Atch_W_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

2D CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AFGSC)

BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE LOUISIANA

11 Feb 19 MEMORANDUM FOR Past Performance Evaluators

FROM 2d Contracting Squadron

41 Vandenberg Ave.

Barksdale AFB LA 71110-2271

SUBJECT: FA4608-19-R-A003 COCESS Solicitation, Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The 2nd Contracting Squadron, Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana, Air Force Global Strike

Command is in the process of selecting a contractor for a Contractor Operated Civil Engineer

Supply Store (COCESS) contract.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

a. Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than 20 March 2019 at 3 p.m. CST to this office. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to evaluation.

b. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and faxed to 318-456-2629 to the attention of MSgt Ryan Haselhuhn or email to ryan.haselhuhn@us.af.mil.

c. Please contact the above POC at (318) 456-1353 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

3. Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated and will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Attachment

Past Performance Questionnaire

//signed//

MARLA J. POIRIER, GS-13, DAF

Contracting Officer

FA4608-19-R-A003

Attachment W mailto:valerie.ewing@barksdale.af.mil

SECTION 1: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing)

(Date) (Name and Title of Authorized Official)

(Signature)

Cost Reimbursement

G. Project Award Date: Schedule Completion Date:

Current/Final Completion Date:

H. Project Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount:

Subcontractor Supplier

J. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire.

A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Point of Contact:

C. Phone Number:

D. Contract Number:

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project:

F. Contract Type:

Task Order

Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity

I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the Prime Contractor

FA4608-19-R-A003

Attachment W

SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent)

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

(Phone Number)

(Address)

FA4608-19-R-A003

SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Pleas Provide a Narrative Explanation For Any Ratings Of 1 or 2.

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

6 BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.

5 PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

4 GREEN/SATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action.

3 YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

2 RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non- existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.

1 WHITE/NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

1. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Customer would have no reservations in awarding another contract to the contractor.

1 2 3 4 5 6

2. QUALITY

a. Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6

b. Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6

c. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications.

1 2 3 4 5 6

d. Contractor corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control plan.

1 2 3 4 5 6

3. TIMELINESS

a. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time.

1 2 3 4 5 6

b. Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals. 1 2 3 4 5 6

FA4608-19-R-A003

c. Contractor submitted the progress schedule and progress reports as required.

1 2 3 4 5 6

d. Contractor provided on-time submittals as required. 1 2 3 4 5 6

e. Contractor provided payrolls for both their employees and their subcontractor employees as required.

1 2 3 4 5 6

f. Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items. 1 2 3 4 5 6

4. RESPONSIVENESS

a. Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations.

1 2 3 4 5 6

b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay.

1 2 3 4 5 6

c. Contractor identified problems as they occurred, suggested approaches to the problems; displayed initiative to solve problems and performed as a Team Member.

1 2 3 4 5 6

d. Contractor responded to warranty issues within the time frames specified in the contract.

1 2 3 4 5 6

5. SUBCONTRACTS AND MANAGEMENT

a. Contractor provided experience/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

1 2 3 4 5 6

b. Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

1 2 3 4 5 6

c. Contractor hired, maintained and replaced as necessary qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.

1 2 3 4 5 6

d. Contractor ensured the project manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.

1 2 3 4 5 6

e. Contractor ensured site superintendent and quality control representative were consistently present on site when work was performed.

1 2 3 4 5 6

f. Contractor paid employees/subcontractor/suppliers as required. 1 2 3 4 5 6

6. CHANGE/COST CONTROL

a. Contractor responsive to contract changes and provided accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals.

1 2 3 4 5 6

b. Contractor demonstrated the ability to control costs and/or design projects or modifications within the magnitude specified.

1 2 3 4 5 6

c. Contractor validated subcontractor cost proposals prior to submission to the Government.

1 2 3 4 5 6

Overall Rating: (circle) Acceptable / Unacceptable

FA4608-19-R-A003

REMARKS:

SECTION 4: NARRATIVE SUMMARY:

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

3. Please provide any additional comment concerning the contractor’s performance.

4. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Has or was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes No Default Convenience Pending Termination

If yes, please explain.

5. Were there any performance issues regarding the contractor’s work? If yes, please explain.

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing address: 2d Contracting Squadron MSgt Ryan Haselhuhn 801 Kenney Ave, Suite 2300 Barksdale

AFB, LA 71110

Phone: (318) 456-6544 Email: ryan.haselhuhn@us.af.mil

FA4608-19-R-A003

Attachment W mailto:valerie.ewing@us.af.mil