PAST_AND_PRESENT_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf
PDF 241 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA4418-17-H-XXXX
About this file
Attachment 1, Past and Present Performance Questionnaire - RFQ Barber Services Concessionaire, Joint Base Charleston
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFQ_Barbershop.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Barber Services (Concessionaire) contract at Joint Base Charleston, SC
29404.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, you may contact Aubreigh Sumner, Contract Specialist at
843-963-5162.
ANNA M. URRUTIA
Contracting Officer
1 Atch:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire file:///C:/Users/robert.melton/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/far/Far02.doc%23T2101 file:///C:/Users/robert.melton/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/far/FAR03.DOC%23b3104
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________
__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________
_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________
_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________
C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: aubreigh.sumner@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE
PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
mailto:aubreigh.sumner@us.af.mil
E G S M U N
Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Provided experienced personnel with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
3. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
4. Did the contractor maintain the proper licensing required by law to perform the services throughout the entire contract?
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
6. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO
7. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” YES/NO
5.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________
Remarks:______________________________________________________________________
| 2016-12-14T16:31:13-0500 | |
| URRUTIA.ANNA.M.1065296884 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .