Exhibit_B_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ),_18_April_2018.pdf
PDF 82 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair Modernization Building T-121
- Solicitation number
- FA448618R0008
About this file
Exhibit B Past and Present Performance Questionnaire (PPQ), 18 April 2018
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Exhibit B 18 April 2018
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations should complete this survey.
However, this individual is encouraged to supplement his or her knowledge with the judgment of others within his or her organization. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible by indicating your ratings and providing comments, wherever applicable. Please print neatly and submit all information in the English language. Follow up phone calls may be conducted by the contracting officer to ensure the accuracy of this questionnaire.
Contractor’s Name: Telephone Number:
Address: Point of Contact:
Project Title and Detailed Description of Work:
Contract Number: Dollar/Euro Amount:
Contract Dates of Performance:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Address: Telephone Number:
Email Address:
C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by circling or placing an “X” over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:
O A S M U
Outstanding Above Average Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the
Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the ratings above.
Performance Information: O A S M U 1 Quality of Workmanship
2 Adequacy of the Quality Control Plan 3 Implementation of the Quality Control Plan 4 Storage of materials 5 Adequacy of Submittals 6 Adequacy of Quality Control Testing 7 Adequacy of As Built Drawings 8 Use of Specified Materials 9 Identification and Correction of Deficient Work Effectiveness of Management/Business Relations O A S M U 10 Cooperation and Responsiveness 11 Management of Resources/personnel 12 Coordination and Control of Subcontractors (If applicable) 13 Adequacy of Site Cleanup 14 Effectiveness of Job Site Supervision 15 Professional Conduct 16 Review/Resolutions of Subcontractor’s Issues (If applicable) 17 Implementation of Subcontracting Plan (If applicable) Timeliness of Performance O A S M U 18 Adequacy of Initial Progress Schedule 19 Adherence to approved Schedule 20 Resolution of Delays
21 Submission of Required Documentation 22 Completion of Punch list Items
23 Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules
24 Warranty Responses
Compliance with Labor Standards O A S M U 25 Compliance with Labor Laws and Regulations
Compliance with Safety Standards O A S M U 26 Adequacy of Safety Plan 27 Implementation of Safety Plan
28 Correction of Noted Deficiencies
29 Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
30 Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
D. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)
Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in the proposal, I definitely would award to this contractor today given that I had a choice.
probably would might or might not probably would not definitely would not
Remarks:
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please e-mail this completed questionnaire to:
andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil or hand deliver to 65th Contracting Flight no later than 19 July 2018, 04:00pm, AZOST.
mailto:andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil mailto:65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil 1522718994U Highlight
| PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION: |
| Thank you for your prompt response and assistance! |
| andrea.silva.1.pt@us.af.mil and 65CONF.LGC.ALL@us.af.mil or hand deliver to 65th Contracting Flight no later than 18 of June 2018, 04:00pm, AZOST. |
File details come from the government source that posted it.