PAST_AND_PRESENT_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.pdf

PDF 241 KB Posted

Attached to
Barber Services Concessionaire, Joint Base Charleston
Solicitation number
FA4418-17-H-XXXX
Issued by

About this file

Attachment 1, Past and Present Performance Questionnaire - RFQ Barber Services Concessionaire, Joint Base Charleston

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ_Barbershop.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Barber Services (Concessionaire) contract at Joint Base Charleston, SC

29404.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, you may contact Aubreigh Sumner, Contract Specialist at

843-963-5162.

ANNA M. URRUTIA

Contracting Officer

1 Atch:

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire file:///C:/Users/robert.melton/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/far/Far02.doc%23T2101 file:///C:/Users/robert.melton/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/far/FAR03.DOC%23b3104

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________

_____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________

_____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: aubreigh.sumner@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE

PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

mailto:aubreigh.sumner@us.af.mil

E G S M U N

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor: E G S M U N

1. Provided experienced personnel with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

3. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

4. Did the contractor maintain the proper licensing required by law to perform the services throughout the entire contract?

How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

6. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES/NO

7. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” YES/NO

5.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:______________________________________________________________________

2016-12-14T16:31:13-0500
URRUTIA.ANNA.M.1065296884

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .