Attachment 7 - RFI QA - 07.24.2023.pdf
PDF 417 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace B1191 Chiller Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA667523Q0010
About this file
This document provides answers to questions from a request for information related to solicitation number FA667523Q0010 to replace a B1191 chiller. The solicitation involves a brand name requirement for a Carrier chiller, with no tradeoffs permitted for expedited delivery, different models, contract extensions, past performance at specific military bases, or woman-owned small business status. Award will be made based on lowest price for proposals meeting acceptability standards for technical factors in accordance with FAR 15.101-2 for a lowest price technically acceptable source selection. The replacement chiller is needed by the Department of the Air Force Reserve Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work 15 Aug 23.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Site Visit Sign In Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Statement of Work July 2023.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - RFI.pdf | ||
| HQ AFRC-A4C CM4_Chiller Mfgr Approval Memo Jun 2021 Redacted.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Offerors Information.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 2 - Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - AF 3000.pdf | ||
| HVAC Chiller Justification and Approval - Signed_Redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA6675-23-Q-00010 Q&A from RFI’s Dated: 24 July 2023
RFI#01
Question 1: Would expedited delivery receive a higher rating over price?
Government Answer: No. As specified under the Evaluation Criteria of the solicitation post, the source selection processes and techniques are in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, Lowest price technically acceptable source selection process. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of quotes meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs for expedited delivery are not permitted.
Question 2: Would you accept a different model of the Carrier brand that was greater/equal to the specified?
Government Answer: No. As specified in the solicitation post, this is a Brand Name requirement.
Question 3: Would contract extension be considered due to supply chain delays of specific models?
Government Answer: Yes.
Question 4: Would the contractor's past performance at JBSA-Lackland and/or NAS-FW JRB be considered for a higher rating?
Government Answer: No. As specified under the Evaluation Criteria of the solicitation post, the source acceptable source selection process. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs for past performance are not permitted.
Question 5: Would a contractor's Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) classification be considered for a higher rating?
Government Answer: No. As specified under the Evaluation Criteria of the solicitation post, the source acceptable source selection process. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. Tradeoffs for small business socioeconomic status are not permitted.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .