IAC Industry Day 7Mar2012 FINAL.ppt
PPT presentation 5 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8075-12-R-0002
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_3_HD_TATs_RFP_SF30.doc | DOC document | |
| HD_TATs_RFP_Compiled_QandA_11Dec12.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment_2_HD_TATs_RFP_SF30.doc | DOC document | |
| HD_TATs_RFP_Compiled_QandA_6Dec12.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Amendment_1_HD_TATs_RFP_SF30.doc | DOC document | |
| ESG_HD_TATs_RFP.doc | DOC document | |
| Pre-Solicitation_Notice.docx | DOCX document | |
| HD_TATs_Draft_RFP_Compiled_QandA_Final_08Oct12.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| DRAFT_HD_TAT_RFP.doc | DOC document | |
| Industry_Day_7Mar12_QA_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| Industry Day Attendees 7Mar12.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Draft_HD_TATs_PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| HD_TATs_Special_Notice.doc | DOC document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Agenda
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
“We need to strengthen small businesses, which are the backbone of our economy and critical to job creation and sustained economic growth… Expanding contracting opportunities with the Federal Government is one of the most powerful small business development tools we can utilize.”
| President Obama on Small Business |
| http://www.whitehouse.gov/economy/jobs/supporting-small-businesses |
“I can’t keep buying stuff at the prices I paid in the past.”
| Maj. Gen. Wendy Masiello |
| Deputy Assistant Secretary for Contracting |
| United States Air Force |
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
Information Analysis Centers
Industry Day
Mr. Terry Heston Program Manager, DoD Information Analysis Centers
7 March 2012
See welcome notes
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
The Department’s Acquisition Directive: “Do More Without More”
– Ash Carter, Deputy Secretary of Defense (former Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (AT&L))
| Today’s Uncomfortable Reality | ||
| Headline | Source | Date |
| Pentagon Says Projected Spending Cuts Could Undermine Security | Los Angeles Times | 4 August 2011 |
| Panetta Sounds Alarm on Threat of Pentagon Budget Cuts | The New York Times | 3 August 2011 |
| Defense Spending on the Chopping Block | Washington Post | 12 November 2011 |
| Defense Budgets: Are Deeper Cuts on the Horizon? | The Wall Street Journal | 26 July 2011 |
| Debt Deal Could Cut Defense $900B Over Next Decade | USA Today | 16 August 2011 |
| Pentagon Could See Deep Cuts in Debt Deal | NPR.org | 25 August 2011 |
| Incoming! More Defense Spending Cuts | Time Magazine | 15 July 2011 |
I know I don’t need to read you these headlines. Today’s uncomfortable reality is one we are all familiar with: funding is tight, and our leadership has asked us to “do more without more”
GAO Report (March 2011)*– “Reducing or eliminating duplication, overlap, or fragmentation could potentially save billions of tax dollars annually and help agencies provide more efficient and effective services.”
*GAO Report: Opportunities to Reduce Potential Duplication in Government Programs, Save Tax Dollars, and Enhance Revenue (March 2011)
Last March, GAO released a report that highlighted several inefficiencies across the federal government. In this report, GAO calculated that we could save BILLIONS of tax dollars each year by simply reducing or eliminating duplication and overlap.
Question How do you “do more without more” AND eliminate duplication and overlap of efforts?
So, the question we are all faced with is this: how do you “do more without more” while also eliminating duplication and overlap?
Answer The Information Analysis Center (IAC) Program
The answer is simple: DoD’s Information Analysis Center Program has been dedicated to this mission for over 65 years.
Traditional Contracts IAC Contracts Limited Knowledge Base (Internal and Sub-contract) Extensive Knowledge Base (“Leverages the network” and builds on existing work at DTIC/IACs. Maintains a broad network that spans government/industry/academia.)
Deliverables Flow ONLY to Customer (Usually unavailable to others) Deliverables Flow to DTIC (Become available to the broadest possible audience for reuse. The IAC Process requires each effort to build on this historical foundation.)
Best Case Scenario: Information is reused within the company or program.
Best Case Scenario: Information is reused across the government (including contractors).
We are all familiar with typical contracts:
| At best, they build on the existing knowledge of the contractor |
| Deliverables are read by 1 or 2 people, and end up in an over-stuffed file cabinet |
| Or maybe, if the program really has their act together, the deliverables are filed where that office can re-use them; but that’s the BEST CASE SCENARIO |
IAC contracts are different:
| IACs are chartered to establish knowledge centers that reach across government, industry and academia |
| These centers pro-actively pull together information in areas of strategic importance |
| As individual operational requirements come about, IACs leverage this knowledge base to respond to those emerging needs |
| Results of this new work is then fed back into the IAC knowledge base, to be reused again in the future |
Through this model, the IACs take advantage of a unique characteristic of information: that it is the only commodity that increases in value the more it is used.
As historic information that may have originated in one operational context is applied in new environments, our understanding grows. In this way, the IACs build on the past in order to anticipate and respond to the evolving needs of the future.
IAC BCOs IAC TATs IAC Model BCOs Serve as Foundation for TATs
| Interdependence between “Core” and TATs defined in DoD guidance |
| DoD Instruction 3200.14 establishes IACs to provide Core and Additional Tasks (Technical Area Tasks, or TATs) |
| BCO/Core establishes knowledge base in areas of strategic importance |
| Intent of TATs is to leverage Core knowledge base to increase efficiency and effectiveness |
Here we see a graphic representation of the IAC model.
The BCO serves as the foundation. IAC BCOs are established in areas of strategic importance to serve that technical community as the central knowledge resource. What does that mean? IACs are charged not only with hosting historic research data from their technical community, but also with maintaining information on the latest developments within that community – including work by government, industry, and academia. To facilitate this, they maintain databases, publish journals, provide web-based resources, attend and host conferences, and much more. IACs also maintain a SME network, through which they reach out to key leaders and members of their technical community.
The IAC Program also offers Technical Area Tasks, or “TATs” which are externally-funded research and analysis efforts driven by emerging operational requirements. In order to increase efficiency and effectiveness in addressing today’s most challenging problems, TATs build on the knowledge base of the BCO.
Current Structure
10 Single-award IDIQ contracts for all requirements for each IAC Way-Ahead 3 Single-award contracts for the IAC Core (BCO) requirements 3 Multiple-award IDIQ contracts for TATs Defense Systems TATs Weapon Systems Survivability/Vulnerability
RMQSI
Advanced Materials Military Sensing Energetics Autonomous Systems Directed Energy Non-lethal Weapons Homeland Defense & Security TATs Homeland Defense & Security Critical Infrastructure Protection Weapons of Mass Destruction CBRN Defense Biometrics Medical Cultural Studies Alternative Energy SNIM TATs Software Analysis Information Assurance Information Sharing Knowledge Management Modeling & Simulation Some existing coverage New Area for IACs
IAC PMO (DTIC)
IAC Program Way-Ahead Scale Back IAC Overhead / Align with New Priorities Data to Decisions Cyber Science & Technology Engineered Resilient Sys, EW, Autonomy, Human Sys Counter WMD S&T Priorities Mapping:
AMMTIAC
Core & TATs
MSIAC
Core & TATs
SURVIAC
Core & TATs
WSTIAC
Core & TATs
RIAC
Core & TATs
CBRNIAC
Core & TATs
CPIAC
Core & TATs
DACS
Core & TATs
SENSIAC
Core & TATs
IATAC
Core & TATs
Cyber Security & Information Systems IAC (CSIAC) DACS, IATAC, MSIAC + new scope
Defense Systems IAC (DSIAC) WSTIAC, SURVIAC, RIAC, AMMTIAC, CPIAC, SENSIAC + new scope
Homeland Defense & Security IAC (HDIAC) CBRNIAC + new scope
The IAC Program is reshaping to respond to emerging areas of interest, while simultaneously reducing overhead and increasing opportunities for small business.
In the past, both BCO and TAT efforts were performed under the same contract. Our way ahead separates these efforts, allowing each contract to focus on the unique characteristics of either the BCO or the TAT efforts.
Core/BCO contracts will allow us to proactively build knowledge in these areas, while TAT contracts provide a cost-reimbursable avenue for customers to apply the core knowledge base to meet deeper requirements.
So far, we have awarded the SNIM contract, with 9 prime awardees. We are in source selection for the CSIAC, the BCO counterpart to SNIM; CSIAC was competed as a 100% SB set-aside. And we are about to release the formal RFP for HDIAC BCO, also as a 100% SB set-aside.
We’ll have additional detail on dollar values and schedules later in today’s presentations.
Data to Decisions Developing a Community of Practice
These next three charts provide examples of IAC work, moving from raw data to actionable information – what OASD(R&E) calls “data to decisions.”
CBRNIAC was tasked with conducting technical forums across the interagency, to facilitate information sharing and standardization in areas of technical interest. CBRNIAC conducted 4 forums on the following topics:
| Bioforensics resources and repositories |
| Biological decontamination |
| Food protection from radiological threats |
| Biosurveillance |
CBRNIAC successfully served as a third party facilitator, bringing all stakeholders together on common ground.
This is an example of the value of the IACs in bringing together stakeholders across a broad technical community to exchange information and agree on opportunities for standardization in solving the day’s most challenging technical problems.
Information Products for Operational Users
DoD scientists and engineers simply do not have the time to sift through mountains of data to uncover essential information to address emerging requirements. This situation underscores the value of and necessity for organizations that provide analysis, synthesis, and dissemination of relevant, timely knowledge and information. The Information Analysis Center Program is just such a resource.
Rather than simply providing users large quantities of raw data, leaving it to users to sift through and make sense of the details, IACs pull together data from numerous sources to create meaningful information products. These products are focused on a specific question or topic of interest. For example, State-of-the-Art Reports provide a summary of the latest in technology and practice across government, industry, and academia; here we have found some innovative practices in sectors that are not typically seen as resources for DoD (e.g., best practices in addressing the insider threat come from the private finance and entertainment industries).
Analytical Tools for Informed Decisions
IACs also provide analytical tools to help make sense of raw technical data, enabling more informed decisions. The DACS Software & Systems Cost and Performance Analysis Toolkit, or S2CPAT, is an example of one we just released (and which we continue to develop).
The goal of S2CPAT is to capture and analyze software and software engineering data, that can be used to improve:
| The quality of software-intensive systems; and |
| The ability to predict the development of software-intensive systems with respect to effort and schedule |
The toolkit allows users to search for similar software projects and use the data to support:
| ROM estimates for software development effort and schedule |
| Project planning and management: life cycle model information, key risks, lessons learned, templates, estimation heuristics |
| Software engineering research |
This toolkit, developed in conjunction with the University of Southern California, builds on the COCOMO model (another USC product). We have integrated data from current Air Force systems, and are finalizing an international agreement with the Australians to integrate data from upcoming modernization projects which will replace 80% of their defence infrastructure.
Better Buying Power Case Study Center for Strategic & International Studies
| CSIS completed case study on IACs, reviewing alignment with Better Buying Power (aka “efficiency”) Initiatives |
| CSIS served as venue for then Under Secretary (now DEPSECDEF) Ashton Carter to unveil his efficiency initiatives |
| DTIC requested outside perspective to ensure alignment as IACs undergo restructuring |
| Findings: IACs are a “value-added resource” for the acquisition community |
| “With multiple avenues to support USD(AT&L), IACs represent an essential tool for cost-effectively fielding superior warfighting capabilities in today’s ever-changing high-technology environment.” |
| The restructured IAC Program will be in an even better position to improve affordability, productivity, and standardization within defense acquisition programs |
| CSIS identified 8 specific Better Buying Power initiatives that “would benefit most significantly” from IAC products |
| DTIC is working to maximize impact through restructured IACs (BCOs and TATs) |
See notes on chart; add only that CSIS is a bipartisan policy institution (aka “think tank”)
| IACs are a valuable resource for accessing evaluated STI culled from efforts to solve new and historic challenges |
| Integrate knowledge base and customer-funded work to provide increased value in a time of shrinking budgets and growing requirements |
Provide tactical relevance by responding to an immediate need Develop strategic capabilities by analyzing trends and recommending improvements to the acquisition community
| IACs are actively contributing to achieving ASD(R&E) imperatives |
| Focused on reducing development cycle, by building on existing knowledge base |
| Minimize unknowns by building a community of knowledge |
| Reduce cost and risk by identifying and applying lessons learned |
| Directly contribute to STEM through collaboration with academia |
| IACs are integrated in research communities |
| Composed of scientists and engineers |
| Closely connected to DoD labs |
| Reach across government, industry, and academia |
| IACs are directly contributing to solving immediate Warfighter needs |
| Currently supporting all 9 COCOMs |
| Technical Inquiry Service and TATs leverage knowledge base and information resources to respond to operational challenges |
| New structure provides sustainable value |
| Alignment of BCO and TAT efforts |
| Governance role of DTIC as sponsor |
| IAC role in enabling efficiencies across DoD (“Better Buying Power”) |
IAC Value Proposition Leveraging Research for Operational Application
See text; highlight:
| The IAC model of using evaluated STI to solve new challenges saves time and resources in a constrained environment |
| IACs are focused on the top priorities of the Department, integrating the work of the research community with operational users, to ensure our research remains relevant and useful |
| The new IAC structure provides a model for sustainable value, aligning BCO and TAT efforts, while enabling efficiencies across DoD as we focus on achieving better buying power |
Information Analysis Center (IAC) Overview:
“Think Tanks” focused on topics of strategic interest to DoD Who We Are: The IACs are research and analysis organizations established by the DoD and managed by the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC), to help researchers, engineers, scientists and program managers utilize existing Scientific and Technical Information (STI). IACs establish and maintain comprehensive knowledge bases that include historical, technical, scientific, and other data and information collected worldwide. IACs also work directly with customers on Technical Area Tasks (TATs), which yield new STI; this is added to one of the ten IACs, based on its technical focus.
Our Model: Invest in areas of strategic importance; invite others to build on that foundational knowledge base.
Where We Work: The IAC Program comprises over 5,700 scientists and engineers in 49 states (+ Korea and Germany).
Top States by Jobs Produced
| Virginia 1,578 | 6. Ohio 266 |
| Maryland 1,043 | 7. Texas 249 |
| Georgia 379 | 8. Michigan 193 |
| Florida 307 | 9. District of Colombia 172 |
| California 293 | 10. Hawaii 159 |
Total investment was over $1.9 billion in Government Fiscal Year 2011; funds are utilized for military research and analysis, building knowledge for reuse by government, industry, and academia.
Value to the DoD Community: Customers who use the IAC program are able to save federal dollars by not duplicating work that’s already been performed while simultaneously strengthening the scientific community by adding new STI for others to use.
The IAC Program Serves as a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community, and is recognized as an “essential value-added resource for the acquisition community” by one of the world’s preeminent bipartisan policy institutions. The IACs will consolidate from 10 centers into three centers in order to reduce overhead costs, while simultaneously expanding scope.
Examples of our Work: IED Defeat, MRAP Reliability, Helicopter Survivability
What We Do: Improve productivity of researchers, engineers, and program managers in the Defense research, development, and acquisition communities by collecting, analyzing, synthesizing, and disseminating worldwide STI in clearly defined, specialized fields or subject areas.
Who We Serve: IACs serve as a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community. The IACs currently provide support to all 9 Combatant Commands (COCOMS) with over 100 researchers deployed for “in theater” support.
http://iac.dtic.mil
I’ll leave you with this chart, which summarizes who we are. More detailed information on specific IAC processes and products can be accessed via our website; the industry day charts from Oct 2010 document in detail each process and its outputs and objectives.
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
| CBRNIAC covers 20 scope areas; individual TATs often touch multiple areas |
| Breakout of open TATs by scope area as follows: |
| Over the last 3 years, the average CBRNIAC TAT has been $5.7M |
| Average of 50 new TATs / year are broken out as follows: |
CBRNIAC
Historical Information
| Amount | # TATs |
| >$10M | 8 |
| $5M-$10M | 8 |
| $2M-$5M | 12 |
| <$2M | 22 |
| TOTAL # TATs (3-yr avg) | 50 |
| Chemical & Physical Properties (13%) | Combat Effectiveness (7%) |
| Chemical Identification (9%) | Smoke & Obscurants (2%) |
| Environmental Fate & Effects (12%) | Demilitarization (3%) |
| Medical Effects & Treatment (31%) | International Tech, Proliferation, & Control (7%) |
| Toxicology (4%) | Defense Conversion & Tech Transfer (10%) |
| Warning & Identification (21%) | Mfg Processes for NBC Defense Syst (4%) |
| Treaty Verification (2%) | Counterproliferation (4%) |
| Individual & Collective Protection (25%) | Force Protection (34%) |
| Decontamination (13%) | Domestic Preparedness (32%) |
| NBC Survivability (11%) | Counter-Terrorism (12%) |
CBRNIAC TAT
Chemical Terrorism Biomonitoring Response
Objective:
The objective of task is to provide information about human exposure to chemical toxicants and their metabolites by: 1) providing literature searches to identify the present state of science in biomonitoring methods; 2) developing ways to identify and measure metabolites and other biomarkers of human exposure using modern state-of-the-art instrumentation and sample preparation techniques; 3) developing and implementing measures to ensure the integrity of samples from earliest handling to final disposition; and 4) applying the newly developed and robust methods to samples so that data are verified and validated.
Key Tasks:
| Human Exposure to Chemical Agents and Toxicants |
| Biomonitoring Methods |
| Sample Collection Techniques |
| Analyses of Research Samples |
| Proficiency Testing for Biomonitoring Methods |
| Information Technology Solutions for Handling Laboratory Information and Analytical Data |
Deliverables:
| Biomonitoring Methods |
| Sample Collection Techniques |
| Analysis of Research Samples |
| Proficiency Testing Materials and Procedures |
| Information Technology Solutions for Handling Laboratory Information and Analytical Data. |
Sponsor: US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), Division of Laboratory Sciences (DLS)
20th Support Command (CBRNE) Gap Analysis, Plans and SOPs
Objective:
The objective of this task is to design, develop, analyze and produce various plans and missions to refine 20th SUPCOM (CBRNE) and Joint Task Force – Elimination (JTF-E) Concept of Operations (CONOP) plans, Contingency Operations Plans (CONPLAN), Continuity of Operations Plans (COOP) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in accordance with the military decision making process (MDMP) and the Joint Operational Planning Process (JOPP).
| Continuity of Operations (COOP) planning and coordination. |
| CBRNE / WMD contingency planning in support of multiple Combatant Commanders (COCOM) for elimination operations. |
| Domestic CBRN Response Force (DCRF) operational planning & coordination with USNORTHCOM, ARNORTH, and JTF-CS. |
| JTF-E mission planning in support of Ulchi Freedom Guardian, Key Resolve, Liberty Focus, and other multi-national exercises. |
| Literature Search. The CBRNIAC shall perform a search of the DTIC and CBRNIAC databases for information relevant to this effort. |
| Gap Analysis, Plans and SOPs. |
| Planning Development and Documentation. |
| Readiness Mission Planning Recommendations. |
Sponsor: US Army 20th Support Command (SUPCOM) Chemical Biological Radiological Nuclear and High Yield Explosives (CBRNE)
Individual Protective Clothing and System Testing and Design
Objective:
The primary objective of this task is to provide test development, test analyses, and program and system analyses for individual protective clothing and system programs, addressing initiatives for individual NBC, and/or HAZMAT protection integrated equipment, such as microclimate conditioning, respiratory protection and sensors. A secondary objective is to provide technical research in support of the development of advanced CB protective textiles and prototype clothing systems and designs.
| Conduct technical testing and provide analyses. |
| Provide technical research in the development of textiles for CB protective clothing and systems. |
| Market Investigations. |
| NBC / HAZMAT Initiative Analyses. |
| Chemical/Biological (CB) Protective Textiles and Systems. |
| Clothing Materials and Equipment Performance Assessments. |
| Hazard/Threat Assessments. |
| Test and Evaluation Master Plans. |
| Chemical Agent Testing Reports. |
| Knowledge Management. |
| CB Workshop Curriculum Materials. |
Sponsor: US Army Research Development and Engineering Command (RDECOM) Natick Soldier Research Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC), Warfighter Science Technology and Applied Research (WARSTAR) Directorate, Materials and Defense Sciences Division, Chemical Technology Team
| Objectives |
| Draw from and build on Homeland Defense and Security knowledge base |
| Conduct HD studies, evaluations, and analyses |
| Promote standardization in HD technical domain across the interagency |
| Scope |
| Matrix represents technical focus areas with types of tasks across each area |
Homeland Defense & Security TATs Technical Scope and Requirements
HD TAT
Scope
| Technical Development | Evaluation | Plans & Frameworks | Implementation | Research & Analysis | Training (non-routine) | O&S Developmental Analysis | SME | Technical Conferences & Meetings |
| HD&S | ||||||||
| CIP | ||||||||
| WMD | ||||||||
| CBRN Defense | ||||||||
| Biometrics | ||||||||
| Medical | ||||||||
| Cultural Studies | ||||||||
| Alternative Energy |
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
| Full and Open Competition with a Small Business Reservation |
| Seeking to award 6 F&O and 4 SB reservation contracts |
| NAICS Code |
| 541712, R&D in Physical, Engineering, & Life Sciences (Except Biotechnology) |
| 500 employee small business size standard |
| Contract Type |
| Multiple Award IDIQ with capability for both cost and fixed-price orders |
| Contract Length |
| 5 years (1 year Base + 4 one-year Options) |
| $900M Ceiling |
| Cumulative total for all TAT orders awarded |
| $2.5K Minimum Order Guarantee |
| Management Reporting Requirement for Base Period only (FFP CLIN) |
HD TAT
Acquisition Strategy Considerations
| Past Performance Tradeoff (PPT) Source Selection Process |
| Past performance approximately equal to cost |
| Rank proposals by total overall evaluated Cost/Price (lowest to highest) |
| FFP Management Reporting CLINs + Skill Set Cost/Pricing Matrix Model |
| Evaluate technical capability (Pass/Fail) |
| 2 Sample TATs: 1 for CBRN & WMD; 1 for Homeland Defense/Security & CIP |
| Experience/Capability for Biometrics, Medical, Cultural Studies and Alternate Energy |
| Program Management Approach to managing the IDIQ contract |
| Top Secret Facility clearance and Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory required at time of proposal |
| Small Business Participation (Large Businesses only) |
| Subcontracting Plan to meet requirement of total obligated dollars |
| Assess Past Performance |
| RFP will specify minimum number of PP submittals required from Prime |
| SSA conducts best value assessment/tradeoff determination |
HD TAT
| Organizational Conflict of Interest with HDIAC BCO |
| HDIAC BCO prime contractor cannot be a prime/subcontractor on a HD TAT contract |
| HDIAC BCO contractor serves as a “trusted agent” |
| DCAA-confirmed adequate accounting system |
| Information for Contractors, DCAA Pamphlet No. 7641.90 (www.dcaa.mil/dcaap7641.90.pdf) |
| Small Business Reservation |
| Small Businesses can compete for SB Reservation and/or F&O pool awards |
| Will have to identify as part of proposal |
| SB Reservation Pool TAT Competitions |
| FAR 52.219-14, Limitations on Subcontracting: At least 50% of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel performed by SB contractor, assessed for each TAT |
| F&O Pool TAT Competitions |
| FAR 52.219-14 rule not applicable |
HD TAT
| Post Award TAT Process(es) |
| Advanced Planning Matrix for upcoming requirements |
| Review each TAT requirement for SB Reservation consideration |
| Quick turn assessment to determine if two or more small businesses have capability, capacity, and interest in bidding |
| SB representative at DTIC will facilitate a streamlined review process |
| Provide “Draft” documents for review/comment as applicable |
| Compete TAT in SB Reservation or F&O pool |
| Full tradeoff, PPT, LPTA |
HD TAT
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
| HDIAC BCO |
| 100% Small Business Set-aside |
| NAICS Code 541712 (500 employee size standard) |
| RFP release in March-April 2012 |
| DSIAC BCO and DS TATs |
| Market Intelligence still being conducted |
| NAICS Code 541712 (Size standard TBD) |
| DSIAC BCO PWS/RFP will be similar to CSIAC & HDIAC |
| DS TATs PWS/RFP will be similar to SNIM & HD TATs |
| Looking for best practices/examples from other programs/contracts |
Future Acquisition Considerations HDIAC BCO, DSIAC BCO, DS TATs
Acquisition Process New Contract Acquisition Planning Acquisition Cycle Times
| Jun | |
| 2012 | Dec |
| 2012 | Jun |
| 2013 | Dec |
| 2013 | Jun |
| Cyber Security BCO | |
| (DACS, IATAC, MSIAC) | CSIAC BCO (Estimated 7/12 – 7/17) |
| Homeland Defense BCO | |
| (CBRNIAC + new scope) | HDIAC BCO (Estimated 1/13 – 1/18) |
Defense Systems BCO (AMMTIAC, CPIAC, RIAC, SENSIAC, SURVIAC, WSTIAC) DSIAC BCO (Est. 10/13 – 10/18)
SNIM TATs Multiple Award IDIQ Awarded May 2010 ($2B Ceiling)
Homeland Defense TATs Multiple Award IDIQ Est. Award 10/13 ($900M)
Defense Systems TATs Multiple Award IDIQ Est. Award 1/14 ($3B)
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
| Bottom Line Up Front |
| The Government is very receptive to industry input/feedback on the contemplated strategies for HD TATs, as well as DS IAC BCO and TATs procurements |
| Desired input includes elements of acquisition strategy, as well as post-award execution |
| Are there best practices / samples of approaches used on other successful programs/contracts, especially with respect to source selection/proposal evaluation approaches and ordering procedures, that would optimize opportunities for small businesses? |
| Are there best practices / samples of approaches… that would facilitate cost and/or time savings at either the IDIQ level or Task Order level? |
| DTIC has incorporated input from industry in shaping the acquisition strategies and post-award ordering processes on past acquisitions: SNIM TATs, CSIAC and HDIAC BCO, and plans to continue doing so on future awards |
Industry Input Developing a “Workable” Approach
| Other examples of specific questions where we are specifically seeking industry input |
| Do the contemplated strategies present barriers to small business participation – either at the prime or subcontractor level? If so, what are some alternatives that would remove these? |
| Are small businesses planning to form teaming agreements to pursue these opportunities (traditional prime/sub arrangements as well as joint ventures and mentor-protégé agreements) – if not why not? |
| See DoD Guidebook for Facilitating Small Business Teaming Agreements at: http://www.acq.osd.mil/osbp/doing_business/index.htm |
| Industry is encouraged to review latest FAR language on new “small business reservation” feature available for multiple award IDIQ contracts – see FAR 19.502-4(a) |
| Get ready for DSIAC BCO / TAT market intelligence |
| Follow-up Requests for Information (RFIs) will be posted to FedBizOpps in the coming weeks |
Industry Input Developing a “Workable” Approach
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation (SNIM) Overview:
A best-in-class contract vehicle for R&D and R&D related A&AS efforts What is SNIM: SNIM (Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation Technical Area Tasks (TATs)) is an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) focused on the areas of:
Value to the DoD Community: Customers who utilize SNIM, part of the Information Analysis Center (IAC) program, are able to save federal dollars by not duplicating work that’s already been performed while simultaneously strengthening the scientific community by adding new STI for others to use.
The IAC Program Serves: As a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community and is recognized as an “essential value-added resource for the acquisition community” by one of the world's international bipartisan policy institutions. The IACs currently provide support to all 9 Combatant Commands (COCOMS) with over 100 researchers deployed for “in theater” support.
Current SNIM Users: NAVAIR, STRATCOM, USAF Nuclear Weapons Center, AFRL, and the US Army Corps of Engineers
Quality, Speed and Ease of Use:
SNIM contractors represent the best and brightest from both industry and academia. SNIM was developed through a careful analysis of other top contracts and incorporates the best tools, techniques, and processes that simplify and speed up your contracting experience. Our average PALT is less than 75 days.
Ready to start using SNIM?
Our DTIC Customer Support Cell is on hand and ready to assist you with your requirements and walk you through the process. Learn more about SNIM and other IAC offerings at http://iac.dtic.mil/snim
Available Contractors: Nine prime contractors and hundreds of subcontractors possess the diverse capabilities and experiences to meet your mission needs.
Prime SNIM Contractors
| Alion Science and Technology Corporation (Alion) |
| Applied Research Associates, Inc (ARA) |
| Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle) |
| Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH) |
| ITT Corporation (ITT) |
| L3 Communications, Inc. (L3) |
| MacAulay Brown, Inc. (MacB) |
| Science Applications International |
Corporation (SAIC) Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (Wyle)
Information Assurance -Defense Information Operations -Information Warfare Technologies Software Data and Analysis -Software Technology -Software Engineering -Software Development Contract Quick Facts: Type: IDIQ Ceiling: $2B Min TO: $2,500 Term: 5 yrs (1 Base + 4 1 yr options) Customer Shared Direct Cost Rate: 0.7% http://iac.dtic.mil/financial_mgmt.html Knowledge Management and Information Sharing -DoD-related SNIM conference, symposia, workshops
- Technical coordination and information services Modeling and Simulation -Modeling and Simulation Policy -Modeling and Simulation Practices -Emerging Technologies
Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation (SNIM) Overview:
A best-in-class contract vehicle for R&D and R&D related A&AS efforts What is SNIM: SNIM (Software, Networks, Information, Modeling and Simulation Technical Area Tasks (TATs)) is an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) focused on the areas of:
Value to the DoD Community: Customers who utilize SNIM, part of the Information Analysis Center (IAC) program, are able to save federal dollars by not duplicating work that’s already been performed while simultaneously strengthening the scientific community by adding new STI for others to use.
The IAC Program Serves: As a bridge between the Warfighter and the acquisition community and is recognized as an “essential value-added resource for the acquisition community” by one of the world's international bipartisan policy institutions. The IACs currently provide support to all 9 Combatant Commands (COCOMS) with over 100 researchers deployed for “in theater” support.
Current SNIM Users: NAVAIR, STRATCOM, USAF Nuclear Weapons Center, AFRL, and the US Army Corps of Engineers
Quality, Speed and Ease of Use:
SNIM contractors represent the best and brightest from both industry and academia. SNIM was developed through a careful analysis of other top contracts and incorporates the best tools, techniques, and processes that simplify and speed up your contracting experience. Our average PALT is less than 75 days.
Ready to start using SNIM?
Our DTIC Customer Support Cell is on hand and ready to assist you with your requirements and walk you through the process. Learn more about SNIM and other IAC offerings at http://iac.dtic.mil/snim
Available Contractors: Nine prime contractors and hundreds of subcontractors possess the diverse capabilities and experiences to meet your mission needs.
Prime SNIM Contractors
| Alion Science and Technology Corporation (Alion) |
| Applied Research Associates, Inc (ARA) |
| Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle) |
| Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH) |
| ITT Corporation (ITT) |
| L3 Communications, Inc. (L3) |
| MacAulay Brown, Inc. (MacB) |
| Science Applications International |
Corporation (SAIC) Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (Wyle)
Information Assurance -Defense Information Operations -Information Warfare Technologies Software Data and Analysis -Software Technology -Software Engineering -Software Development Contract Quick Facts: Type: IDIQ Ceiling: $2B Min TO: $2,500 Term: 5 yrs (1 Base + 4 1 yr options) Customer Shared Direct Cost Rate: 0.7% http://iac.dtic.mil/financial_mgmt.html Knowledge Management and Information Sharing -DoD-related SNIM conference, symposia, workshops
- Technical coordination and information services Modeling and Simulation -Modeling and Simulation Policy -Modeling and Simulation Practices -Emerging Technologies
For More Information visit us at: http://iac.dtic.mil
TAT Requirements Templates Getting Started with SNIM All customers who wish to use SNIM must submit a requirements package. An Ordering Guide for preparing your requirements package and filling out applicable templates can be found on our website, at http://iac/snim.html#snimtemplates. Each requirements package will consist of the following documents:
IAC Requirements Ordering Guide
IAC Requirements Package Checklist
Sample Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR)
Multiple Award Contract Task Order Performance Work Statement (PWS)
Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE)
Proposal Evaluation Plan
DD Form 254 (if applicable to your Task Order)
IAC Program Multiple Award TAT Contracts The Software Data and Analysis, Information Assurance, Knowledge Management & Information Sharing, and Modeling & Simulation (SNIM) contract was the first multiple-award IDIQ contract for the IAC Program Office. The SNIM contract was awarded 24 May 2010, consists of 9 industry leading contractors, and has a $2 billion ceiling. SNIM also offers the flexibility to utilize:
| CPFF or FFP type task orders |
| LPTA or Trade-Off method for source selection |
| Incremental funding |
SNIM was awarded in conjunction with and oversight of the Air Force PEO/CM. SNIM was also the first AF contract over $1 billion to go though the DPAP approval and peer review process.
SNIM is quick and easy-to-use: tools, templates, and a dedicated Customer Support Cell (CSC) assist Requiring Activities (RA) through the entire process of obtaining support from an IAC.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
<75 day average PALT Requirement added to Advance Planning Matrix
Governance Process IAC BCO, TAT, & Steering Committee
| Executive Steering Committee (ESC) comprises senior stakeholders across the IAC’s technical community |
| ESC members have an interest in understanding: |
| Operational needs of the broader community |
| IAC work being performed in support of these requirements |
| ESC members bring an executive perspective on the needs and focus of the community, with specific focus on their agency |
| BCO provides a broad-based perspective looking across the community (strategic) |
| TAT work provides bottom-up information on what are the community’s needs “in the field” (operational/tactical) |
| ESC validates trends and future research needs |
| IACs provide a unique perspective for senior leaders in the IAC’s technical community |
| Dual efforts, both supporting research and executing operational requirements |
| IAC brings together information from two ends of the acquisition lifecycle: from early research to operational requirements and feedback |
BCO/TAT Collaboration Building on Existing STI Pre-award literature search ensures new work builds on existing knowledge
Post-award gap analysis provides feedback to IAC BCO
Customer
PWS
IAC PMO /
CSC
IAC BCO
(lit search)
IAC PMO /
CSC
Customer (updated
PWS)
Lit Search Results
TAT
Awardee
TAT
Kickoff
TAT
Execution BCO (new research)
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
| Time | Event | Briefer |
| 7:30 – 8:00 | Arrival (Breakfast / Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 8:00 – 8:05 | Welcome | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:05 – 8:45 | IAC Program Overview | Mr. Terry Heston |
| 8:45 – 9:15 | HD TAT Requirements | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 9:15 – 10:00 | HD TAT Acquisition Strategy Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:00 – 10:15 | Break (Coffee in cafeteria) | |
| 10:15 – 10:30 | Future Acquisition Considerations | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:30 – 10:45 | Industry Input | Mr. Jared Dostal |
| 10:45 – 11:15 | Post-Award Processes | Mr. Christopher Zember |
| 11:15 – 11:45 | Q&A (open to all participants) | |
| 11:45 – 12:00 | Closing Remarks | Mr. Terry Heston |
| HDIAC BCO |
| Industry questions/comments already received |
| HD TATs |
| Draft RFP in next 45-60 days |
| DSIAC BCO |
| Sources Sought / RFI in next 30-45 days |
| Capability and capacity to perform BCO requirements |
| Industry perceived barriers to SB participation and suggestions to overcome |
| Draft RFP in Fall 2012 |
| DS TATs |
| Sources Sought / RFI in next 30-45 days |
| Capability and capacity to perform in DS TAT focus areas |
| Input on SB size standard within NAICS Code 541712; perceived barriers to SB participation and suggestions to overcome |
| Input on SB participation requirements/goals |
| Draft RFP in Fall 2012 |
Closing Remarks Key Upcoming Milestones
See chart; walk through bullets for each upcoming contract
Innovation, Speed, Agility… “We are in a period of remarkable change. Innovation, speed, and agility have taken on greater importance to our efforts given today’s globalized access to knowledge and the rapid pace of technology development.”
| HON Zachary Lemnios, Assistant Secretary of |
| Defense for Research & Engineering |
| Statement before the US House of Representatives |
| Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on |
| Emerging Threats and Capabilities, Mar 1, 2011 |
| Evolving requirements necessitate innovation, speed, and agility |
| IACs respond by providing: |
| Innovation through timely access to cutting-edge information |
| Speed through efficient contracts and reuse of existing information |
| Agility through close connection to technical community and forward-looking role of IAC PMO and BCO |
We look forward to your partnership in achieving this
I’ll leave you with this quote, which highlights the importance of remaining agile, enabling innovation, and moving with unprecedented speed.
IACs provide:
| Innovation, through timely access to cutting-edge information |
| Speed, through an efficient contract process, which ensures reuse of existing information |
| And agility, through integration with the technical community |
Our work is greatly important, and frankly (I believe) just what the Department needs, especially in today’s environment.
We look forward to your partnership in building on our own 65 year history to do new and better things, while reducing cost – both within the Program and for our customers.
Mr. Christopher Zember IAC Deputy PM czember@dtic.mil 703-767-9235
Mr. Terry Heston IAC Program Manager theston@dtic.mil 703-767-9120
Mr. Jared Dostal Director, ESG/PKS jared.dostal@offutt.af.mil 402-232-5319
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .