FA521517R00020002_Released.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Attach the Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBA) for JBER, AK F-22 and JBER, AK E-3 and JBPHH, HI F-22.

2. Attach the SCA Wage Determinations for Alaska and Haw aii.

3. Update Sections L & M, the DD254, and the SOW based on industry questions.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 17

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Mar-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA5215-17-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Feb-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Feb-2018

CODE

766 SPECIALIZED CONTRACTING SQDN FA5215

560 CENTRAL AVE BLDG 287

HONOLULU HI 96860-4961

FA5215 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

x

FA5215-17-R-0002

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0014

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with paragraph 4.2.3 of the Attachment 1, Statement of Work. Prior to execution, the Contracting Officer shall approve the surge hours.

To:

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with the Statement of Work. Prior to execution, the Contracting Officer shall approve the surge hours.

CLIN 1014

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with paragraph 4.2.3 of the Attachment 1, Statement of Work. Prior to execution, the Contracting Officer shall approve

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with the

CLIN 2014

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with paragraph 4.2.3 of the Attachment 1, Statement of Work. Prior to execution, the Contracting Officer shall approve

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with the

CLIN 3014

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with paragraph 4.2.3 of the Attachment 1, Statement of Work. Prior to execution, the Contracting Officer shall approve

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with the

CLIN 4014

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with paragraph 4.2.3 of the Attachment 1, Statement of Work. Prior to execution, the Contracting Officer shall approve

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with the

CLIN 5014

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with paragraph 4.2.3 of the Attachment 1, Statement of Work. Prior to execution, the Contracting Officer shall approve

Surge Hours for Non-personal services that would occur outside regular scheduled hours in accordance with the

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by reference:

52.222-41 52.222-43

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The Table of Contents has changed from:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 01 RAP SOW 25-JAN-2018 Attachment 02 DD 254 25-JAN-2018 Attachment 03 RAP PPQ 25-JAN-2018 Attachment 04 RAP CLIN Pricing

Structure

25-JAN-2018

Attachment 05 Performance Incentive Plan (PIP)

01-FEB-2018

Attachment 06 CDRL A001 RAP, DMO/LSB

ATTENDANCE

RECORD

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 07 CDRL A002

CONTRACTOR

TRAINING AND EVAL

RECORDS

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 08 CDRL A003 SSM INFO 02-FEB-2018 Attachment 09 CDRL A004 MTCI/CIP

INFO

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 10 CDRL A005 PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT PLAN

(PMP)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 11 CDRL A006 SYSTEM

SECURITY PLAN

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 12 CDRL A007 MTCI CIP

TRAINING PLANS

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 13 CDRL A008 QUALITY

CONTROL PLAN (QCP)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 14 CDRL A009 ENV

HEALTH AND SAFETY

PLAN

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 15 CDRL A00A PHASE IN

PLAN

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 16 CDRL A00B PHASE

OUT PLAN

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 17 CDRL A00C MONTHLY

CONTRACTOR

PERFORMANCE

STATUS

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 18 CDRL A00D MONTHLY

STATUS REPORT

(MSR)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 19 CDRL A00E TRIP

REPORT

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 20 CDRL A00F MEETING

MINUTES

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 21 CDRL A00G INCIDENT

REPORT

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 22 CDRL A00H SECURITY

STANDARD

OPERATING

PROCEDURE

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 23 CDRL A00J LETTER OF

IDENTIFICATION (LOI)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 24 CDRL A00K TRAVEL

AUTHORIZATION (TA)

REQUEST

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 25 CDRL A00L SURGE

HOURS REQUEST

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 26 CDRL A00M

PERSONNEL

REPLACEMENT PLAN

(PRP)

to:

Exhibit/Attachment Table of Contents

DOCUMENT TYPE DESCRIPTION PAGES DATE

Attachment 02 DD-254 01-MAR-2018 Attachment 03 RAP PPQ 25-JAN-2018 Attachment 04 RAP CLIN Pricing

Structure

25-JAN-2018

Attachment 05 Performance Incentive Plan (PIP)

01-FEB-2018

Attachment 06 CDRL A001 RAP, DMO/LSB

ATTENDANCE

RECORD

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 07 CDRL A002

CONTRACTOR

TRAINING AND EVAL

RECORDS

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 08 CDRL A003 SSM INFO 02-FEB-2018 Attachment 09 CDRL A004 MTCI/CIP

INFO

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 10 CDRL A005 PROGRAM

MANAGEMENT PLAN

(PMP)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 11 CDRL A006 SYSTEM

SECURITY PLAN

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 12 CDRL A007 MTCI CIP

TRAINING PLANS

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 13 CDRL A008 QUALITY

CONTROL PLAN (QCP)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 14 CDRL A009 ENV

HEALTH AND SAFETY

PLAN

Attachment 15 CDRL A00A PHASE IN

PLAN

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 16 CDRL A00B PHASE

OUT PLAN

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 17 CDRL A00C MONTHLY

CONTRACTOR

PERFORMANCE

STATUS

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 18 CDRL A00D MONTHLY

STATUS REPORT

(MSR)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 19 CDRL A00E TRIP

REPORT

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 20 CDRL A00F MEETING

MINUTES

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 21 CDRL A00G INCIDENT

REPORT

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 22 CDRL A00H SECURITY

STANDARD

OPERATING

PROCEDURE

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 23 CDRL A00J LETTER OF

IDENTIFICATION (LOI)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 24 CDRL A00K TRAVEL

AUTHORIZATION (TA)

REQUEST

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 25 CDRL A00M

PERSONNEL

REPLACEMENT PLAN

(PRP)

02-FEB-2018

Attachment 26 JBPHH, HI F-22 CBA 27-FEB-2018 Attachment 27 JBER, AK F-22 CBA Attachment 28 JBER, AK E-3 CBA 27-FEB-2018 Attachment 29 Hawaii SCA Wage

Determination

27-FEB-2018

Attachment 30 Alaska SCA Wage Determination

27-FEB-2018

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Non-commercial)

L-PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of five (5) separate parts; Part I - Summary and Miscellaneous Data, Part II – Technical Proposal, Part III - Price Proposal, Part IV - Past Performance Proposal and Part V – Small Business Sub-contracting Plan.

B. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS DATA. Limited to no more than 10 pages. Submit original plus 3 copies plus 1 CD.

(a) The offeror shall provide a concise summary and master table of contents of the entire proposal.

(b) The offeror shall provide their company name, address, CAGE code, DUNS number and tax identification number (TIN).

(c) Complete blocks 13, 15, 16, 17 and 18 of the RFP Section A, SF 33. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K. These sections constitute the model contract.

(d) Complete block 14 of the RFP Section A, SF 33, if any solicitation amendment(s) to the original solicitation documents was/were issued. Amendments will not be counted against the page limits.

(e) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For Sections C through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in. (Does not count towards the page limitation)

(f) If applicable, provide a copy of the letter from the Small Business Administration (SBA) showing proof of 8(a) status.

(g) If none proposed, submit an Affirmation of no Exceptions, Deviations, or Waivers.

(h) A completed DD-254.

2. PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. Limited to no more than 32 pages. Submit original plus 3 copies plus 1 CD.

(a) Experience Performing Similar Services: Offeror shall provide any information currently available to demonstrate that your company has prior experience employing similar qualified candidates at multiple, geographically separated locations with at least one location subject to Status of Forces Agreement coordination.

(b) Resumes of Key Staff: Provide one resume, and firm letter of commitment for each of the following key staff members:

1. F-22 CIP

2. F-15 CIP

3. F-16 CIP

4. A-10 CIP

5. E-3 MTCI

6. Site Scenario Developer

7. Site Lead

8. Contract Program Manager/Lead Scenario Developer at Training Coordination Center

(c) Phase-In Plan: Offerors shall describe their plan to fully meet the Phase-In requirements outlined in

SOW paragraphs 7.13 and 10.2.6.

(d) Personnel Replacement Plan: Offerors shall describe their plan to retain employees once they are hired, and to handle the turnover of the employees that will need to be replaced as outlined in SOW paragraphs 6.6 and 10.2.8.

3. PART III – PRICE PROPOSAL. Submit original plus 3 copy plus 1 CD.

(a) This part shall contain a completed Section B (Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs).

(b) All offerors shall insert proposed unit prices and extended amounts in Section B for each Contract Line

Item Number (CLIN) or Sub CLIN (SLIN), including all option periods. All offerors shall insert proposed prices in the provided exhibit line item structure (Attachment J-4). The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number of units. It is imperative that mathematical calculations are correct; particular care should be taken to ensure the amounts match when using a spreadsheet program, such as Microsoft EXCEL. The unit prices and extended amounts are limited to two decimal places.

(c) Extreme care should be exercised to ensure that no price data of any kind is included in any other part of the proposal.

4. PART IV – PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL. Submissions are limited to 4 past performance contracts per team. Part III shall not exceed 24 pages total. Pages beyond the limit will not be evaluated. Only references within 3 years, from the issuance date of the solicitation, with at least 6 months of performance for past efforts/contracts of relevance are desired. Submit original plus 3 copies plus 1 CD.

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating of Contracts: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) that demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and/or quality of completed and/or ongoing contracts. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems, such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc. (See Sec M-01, paragraph B.).

(b) Performance Surveys/Questionnaires: Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) shall be used by the offeror in obtaining and providing past performance information. The government requires the offeror send out a PPQ to each of the Points-of-Contact (POCs) identified in the Past Performance Proposal (paragraph (c) below).

The offeror shall send out the PPQ (RFP Attachment J-3) to each of its references.

THE RESPONSIBILITY TO SEND OUT THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RESTS SOLELY

WITH THE OFFEROR.

Once the questionnaires are completed by the points of contact (POCs), the information contained therein will be considered source selection sensitive and will not be released outside the Government. The POCs shall forward their completed questionnaires directly to the Government – NOT BACK TO THE OFFEROR. PPQs will not be accepted directly from offerors. Only PPQs from references will be accepted.

PPQs shall be sent directly from your reference to this office marked to the attention of Ms. Lara A. Staley, via e-mail to lara.staley.1@us.af.mil, or mailed to the following address:

766 SCONS

Attn: Lara A. Staley 560 Central Ave., Bldg 287

JBPHH, HI 96860-4963

(c) Past Performance Information: Provide a list of no more than four of the most relevant contracts performed for any customer. (See Sec M-01, paragraph B)

Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(1) Company/Division name.

(2) Product/Service.

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer.

(4) Contract Number.

(5) Contract Dollar Value.

(6) Period of Performance.

(7) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer and contracting officer representative or program manager (Point-of-Contact).

(8) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions.

(9) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(10) Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

(11) A current copy of the Statement of Work/Performance Work Statement for the submitted contract. (This document will not count against the page count limitation of this volume and may be submitted electronically).

If an offeror has no past performance history of relevance, the offeror must state affirmatively it possesses no past performance history of relevance.

(d) The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance regarding predecessor companies and/or will take into account past performance regarding subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. Major or critical aspects of the requirement are defined as a contractor performing a minimum of 25% of the required manning.

(e) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated (this includes Prime/Sub-contractor relationships), provide a complete break down of the portions of the contract that will be performed by each company involved in the team.

Subcontractor past performance information must include the dollar value of the subcontract performance completed. Map each proposed subcontractor’s past performance information to the specific paragraphs in the statement of work under which the the proposed subcontractor previously performed. In addition map each proposed subcontractor’s past performance informaiton to the statement of work inlcuded in this solicitation. .

(f) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of its past performance information to the prime contractor.

5. PART V – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN- Limited to no more than 10 pages.

Submit original plus 3 copies plus 1 CD. Page limits do not apply to Master Subcontracting Plans incorporated into Individual Subcontracting Plans, provided the Master Subcontracting Plan has been approved.

(a) Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Other than Small Businesses Only).

Separate from the Small Business Commitment Document (SBCD), other than Small Businesses shall provide a clear, detailed and realistic Small Business Subcontracting Plan that complies with FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003 and satisfies all of the requirements of FAR 19.704, DFARS 219.704, and AFFARS 5319.704(a)(1).

A Subcontracting Plan is required for contract award to an other than Small Business offeror.

(b) Subcontracting Goals. The proposed subcontracting goal minimum is 5% of the total awarded dollars for Small Business.

C. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (CLINs and SOW) and Government standards and regulations pertaining to the

SOW.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this solicitation.

3. If a Part in a proposal exceeds the specified page limit cited in the Part Content, the excess pages will not be evaluated.

4. Format for proposal Parts I, II, III, IV, & V shall be as follows:

(a) Each written part of the proposal shall be separately bound and labeled in standard three ring loose-leaf binders and clearly identified on the front and side. Each Part shall contain a Table of Contents, Cross References, and the List of Tables and Drawings (if applicable). Cover pages, Table of Contents, and Tabs will not be counted against the page limits. However, pages depicting tables, charts, graphs and figures will count toward the page limit.

The number of copies of each part is specified in paragraph B, Specific Instructions, above.

(b) The proposals shall be on 8 1/2” x 11” paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

(c) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Two pages may be printed on one sheet of paper.

(d) All printing shall be single-spaced. Spacing characteristics are applicable to charts and graphs.

(e) Written entries shall not be less than 11 font size. Size of print is applicable to charts and graphs.

(f) Page margins shall be a minimum of 1 inch top, bottom, and each side.

(g) In addition to the paper copies specified for each Part, one electronic copy of each Part of the entire offer must be submitted. The electronic version of the proposal shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft Office 2010 which includes software programs such as WORD, EXCEL, or PowerPoint. For those pages of the proposal that cannot be submitted using Microsoft Office, such as the Standard Form 33, offerors shall include those pages electronically using Adobe Acrobat portable document files (.pdf) format. The Price Part shall be submitted in EXCEL spreadsheet format. The electronic version shall be submitted on a compact disc (CD). USB flash drives, floppy disks, and zip disks are NOT acceptable.

Indicate on each CD the Part number and title. The paper copies and electronic versions shall be identical in all respects. In the event there are any discrepancies between the hard and electronic copies, the hard copies take precedence and will be used for evaluation. Ensure the electronic documents stored on the CD can be opened. Use separate files and folders to permit rapid location of all portions, including exhibits and attachments, if any.

Replacement CDs will be required to update the final proposal resulting from any discussions and updates, if applicable.

(h) Each Part shall be complete in itself and shall not reference information contained in other Parts. Page

1 of a Part is defined as the first page after the Table of Contents. All pages shall be numbered.

(i) Price data of any kind shall be presented only in the Price Proposal Part.

(j) Elaborate formats, bindings, and color presentations are not desired or required.

The following table summarizes the proposal submission:

PART TITLE

ELECTRONIC

COPY

PAPER

COPY

PAGE LIMIT DUE DATE

I

Summary and Miscellaneous Data (File Name: Part I) 1 Original + 3 10

NLT 21 Mar 18 at

1:00 PM HST

D. General Information:

1. Information regarding submission of proposals: Hand carried or mailed proposals must be delivered to the following address:

766 SCONS

Attn: Lara A. Staley 560 Central Ave, Bldg. 287

JBPHH, HI 96860-4961

2. The sealed envelope or package used to submit your proposal must show the time and date specified for receipt, the solicitation number, and the name and address of the offeror.

3. Information concerning this solicitation or requests for clarification will not be provided in response to telephone calls initiated by an Offeror. All such requests shall be made in writing, NLT 26 February 2018, 01:00PM Hawaii Standard Time (HST), and submitted to the above address, or via email to the Contract Administrator at lara.staley.1@us.af.mil. Written inquiries may not be answered if requests are received after this date in order to ensure timely receipt of proposals.

4. Offerors are cautioned that JBPH-Hickam has visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE EXPECTED WHEN HAND-CARRYING PROPOSALS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass and arrive at 766 SCONS prior to the time specified for receipt. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.215- 1(c)(3), “Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals.”

5. FEDERAL HOLIDAYS: The following Federal Legal Holidays are observed by this base:

New Year’s Day 1 January Birthday of Martin Luther King Third Monday in January Washington’s Birthday Third Monday in February Memorial Day Last Monday in May Independence Day 4 July Labor Day First Monday in September Columbus Day Second Monday in October Veterans Day 11 November Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November Christmas Day 25 December

II

Technical (File Name: Part II) 1 Original +3 32

NLT 21 Mar 18 at

III

Price (File Name: Part III) 1 Original + 3 No Limit

NLT 21 Mar18 at

IV

Past Performance (File Name: Part IV) 1 Original + 3

Maximum of 4 pages for each contract. Total Vol page limit is 24

NLT 14 Mar 18 at

1:00 PM HST

V

Small Business Sub-contracting Plan (File Name: Part V) 1 Original + 3 10

NLT 21 Mar 18 at

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

SECTION M

Section M – Subjective Tradeoff (STO) (Non-commercial)

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive Subjective Tradeoff (STO) best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15, Department of Defense (DoD) FAR Supplement Procedures, Guidance and Information Subpart 215.3, and Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) Mandatory Procedure (MP) 5315.3 in which competing offerors' combined technical, and small business subcontracting plan ratings when combined with past performance information will be evaluated on a basis of significantly more important than price. The offeror's Technical Submission and Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be evaluated on a pass/fail basis. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. All technically acceptable offers will be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Offerors are required to have an active Top Secret facility clearance at the time of solicitation closing and must provide proof of their clearance in volume I of their proposal.

Failure to meet a solicitation requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP). In that event, the Source Selection Authority will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Past Performance Confidence Rating. The evaluation process will include the following:

A. Price Evaluation Factor. The Government will rank all technically acceptable offers by TEP, including all option prices. The price evaluation will document the reasonableness of the TEP. In addition, each offeror’s separately priced line items or subline items shall be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g). The Government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis. If the Government elects to perform a price realism analysis, the Government reserves discretion over the method within which it performs its price realism analysis. If the Government elects to perform a price realism analysis and finds a proposal unrealistic, the Government may withhold award to that offeror. The Government will not accept any price proposal submitted in a different format other than the provided CLIN structure in Section B as well as the attached exhibit line item structure (Attachment J-4).

Total Evaluated Price: A TEP will be computed for each offer in order to meet the requirements of FAR Parts 6 and

17. The price of a six-month extension authorized by 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, will be added to the proposed price for each potential contract performance period.

The TEP is a two-part computation. First, the offeror’s total proposed price will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in Section B by the unit price, limited to two decimal places, for Contract Line Item Numbers (CLIN) 0001-0011, 1002-1011, 2002-2011, 3002-3011, 4002-4011, and 5002-5011 to confirm the extended total amount for each CLIN; the sum of all extended amounts will be the offeror’s total proposed price. Second, the total proposed price (total amount for CLINs 0001-0011, 1002-1011, 2002-2011, 3002-3011, 4002-4011, 5002-5011) plus the sum of Option to Extend Services clause 52.217-8 formula (shown below) will constitute the TEP. CLIN 0001 will be used in the TEP calculation however, the 52.217-8 formula will not be applied to that line item.

The formula for the Option to Extend Services amount is as follows:

Base Year = CLINs 0002-0011 Unit Amounts x 6* Option Year 1 = CLINs 1002-1011 Unit Amounts x 6* Option Year 2 = CLINs 2002-2011 Unit Amounts x 6* Option Year 3 = CLINs 3002-3011 Unit Amounts x 6* Incentive Option Year 4 = CLINs 4002-4011 Unit Amounts x 6* Incentive Option Year 5 = CLINs 5002-5011 Unit Amounts x 6*

*Evaluating the Option CLINs does not obligate the government to exercise the Options.

B. Technical Factor. The government technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on a pass/fail basis, assigning ratings of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The offeror’s proposal must meet the criteria for each of the subfactors below. Failure to meet the requirements of one subfactor will render the proposal Unacceptable and therefore ineligible for award. The proposals shall be evaluated against the following:

1. Sub-factor 1 - Experience. Acceptable when the offeror’s technical proposal clearly demonstrates that the offeror has experience employing qualified candidates at two or more geographically separated locations on a single contract with a minimum performance period of 12 months. The contract must have required two or more individuals at each location. One of the locations must have required Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) coordination.

2. Sub-factor 2 – Resumes. Acceptable when the offeror provides the required 8 resumes and firm letters of commitment for each of the positions listed in Section L para B.2.B of this solicitation, and the resumes meet all of the minimum requirements outlined in section 6 of the SOW.

3. Sub-factor 3 – Phase-in Plan. Acceptable when the offeror’s Phase-In plan provides an approach which meets the requirements of paragraphs 7.13 and 10.2.6 of the

SOW.

4. Sub-factor 4 – Personnel Replacement Plan. Acceptable when the offeror’s personnel replacement plan provides an approach for attracting and retaining the required qualified personnel in sufficient quantities to meet the manning requirements in table 2 of the SOW. Acceptable when the offeror’s retention plan provides an approach to replace vacant positions IAW paragraphs 6.6 and 10.2.8 of the SOW.

Table 1. Technical Ratings Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

C. Past Performance Factor. The Government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (i) the references provided by the offeror, and (ii) any past performance information obtained from survey/questionnaires (Attachment J-3), and (iii) any data independently obtained by the government. If a reference identified by the offeror in accordance with Sec L, paragraph B.4(c), does not submit a survey/questionnaire, the government will follow up with the reference POC, but it is not responsible for the failure of a reference POC to provide a survey/questionnaire.

Past performance regarding predecessor companies of the offeror and/or subcontractors and subcontractors that will perform major aspects of the requirement, if applicable (see Sec L, paragraph B.4(d)), will be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror.

(1) Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last three (3) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation. Contracts must have a minimum of six months of work performed prior to the issuance of the solicitation in order to be considered recent.

(2) Relevant contracts performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation. The Government will assess relevancy for each contract and assign a rating as described in Table 2 below:

(a) In determining relevancy, the Government will consider the portion of the effort accomplished by the prime, the subcontractor, and/or teaming partner on previous/current contracts and as described in the offeror’s past performance proposal for this solicitation.

(b) Scope and complexity will be determined by the similarity to the Offerors Past Performance in:

1. Performance on a Combat Air Force CIP task order/delivery order/purchase order.

2. Performance on a contract/task order/delivery order/purchase order managing personnel at 2 or more Geographically Separated Locations including one location requiring SOFA coordination.

3. Performance on a contract/task order/delivery order/purchase order requiring scenario development functions (RAP, Distributed Mission Operations, Live, Synthetic, Blended, Distributed Live Control).

4. Performance on a contract/task order/delivery order/purchase order requiring multi-location large scale scenario coordination for Combat Air Forces involving 2 or more different airframes.

5. Performance on a contract/task order/delivery order/purchase order requiring performance of site security management to include obtaining Top Secret clearances and SCI eligibility per the Special Access Program Nomination Process.

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Rating Definition

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same magnitude of effort this solicitation requires, and meets at least four of five areas identified in M-1(B)(2)(b).

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar magnitude of effort this solicitation requires, and meets at least three of five areas identified in M-1(B)(2)(b).

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the magnitude of effort this solicitation requires, and meets at least two of five areas identified in M-1(B)(2)(b).

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the magnitude of effort this solicitation requires, and meets one or fewer areas identified in M-1(B)(2)(b).

(3) Performance Quality Assessment: For each recent past performance information reviewed, the performance quality of work will be assessed based on the (i) Quality Assessment Criteria evaluated under Section 4 of the Present/Past Performance Questionnaire and (ii) the evaluation ratings in the Federal Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), if available.

(4) The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the offeror’s demonstrated record of performance.

The assessment process will result in an offeror’s overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence. Offerors with no recent past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will receive the rating “Neutral Confidence,” meaning the offeror is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably (neutral). As a result of the relevancy and performance quality assessments, offerors will receive an integrated past performance confidence assessment rating as described in Table 4 below:

TABLE 3. Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings Rating Description

SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NEUTRAL CONFIDENCE

No recent/relevant performance is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

D. Acceptable Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

(1) All offerors’ Small Business Subcontracting Plans shall be assessed in accordance with FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003 and must satisfy all of the requirements of FAR 19.704, DFARS 219.704, and AFFARS

5319.704(a)(1). Small Business Subcontracting Plans must meet the minimum goal of 5% of the total awarded dollar amount to be determined acceptable. Goals provided by the offerors will be incorporated into and become a part of the contract. The Subcontracting Plan is a material requirement of the solicitation and any resultant contract.

A Small Business Subcontracting Plan deemed as ‘unacceptable’ shall preclude an offeror from being eligible for contract award.

Table 4. Small Business Subcontracting Plan Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

E. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

F. Integrated Assessment. The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest TEP. In that event, the Source Selection Authority will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Past Performance Confidence Rating.

(End of Summary of Changes)