RFP-FA5685-17-R-0002.pdf
PDF 550 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Orthopedic Surgery Services
- Solicitation number
- FA5685-17-R-0002
About this file
FA5685-17-R-0002 Orthopedic Surgery Services
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment1_PWS-Ortho_Svs_v2_(25Apr16).pdf | ||
| Attachment2_QASP-Ortho_Svs_(28Mar16).pdf | ||
| DECA_Information_with_Agreement_3_p.16.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SEE ADDENDUM
(No Collect Calls)
FA5685-17-R-0002 12-Oct-2016
b. TELEPHONE NUMBER
+903223168083
8. OFFER DUE DATE/LOCAL TIME
10:00 AM 14 Nov 2016
5. SOLICITATION NUMBER 6. SOLICITATION ISSUE DATE
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012)
Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
(TYPE OR PRINT)
(SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER)
ADDENDA X ARE
26. TOTAL AWARD AMOUNT (For Gov t. Use Only )
23.
CODE 10. THIS ACQUISITION IS
SUCH ADDRESS IN OFFER
17b. CHECK IF REMITTANCE IS DIFFERENT AND PUT
BELOW IS CHECKED
TELEPHONE NO.
FA56859. ISSUED BY
18b. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN BLOCK 18a. UNLESS BLOCK
7. FOR SOLICITATION
INFORMATION CALL:
a. NAME
CHELSEA B. BAKER
2. CONTRACT NO. 3. AWARD/EFFECTIVE DATE 4. ORDER NUMBER
(TYPE OR PRINT)
30b. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 30c. DATE SIGNED 31b. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER
30a. SIGNATURE OF OFFEROR/CONTRACTOR 31a.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1 27a. SOLICITATION INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-1. 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-3. 52.212-5 ARE ATTACHED.X
25. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
1. REQUISITION NUMBER
20.
ADDITIONAL SHEETS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED.
OFFEROR TO COMPLETE BLOCKS 12, 17, 23, 24, AND 30
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
ARE NOT ATTACHED
27b. CONTRACT/PURCHASE ORDER INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE FAR 52.212-4. FAR 52.212-5 IS ATTACHED. ADDENDA ARE ARE NOT ATTACHED
(BLOCK 5), INCLUDING ANY ADDITIONS OR CHANGES WHICH ARE
SET FORTH HEREIN, IS ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS:
. YOUR OFFER ON SOLICITATION
28. CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT AND RETURN
% FOR:SET ASIDE:UNRESTRICTED ORX
SMALL BUSINESS
17a.CONTRACTOR/ CODE FACILITY
OFFEROR CODE
39 CONS/LGC - FA5685 (FOREIGN)
39 UNCU KONTRAT SUBAYLIGI
BINA NO. 485 10.NCU TANKER
US KOMUTANLIGI
INCIRLIK/ADANA
18a. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY CODE
RATED ORDER UNDER
DPAS (15 CFR 700)
13a. THIS CONTRACT IS A
13b. RATING
CODE15. DELIVER TO CODE F2G4A2 16. ADMINISTERED BY
12. DISCOUNT TERMS11. DELIVERY FOR FOB DESTINA-
TION UNLESS BLOCK IS
MARKED
SEE SCHEDULE
14. METHOD OF SOLICITATION
RFQ IFB RFPX
F2G4A2 39 MDS
SERDAL GURSES
UNIT 7095 BOX 185 BLDG 865
APO AE 09824
TEL: 90-322-3168659 FAX:
90-322-316-1090FAX:
TEL: 90-322-316-8076 SERVICE-DISABLED
VETERAN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS
8(A)
HUBZONE SMALL
BUSINESS
SIZE STANDARD:
$10,000,000
NAICS:
621111
X
OFFER DATED
29. AWARD OF CONTRACT: REF.
DELIVER ALL ITEMS SET FORTH OR OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED ABOVE AND ON ANY
COPIES TO ISSUING OFFICE. CONTRACTOR AGREES TO FURNISH AND
EMAIL:
TEL:
31c. DATE SIGNED
SEE SCHEDULE
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICESITEM NO. QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
24.22.21.19.
WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS (WOSB)
ELIGIBLE UNDER THE WOMEN-OWNED
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM
EDWOSB
32g. E-MAIL OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT/ORDER FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS
(CONTINUED)
ACCEPTED, AND CONFORMS TO THE CONTRACT, EXCEPT AS NOTED: ______________________________________________________
32a. QUANTITY IN COLUMN 21 HAS BEEN
RECEIVED INSPECTED
32b. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32c. DATE 32d. PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT
REPRESENTATIVE
32e. MAILING ADDRESS OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE 32f . TELEPHONE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVE
37. CHECK NUMBER
FINALPARTIALCOMPLETE
36. PAYMENT35. AMOUNT VERIFIED
CORRECT FOR
34. VOUCHER NUMBER
FINAL
33. SHIP NUMBER
PARTIAL
38. S/R ACCOUNT NUMBER 39. S/R VOUCHER NUMBER 40. PAID BY
41a. I CERTIFY THIS ACCOUNT IS CORRECT AND PROPER FOR PAYMENT 41b. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF CERTIFYING OFFICER 41c. DATE
42a. RECEIVED BY (Print)
42b. RECEIVED AT (Location)
42c. DATE REC'D (YY/MM/DD) 42d. TOTAL CONTAINERS
STANDARD FORM 1449 (REV. 2/2012) BACK
Prescribed by GSA – FAR (48 CFR) 53.212
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
PREVIOUS EDITION IS NOT USABLE
SEE SCHEDULE
20.
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLIES/ SERVICES
21.
QUANTITY UNIT
22. 23.
UNIT PRICE
24.
AMOUNT
19.
ITEM NO.
FA5685-17-R-0002
Section SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET
ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
0001 8 Months Orthopedic Surgery Services Non-Personal
FFP
The Contractor shall furnish all labor, management, supervision, consultations and reports necessary to perform orthopedic surgery services as required by the Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 February 2017 - 30 September 2017 for a total of 1,280 hours.
FOB: Destination
SIGNAL CODE: A
NET AMT
0002 75 Hours Orthopedic Call Back Hours
FFP
Call back hours will be billed according to paragraph 1.2.2.1 of the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 February 2017 - 30 September 2017.
1001 12 Months OPTION Orthopedic Surgery Services Non-Personal
FFP
The Contractor shall furnish all labor, management, supervision, consultations and reports necessary to perform orthopedic surgery services as required by the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2017 - 30 September 2018 for a total of 1,920 hours.
FOB: Destination
NSN: Q513-17-085-A002
1002 150 Hours OPTION Orthopedic Call Back Hours
FFP
Call back hours will be billed according to paragraph 1.2.2.1 of the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2017 - 30 September 2018.
FOB: Destination
2001 12 Months OPTION Orthopedic Surgery Services Non-Personal
FFP
The Contractor shall furnish all labor, management, supervision, consultations and reports necessary to perform orthopedic surgery services as required by the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2018 - 30 September 2019 for a total of 1,920 hours.
FOB: Destination
2002 150 Hours OPTION Orthopedic Call Back Hours
FFP
Call back hours will be billed according to paragraph 1.2.2.1 of the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2018 - 30 September 2019.
FOB: Destination
3001 12 Months OPTION Orthopedic Surgery Services Non-Personal
FFP
The Contractor shall furnish all labor, management, supervision, consultations and reports necessary to perform orthopedic surgery services as required by the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2019 - 30 September 2020 for a total of $1,920 hours.
FOB: Destination
3002 150 Hours OPTION Orthopedic Call Back Hours
FFP
Call back hours will be billed according to paragraph 1.2.2.1 of the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2019 - 30 September 2020.
FOB: Destination
4001 12 Months OPTION Orthopedic Surgery Services Non-Personal
FFP
The Contractor shall furnish all labor, management, supervision, consultations and reports necessary to perform orthopedic surgery services as required by the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2020 - 30 September 2021 for a total of 1,920 hours.
FOB: Destination
4002 150 Hours OPTION Orthopedic Call Back Hours
FFP
Call back hours will be billed according to paragraph 1.2.2.1 of the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2020 - 30 September 2021.
FOB: Destination
5001 6 Months OPTION Orthopedic Surgery Services Non-Personal
FFP
The Contractor shall furnish all labor, management, supervision, consultations and reports necessary to perform orthopedic surgery services as required by the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2021 - 31 March 2022 in accordance with clause 52.217-8 for a total of 960 hours.
FOB: Destination
5002 75 Hours OPTION Orthopedic Call Back Hours
FFP
Call back hours will be billed according to paragraph 1.2.2.1 of the PWS dated 25 April 2016. The period of performance is 1 October 2021 - 31 March 2022 in accordance with clause 52.217-8.
FOB: Destination
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS
Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:
CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY
0001 Destination Government Destination Government 0002 Destination Government Destination Government
1001 Destination Government Destination Government 1002 Destination Government Destination Government 2001 Destination Government Destination Government 2002 Destination Government Destination Government 3001 Destination Government Destination Government 3002 Destination Government Destination Government 4001 Destination Government Destination Government 4002 Destination Government Destination Government 5001 Destination Government Destination Government 5002 Destination Government Destination Government
DELIVERY INFORMATION
CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC
0001 POP 01-FEB-2017 TO
30-SEP-2017
N/A F2G4A2 39 MDS
SERDAL GURSES
UNIT 7095 BOX 185 BLDG 865
APO AE 09824
90-322-3168659
F2G4A2
0002 POP 01-FEB-2017 TO
30-SEP-2017
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
1001 POP 01-OCT-2017 TO
30-SEP-2018
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
1002 POP 01-OCT-2017 TO
01-SEP-2018
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
2001 POP 01-OCT-2018 TO
30-SEP-2019
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
2002 POP 01-OCT-2018 TO
30-SEP-2019
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
3001 POP 01-OCT-2019 TO
30-SEP-2020
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
3002 POP 01-OCT-2019 TO
30-SEP-2020
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
4001 POP 01-OCT-2020 TO
30-SEP-2021
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
4002 POP 01-OCT-2020 TO
30-SEP-2021
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
5001 POP 01-OCT-2021 TO
31-MAR-2022
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
5002 POP 01-OCT-2021 TO
31-MAR-2022
N/A (SAME AS PREVIOUS LOCATION)
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
52.203-3 Gratuities APR 1984 52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To
Influence Certain Federal Transactions
SEP 2007
52.203-12 Limitation On Payments To Influence Certain Federal Transactions
OCT 2010
52.203-17 Contractor Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement To Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights
APR 2014
52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber Content Paper
MAY 2011
52.204-7 System for Award Management JUL 2013 52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance JUL 2013 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2015 52.204-17 Ownership or Control of Offeror NOV 2014 52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2015 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and
Certifications.
DEC 2014
52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation
NOV 2015
52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors--Commercial Items OCT 2015 52.212-4 Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items MAY 2015 52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain
Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-- Representation and Certifications.
OCT 2015
52.229-6 Taxes--Foreign Fixed-Price Contracts FEB 2013 52.232-1 Payments APR 1984 52.232-11 Extras APR 1984 52.232-17 Interest MAY 2014 52.232-23 Assignment Of Claims MAY 2014 52.232-39 Unenforceability of Unauthorized Obligations JUN 2013 52.237-1 Site Visit APR 1984 52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And
Vegetation
APR 1984
52.237-10 Identification of Uncompensated Overtime MAR 2015 52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-15 Stop-Work Order AUG 1989 52.242-17 Government Delay Of Work APR 1984 52.253-1 Computer Generated Forms JAN 1991 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD
Officials
SEP 2011
252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013
252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials
NOV 2011
252.204-7000 Disclosure Of Information AUG 2013 252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7004 Alt A System for Award Management Alternate A FEB 2014 252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber
Incident Reporting.
DEC 2015
252.209-7004 Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism
OCT 2015
252.222-7002 Compliance With Local Labor Laws (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.223-7006 Prohibition On Storage, Treatment, and Disposal of Toxic or
Hazardous Materials
SEP 2014
252.225-7041 Correspondence in English JUN 1997 252.225-7042 Authorization to Perform APR 2003 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013 252.225-7050 Disclosure of Ownership or Control by the Government of a
Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism
OCT 2015
252.229-7000 Invoices Exclusive of Taxes or Duties JUN 1997 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving
Reports
JUN 2012
252.232-7008 Assignment of Claims (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.233-7001 Choice of Law (Overseas) JUN 1997 252.237-7010 Prohibition on Interrogation of Detainees by Contractor
Personnel
JUN 2013
252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
52.204-20 Predecessor of Offeror (APR 2016)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--
Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code means--
(1) An identifier assigned to entities located in the United States and its outlying areas by the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch to identify a commercial or government entity, or
(2) An identifier assigned by a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) or by NATO's Support Agency (NSPA) to entities located outside the United States and its outlying areas that DLA Contractor and Government Entity (CAGE) Branch records and maintains in the CAGE master file. This type of code is known as an NCAGE code.
Predecessor means an entity that is replaced by a successor and includes any predecessors of the predecessor.
Successor means an entity that has replaced a predecessor by acquiring the assets and carrying out the affairs of the predecessor under a new name (often through acquisition or merger). The term “successor” does not include new offices/divisions of the same company or a company that only changes its name. The extent of the responsibility of the successor for the liabilities of the predecessor may vary, depending on State law and specific circumstances.
(b) The Offeror represents that it [____] is or [____] is not a successor to a predecessor that held a Federal contract or grant within the last three years.
(c) If the Offeror has indicated “is” in paragraph (b) of this provision, enter the following information for all predecessors that held a Federal contract or grant within the last three years (if more than one predecessor, list in reverse chronological order):
Predecessor CAGE code: ____ (or mark “Unknown”).
Predecessor legal name: ____.
(Do not use a “doing business as” name).
(End of provision)
52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2015)
(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-
(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-
(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;
(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and
(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.;
and
(D) Have , have not , within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,500 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.
(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:
(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.
(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.
(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.
(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.
(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.
(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).
(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.
(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;
head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).
(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.
(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.
52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JULY 2013)
(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--
Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.
Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--
(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and
(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).
Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).
(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000.
(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:
(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:
(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.
(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.
(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--
(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or
(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.
(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.
(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.
(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the System for Award Management database via https://www.acquisition.gov (see 52.204-7).
52.209-11 REPRESENTATION BY CORPORATIONS REGARDING DELINQUENT TAX LIABILITY OR A
FELONY CONVICTION UNDER ANY FEDERAL LAW (FEB 2016)
https://www.acquisition.gov/
(a) As required by sections 744 and 745 of Division E of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235), and similar provisions, if contained in subsequent appropriations acts, the Government will not enter into a contract with any corporation that--
(1) Has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability, where the awarding agency is aware of the unpaid tax liability, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that suspension or debarment is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government; or
(2) Was convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months, where the awarding agency is aware of the conviction, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.
(b) The Offeror represents that--
(1) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability; and
(2) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that was convicted of a felony criminal violation under a Federal law within the preceding 24 months.
52.212-1 ADDENDUM
52.212-1 ADDENDA
Addenda to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items (Oct 2015)
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.
Addenda to 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Proposals. The paragraph is tailored as follows: “The Offeror agrees to hold the prices in its proposal firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of proposals.”
A. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the Offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation.
Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. The response shall consist of two (2) separate parts:
PART I – Price Proposal PART II – Technical Proposal
B. All parts may be mailed or delivered to 39 CONS, Attn: MSgt David Alvarez/SSgt Chelsea Baker 39th Contracting Squadron, Unit 7090, APO AE 09824, building 485, Incirlik Hava USSU, Adana, Turkey. If proposals are hand delivered, they shall be delivered to building 485 and addressed to MSgt David Alvarez/SSgt Chelsea Baker. Proposals must be received no later than 1000 Eastern European Time (EET) 14 November 2016.
Offerors should verify receipt of any mailed or delivered proposal with the Contracting point of contact.
C. Offerors should be aware that this is a Turkish Installation and that all access to this installation is granted by the Turkish Air Force (TurAF). Therefore, SOME DELAYS SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HAND CARRYING PROPOSALS. The Offeror should allow sufficient time to arrive and submit the proposals to the Contracting Office PRIOR to the set closing time. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212- 1(f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.” If gate access is not granted, please contact the CO (MSgt David Alvarez) immediately. The Offerors are responsible for coordinating and processing gate pass requests in a timely manner. The United States Government (USG) shall not be held accountable for denied gate entry. Furthermore, Offerors must be aware that the duty day at Incirlik AB is Monday through Friday from 07:30 to 16:30. Also, Offerors need to exit the base by 16:30. This may require contractors to stop work, prepare to leave the base, and clean up prior to 16:30. Offerors are encouraged to take this into consideration when proposing a delivery or performance time. The USG shall not be responsible for delays due to in processing or out-processing the base. Vendors that have problems entering the base can call the Contracting Office at 676-8075 for further assistance.
D. Evaluation factors and standards: The addendum to FAR Clause 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS (JULY 2013) provides information on the format and content of the proposal package and what items need to be submitted for each part. The FAR Clause 52.212-2, EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999), provides a complete description regarding the evaluation factors for award.
E. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination, and if in the Contracting Officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists, no additional information will be requested.
However, if at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; Offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.
F. “DUE TO AN ESTABLISHED ECONOMIC AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT AND THE GOVERNMENT OF TURKEY, THE U.S. AIR FORCE INTENDS TO AWARD
THIS SOLICITATION TO A BUSINESS CONCERN WITHIN THE COUNTRY OF TURKEY, AS REQUIRED
BY THE DEFENSE AND ECONOMIC COOPERATIONS AGREEMENT, SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT
3, ARITCLE VI. IF IT IS DISCOVERED THAT THE U.S. AIR FORCE IS NOT ABLE TO MAKE AWARD TO
A BUSINESS CONCERN WITHIN THE COUNTY OF TURKEY, IT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE
AWARD TO A BUSINESS CONCERN THAT IS NOT WITHIN THE COUNTY OF TURKEY.”
G. Point of Contact (POC): The Contract Administrator (CA), SSgt Chelsea Baker is the primary POC for this acquisition. Address any questions you have to the CA. Written questions concerning the solicitation may be sent to SSgt Chelsea Baker, chelsea.baker@us.af.mil. All questions must be submitted no later than 1100 EET 26 October 2016.
SPECIFIC PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS.
H. The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table. Failure to provide all of the required elements in accordance with the below chart may render the proposal ineligible for award.
Table 1.1 Proposal Organization
Element Title Maximum # Pages Forms, fill-ins, required information, documents, and records
Contract Documentation No Limit
Part I Price Proposal No Limit Part II Technical Proposal No Limit
I. Specific Instructions.
mailto:chelsea.baker@us.af.mil
1. PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL (EVALUATION FACTOR 1)
(a) Complete blocks 12, 17a, and 30a, b, and c of the SF 1449. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.
(b) Insert the proposed unit and extended prices in the Pricing Schedule. The proposal(s) must be submitted for a base period plus four (4) Option Years and one (1) 6 Month Extension.
(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. The provision FAR 52.212-3 shall be returned along with the proposal.
(d) Complete and return Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract (If applicable)
(e) All proposed prices shall be submitted in U.S. DOLLARS. Offers not submitted in the U.S. DOLLAR will not be considered for award.
2. PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (EVALUATION FACTOR 2) – All requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory and by submitting a proposal, offerors are representing that their firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation and PWS. It is not necessary or desirable to reiterate the requirements of the PWS.
Subfactor 1 – Doctor of Medicine Degree: The offeror must provide proof of a formal Doctor of Medicine degree earned from an accredited university. The medical degree must have been issued from a medical school that is accredited from the Liaison Committee of Medical Education or in accordance with other globally accepted standards. In Turkey, accreditation of medical schools is conducted by the Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Medical Education Programs (http://www.uteak.org.tr/).
Subfactor 2 – Working Experience: The offeror must hold a minimum of ten (10) years of experience from the issuance date of their valid unrestricted license and/or certification to practice orthopedic surgery in the Republic of Turkey. Note: The certification is normally issued by the Minister of Health.
Subfactor 3 – Life Support Certification. The offeror must possess a current Basic Life Support, and Advanced Cardiac Life Support Certification.
Subfactor 4 – HIPAA Certification. The offeror must possess a current Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) certification.
Subfactor 5 – Liability Insurance. The offeror must have a minimum medical malpractice liability insurance policy of 1,000,000.00 Turkish Lira.
Subfactor 6 – CME Credits. The offeror must have a continuation medical education Category 1 CME credits for a minimum of 20 hours for the previous three (3) years from the issuance date of this solicitation.
Subfactor 7 – Criminal Background Check. The offeror must provide a criminal background check from Saglik Mudurlugu, Stadyom Giris Kapisi Karsisi, Hifzisihha Mlid Bitisigi, Adana, Turkey. Note: The background check must be accompanied with a translation from Turkish into English. It must not include any felonies that would be contradictory to proper medical care.
Subfactor 8 – Medical Staff Experience. The offeror must submit proof of experience in participation in medical quality assurance and risk management meetings. The applicant needs to show that he has participated in at least four professional staff meetings in the previous 12 months, from the issuance date of this solicitation, at any JCI (Joint Commission International) accredited hospital or any AAAHC (Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care) facilities.
http://www.uteak.org.tr/
Subfactor 9 – Electronic Medical Records Experience. The offeror must have functioning working knowledge of the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA) / Composite Health Care System (CHCS) electronic medical systems that are required in documenting all medical records. The offeror must indicate when and where this experience was obtained. Note: Experience in alternative electronic medical systems cannot be submitted as a substitution.
Subfactor 10 – Medical Procedure Experience. The offeror must provide proof of experience, over the past 60 months, from the issuance date of this solicitation, in successfully performing the minimum medical procedures and quantities listed below. Appropriate documentation of proof would be a signed memorandum for record from a medical director/chief that summarized the total number of procedures and encounters.
Achilles tendon repair Acromioplasty AD clavicle resection bankart repair AD clavicle resection Ankle arthroscopy Anterior cruciate ligament repair Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis Arthroscopic ankle ligament repair Arthroscopic ankle synovectomy Arthroscopic bankart repair Arthroscopic knee, shoulder, elbow, and ankle surgeries Arthroscopic OCD lesion treatment Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tendons Arthroscopic SAD ecompression Bankart repair Carpal tunnel release Cartilage shaving Debridement of skin/muscle/bone/fracture Incise finger tendon sheath Internal and external fixation (ORIF) Knee arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee arthroscopy and chondroplasty Knee arthroscopy and meniscectomy and/or repair Knee arthroscopy repair of both menisci Knee replacement Latarjet procedure Microfracture and cartilage debridement Open and closed reduction Removal of support implant Repair fracture of radius (bone)/ulna Repair fracture of the distal part of radius Repair of ankle fracture (bi malleolar type) Repair of ankle fracture (fibula) Repair of femoral neck fracture Repair of femoral shaft fracture Repair of trochanteric fracture Shoulder arthroscopic distal clavicle excision Shoulder arthroscopy and debridement Shoulder arthroscopy and decompression Shoulder, hip, and knee prosthetic replacement procedures Subacromion bursectomy Synovectomy meniscectomy/meniscal repair
Subfactor 11 – Complication Rates. The offeror must provide proof, over the past 12 months, that overall procedural complication rate has been less than three percent and that the overall post-procedural infection rate has been less than three percent. Appropriate documentation of proof would be a signed memorandum for record from a medical director/chief that summarized any complication procedures and encounters.
CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT
--52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)
The Government will award one contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation is determined to be the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) offer utilizing FAR Parts 12 and 13. The Government may award without discussions; however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in the Government’s best interest. Legibility, clarity and coherence are of great importance.
The Evaluation Factors are:
PART I – Price Proposal PART II – Technical Proposal
I. Factor 1 – Price Proposal.
All offeror’s proposed price will be determined by multiplying the quantities by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to confirm the extended amount and the total amount. The total evaluated price will include all option periods and extension period. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness and completeness of the total evaluated price.
Options. The Government will evaluate proposal for award purposes by adding the total price for all options and extension period, to include FAR 52.217-8, to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). As referenced in clause 52.217-8, the total evaluated price will be evaluated by factoring in an additional 50% of the final option period price of a maximum six month extension.
Arithmetic Discrepancies. For the purpose of initial evaluation of offers, the following will be utilized in resolving arithmetic discrepancies as submitted by the offeror.
(A) Obviously misplaced decimal points will be corrected;
(B) Discrepancy between unit price and extended price, the unit price will govern;
(C) Apparent errors in extension of unit prices will be corrected;
(D) Apparent errors in extended prices per CLIN will be corrected.
II. Factor 2 – Technical Proposal.
The Government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. Ratings will be assigned as follows:
Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
(i) In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must successfully demonstrate a clear understanding and to provide documentation and have a technical rating of “Acceptable” on the Technical Proposal Evaluation Subfactor 1 through Subfactor 11. The Subfactors are listed in the Addenda to 52.212-1.
Subfactor 1 – Doctor of Medicine Degree: In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must provide proof of a formal Doctor of Medicine degree earned from an accredited university. The university must be accredited by the Liaison Committee of Medical Education, the Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Medical Education Programs, or other globally acceptable standards.
Subfactor 2 – Working Experience: In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the offeror shall provide proof of a minimum of ten (10) years medical experience, from the date of issuance of the solicitation, that resulted in a valid unrestricted license and/or certification in the practice of orthopedic surgery in the Republic of Turkey. The license and/or certificate in orthopedic surgery must be dated prior to 2006.The certification is normally issued by the Minister of Health.
Subfactor 3 – Life Support Certification. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must submit a current Basic Life Support Certification, and Advanced Cardiac Life Support Certification.
Subfactor 4 – HIPAA Certification. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must submit a current Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) certification.
Subfactor 5 – Liability Insurance. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must submit a minimum medical malpractice liability insurance policy of 1,000,000.00 Turkish Lira or greater.
Subfactor 6 – CME Credits. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must submit a continuation medical education Category 1 CME credits for a minimum of 20 hours for the previous three
(3) years from the issuance date of this solicitation. The minimum must be 60 total hours.
Subfactor 7 – Criminal Background Check. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must provide a criminal background check from Saglik Mudurlugu that shows no felonies that would be contradictory to proper medical care. Note: The background check must be accompanied with a translation from Turkish into English.
Subfactor 8 – Medical Staff Experience. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must submit proof of experience in participation in medical quality assurance and risk management meetings. The applicant needs to show documentation that he has participated in at least four professional staff meetings in the previous 12 months at any JCI (Joint Commission International) accredited hospital or any AAAHC (Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care) facilities. The documentation must show that the offeror has been in attendance at four staff meetings (full attendance via sign-in roster). The document must include the signature of the Medical Director of the accredited facility, a witness signature, and contact information.
Subfactor 9 – Electronic Medical Records Experience. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must have functioning working knowledge of the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA) / Composite Health Care System (CHCS) electronic medical systems that are required in documenting all medical records. The offeror must provide proof that he or she used AHLTA/CHCS electronic medical systems; held regular unrestricted privileges. Note:
Experience in alternative electronic medical systems cannot be submitted as a substitution.
Subfactor 10 – Medical Procedure Experience. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must provide proof of experience, over the past 60 months from the issuance date of this solicitation, in successfully performing the following minimum medical procedures and quantities:
Achilles tendon repair Acromioplasty AD clavicle resection bankart repair AD clavicle resection Ankle arthroscopy
Anterior cruciate ligament repair Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis Arthroscopic ankle ligament repair Arthroscopic ankle synovectomy Arthroscopic bankart repair Arthroscopic knee, shoulder, elbow, and ankle surgeries Arthroscopic OCD lesion treatment Arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tendons Arthroscopic SAD ecompression Bankart repair Carpal tunnel release Cartilage shaving Debridement of skin/muscle/bone/fracture Incise finger tendon sheath Internal and external fixation (ORIF) Knee arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Knee arthroscopy and chondroplasty Knee arthroscopy and meniscectomy and/or repair Knee arthroscopy repair of both menisci Knee replacement Latarjet procedure Microfracture and cartilage debridement Open and closed reduction Removal of support implant Repair fracture of radius (bone)/ulna Repair fracture of the distal part of radius Repair of ankle fracture (bi malleolar type) Repair of ankle fracture (fibula) Repair of femoral neck fracture Repair of femoral shaft fracture Repair of trochanteric fracture Shoulder arthroscopic distal clavicle excision Shoulder arthroscopy and debridement Shoulder arthroscopy and decompression Shoulder, hip, and knee prosthetic replacement procedures Subacromion bursectomy Synovectomy meniscectomy/meniscal repair
Documented proof can be in the form of a copy of a billing statement, certified by the Medical Director of the hospital providing care, a patient operation/procedure report note certified by the Medical Director of the hospital providing care, or if performed in an JCI or AAAHC facility, a letter listing the dates and types of procedures accomplished, signed by the Medical Director of the accredited facility. Each document provided must show a witnessed signature. Applicant should prove that he worked at least 30 hours per month, for 72 months of the past 120 months, in a JCI or AAAHC accredited facility.
Subfactor 11 – Complication Rates. In order to be determined Technically Acceptable, the Offeror must provide proof, over the past 12 months, that overall procedural complication rate has been less than three percent and that the overall post-procedural infection rate has been less than three percent. The offeror must provide certified (signed/witnessed) documentation from the Medical Director of a Joint Commission International or Accreditation for Ambulatory Health Care facility, stating that Quality Management records for that provider have been screened for complication and infection rate occurrences.
(ii) Pre-assignment Medical Evaluation: As specified in the solicitation’s Performance Work Statement, the proposed primary physician will have to submit to a complete and extensive medical evaluation. If the proposed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anterior_cruciate_ligament http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthroscopy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chondroplasty http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthroscopy http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meniscectomy&action=edit&redlink=1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthroscopy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_(bone) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulna http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_(bone) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibula http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_fracture http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clavicle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthroscopy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debridement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthroscopy primary physician does not obtain an “Acceptable” medical evaluation, the offeror shall be determined Nonresponsible (not eligible for contract award) and the next apparent low offeror shall be evaluated.
III. Award Process. The Government intends to award to the lowest priced, technically acceptable offeror. In accordance with 13.106-2(b)(3), the Government is not required to establish a competitive range, conduct discussions, or score offers. Consistent with simplified acquisition procedures, the evaluation process is as follows:
(i) Price: The Government will evaluate all proposals for price, ranking the offerors’ proposals from lowest to highest total evaluated price using the evaulation methods above.
(ii) Technical: The governement will then evaulte the lowest priced offeror’s technical proposal for Technical Acceptability. Proposals must be rated technically “Acceptable”. For the entire technical proposal to be rated as technically “Acceptable,” each subfactor must have a rating of “Acceptable”.
If the lowest priced offeror’s technical proposal is “Unacceptable”, the next low offeror’s technical proposal will be evaluated, continuing until an offeror with an “Acceptable” technical rating is identified.
If the lowest priced offeror’s technical proposal is “Acceptable”, the evaluation process may stop and the award may be made to that offeror, pending an affirmative price fair and reasonable determination. However, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the government, the government will continue with the evaluation and reserves the right to enter into discussions any time during the evaluation process.
A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party.
Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
52.212-5 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT STATUTES OR
EXECUTIVE ORDERS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (MAR 2016)
(a) The Contractor shall comply with the following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clauses, which are incorporated in this contract by reference, to implement provisions of law or Executive orders applicable to acquisitions of commercial items:
(1) 52.209-10, Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations (Nov 2015).
(2) 52.233-3, Protest After Award (AUG 1996) (31 U.S.C. 3553).
(3) 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim (OCT 2004) (Public Laws 108-77 and 108-78 (19 U.S.C.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .