FA5270-13-R-0045-A0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to reflect answ ers to the questions from the site visit.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Sep-2013

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA5270-13-R-0045

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Sep-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Sep-2013

CODE

18 CONS/LGCB

POC:TOMOKO, HANASHIRO

UNIT 5199, BLDG 95 KADENA AB

APO AP 96368

FA5270 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA5270-13-R-0045

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 18-Sep-2013 10:00 AM to 20-Sep-2013

10:00 AM.

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

SUBCLIN 0002AC

The CLIN extended description has changed from The contractor will be reimbersed 100% for all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work StatementNTE: $25,000 to The contractor will be reimbersed 100% for all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work Statement.

SUBCLIN 1002AC

all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work StatementNTE: $25,000 to The contractor will be reimbersed 100% for all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work Statement.

SUBCLIN 2002AC

all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work StatementNTE: $25,000 to The contractor will be reimbersed 100% for all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work Statement.

SUBCLIN 3002AC

all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work StatementNTE: $25,000 to The contractor will be reimbersed 100% for all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work Statement.

SUBCLIN 4002AC

all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work StatementNTE: $25,000 to The contractor will be reimbersed 100% for all replacement parts cost in accordance with Performance-Based Work Statement.

The following have been modified:

ATTACHMENTS

LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

ATTCH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE PAGE(S)

1 Performance Work Statement Aug 2013 26 2 Price Exhibit Aug 2013 2 3 Past and Present Performance Form Aug 2013 1 4 Pre-Proposal Site Visit Reservation Form Aug 2013 1 5 Map of Chimu-Wan Tank Farm 3 Aug 2013 1 6 Question Form Aug 2013 1 **********************************LAST ITEM***************************************

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Technical Acceptability Price

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2, EVALUATION - - COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 1999)

This is a competitive Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 12, Part 13, and Part 15. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in clause FAR 52.212-1, Instructions To Offerors (and its addendum), the offeror accedes to the terms of this model contract. All technically acceptable offers will be treated equally except for past performance record and price. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined “Unacceptable.” The evaluation process will proceed as follows:

A. Technical Acceptability. Initially, the Government technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals by assigning an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating (see Table 1 below). The proposals will be evaluated against the following subfactor:

Subfactor 1, Licenses:

Valid licenses(s) submitted for business in County of Japan as required by the local Government, and any certificate and licenses which related to repair and/or maintenance of tank farm (such as electrical work, welding, oxidization prevention, maintenance and repair foreman) if applicable. Licenses must be current on the date of receipt of proposal(s), and maintained throughout the life of the contract.

Table 1, Technical Acceptability Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s staffing plan, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s staffing plan, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Note: The technical proposal must “Pass” the subfactor to be determined “Acceptable.” There will be no point scores assigned, only “Pass” or “Fail.” Even if a proposal fails a subfactor, the evaluators will continue to assess the remaining portions of the proposal; the entire proposal must be evaluated. In order to be considered awardable, there must be a “Pass” rating in every subfactor. Only those proposals determined to be technically “Acceptable,” either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

Technical Evaluation Table Offeror Name Acceptable Unacceptable Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3

Subfactor 2: Past Performance.

Next, using questionnaires, the Government will seek recent and relevant performance information on all technically acceptable offerors based on the references provided by the offeror and data independently obtained from other Government or commercial sources.

(i) Recent performance information includes relevant contracts performed for the Department of Defense, or Government of Japan, or US Government agencies, or commercial customers within the last three (3) years from the issuance date of the solicitation.

(ii) Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving performing warehousing services that is similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity described in this solicitation. The Government will use the ratings in Table 2 below when evaluating past performance:

Table 2. Past/Present Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Definition Rating Definition Very Relevant Past/Present performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation Relevant Past/Present performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Past/Present performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Past/Present performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Unknown No Past/Present performance effort involved unknown for the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Table 3, Past/Present Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without record of relevant past/present performance or for whom information on past/present performance is not available or so sparse that meaningful past/present performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have an unknown past/present performance.

In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “Unknown” shall be considered as “Acceptable”, however, in evaluating past/present performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater considerations rating to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

The results of the evaluation will be entered into the Past/Present Performance Evaluation Table below.

Past/Present Performance Evaluation Table Offeror Name Acceptable Unacceptable Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3

B. Price Evaluation. Lastly, the Government will rank all proposals rated acceptable in technical and past performance by price, to include all option prices. An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the solicitation by the proposed unit price for proposed quantity for each Contract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each item.

C. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the FAR 52.212-1 and/or its addendum. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal.

Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

D. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

(End of Addendum)

The following have been deleted:

PRICE EVALUATION TABLE

Offeror(s)

CLIN Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3

Total of Basic Year

Total of Option 1

Total of Option 2

Total of Option 3

Total of Option 4

GRAND TOTAL

ADDENDA TO FAR 52.212-1

(End of Summary of Changes)