Solicitation Amendment FA480921R00090003 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Addendum to FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items Paragraph 52.212-1(c), Period for Acceptance of Offers, is tailored as follows: the offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 240 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers. Offerors may specify a longer acceptance period than the Government's minimum requirement.

The following is inserted as new paragraph (m) of the provision:

(m) Proposal Preparation Instructions.

(1) To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet solicitation requirements may result in the proposal being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

(2) The response shall consist of four (4) separate parts: Part I - Summary and Miscellaneous Data, Part II - Price Proposal, Part III - Technical Proposal, and Part IV - Past Performance Information.

Where Page Limits are specified:

Pages Counted. Each page shall be counted except for the following:

Cover pages Table of Contents List of Figures Glossaries

Text. Text type should be Times New Roman, no smaller than 12-point with normal proportional spacing.

Illustrations and tables shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial 10 point. Text lines will be, at a minimum, single-spaced. 1-inch margins.

(3) Offerors shall submit proposals via DOD File Safe (https://safe.apps.mil/). In order to upload documents to this site, please contact Ms. Brittany Judd at brittany.judd@us.af.mil or Mr. Michael Demers michael.demers.

4@us.af.mil no earlier than 15 days prior to proposal due date. Ms. Judd will "request a Drop-off" which initiates an email with a link to upload files. It will be valid for 14 days. Once all documents are uploaded, select "Drop-off Files". All files will be active for 7 days from the date of drop-off. The date and time ascribed to the proposal shall be the date/time the email notification of drop-off is received. Ensure to select the "Encrypt all Files" button for all FOUO, PII, and PHI. If issues occur utilizing this site please contact Ms. Judd 3 working days prior to the proposal due date. IAW FAR 52.212-1(f) it is the offerors responsibility to ensure the proposal is received by the date and time specified on page one of the SF1449.

(4) Specific Instructions:

A. PART I - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS DATA

(i) Standard Form (SF) 1449. Complete blocks 12, 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation unless the offeror affirmatively states any

FA480921R00090003

exceptions, deviations or waivers to the contract terms and conditions. An incomplete proposal may be considered to indicate lack of understanding of the requirement and may result in the entire proposal being determined "unacceptable" and eliminated from further consideration.

(ii) All offerors must be registered and active in the System for Award Management:

https://sam.gov/SAM/, at the time of proposal submission to be considered for award.

(iii) For provisions and clauses in the solicitation, if not included in your reps and certs at SAM.gov, complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications and submit the completed pages with Part I. IAW FAR 52.204-7 and 52.204-13 the Contractor is to ensure the SAM and the reps and certs are up to date IAW the RFP.

(iv) Submit an acknowledgment of all solicitation amendments, if issued. Failure to acknowledge amendments to the solicitation shall result in the proposal being considered nonresponsive and therefore ineligible for award. Amendments shall be acknowledged by signing and returning the first page of the SF30, along with any additional documents required by the amendment.

(v) Statement of Compliance with the Service Contract Act (SCA) Area Wage Determination (WD). The offeror shall provide a statement acknowledging:

a. Offeror is in compliance with the requirements of the WD;

b. The prices proposed for labor covered by the WD was formulated using at least the minimum wage and benefit rates specified in those documents as required for covered contractor personnel;

and c. Those rates are not escalated beyond the first year of performance. (Adjustments will be made on the Contract Anniversary Date IAW FAR 52.222-43)

(vi) Submit a letter, signed at the vice-president level or equivalent or higher, that identifies the individual(s) with the authority to obligate or otherwise bind the offering company to the resulting contract and, if necessary, future contract modifications.

(vii) Responsibility Determination and Supporting Documentation: To assist in determining contractor responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.104-3(a), the offeror shall explain how it plans to maintain adequate financial resources for a contract of this magnitude and length. The offeror shall address a fiscal plan for covering mobilization, unexpected or emergency situations, and initial performance costs prior to recoupment in the form of task order completion payments. The offeror must provide complete financial statements for one (1) fiscal year and year to-date financial information through the last quarter available.

The year-end financial statements must be certified by an independent accounting firm. If the offeror intends to rely on internally available working/operation capital, documentation of availability must be submitted. If the offeror plans to rely on financial support from external sources, documentation of availability and maximum lines of credit available (based upon the inclusion of this contract effort) must be submitted. Evidence of external funding must be provided in the form of a dated letter from the external source.

IAW FAR 9.104-5, the offeror is required to comply with the submission regarding FAR 52.209-5, Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. Since it is the Government's intent to make Award Without Discussions IAW FAR 52.215-1, the Government may request that an offeror submit additional information so a responsibility determination can be made. This request for additional information will not be construed as communications or discussions with an offeror as defined by FAR 15.306.

B. PART II - PRICE PROPOSAL

(i) Insert proposed unit prices in RFP Attachment 5, Schedule B. Include proposed discount terms. Schedule B shall be submitted in Microsoft Excel format.

(ii) Provide a labor and materials breakdown on Attachment 5.

(iii) Provide quote from PEMB manufacturer and/or a steel price quote to construct a canopy showing the current cost of steel. This information will establish a baseline from which adjustments will be made IAW the Economic Price Adjustment clauses.

(iv) Extreme care should be exercised to ensure that no price data of any kind are included in any other Part of the proposal. Only the pricing information contained in Part II shall be considered for award.

(v) Price Reasonableness: this source selection will be conducted with the expectation of adequate price competition per FAR 15.403-1(c)(1); therefore, certified cost or pricing data are not required per FAR 15.403-1(b)(1). If at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists or that price reasonableness cannot be determined, offerors may be required to submit additional data other than certified cost or pricing data for the Contracting Officer to determine price reasonableness.

C. PART III - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

(i) Provide a detailed approach to accomplish/satisfy all subfactors. By submitting a proposal, the offeror affirms that its organization will perform all requirements specified in the RFP, PWS and specifications.

Technical proposal shall not include company names, logos or any other identifying information.

(ii) The Technical volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

(1) Table of Contents

(2) Glossary

(3) Summary Page

(4) Subfactor 1 - Conformance to Specifications

(5) Subfactor 2 - Canopy Installation Plans (to include Drawings) and Schedule

(6) Subfactor 3 - Management Approach

(7) Subfactor 4 - Quality Control Approach

(8) Subfactor 5 - Mobilization Plan

(iii) Summary Page(s). To aid the Government's understanding, provide a summary of the offeror's proposed technical approach and how the approach will efficiently and effectively meet the requirement.

(iv) Subfactor 1 - Conformance to Specifications This subfactor shall address whether the offeror's technical approach conforms to the following specifications, as detailed in Attachment 2, Specification Sheets:

Conformance to Size Requirements Conformance to Roof Requirements Conformance to Wind Speed Rating Requirements Conformance to Fall Protection Requirements Conformance to Lightning Protection Requirements Conformance to Bird Roosting Prevention Requirements Conformance to Traffic Pattern Paint Requirements

(v) Subfactor 2 - Canopy Installation Plans and Schedule This subfactor shall address the offeror's proposed canopy installation plan(s) to include proposed equipment list, materials and order and duration of activities. This subfactor shall also include a notional canopy installation schedule for one to five canopies, plans to protect/store and reinstall the lighting, and plans to minimize the damage to the concrete.

An FAA notice will be required for crane use. The contractor is responsible for the FAA notice.

Civil Engineering and Airfield Management will need to be informed immediately of any crane use to avoid any delays.

(vi) Subfactor 3 - Management Approach This subfactor shall address the offeror's proposed organizational staffing plan by skill classification and work unit. The proposal must demonstrate the organizational structure that the offeror will employ while performing this effort. The proposal shall address:

(1) Lines of authority and the details of onsite personnel by skill mix, function and numbers.

(2) Describe approach to recruit and retain an experienced, motivated workforce.

(3) Interruption of Services. Describe approach to address potential labor disputes or call up of reservists by Executive Order.

(vii) Subfactor 4 - Quality Control Plan This subfactor addresses the offeror's overall quality control plan for ensuring quality of services, products, and workmanship identified in the PWS.

(1) Quality Control Plan. Describe the QC approach the offeror will use to evaluate the quality of services provided. Specifically address/provide:

a) Organizational chart with a supporting narrative identifying lines of authority and responsibilities (as related to the QC).

b) Methods to identify and track discrepancies, document and analyze trends, utilize trend and root cause analyses.

c) Corrective action strategy to include implementation, follow-up, monitoring and methods for information sharing ("cross-tell") throughout the organization.

d) A system for recording, computing and assessing performance measurement data.

e) Linkage between the QC and offeror's training program.

f) Describe the number of Quality Control Inspectors and individual qualifications.

(viii) Subfactor 5 - Mobilization Plan Provide a detailed plan, with timelines (to include start and completion dates for all elements listed below) to achieve full performance on the first day of task order operations and ensure successful transition periods between task orders. The plan must address, but is not limited to:

a) Events: obtaining base access flight line driver's licenses and start work dates.

b) Provision of materials, equipment and vehicles (identify type, quantity of each type, availability and intended utilization).

D. PART IV - PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL

(i) Volume Organization. The Past Performance volume shall be organized according to the following general outline:

(1) Table of Contents

(2) Glossary

(3) Summary Page

(4) Past Performance Information (PPI) - 5-page limit

(5) Organization Structure Change History

(6) Subcontractor Letters of Consent

(7) Client Authorization Letters

(ii) Summary Page. Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant present or past contracts. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of the offering company. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts identified for the past performance evaluation. Since the Government intends to consider past and present performance information provided by other sources as well, the "roadmap" should be applicable to contracts the Government receives information on from other sources.

If applicable, describe the role of the Offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner for whom the Offeror is required to provide Past Performance Information Sheets in accordance with paragraph e below.

(iii) Quality and Satisfaction Rating of Contracts completed in the past five years. Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) that demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and/or quality of completed and/or ongoing contracts. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems, such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

(iv) Past Performance Information (PPI). Utilizing the PPI Sheet (Attachment 6), submit information on no more than five (5) recent and relevant contracts the offeror considers most relevant in demonstrating the ability to perform the proposed effort. Two (2) of the past performance references may be for a subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement (i.e., 25% or more of the work). "Recent" is defined as ongoing contracts or those completed within five (5) years of the date of issuance of the solicitation. The Past Performance Information sheets for each contract is limited to five (5) pages.

C. FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR

The Government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on technically acceptable offerors based on the references provided by the offeror and any data independently obtained by the Government. The past performance evaluation will stop once a substantial confidence assessment has been reached.

The past performance evaluation will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel, or subcontractors that are proposed to perform major or critical aspects of the requirement (i.e., 25% or more of the work) when such information is relevant to this acquisition.

(i) Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last five (5) years with at least 6 months of performance from the issuance date of the solicitation.

(ii) Relevant contract performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation. The Government will assess relevancy for each contract and assign a rating as described in Table 2 below.

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Rating Definition Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, the past/present effort must:

Involve demolition and installation of steel aircraft canopies/shelters/sunshades, include painting traffic patterns.

Number of canopies installed in excess of 50 Include schedule and time management for phased contract performance.

At least 90% of the performance must have been on a military airfield.

Performance must be done as the prime contractor, or, if a member of a joint venture, the Offeror must have contributed at least 50% of the effort.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, the performance may fail to meet all of the requirements for "Very Relevant" but meets all of the following:

Involve installation of steel aircraft canopies/shelters/sunshades Number of canopies installed in excess of 20 Include schedule and time management for contract performance (not phased) At least 60% of the performance must have been on an airfield Performance must be done as the prime contractor, or, if a member of a joint venture, the Offeror must have contributed at least 50% of the effort.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, the performance fails to meet all of the requirements for "Very Relevant" or "Relevant" performance but meets all of the following:

Involve installation of steel aircraft canopies/ shelters/sunshades Number of canopies installed five or more Include schedule and time management for contract performance (not phased) At least 30% of the performance must have been done on a military installation and fastened to concrete surface (not necessarily on the airfield) Performance must be done as the prime contractor, or, if a member of a joint venture, the Offeror must have contributed at least 50% of the effort.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude and of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, all performance fails to meet one of the three relevancy ratings: "Very Relevant", "Relevant" or "Somewhat Relevant".

(v) Specific Content: Offerors may include a discussion of efforts accomplished by the Offeror to resolve problems encountered on prior contracts as well as past efforts to identify and manage program risk.

Merely having problems does not automatically equate to a Limited or No Confidence rating, since the problems encountered may have been on a more complex program or an Offeror may have subsequently demonstrated the ability to overcome the problems. The Offeror is required to clearly demonstrate management actions employed in overcoming problems and the effects of those actions, in terms of improvements achieved or problems rectified. This could result in a rating of Substantial or Satisfactory Confidence.

(vi) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past contracts of relevance.

a. Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor's consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of its past performance information to the prime contractor. If the subcontractor does not consent, include a statement to that effect.

(6) Contract Award: The Government intends to evaluate offers and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror's initial offer should contain the offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the Contracting Officer to be in the Government's best interest.

(7) Discrepancies: If an offeror believes these instructions contain errors, omissions or are unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing with supporting rationale as well as remedies the offeror is asking the Contracting Officer to consider as related to the omission or error.

(End of Addendum) (End of provision)

Evaluation Factors for Award

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Addendum to FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation - Commercial Items

The following is inserted as new paragraph (d) of the provision:

(d) BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

(1) This is a competitive Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 12 and 15 in which competing offerors' technical and past performance information when combined will be significantly more important than price. All technically acceptable offers will be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Any proposal with an unacceptable technical rating will not considered for award. Failure to meet a factor and/or subfactor may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. The Government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP), if the difference in the Past Performance Confidence Rating of another offeror with a higher TEP justifies the higher price premium. In that event, the Source Selection Authority will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Past Performance Confidence Rating.

A. EVALUATION APPROACH: PRICE PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFF

After the initial evaluation of each offeror's price proposal, the Government will rank all offerors by price from the lowest TEP to the highest TEP and conduct the Technical Evaluation on the offer with the lowest TEP. If the lowest-priced offer is determined to be Technically Unacceptable, that offer will be eliminated from consideration and the next lowest priced offer will be evaluated for Technical Acceptability. Once the lowest-priced, Technically Acceptable offer is determined, the Government will then proceed to conduct the Past Performance Evaluation for the offeror. If this offeror is assessed "Substantial Confidence", its offer will be determined to represent the best value to the Government and no other offers will be evaluated or considered.

If the offeror with the lowest-priced, Technically Acceptable offer does not have a "Substantial Confidence" performance confidence assessment, the Government will then evaluate the next lowest priced offer for Technically Acceptability and if determined Technically Acceptable, proceed to conduct a Past Performance Evaluation on that offeror. The process will continue (in ascending TEP) until the Government finds an offeror with a Technically Acceptable offer and a Substantial Confidence performance assessment or until all Technically Acceptable offers have been evaluated for Past Performance. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then make an integrated assessment, best value award decision, with technical and past performance being significantly more important than price.

B. FACTOR 1 - TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY

The Government will evaluate technical proposals on a acceptable/unacceptable basis and assign an Acceptable or Unacceptable rating as described in Table 1 below. A rating of unacceptable in one or more technical subfactors may constitute an overall rating of Unacceptable for the technical evaluation. The offeror's proposal shall, at a minimum, address each of the subfactors outlined below as they apply to the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and specifications. Detailed preparation instructions are included in the Addendum to FAR 52.212-1(m), Proposal Preparation Instructions.

Technical Acceptability Ratings, Defined Rating Definition

Acceptable: Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

The proposals will be evaluated against the following subfactor(s):

(i) Subfactor 1 - Conformance to Specifications This subfactor shall address whether the offeror's technical approach conforms to the specifications, as detailed in Attachment 2, Specification Sheets. For this subfactor to be rated "acceptable", the proposed technical approach will address and conform to all technical specifications.

(ii) Subfactor 2 - Canopy Installation Plans and Schedule This subfactor shall address the offeror's proposed canopy installation plan(s) to include proposed equipment list, materials and order and duration of activities. This subfactor shall also include a notional canopy installation schedule. For this subfactor to be rated "acceptable", the canopy installation plan(s) will address:

All aspects of the installation as stated in the PWS and list all contractor-provided equipment, materials and order of activities.

The notional installation schedule will start upon receipt of a task order, and the timeline will include mobilization, demolition, construction and demobilization.

The installation schedule will be realistic based on the proposed canopy structure, order of activities.

The installation plan will address any timeline efficiencies gained or lost as the number of canopies ordered increases.

Proposed manning.

(iii) Subfactor 3 - Management Approach This subfactor evaluates the adequacy of the offeror's proposed staffing, approach to recruit and retain a qualified workforce and the offeror's approach to mitigate potential interruption of services. For this subfactor to be rated "acceptable", the proposed management approach:

Will clearly address lines of authority, staffing and details of onsite personnel by skill mix, function and numbers;

The approach will address the offeror's approach to recruit and retain a qualified workforce, including how subcontractors will be incorporated; and

The approach ensures no interruption of services due to potential labor disputes or call up of reservists by Executive Order.

(iv) Subfactor 4 - Quality Control Plan This subfactor assesses the offeror's overall quality control plan for ensuring quality of services, products, and workmanship identified in the PWS. For this subfactor to be rated "acceptable", the proposed quality control approach:

Will provide effective oversight measures to ensure quality of product and services.

Lines of authority and responsibilities will be clearly identified as related to QC.

Quality control methods will be adequate to identify, track, document and analyze discrepancies, revealing trends and root causes.

A corrective action strategy that will ensure timely problem resolution, responsive follow-up, effective inter-organizational information sharing and timely and acceptable performance IAW the PWS.

(v) Subfactor 5 - Mobilization Plan Provide a detailed plan, with timelines (to include start and completion dates for all elements listed below) to achieve full performance on the first day of task order operations and ensure successful transition periods between task orders. For this subfactor to be rated "acceptable," the proposed mobilization plan:

Will address major events: obtaining security clearances, flight line driver's licenses and start work dates.

Provision of materials, equipment and vehicles (identify type, quantity of each type, availability and intended utilization).

Availability of equipment (i.e. time to get rental agreements in place and equipment delivered).

C. FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE FACTOR

The Government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on technically acceptable offerors based on the references provided by the offeror and any data independently obtained by the

Government. The past performance evaluation will stop once a substantial confidence assessment has been reached.

The past performance evaluation will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel, or subcontractors that are proposed to perform major or critical aspects of the requirement (i.e., 25% or more of the work) when such information is relevant to this acquisition.

(i) Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last five (5) years with at least 6 months of performance from the issuance date of the solicitation.

(ii) Relevant contract performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation. The Government will assess relevancy for each contract and assign a rating as described in Table 2 below.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Rating Definition Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, the past/present effort must:

Involve demolition and installation of steel aircraft canopies/shelters/sunshades, include painting traffic patterns.

Number of canopies installed in excess of 50 Include schedule and time management for phased contract performance.

At least 90% of the performance must have been on a military airfield.

Performance must be done as the prime contractor, or, if a member of a joint venture, the Offeror must have contributed at least 50% of the effort.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, the performance may fail to meet all of the requirements for "Very Relevant" but meets all of the following:

Involve installation of steel aircraft canopies/shelters/sunshades Number of canopies installed in excess of 20 Include schedule and time management for contract performance (not phased) At least 60% of the performance must have been on an airfield Performance must be done as the prime contractor, or, if a member of a joint venture, the Offeror must have contributed at least 50% of the effort.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, the performance fails to meet all of the requirements for "Very Relevant" or "Relevant" performance but meets all of the following:

Involve installation of steel aircraft canopies/ shelters/sunshades Number of canopies installed five or more Include schedule and time management for contract performance (not phased) At least 30% of the performance must have been done on a military installation and fastened to concrete surface (not necessarily on the airfield) Performance must be done as the prime contractor, or, if a member of a joint venture, the Offeror must have contributed at least 50% of the effort.

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude and of effort and complexities this Solicitation requires. To qualify, all performance fails to meet one of the three relevancy ratings: "Very Relevant", "Relevant" or "Somewhat Relevant".

(iii) Performance Evaluation. In addition to evaluating the extent to which the offeror's past performance meets the PWS and technical requirements of previous efforts, the assessment will consider things such as: the offeror's history of adhering to schedules, the administrative aspects of performance, reasonable and cooperative behavior, and commitment to customer satisfaction.

(iv) When a relevant and recent performance record indicates performance problems, the Government will consider the number and severity of the problems and the suitability and effectiveness of any corrective actions taken (not just planned or promised). The Government may review more recent projects or performance evaluations to review the corrective actions and evaluate their effectiveness.

(v) Performance Confidence Assessment. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror's ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the offeror's demonstrated record of performance. The Government will combine the recency, relevancy and performance evaluations of all of the efforts considered for the offeror to assign a Performance Confidence Assessment of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence or Neutral Confidence as described below in Table 3

Table 3: Past Performance Confidence Assessment Assessment Description Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can reasonably be assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror's recent and relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

D. FACTOR 3 - PRICE EVALUATION FACTOR

The Government will rank all offers by total evaluated price (TEP). The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the TEP. Separately priced line items or subline items shall be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced.

(i) Total Evaluated Price: The offeror's TEP is the sum of all separately priced line items and subline items shown in the Exhibit tab of Schedule B. See Attachment 5, Schedule B for further details and directions.

(ii) Quotes from PEMB manufacturers and/or steel price quotes will be verified on a pass/fail basis.

If the requested data is submitted, a rating of "pass" will be assigned, if the data is not submitted, a rating of "fail" will be assigned.

(iii) In addition, proposed unit prices may be evaluated for unbalanced pricing IAW FAR 15.404-1(g).

Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable TEP, the price of one or more contract line items or sub-line item(s) appears to be significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. An offeror's proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

(iv) If the proposal analysis techniques listed above are insufficient to make a determination of price reasonableness or, if the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists, the Contracting Officer may request submission of other than certified cost or pricing data and may use other proposal analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404, to the extent necessary, in order to make a Fair and Reasonable price determination.

(2) The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors; however, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

(End of Addendum) (End of provision)

1570 WRIGHT BROTHERS AVE BLDG 2903

CP 919 722 5417

SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB, NC 27531-2456

UNITED STATES

Brittany Judd, Email: brittany.judd@us.af.mil Telephone: 919-722-5607

Email: michael.demers.4@us.af.mil Telephone: (919) 722-1762