Questions and Answers for OCS Tutors FA7014-24-Q-0036.pdf

Questions and Responses for OCS Tutors FA7014-24-Q-0036 Revised

1. Attachment 1 Instructions to Offerors 4.3.1.2 page 6 ITO requires offerors to submit a completed TO Request Form(s) for Task Order 1. Attachment 2 Evaluation Criteria 3.4 (p5) also include Task Order 1 as part of evaluation of Factor III Price. Request the government please provide this form in an amendment to the solicitation.

ITO 4.3.1.2 The Price Instructions direct offerors to complete the provided Task Order Request form. Will the government please clarify where this form is provided?

(See attachment)

2. PWS Technical Exhibit 2 page 35 Request that the government please confirm that the positions listed in Technical Exhibit 2 paragraphs A (Air Force) and B (CENTCOM) are both included in Task Order 1. (Location OMITED from PWS) Please see OCS Tutors revised

3. PWS Section 2 PWS Section 2 refers to APPENDIX I multiple times. Will the government please provide APPENDIX I for offerors’ reference.

The Appendix I referenced is a typo. The word doc formatting auto changed this to a roman number I in error. This is supposed to read Appendix 1 in section VII (DEFINITIONS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND ACRONYMS) Please see OCS Tutors revised

4. PWS 6.7.4 The PWS states at 6.7.4 that “All personnel assigned to task orders or the IDIQ are deemed key personnel” and “The contractor will develop a staffing plan to meet the objectives of this task order.”

Section 6.7.4 also includes a table enumerating 1 x Business Process Analyst and 1 x Logistics Training Specialist.

Will the government please confirm that these are the only two key personnel that should be addressed in the proposal?

Confirm these are the only positions that should be addressed. The CENTCOM locations and positions will not be included in the task order. The only 2 FTEs requested are for Air Force (SAF/AQC x 1) and (HAF/A4LR x 1). The CENTCOM position will not be included in any of the task orders.

5. ITO 4.2.2.1.1 The ITO require offerors to include the “Company/Division name” in all Past Performance examples.

Will the government please clarify whether this refers to the name of the Customer Served by the example or the Prime Contractor that provided the services for the example?

This refers to the Government customer/unit that was supported.

6. ITO 3.3.3 The Title Page instructions state that offerors should “Acknowledge any amendments as attachments.” Will the government please clarify this statement?

Please add a single sentence acknowledging the solicitation, all amendments and attachments.

Should offerors acknowledge any amendments with a statement on the title page of each volume, or should offerors sign any amendments and attach them to the proposal?

XXXXXX acknowledges receipt of the solicitation and all amendments.

If signed and attached to the proposal, will the government please indicate to which volume signed amendments should be attached?

Offer acknowledges receipt of the solicitation and all amendments.