Attachment_3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

PRIDE ... TEAMWORK ... SUCCESS

17 May 2018

MEMORANDUM FOR PAST AND CURRENT CUSTOMERS

FROM: AFDW/PKH

1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite

2750 Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire

The Air Force District of Washington (AFDW), Contracting Directorate (PK), Secretary of the Air Force

Enterprise Support Division, will be conducting a competitive source selection for support of the Synthetic

Theater Operations Research Model (STORM).

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Please complete the questionnaire within ten (10) business days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data for our source selection.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to the following:

Ms. Kari K. Walters, Contracting Officer

E-mail address: kari.k.walters.civ@mail.mil

Lt. William M Engelhart, Contract Specialist

Email address: william.m.engelhart.mil@mail.mil

Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official procurement records.

A prompt response is greatly appreciated and is key to a successful and timely completion of this Source

Selection.

Kari K. Walters

Contracting Officer

For Official Use Only

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance:

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other

Commands):

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 7

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 7

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

6. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner.

7. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

8. Identified problems as they occurred.

9. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 7

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

10. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

11. Met established project schedules.

12. Was responsive to contract changes.

13. Provided adequate project supervision.

14. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

15. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

16. How many Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions did the contractor provide on this contract?

Please provide answer below:

17. What type of technical expertise was provided on this contract?

Please provide answer below:

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 7

The Contractor: E V S M U N/A

18. Did the contractor provide technical expertise in the area of the health needs of United

States military service members and/or veterans?

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

19. Did the contractor provide technical expertise in the area of post-employment support and care for former employees of federal, state, or municipal agencies?

20. Did the contractor provide technical expertise in the area of “wounded warrior” programs?

21. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

22. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

Additional remarks:

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to: