Niagara_Taxiways_-_Amendment_1.pdf

F5J3DS7171AW02 RVKQ 14-0605

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

A. This amendment is issued to make administrative corrections and add an additional site visit into solicitation FA6670-17-R-0007, Repair Taxiw ays, RVKQ 14-0605.

B. As a result of the above, the title of sub-factor 1 on pg 45 (section M) and the date of the Davis Bacon WD in section J has been corrected.

C. The site visit clause has been updated w ith an additional site visit having been scheduled and the Questions due date has been extended by tw o days.

D. The proposal due date is not extended as a result of the above.

E. All other terms and conditions of the basic solicitation, as amended, remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 17-Aug-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA667017R0007

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

07-Aug-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Aug-2017

CODE

914 CONF/LGC

2720 KIRKBRIDGE DR

NIAGARA FALLS NY 14304-5001

FA6670 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA667017R0007

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

ATTACHMENTS

THE FOLLOWING ATTACHMENTS (IN HARD COPY) ARE INCORPORATED AND MADE PART OF THIS

SOLICITATION AND ANY RESULTING CONTRACT:

ATTACHMENT 1: SOW - Repair Taxiways, RVKQ 14-0605, dated 14 July 2017

ATTACHMENT 2: Repair Taxiways, RVKQ 14-0605, sheets 1-57, dated 14 July 2017

ATTACHMENT 3: Davis Bacon Wage Decision NY170011, Heavy and Highway, dated 8/4/2017, 13 pgs

ATTACHMENT 4: Insurance Form, 1 pg

ATTACHMENT 5: Entry Access Request for Base Access, 1 pg

ATTACHMENT 6: B-001 Pricing Breakout for CLIN 0001

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

52.236-27 SITE VISIT (CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) – ALTERNATE I (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors or quoters are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for:

Tuesday August 15, 2017 at 1:00 pm

AND

Tuesday August 22, 2017 at 9:30 am

(c) Participants will meet at:

9965 Blewett Ave, Bldg. 902, Rm 205, Niagara Falls, NY 14304

(d) Special arrangements are required to gain access to Niagara Falls ARS. In order to attend the site visit, interested parties MUST submit an Entry Access Request (Attachment #5), including the company name and address as well as the full name, date of birth, driver’s license number and driver’s license state for each of the requested attendees; a state ID number and state will suffice if no driver’s license is available.

1017357243C Highlight

1017357243C Highlight

1017357243C Highlight

The Entry Access Request (Attachment #5) MUST be received by the Contracting Office at least 2 business days prior to the site visit; failure to submit request prior to two business days before hand may result in denial of base access for the site visit. Requests for attendance should be forwarded to Mary Pyle Platts, Contracting Officer, at mary.pyleplatts@us.af.mil

Offerors are cautioned that Niagara Falls ARS has visitor control procedures requiring individuals to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. DELAYS SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass (requiring valid driver’s license, vehicle registration, and current proof of insurance if driving, valid state or government issued ID if passenger).

All questions regarding this solicitation and any questions generated from the site visit must be submitted in writing to Mary Pyle Platts at mary.pyleplatts@us.af.mil Wednesday 23 August 2017 at 4 pm. Answers will be posted out under the solicitation on FBO.gov approximately 1 week later. The Contracting Officer will provide clarification through amendment to the solicitation following receipt of any questions. Submission of questions prior to the site visit is also encouraged.

Remarks and explanations provided at the site visit shall NOT qualify the terms of the solicitation and Statement of Work. Unless the solicitation is amended in writing, it will remain unchanged. If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of solicitation amendments shall apply.

ALL Prime contractors and subcontractors are encouraged to attend the site visit. There will NOT be additional site visits.

(End of provision)

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M-002 EVALUATION FACTORS

Evaluation Factors and Sub factors

The evaluation process is as follows:

A. First, the Government will determine if the proposal conforms to the RFP requirements. Only conforming proposals will be eligible for award.

B. Second, the Government shall perform a price analysis on all conforming proposals, ranking them from lowest to highest evaluated price.

C. Third, the Government shall then determine if the two lowest priced proposals are technically acceptable or unacceptable in accordance with the evaluation criteria (factors/sub factors.) If both proposals are found to be technically acceptable and price is determined to be reasonable, award will be made to the offeror with the lowest price without further consideration of any other offerors. If the two lowest price proposals are not found to be technically acceptable, the process will continue until two are found to be acceptable and again, award will be made to the lowest offeror.

Factor 1 – Price mailto:mary.pyleplatts@us.af.mil

Factor 2 – Technical

SUB FACTOR 1a: Project Plan

SUB FACTOR 1b: Previous Project Plan

SUB FACTOR 2: Previous Safety Plan

SUB FACTOR 3: Previous Quality Control Plan

Proposals which do not address all evaluation factors and subfactors, or that are found to be unacceptable in any factor/subfactor, will be determined unacceptable proposals and will receive no further consideration for award.

A. Factor 1: Price: The offeror’s Price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness, total evaluated price and financial resources. These will be evaluated in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4.

1. Reasonableness: The offeror’s Price proposal will be evaluated to ensure it is fair and reasonable pursuant to FAR 15.404-1. The existence of adequate price competition is expected to support a determination of reasonableness. Price analysis techniques may be used to further validate price reasonableness. If adequate price competition is not obtained or if price reasonableness cannot be determined using price analysis of Government obtained information, additional information in accordance with FAR 15.4 may be required to support the proposed price.

2. Total Evaluated Price: The TEP will be the proposed price for CLIN 0001 in Schedule B of SF 1449.

The offeror’s TEP will be evaluated to ensure it is fair and reasonable, pursuant to FAR15.404.

For additional information see FAR 31.201-3. The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced offeror may be required to confirm its price on a total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award.

Offerors whose price is determined to be unreasonable or unaffordable may not be considered for award.

3. Financial Resources: The financial capability letter will be evaluated to determine financial capacity to meet this requirement. The letter from the bonding company will be evaluated to determine bonding capacity and maximum dollar threshold.

B. Factor 2: Technical: The Government’s technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each sub factor. Any sub factor evaluated as “unacceptable” will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable.

Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

Table 1 – TECHNICAL RATINGS Rating Description

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical sub factors:

1. Sub factor 1a: Project Plan

• Description: This sub factor evaluates the Offeror’s effective and efficient Project Plan in accordance with the requirements of the entire solicitation and elements submitted in response to those outlined in Section L.

• Measure of Merit: This sub factor is met when the offeror demonstrates a competent Project

Plan with which to perform the requirements of the solicitation while meeting the Government’s required performance period.

2. Sub factor 1b: Previous Project Plan

• Description: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s successfully completed relevant Project

Plan

• Measure of Merit: This sub factor is met when the offeror demonstrates a successfully completed relevant (greater than 2,500 SY of PCC airfield paving and greater than $2M) Project Plan which demonstrates their ability to perform the requirements of the solicitation while meeting the Government’s required performance period.

3. Sub factor 2: Previous Safety Plan

• Description: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s approach to providing a successfully completed relevant Safety Plan.

• Measure of Merit: This sub factor is met when the offeror demonstrates a successfully completed relevant (working within an FAA Runway Controlled Movement Area) comprehensive plan for Safety.

4. Sub factor 3: Previous Quality Control Plan

• Description: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s approach to providing a successfully completed relevant Quality Control Plan.

• Measure of Merit: This sub factor is met when the offeror demonstrates a successfully completed relevant (greater than 2,500 SY of PCC airfield paving and greater than $2M project) comprehensive Quality Control Plan which identifies the contractor’s method of quality control and demonstrates their commitment to provide a quality product.

C. Other/Conformance to RFP Requirements: The Government will determine if the proposal conforms to the RFP requirements; only conforming proposals will be eligible for award. Proposals will be determined to conform based on the following:

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

• Offer is submitted by a Small Business firm.

• Offeror registration is current in System for Award Management (SAM) and offeror is not debarred/ineligible.

• Offer must provide evidence of sufficient bid guarantee, as required in FAR 52.228-1, Bid

Guarantee. (include in volume I of proposal under section e)

• Offeror has the financial and bonding capability and is determined responsible in accordance with

FAR 9. (include in volume I of proposal under section f)

(End of Summary of Changes)

Factor 2 – Technical