developmental AnalysisSMETechnical Conferences & Meetings
HD&S
CIP
WMD
CBRN Defense
Biometrics
Medical
Cultural Studies
Alternative Energy
TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston
Full and Open Competition with a Small Business Reservation
Seeking to award 6 F&O and 4 SB reservation contracts
NAICS Code
541712, R&D in Physical, Engineering, & Life Sciences (Except Biotechnology)
500 employee small business size standard
Contract Type
Multiple Award IDIQ with capability for both cost and fixed-price orders
Contract Length
5 years (1 year Base + 4 one-year Options)
$900M Ceiling
Cumulative total for all TAT orders awarded
$2.5K Minimum Order Guarantee
Management Reporting Requirement for Base Period only (FFP CLIN)

HD TAT

Acquisition Strategy Considerations

Past Performance Tradeoff (PPT) Source Selection Process
Past performance approximately equal to cost
Rank proposals by total overall evaluated Cost/Price (lowest to highest)
FFP Management Reporting CLINs + Skill Set Cost/Pricing Matrix Model
Evaluate technical capability (Pass/Fail)
2 Sample TATs: 1 for CBRN & WMD; 1 for Homeland Defense/Security & CIP
Experience/Capability for Biometrics, Medical, Cultural Studies and Alternate Energy
Program Management Approach to managing the IDIQ contract
Top Secret Facility clearance and Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory required at time of proposal
Small Business Participation (Large Businesses only)
Subcontracting Plan to meet requirement of total obligated dollars
Assess Past Performance
RFP will specify minimum number of PP submittals required from Prime
SSA conducts best value assessment/tradeoff determination

HD TAT

Organizational Conflict of Interest with HDIAC BCO
HDIAC BCO prime contractor cannot be a prime/subcontractor on a HD TAT contract
HDIAC BCO contractor serves as a “trusted agent”
DCAA-confirmed adequate accounting system
Information for Contractors, DCAA Pamphlet No. 7641.90 (www.dcaa.mil/dcaap7641.90.pdf)
Small Business Reservation
Small Businesses can compete for SB Reservation and/or F&O pool awards
Will have to identify as part of proposal
SB Reservation Pool TAT Competitions
FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting: At least 50% of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel performed by SB contractor, assessed for each TAT
F&O Pool TAT Competitions
FAR 52.219-14 rule not applicable

HD TAT

Post Award TAT Process(es)
Advanced Planning Matrix for upcoming requirements
Review each TAT requirement for SB Reservation consideration
Quick turn assessment to determine if two or more small businesses have capability, capacity, and interest in bidding
SB representative at DTIC will facilitate a streamlined review process
Provide “Draft” documents for review/comment as applicable
Compete TAT in SB Reservation or F&O pool
Full tradeoff, PPT, LPTA

HD TAT

TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston
TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston
HDIAC BCO
100% Small Business Set-aside
NAICS Code 541712 (500 employee size standard)
RFP release in March-April 2012
DSIAC BCO and DS TATs
Market Intelligence still being conducted
NAICS Code 541712 (Size standard TBD)
DSIAC BCO PWS/RFP will be similar to CSIAC & HDIAC
DS TATs PWS/RFP will be similar to SNIM & HD TATs
Looking for best practices/examples from other programs/contracts

Future Acquisition Considerations HDIAC BCO, DSIAC BCO, DS TATs

Acquisition Process New Contract Acquisition Planning Acquisition Cycle Times

Jun
2012Dec
2012Jun
2013Dec
2013Jun
Cyber Security BCO
(DACS, IATAC, MSIAC)CSIAC BCO (Estimated 7/12 – 7/17)
Homeland Defense BCO
(CBRNIAC + new scope)HDIAC BCO (Estimated 1/13 – 1/18)

Defense Systems BCO (AMMTIAC, CPIAC, RIAC, SENSIAC, SURVIAC, WSTIAC) DSIAC BCO (Est. 10/13 – 10/18)

SNIM TATs Multiple Award IDIQ Awarded May 2010 ($2B Ceiling)

Homeland Defense TATs Multiple Award IDIQ Est. Award 10/13 ($900M)

Defense Systems TATs Multiple Award IDIQ Est. Award 1/14 ($3B)

TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston
Bottom Line Up Front
The Government is very receptive to industry input/feedback on the contemplated strategies for HD TATs, as well as DS IAC BCO and TATs procurements
Desired input includes elements of acquisition strategy, as well as post-award execution
Are there best practices / samples of approaches used on other successful programs/contracts, especially with respect to source selection/proposal evaluation approaches and ordering procedures, that would optimize opportunities for small businesses?
Are there best practices / samples of approaches… that would facilitate cost and/or time savings at either the IDIQ level or Task Order level?
DTIC has incorporated input from industry in shaping the acquisition strategies and post-award ordering processes on past acquisitions: SNIM TATs, CSIAC and HDIAC BCO, and plans to continue doing so on future awards

Industry Input Developing a “Workable” Approach

Other examples of specific questions where we are specifically seeking industry input
Do the contemplated strategies present barriers to small business participation – either at the prime or subcontractor level? If so, what are some alternatives that would remove these?
Are small businesses planning to form teaming agreements to pursue these opportunities (traditional prime/sub arrangements as well as joint ventures and mentor-protégé agreements) – if not why not?
See DoD Guidebook for Facilitating Small Business Teaming Agreements at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/osbp/doing_business/index.htm
Industry is encouraged to review latest FAR language on new “small business reservation” feature available for multiple award IDIQ contracts – see FAR 19.502-4(a)
Get ready for DSIAC BCO / TAT market intelligence
Follow-up Requests for Information (RFIs) will be posted to FedBizOpps in the coming weeks

Industry Input Developing a “Workable” Approach

TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston

Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation (SNIM) Overview:

A best-in-class contract vehicle for R&D and R&D related A&AS efforts What is SNIM: SNIM (Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation Technical Area Tasks (TATs)) is an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) focused on the areas of:

Value to the DoD Community: Customers who utilize SNIM, part of the Information Analysis Center (IAC) program, are able to save federal dollars by not duplicating work that’s already been performed while simultaneously strengthening the scientific community by adding new STI for others to use.

The IAC Program Serves: As a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community and is recognized as an “essential value-added resource for the acquisition community” by one of the world's international bipartisan policy institutions. The IACs currently provide support to all 9 Combatant Commands (COCOMS) with over 100 researchers deployed for “in theater” support.

Current SNIM Users: NAVAIR, STRATCOM, USAF Nuclear Weapons Center, AFRL, and the US Army Corps of Engineers

Quality, Speed and Ease of Use:

SNIM contractors represent the best and brightest from both industry and academia. SNIM was developed through a careful analysis of other top contracts and incorporates the best tools, techniques, and processes that simplify and speed up your contracting experience. Our average PALT is less than 75 days.

Ready to start using SNIM?

Our DTIC Customer Support Cell is on hand and ready to assist you with your requirements and walk you through the process. Learn more about SNIM and other IAC offerings at http://iac.dtic.mil/snim

Available Contractors: Nine prime contractors and hundreds of subcontractors possess the diverse capabilities and experiences to meet your mission needs.

Prime SNIM Contractors

Alion Science and Technology Corporation (Alion)
Applied Research Associates, Inc (ARA)
Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle)
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH)
ITT Corporation (ITT)
L3 Communications, Inc. (L3)
MacAulay Brown, Inc. (MacB)
Science Applications International

Corporation (SAIC) Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (Wyle)

Information Assurance -Defense Information Operations -Information Warfare Technologies Software Data and Analysis -Software Technology -Software Engineering -Software Development Contract Quick Facts: Type: IDIQ Ceiling: $2B Min TO: $2,500 Term: 5 yrs (1 Base + 4 1 yr options) Customer Shared Direct Cost Rate: 0.7% http://iac.dtic.mil/financial_mgmt.html Knowledge Management and Information Sharing -DoD-related SNIM conference, symposia, workshops

- Technical coordination and information services Modeling and Simulation -Modeling and Simulation Policy -Modeling and Simulation Practices -Emerging Technologies

Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation (SNIM) Overview:

A best-in-class contract vehicle for R&D and R&D related A&AS efforts What is SNIM: SNIM (Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation Technical Area Tasks (TATs)) is an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) focused on the areas of:

Value to the DoD Community: Customers who utilize SNIM, part of the Information Analysis Center (IAC) program, are able to save federal dollars by not duplicating work that’s already been performed while simultaneously strengthening the scientific community by adding new STI for others to use.

The IAC Program Serves: As a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community and is recognized as an “essential value-added resource for the acquisition community” by one of the world's international bipartisan policy institutions. The IACs currently provide support to all 9 Combatant Commands (COCOMS) with over 100 researchers deployed for “in theater” support.

Current SNIM Users: NAVAIR, STRATCOM, USAF Nuclear Weapons Center, AFRL, and the US Army Corps of Engineers

Quality, Speed and Ease of Use:

SNIM contractors represent the best and brightest from both industry and academia. SNIM was developed through a careful analysis of other top contracts and incorporates the best tools, techniques, and processes that simplify and speed up your contracting experience. Our average PALT is less than 75 days.

Ready to start using SNIM?

Our DTIC Customer Support Cell is on hand and ready to assist you with your requirements and walk you through the process. Learn more about SNIM and other IAC offerings at http://iac.dtic.mil/snim

Available Contractors: Nine prime contractors and hundreds of subcontractors possess the diverse capabilities and experiences to meet your mission needs.

Prime SNIM Contractors

Alion Science and Technology Corporation (Alion)
Applied Research Associates, Inc (ARA)
Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle)
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH)
ITT Corporation (ITT)
L3 Communications, Inc. (L3)
MacAulay Brown, Inc. (MacB)
Science Applications International

Corporation (SAIC) Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (Wyle)

Information Assurance -Defense Information Operations -Information Warfare Technologies Software Data and Analysis -Software Technology -Software Engineering -Software Development Contract Quick Facts: Type: IDIQ Ceiling: $2B Min TO: $2,500 Term: 5 yrs (1 Base + 4 1 yr options) Customer Shared Direct Cost Rate: 0.7% http://iac.dtic.mil/financial_mgmt.html Knowledge Management and Information Sharing -DoD-related SNIM conference, symposia, workshops

- Technical coordination and information services Modeling and Simulation -Modeling and Simulation Policy -Modeling and Simulation Practices -Emerging Technologies

For More Information visit us at: http://iac.dtic.mil

TAT Requirements Templates Getting Started with SNIM All customers who wish to use SNIM must submit a requirements package. An Ordering Guide for preparing your requirements package and filling out applicable templates can be found on our website, at http://iac/snim.html#snimtemplates. Each requirements package will consist of the following documents:

IAC Requirements Ordering Guide

IAC Requirements Package Checklist

Sample Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR)

Multiple Award Contract Task Order Performance Work Statement (PWS)

Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE)

Proposal Evaluation Plan

DD Form 254 (if applicable to your Task Order)

IAC Program Multiple Award TAT Contracts The Software Data and Analysis, Information Assurance, Knowledge Management & Information Sharing, and Modeling & Simulation (SNIM) contract was the first multiple-award IDIQ contract for the IAC Program Office. The SNIM contract was awarded 24 May 2010, consists of 9 industry leading contractors, and has a $2 billion ceiling. SNIM also offers the flexibility to utilize:

CPFF or FFP type task orders
LPTA or Trade-Off method for source selection
Incremental funding

SNIM was awarded in conjunction with and oversight of the Air Force PEO/CM. SNIM was also the first AF contract over $1 billion to go though the DPAP approval and peer review process.

SNIM is quick and easy-to-use: tools, templates, and a dedicated Customer Support Cell (CSC) assist Requiring Activities (RA) through the entire process of obtaining support from an IAC.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

<75 day average PALT Requirement added to Advance Planning Matrix

Governance Process IAC BCO, TAT, & Steering Committee

Executive Steering Committee (ESC) comprises senior stakeholders across the IAC’s technical community
ESC members have an interest in understanding:
Operational needs of the broader community
IAC work being performed in support of these requirements
ESC members bring an executive perspective on the needs and focus of the community, with specific focus on their agency
BCO provides a broad-based perspective looking across the community (strategic)
TAT work provides bottom-up information on what are the community’s needs “in the field” (operational/tactical)
ESC validates trends and future research needs
IACs provide a unique perspective for senior leaders in the IAC’s technical community
Dual efforts, both supporting research and executing operational requirements
IAC brings together information from two ends of the acquisition lifecycle: from early research to operational requirements and feedback

BCO/TAT Collaboration Building on Existing STI Pre-award literature search ensures new work builds on existing knowledge

Post-award gap analysis provides feedback to IAC BCO

Customer

PWS

IAC PMO /

CSC

IAC BCO

(lit search)

IAC PMO /

CSC

Customer (updated

PWS)

Lit Search Results

TAT

Awardee

TAT

Kickoff

TAT

Execution BCO (new research)

TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston
TimeEventBriefer
7:30 – 8:00Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria)
8:00 – 8:05WelcomeMr. Terry Heston
8:05 – 8:45IAC Program OverviewMr. Terry Heston
8:45 – 9:15HD TAT RequirementsMr. Christopher Zember
9:15 – 10:00HD TAT Acquisition Strategy ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:00 – 10:15Break (Coffee in cafeteria)
10:15 – 10:30Future Acquisition ConsiderationsMr. Jared Dostal
10:30 – 10:45Industry InputMr. Jared Dostal
10:45 – 11:15Post-Award ProcessesMr. Christopher Zember
11:15 – 11:45Q&A (open to all participants)
11:45 – 12:00Closing RemarksMr. Terry Heston
HDIAC BCO
Industry questions/comments already received
HD TATs
Draft RFP in next 45-60 days
DSIAC BCO
Sources Sought / RFI in next 30-45 days
Capability and capacity to perform BCO requirements
Industry perceived barriers to SB participation and suggestions to overcome
Draft RFP in Fall 2012
DS TATs
Sources Sought / RFI in next 30-45 days
Capability and capacity to perform in DS TAT focus areas
Input on SB size standard within NAICS Code 541712; perceived barriers to SB participation and suggestions to overcome
Input on SB participation requirements/goals
Draft RFP in Fall 2012

Closing Remarks Key Upcoming Milestones

See chart; walk through bullets for each upcoming contract

Innovation, Speed, Agility… “We are in a period of remarkable change. Innovation, speed, and agility have taken on greater importance to our efforts given today’s globalized access to knowledge and the rapid pace of technology development.”

HON Zachary Lemnios, Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Research & Engineering
Statement before the US House of Representatives
Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on
Emerging Threats and Capabilities, Mar 1, 2011
Evolving requirements necessitate innovation, speed, and agility
IACs respond by providing:
Innovation through timely access to cutting-edge information
Speed through efficient contracts and reuse of existing information
Agility through close connection to technical community and forward-looking role of IAC PMO and BCO

We look forward to your partnership in achieving this

I’ll leave you with this quote, which highlights the importance of remaining agile, enabling innovation, and moving with unprecedented speed.

IACs provide:

Innovation, through timely access to cutting-edge information
Speed, through an efficient contract process, which ensures reuse of existing information
And agility, through integration with the technical community

Our work is greatly important, and frankly (I believe) just what the Department needs, especially in today’s environment.

We look forward to your partnership in building on our own 65 year history to do new and better things, while reducing cost – both within the Program and for our customers.

Mr. Christopher Zember IAC Deputy PM czember@dtic.mil 703-767-9235

Mr. Terry Heston IAC Program Manager theston@dtic.mil 703-767-9120

Mr. Jared Dostal Director, ESG/PKS jared.dostal@offutt.af.mil 402-232-5319

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .