FA5613-20-Q-0009 A4 Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 46 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 86th MXG C-130 Aircraft Washing Services
- Solicitation number
- FA561320Q0009
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a contractor providing C-130 aircraft wash services at Ramstein Air Base in Germany. The questionnaire requests information about the contractor's performance on the referenced contract, including whether they met required turnaround times and technical requirements, provided qualified personnel, communicated effectively to resolve issues, and whether the contractor received any cure notices. Respondents are asked to provide ratings in categories such as timeliness, compliance with technical orders, personnel qualifications, and overall performance. The questionnaire should be returned before March 2, 2020 to an Air Force contact regarding solicitation FA5613-20-Q-0009 for 86th MXG C-130 Aircraft Wash Services.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| QA Attachment - Projected 90D WA Sched.pdf | ||
| Questions and Answers for FA5613-20-Q-0009.pdf | ||
| FA5613-20-Q-0009 A2 CLIN Breakout.doc | DOC document | |
| FA5613-20-Q-0009 A3 Applicable Clauses and Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA5613-20-Q-0009 Combo.doc | DOC document | |
| FA5613-20-Q-0009 A5 DD 254.pdf | ||
| FA5613-20-Q-0009 A1 PWS Washing Final.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA5613-20-Q-0009
Attachment 2
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
This Acquisition is for 86th MXG C-130 Aircraft Wash Services at Ramstein AB.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Primary
Alternate Name of Respondent:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Title:
Telephone Number:
Telephone Number:
Email Address:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM PRIOR TO OFFER DUE DATE OF 2 MARCH 2020:
Attn: 700 CONS/PKA SSgt Jessica Young jessica.young.7@us.af.mil +49-631-536-6598 or DSN 489-6598
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATING GIVEN.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Has the offeror met required service turnaround times? |
| 2. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to comply with the applicable technical orders required to render services in a timely fashion? |
| 3. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to provide qualified personnel |
(to include security and proper skill levels)
| 4. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to retain qualified personnel? |
| 5. |
| Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to communicate and resolve technical problems timely and thoroughly? |
| 6. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 7. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? |
If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES / NO
| 8. |
| For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES / NO |
| 9. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
| YES / NO |
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Other Remarks:
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
For Official Use Only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .