Atch_3_PPQ_ _Cover_Ltr_2013_02_13_MC T_Final.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Medical Coding and Training (MC&T) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5613-13-R-0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

About this file

Atch 3 PPQ and Coverletter FA5613-13-R-0001

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Medical Coding and Training (MC&T), newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30_MC T_0001_(1).pdf PDF
MC T_Solicitation_Q As.docx DOCX document
MC T_Combined_Synopsis_Conformed_through_Amendment_0001.docx DOCX document
Atch_1_PWS_FA5613-13-R-0001_MC T_Amend_001.docx DOCX document
MC T_Combined_Synopsis_FA5613-13-R-0001_Final.docx DOCX document
Atch_2_QASP_FA5613-13-R-0001_MC T_Final.docx DOCX document
Atch_4_Subctr._Consent_Form_2013_02_25_Final.docx DOCX document
Atch_1_PWS_FA5613-13-R-0001_MC T_Final.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 3

FA5613-13-R-0001

QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENT LETTER

FROM: 700 CONS/USAFE CONS Specialized Unit 3115

APO AE 09021-3115

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

1. The USAFE CONS Specialized contracting flight is in the process of conducting a source selection for USAFE Medical Coding and Training (MC&T) Services requirements. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform. The Government depends on information received from those who have first hand information, in order to evaluate the offeror’s past performance.

2. Areas of interest in the offerors past performance are summarized in the electronic past performance questionnaire e-mailed to you by the offeror.

3. Although this questionnaire was distributed to you by the offeror/contractor, it is important you electronically complete the questionnaire and forward it directly to the Government Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), not later than 21 Mar 2013, at the following e-mail address: justin.truitt.1@us.af.mil and benjamin.wood.8@us.af.mil. If you are unable to electronically submit the questionnaire to the e-mail address above, faxed copies will be accepted and can be sent to the attention of IM/IT PCO, Mr. Justin Truitt, FAX: 011-49-6371-9748.

4. DO NOT RETURN OR E-MAIL THE QUESTIONNAIRES BACK TO THE OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR! Once the questionnaire is filled out, it becomes source selection sensitive and needs to be handled accordingly. If you have any concern please contact Mr. Justin Truitt at +49 (0)631-536-7123.

5. Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

Sincerely,

//Signed//
JUSTIN TRUITTProcuring Contracting Officer

Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:_____________________
_____________________________Email Address: _____________________

C. EMAIL or FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Mr. Justin Truitt, FAX: 011-49-6371-9748

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A, U and UNK) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF U.

Rating
Definition
Acceptable (A)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
Unacceptable (U)
Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Unknown (UNK)
In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

* Please explain the circumstances of any “unsatisfactory” rating in the corresponding “Remarks” area of each item.

A
U *
UNK
1.
Rate how well the contractor transitioned into assuming full performance responsibility from the incumbent contractor.

Remarks:

2.
Rate how well the contractor recruited and provided qualified management and key personnel during the transition period and throughout the contract performance period.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
3.
Rate how well the contractor provided adequate, competent and qualified technical personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
4.
Rate how well the contractor’s top management was involved and committed to program success during the transition period and throughout the period of the contract.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
5.
Rate how effective the contractor’s management of subcontracts was/is.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
6.
Rate how timely and sufficient the contractor’s resources (manning levels, skill mix etc.) were/are to meet contract requirements (technical, management, and contractual).

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
7.
Rate how well the contractor respond(s/ed) to and act(s/ed) on customer feedback.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
8.
Rate how well the contractor perform(s/ed) the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
9.
Rate how well the contractor demonstrate(s/d) a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the Government’s Program Management and Contract Management teams.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
10.
Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
11.
Rate how timely and effective the contractor’s responses to and resolution of technical problems were/are.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
12.
Rate how well the contractor work(s/ed) independent of Government guidance, oversight and assistance.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
13.
Rate how responsive the contractor’s quality program was/is in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
14.
Rate how well the contractor complied with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability (HIPAA) requirements.

Remarks:

A
U
UNK
15.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Remarks.”

Remarks:

YES
NO
16.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “Remarks” below.
YES
NO

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .