FA4855-18-R-0036_Atch_9_P_&_P_Questionnaire.xls
XLS spreadsheet 51 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Packing and Crating
- Solicitation number
- FA4855-18-R-0036
About this file
Atch 9 Past & Present Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE | ||
| SECTION A - CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: Offeror is to complete this section prior to sending this form to each reference listed on the Past and Present Performance References form (Attachment 2). | ||
| CONTRACTOR COMPANY NAME | ADDRESS | CAGE CODE: |
DUNS NUMBER:
| POINT OF CONTACT AND E-MAIL ADDRESS | TELEPHONE NUMBER (to include area code) | FAX NUMBER (to include area code) | ||
| CONTRACT NUMBER | CONTRACT TITLE | |||
| SECTION B - RESPONDENT INFORMATION: To be completed by each reference providing information in Sections C & E. This is a 4-page questionnaire---please complete all 4 pages. | ||||
| TYPED/PRINTED NAME | TITLE | COMPANY/ORGANIZATION | ||
| ADDRESS (Street, City, State, and Zip Code) | TELEPHONE NUMBER (to include area code) | FAX NUMBER (to include area code) | ||
| E-MAIL ADDRESS | SIGNATAURE | DATE | ||
| RETURN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE INDIVIDUAL LISTED BELOW: | ||||
| POINT OF CONTACT AND E-MAIL ADDRESS: |
PATRICIA THATCHER
patricia.thatcher@us.af.mil MAILING ADDRESS:
27 SOCONS/PKA
110 AlisonAve, Bldg 600 Cannon AFB NM 88103-5214 TELEPHONE NUMBERS
VOICE: (575) 784-6193
| FAX: (575) 784-0151 | COMPLETE & RETURN PRIOR TO THE OFFER DUE DATE & TIME INDICATED ON STANDARD FORM 1449, BLOCK 8. | ||||
| SECTION C - CONTRACT SPECIFICS: To be completed by each reference. Some of this information is repeat from Section A and is requested only to confirm the information. | |||||
| CONTRACT NUMBER | CONTRACT TYPE (Firm-Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, etc.) | PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE | COMPETITIVE CONTRACT? |
YES NO
INITIAL CONTRACT VALUE CURRENT/FINAL CONTRACT VALUE CONTRACT BEING EVALUATED AS (indicate which):
PRIME CONTRACTOR SUBCONTRACTOR
| CONTRACT TITLE | |||||||||
| BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES | |||||||||
| APPROXIMATE SQUARE FOOTAGE | APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF BUILDINGS | ||||||||
| REASON FOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INITIAL AND CURRENT/FINAL CONTRACT COSTS | |||||||||
| SECTION D - EVALUATION CONFIDENCE RATING SCALE: | |||||||||
| RATING | DEFINITION | ||||||||
| E | Exceptional | Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was highly effective. | |||||||
| VG | Very Good | Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was effective. | |||||||
| S | Satisfactory | Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory. | |||||||
| M | Marginal | Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully emplemented. | |||||||
| U | Unsatisfactory | Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. | |||||||
| NA | Not Applicable | Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against. | |||||||
| SECTION E: CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE RATINGS: To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in Section D. | |||||||||
| SCHEDULE | E | VG | S | M | U | NA | |||
| How well did the contractor adhere to required response times, upon notification of work? | |||||||||
| Contractor met established approved schedules to complete all the services on time, as scheduled. | |||||||||
| Contractor submitted revised service schedules as required. | |||||||||
| Contractor provided timely cost proposals for contract changes. | |||||||||
| If applicable, how well did the contractor adhere to reperformance requirements as stated in the contract requirements? If not applicable, indicate N/A in this block. | |||||||||
| How well did contractor respond to overall contract requests (i.e., requests for proposal for modifications, ensuring required training is preformed when required, etc.)? | |||||||||
| How would you rate the contractor's responsiveness/timeliness in submitting certification data and other administrative documents required by the contract? | |||||||||
| QUALITY OF SERVICE | E | VG | S | M | U | NA | |||
| How would you rate the contractor's willingness to improve and correct non-compliance issues? | |||||||||
| How would you rate the contractor's initiative to resolve problems? | |||||||||
| Contractor developed and submitted realistic work schedule(s). | |||||||||
| If applicable, how well did the contractor re-perform the work? If not applicable, indicate N/A in this block. | |||||||||
| Contractor's history of recurring performance problems. How well did the contractor prevent the |
recurrence of the same performance problems?
| Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified product information that matched contract requirements, if required. |
| Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures, which |
resulted in quality service to the customer?
| Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the Performance Work Statement, resulting in mimimal contract discrepancy reports. | ||||||
| Contractor identified problems as they occurred; suggested realistic approaches to problesm; displayed initiative to solve problems; and performed as a "Team Member". | ||||||
| Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the Government to keep all required services on schedule. | ||||||
| SECTION E: CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE RATINGS (CON'T): To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in Section D. | ||||||
| Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations. | ||||||
| How well did the contractor do in complying with contract requirements (i.e., terms and conditions, performance work statement, clauses, etc.)? If marginal or unsatisfactory, please explain: | ||||||
| How would you rate the contractor's quality of services and/or products provided? If marginal or unsatisfactory, please explain: | ||||||
| PLEASE ANSWER YES/NO TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS WHERE REQUESTED. | YES | NO | ||||
| Did you ever elect not to exercise an option due to the contractor's performance? If yes, please explain: | ||||||
| Was the contractor ever issued a letter of concern, cure notice, or show-cause notice? If yes, please explain: | ||||||
| MANAGEMENT | E | VG | S | M | U | NA |
| How would you rate the contractor's effectiveness in managing the overall contract (incuding the ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program)? | ||||||
| How well did the contractor do in providing a responsible point of contact and giving that individual the proper authority to perform the work related to daily operation of the contract? | ||||||
| How would you rate the contractor's ability to provide experienced managers/supervisors during the initial startup and through the life of the contract? If marginal or unsatisfactory, please explain: | ||||||
| How would you rate the contractor's reasonableness and cooperativeness in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements and disputes)? | ||||||
| How would you rate the contractor's timeliness and effectiveness in problem resolution without extensive customer guidance and time? | ||||||
| Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work, if required. | ||||||
| Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers. | ||||||
| Contractor ensured the Project Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during contract performance to keep services on schedule. | ||||||
| Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. | ||||||
| Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required. | ||||||
| Contractor ensured the Project Manager or alternate was consistently available when work was performed. | ||||||
| How would you rate the contractor's quality and effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts? | ||||||
| PLEASE ANSWER YES/NO TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS AND PROVIDE EXPLANATIONS WHERE REQUESTED. | YES | NO | ||||
| Did the contractor meet the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price? If no, please explain: | ||||||
| Were any contract concessions or changes made due to the contractor's failure to accurately estimate costs? If yes, |
please explain:
| SECTION E: CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE RATINGS (CON'T): To be completed by each reference using the rating scale in Section D. |
| Were any contract concessions or changes made due to the contractor's inability to meet technical requirements and/or |
delivery schedules? If yes, please explain:
| Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances) | ||||||
| Has the contractor submitted any claims? If yes, please explain below. Were any of the claims valid? | ||||||
| BUSINESS RELATIONS | E | VG | S | M | U | NA |
| Rate the contractor's flexibility in satisfying the requirements of their customers within the terms |
of the contract.
| Rate your overall satisfaction with this contractor's performance. | ||||||
| COST: | E | VG | S | M | U | NA |
| Contractor provided complete, supportable, accurate, and reasonable cost proposals that met the requirements of the contract or modifications thereto. They were not over-inflated nor were they underestimated. | ||||||
| Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or submit reasonable proposals for modifications to contract requirements. | ||||||
| NARRATIVE SUMMARY | ||||||
| After contract award, did the contractor live up to what was proposed during the solicitation process? | ||||||
| What were the contractor's greatest strengths in the performance of the contract? | ||||||
| What were the contractor's greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract? | ||||||
| Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and |
demanding programs?
| PLEASE ANSWER YES/NO TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION. | YES | NO |
| Is the contract rated in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS)? |
&L&8Solicitation No. FA4855-18-R-0036 23 May 2018&R&8Attachment 9 Page &P of &N &C&"Arial,Bold Italic"&9FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (When filled in, this document contains Source Selection Sensitive Information)
File details come from the government source that posted it.