Technical_Evaluation_Checklist.docx

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

TECHNICAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST

RAFL Contingency Cooks – RFQ FA5587-15-T-0006

· Below is the technical evaluation checklist that will be used when evaluating the Technical Portion of the contractor quote. Please be sure you have fully reviewed and understand the information required for submission per Addendum 52.212-1, C, Part 2- Technical.

Initial/Final (Circle one)

OFFEROR _________________ EVALUATOR(S): ______________ ___________ DATE: ____________

Technical evaluation ratings for the criteria listed under Addendum 52.212-2 of the RFQ paragraph B.2 shall be entered below and a complete justification provided for each rating of Unacceptable.

SUB FACTOR # 1 – Transition Plan-

1. Has the offeror thoroughly and clearly described their key processes and procedures for hiring or obtaining the necessary personnel and ensuring that employees are available and capable to perform the contract requirements on the contract start date? This should include processes which will adhere to the required shift times, employee replacements, and re-performance (ref. Performance Work Statement (PWS) paragraphs 1.6, 2.2, and Section III, Appendix 1, Approximate Shift Times per Task Order)

Acceptable Unacceptable

2. Has the offeror thoroughly and clearly described their key processes and procedures for ensuring employees have received and are capable of providing the Health Examination Certificates to enable performance of the contract requirements on the contract start date (ref. PWS paragraph 1.4.4).?

Acceptable Unacceptable

3. Has the offeror thoroughly and clearly described their key processes and procedures for ensuring means to both provide uniforms that meet the criteria set forth in the PWS, as well as methods to control and enforce proper wear by contracted employees to enable performance of the contract requirements on the contract start date (ref. PWS paragraph 1.2 and Section III Appendix 2 Contractor Furnished Items)?

Acceptable Unacceptable

4. Has the offeror thoroughly and clearly described their key processes and procedures for ensuring timely submission of all materials required for base pass access; taking into account that submitting employees that have criminal records or other extenuating circumstances may take longer to be approved, if they receive approval at all? Has offeror described how they will enforce/ensure all employees have base access to enable performance of the contract requirements on the contract start date (ref. PWS paragraph 1.9).

Acceptable Unacceptable

OVERALL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY RATING

Acceptable – The offeror’s resources/transition plan and quality control plan have clearly and comprehensively addressed all areas prescribed by 52.212-1, and have provided the Government reasonable assurance the offeror will successfully meet the requirements under the solicitation and resultant contract if awarded.

Unacceptable – The offeror’s resources/transition plan and quality control plan have not clearly and comprehensively addressed all areas prescribed by 52.212-1, and have not provided the Government reasonable assurance the offeror will successfully meet the requirements under the solicitation and resultant contract if awarded.

Document specific reason(s) below if a factor is rated Unacceptable— Areas needing additional information:

Deficiencies noted:

TECHNICAL EVALUATION TEAM LEAD

NAME:

TITLE: