RAP_DRAFT_PPQ_17_Aug_2017-Attach_4.pdf

**DRAFT**

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: _________________________________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: ________________________________________________________

C. Contract number: ____________________________________________________________

D. Contract type: _______________________________________________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $_________________________________________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $___________________________________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

Length of time (number of years and months) evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

E EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.

Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

VG VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

S SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

M MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Technical Performance E VG S M U N/A

T1 How did the contractor meet the employee qualification requirements of the specification?

T2 How did the contractor implement current standard practices for accomplishing sorties required annually?

T3. How effective was the contractor at providing training and updating training based on mission requirements?

Program Management E VG S M U N/A

P1. How effective was overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control and deliver on-time)?

P2. How well did the contractor develop staffing plans with the required job qualifications to include training, certifications, experience and personal security clearances up to TOP SECRET?

P3. How effective was the contractor in the human resources management of contractor personnel located in one or more foreign countries necessitating country clearances, status of forces agreements, cost of living, dependents education, vacations, remote locations and relocation considerations?

P4. How effective was the contractor’s acquisition management?

Transition/phase-in E VG S M U N/A

T1. How smoothly did the Contractor transition resources and personnel on and off the contract?

T2. How effective was the Contractor in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts?

Employee Retention/Attraction E VG S M U N/A

E1. How effective was the Contractor at hiring/applying a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effective was the Contractor at being able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

E3. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this Contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

OVERALL RATING E VG S M U N/A

Based on the above, what is your overall assessment of the contractor’s past performance? And why (please provide below)?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this Contractor’s overall performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

766th Specialized Contracting Squadron Attn: Lara A. Staley and Brian C Powell, Contract Specialist

766 SCONS/PKZ

560 Central Ave., Bldg 287

JBPHH, HI 96860-4961

or

Email: Lara A. Staley, lara.staley.1@us.af.mil Brian Powell, brian.powell.1@us.af.mil