PTR_QandAs from RFP_7Mar12.pdf

Primary Training Ranges OM&S Government Responses to Industry Questions for RFP

ID Reference Question/Comment Response

13 Reference SOW 1.7 and Table 1-3

We interpret Paragraph 1.7 to mean that the Transition Plan will be included as part of the PMP on Day 1 of the Period of Performance which is clearly not logical as Transition is now over. Section L-8.4.1.2

(while it doesn’t say “plan”) requires the effective inclusion of a

Transition Plan within the Proposal. Furthermore, Table 1-3 (page 18 of the SOW) does not reference the Transition Plan (SOW 1.7.5) as a

Deliverable at any point but does include the paragraph reference incorrectly identified as the Quality Control Plan (SOW 1.8). Should the Transition Plan (paragraph 1.7.5) be identified as preceding the

PMP?

Transition Plan will be due 14 calendar days after contract award. SOW is updated to reflect the change. Will be updated in an amendment to the

RFP at a later date.

14 Reference SOW 1.7 and Table 1-3

Table 1-3 (page 18 of the SOW) does not reference the Transition Plan

(SOW 1.7.5) as a Deliverable at any point but does include the paragraph reference incorrectly identified as the Quality Control Plan

(SOW 1.8). Should Table 1-3 reflect the QC Plan as a deliverable and renumber the identifier as 1.8?

The table has been updated to reflect the correct para identifier for the

Quality Control Plan and to add the Transition Plan. Will be updated in an Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

15 Reference SOW Section C-3 Are all Grand Bay range maintenance requirements included in

Section C-3 of the current SOW?

Grand Bay Range maintenance requirements are in C-2, C-3 and TE-2.

Requirements may not be spelled out that are specifically listed in AFI-13-

212.

16 Reference SOW Section C-6

Will the Government clarify the mandatory requirement for TPX54

Technical Orders and verify whether or not the TPX-54 is present and in use at Snyder?

TPX-54 Technical Orders are not required. C-6 will be updated to clarify.

Will be updated in an Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

17 Reference SOW Section C-6

Section C-6 contains a list of Technical Orders for the TPS-63 system and lists them as mandatory. The TPS-63 system is not shown under any location as in use and is not contained in any workload estimate.

Will the Government please clarify the mandatory requirement for the TPS-63 series of Technical Orders and clarify whether or not the

TPS-63 system is actually in use on this contract?

TPS-63 Technical Orders are not required. C-6 will be updated to clarify.

Will be updated in an Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

Reference SOW Section C-4, Chapter 1, Para.

4.2

TO 00-33-1001 is not listed in Section C-6 as either Mandatory or

Advisory. Will the Government please clarify its status?

Actual Technical Order is 00-33A-1001. It is mandatory for EC locations.

Will be updated in an amendment to the RFP at a later date.

Reference SOW Section C-4, Chapter 1, Para.

4.1

The equipment list in para. 4.1 contains the term MSCT. The term

MSCT is not listed in either the Definitions or Acronym list. Will the

Government please explain this term?

Para 4.1 and Acronym list will be updated to define MSCT. MSCT is a

Multi-system correlation Tracker which is a system used to take multiple types of positional feeds as a pointing source for threat systems. Will be updated in an Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

20 Reference SOW Section C-3, Para. 3.6.2.3

If the Government chooses to exercise the Holloman RCO requirement, would the same firefighter/EMT requirement apply during Class A manned operations? If so, will the Government clarify the paragraph wording to reflect that?

Para 3.6.2.3. wording will be changed to clarify that the requirement would apply to Class A operations. Will be updated in an Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

Reference SOW Section C-4, Chapter 1, Para.

4.3.3

AFI 10-602 is listed as superseded by AFI 63-101 on the Air Force e-publishing site. Will the Government please update the reference in both Para. 4.3.3 and Section C-6 of the SOW?

The reference has been deleted in its entirety. Will be updated in an

Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

FA4890-11-R-0012 Page 1 of 2

Primary Training Ranges OM&S Government Responses to Industry Questions for RFP

ID Reference Question/Comment Response

Reference SOW, EC Services Summary PO11 and PO20

Section C-6 of the SOW doe not list any discernable documentation pertaining to operation and maintenance of the Joint Threat

Emitter. Will the Government provide information relevant to operations and maintenance of the Joint Threat Emitter and update

Section C-6 accordingly?

The Joint Threat Emitter is also known as the TSQ-T10. C-6 mistakenly listed the TPT-T1(V). C-6 will be updated to clarify. Will be updated in an

Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

Reference SOW Section C-3, Para. 3.1.9.3 and

Schedule B

Schedule B does not contain a CLIN entitled "Work Requests" yet work request is called out in Para 3.1.9.3, Grand Bay Portable Threat

Operations. Will the Government please clarify what is meant by the term "work request" in this context? If deemed necessary, will the

Government include a reimbursable CLIN in Schedule B against which to invoice these requirements?

Work Request language deleted. Will be updated in an Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

Reference SOW Section C-3, Para. 3.1.9.1 and

Para. 3.1.9.3

Both paragraphs are addressing the subject of Portable Threat

Emitters yet they have different set-up and shut-down times stated. If

"Portable Threat Emitters" in both paragraphs are referring to RWR

LTE's, shouldn't the set-up and shut-down times be similar? Will the government please clarify any differences between Portable Threat

Emitter operations at Dare County versus Grand Bay Range?

Para 3.1.9.3 specifically spells out requirements for Grand Bay that are different than the Dare County Requirements in 3.1.9.1

Reference Schedule B AOH CLINs 0012, 1010, 2010, 3010, 4010, and 5010

Since there are two different sets of rules for manning Mountain

Home Ranges, namely Fire Season and not Fire Season, will the

Government allow a bidder to submit two different prices for AOH relative to Mountain Home Ranges?

Juniper Butte Range is not used for AOH during Fire Season. Par 1.4 updated to reflect requirement. Offerors will not be allowed to submit two different prices. Will be updated in an Amendment to the RFP at a later date.

26 Reference RFP Section L-10.2

Is there a requirement for a teaming partner or subcontractor to provide backup data, cost buildup information, etc. as a sealed package to the government?

There is no requirement for Teaming Partner or Sub Ktr to submit to the

Government as a separate package. The requirement covered under L-

10.2 is for the Prime Contractor and must include breakout of subcontractor/Teaming Partner Costs. Supporting data may be submitted in a format selected by the offeror. Thus, the offeror can choose whether their Subs/Teaming Partners send separate backup data.

27 Reference SOW Table of Contents

Section C-2 references Snow Removal as 2.2, however within the section it is paragraph 2.1.11 and 2.2 is Real Property (Facility)

Maintenance & Repair. Also there is a 2.4 Refuse Collection that is not in the TOC. Could the government clarify the correct numbering scheme?

See Question 10.

FA4890-11-R-0012 Page 2 of 2